Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
What accounted for the wide swing in less than three weeks? Management may have succeeded during that time in
persuading the rank and file that the choice came down to accepting a revised offer or kiss their company, and their
jobs, goodbye. But it could have just as easily come down to one word: equality.
The company's first offer included wage increases and lump-sum bonuses for its drivers over the five-year
life of the extended contract. However, it froze salaries for so-called non-CDL employees, or workers who don't
hold a commercial driver's license. These employees include the thousands of dockworkers manning breakbulk
terminals in mostly large, established markets. These cities have sizable voting blocks and have members both
seasoned and active in labor contract issues.
Angered by the exclusion and by the prospect of no wage increases through March 2019, many workers told the company
to pound sand; big markets like Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, and Kansas City had a wide swath of "no" votes,
according to data from SJ Consulting, a Pittsburgh-based consultancy. SJ estimated that non-CDL employees account for
7,000 of YRC's unionized workforce of 26,000 to 30,000 members.
Stunned by the outcome, YRC executives scrambled to right the rig. Unlike the first proposal that was sent directly
to the membership without any input from union negotiators, the second proposal was the byproduct of intense bargaining
with Teamster hierarchy. It included, among other things, a softening of vacation restrictions, additional protections
for drivers affected by provisions allowing YRC to subcontract up to 6 percent of its driver work, and language that
would not subject any profit-sharing bonuses to the 15-percent annual wage reductions that were first negotiated in
2010 and will remain in effect through March 2019.
Perhaps most important, the revised offer brought nondrivers to parity with their driver counterparts; all union workers
will now receive annual lump-sum bonuses in each of the extended contract's first two years, with annual hourly
increases—offset by the 15- percent wage reduction—in the next three years.
The change in the wage language, combined with the knowledge that the union's top officials were involved in the process,
may have turned the tide. SJ's data, which took the form of a map of YRC's nationwide terminal network, showed a dramatic shift
in a number of key markets. Many cities that had either rejected the first offer or had split the votes down the middle swung to
ratification the second time around.
The contract extension restarted the all-important debt restructuring process that had stalled after the initial vote. YRC
said today it would go ahead with its plan to issue $250 million in equity, the proceeds of which will be used to pay off part
of its $1.4 billion debt load. In addition, bondholders have agreed to swap an additional $50 million in debt for new equity.
The company is also expected to receive two five-year-term loans for a total $1.1 billion in two five-year-term loans. Each
loan will be repaid at lower carrying costs than the crushing double-digit interest rates that currently accompany the company's
debt service. YRC's lenders demanded a contract extension with labor concessions in return for agreeing to restructure the
company's debt.
The ratification vote buys YRC labor peace for nearly the rest of the decade. But as in 2009 and 2010 when the rank and file
agreed to three extraordinary rounds of concessions to keep the company alive, this latest cycle will not play out painlessly
for labor. The company had estimated its original proposal would, along with unspecified corporate efficiencies, save it about
$100 million a year. There is little doubt that a chunk of those savings will come on the backs of workers, especially since
major wage and pension cutbacks already in effect will be unchanged.
For union employees at YRC's profitable regional division, the hurt of continued concessions is amplified by the bitterness
of feeling like the proverbial good son punished for the sins of the father. The elder, in this case, is YRC Freight, the
company's long-haul division, which has been an operating and financial mess since the old Yellow Transportation Co. bought
rival Roadway Express in 2003 and launched what would become a disastrous, multiyear integration.
"It makes me sick to my stomach," said Stephen Walski, a Joliet, Ill.-based driver for Holland, one of YRC's regional carriers.
Walski, an 18-year employee who had opposed further concessions, said many workers were scared by management's threats that the
company would cease operations Feb. 1 if the revised offer was rejected. Walski said he was suspicious about the wide swing in
the margins of the two votes and charged the union and the company with lying to the workers.
WELCH'S CHALLENGE
In this climate of mistrust, the burden falls squarely on YRC CEO James L. Welch to reassure anxious shippers,
boost the morale of deflated workers, and fend off thrusts by rivals poised to pick off profitable accounts if the
revised deal fell through. Welch will have several gusts of tailwind, namely a better—though hardly robust—economy;
a more disciplined pricing environment that will deter competitors from underbidding YRC for business; and a still-solid terminal
network with prime locations in markets like Chicago. YRC is also past a botched summertime network realignment of YRC Freight
that caused service disruptions, ratcheted up costs, and helped lead to the removal of Jeffrey A. Rogers as the unit's CEO.
Welch, who has since taken over the helm of the unit, said its operating metrics are back to where they were prior to the
start of the restructuring.
YRC also enjoys, from a wage standpoint at least, a seeming cost advantage over its two unionized rivals: ABF Freight System,
a unit of Fort Smith, Ark-based Arkansas Best Corp., and UPS Freight, the LTL division of Atlanta-based UPS Inc. According to SJ
data, the top rate for a YRC Freight driver in central Pennsylvania is $21.10 an hour. The top rates for ABF and UPS Freight
drivers are $22.72 and $26.65 an hour, respectively. The regional data is representative of the nationwide wage differential
between the carriers. Over the past three months, ABF and UPS Freight reached new collective-bargaining agreements with the Teamsters.
Satish Jindel, founder and president of SJ consulting, however, cautions that the data excludes the impact of health, welfare,
and benefit contributions as well as work-rule changes, all of which can add or subtract to the total cost of a carrier's
operations. Thus, there is no certainty that UPS Freight has the highest costs even though it pays the highest wages, he said.
YRC, which currently controls about 9 percent of U.S. LTL capacity, also has what is believed to be a loyal cluster of big
customers, including The Home Depot Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the Boeing Co., and broker and third-party logistics giant C.H.
Robinson Worldwide Inc. Welch said in an interview yesterday that YRC was regularly communicating with customers about operational
scenarios but was not addressing financial issues with them.
A top-level transportation executive who asked not to be identified said it was in the shippers' best interests for YRC to
remain on the road. "None of these guys want YRC to fail. It will cause panic and it will trigger chaos on multiple fronts,"
the executive said prior to the results of the second vote.
The most significant takeaway from this wrenching and seemingly endless saga is that YRC has gained financial breathing space,
increased its operating maneuverability, and cast its lenders off its back. However, the company still has significant mountains
to climb. It is a high-cost, unionized player in a largely low-cost, nonunion environment. It has old terminals and an aging
fleet—although a fleet's age is less important for LTL carriers that don't log as many miles as their truckload brethren.
One day, it will have to make good on a multibillion dollar pension nut. It still has a billion-dollar debt load, though it
will be carried at lower interest expense than before. And those who've walked this road for the past five years know that
YRC has made similar pledges of improvement before, only to return to the precipice.
Still, Jindel—who during YRC's darkest days in 2009 said that the company would survive while others wrote it
off—believes that Welch is a strong and competent leader who now finally has the tools he needs to make YRC
sustainable. "He has a very long runway to land safely on and bring people home," he said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."