Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
What accounted for the wide swing in less than three weeks? Management may have succeeded during that time in
persuading the rank and file that the choice came down to accepting a revised offer or kiss their company, and their
jobs, goodbye. But it could have just as easily come down to one word: equality.
The company's first offer included wage increases and lump-sum bonuses for its drivers over the five-year
life of the extended contract. However, it froze salaries for so-called non-CDL employees, or workers who don't
hold a commercial driver's license. These employees include the thousands of dockworkers manning breakbulk
terminals in mostly large, established markets. These cities have sizable voting blocks and have members both
seasoned and active in labor contract issues.
Angered by the exclusion and by the prospect of no wage increases through March 2019, many workers told the company
to pound sand; big markets like Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, and Kansas City had a wide swath of "no" votes,
according to data from SJ Consulting, a Pittsburgh-based consultancy. SJ estimated that non-CDL employees account for
7,000 of YRC's unionized workforce of 26,000 to 30,000 members.
Stunned by the outcome, YRC executives scrambled to right the rig. Unlike the first proposal that was sent directly
to the membership without any input from union negotiators, the second proposal was the byproduct of intense bargaining
with Teamster hierarchy. It included, among other things, a softening of vacation restrictions, additional protections
for drivers affected by provisions allowing YRC to subcontract up to 6 percent of its driver work, and language that
would not subject any profit-sharing bonuses to the 15-percent annual wage reductions that were first negotiated in
2010 and will remain in effect through March 2019.
Perhaps most important, the revised offer brought nondrivers to parity with their driver counterparts; all union workers
will now receive annual lump-sum bonuses in each of the extended contract's first two years, with annual hourly
increases—offset by the 15- percent wage reduction—in the next three years.
The change in the wage language, combined with the knowledge that the union's top officials were involved in the process,
may have turned the tide. SJ's data, which took the form of a map of YRC's nationwide terminal network, showed a dramatic shift
in a number of key markets. Many cities that had either rejected the first offer or had split the votes down the middle swung to
ratification the second time around.
The contract extension restarted the all-important debt restructuring process that had stalled after the initial vote. YRC
said today it would go ahead with its plan to issue $250 million in equity, the proceeds of which will be used to pay off part
of its $1.4 billion debt load. In addition, bondholders have agreed to swap an additional $50 million in debt for new equity.
The company is also expected to receive two five-year-term loans for a total $1.1 billion in two five-year-term loans. Each
loan will be repaid at lower carrying costs than the crushing double-digit interest rates that currently accompany the company's
debt service. YRC's lenders demanded a contract extension with labor concessions in return for agreeing to restructure the
company's debt.
The ratification vote buys YRC labor peace for nearly the rest of the decade. But as in 2009 and 2010 when the rank and file
agreed to three extraordinary rounds of concessions to keep the company alive, this latest cycle will not play out painlessly
for labor. The company had estimated its original proposal would, along with unspecified corporate efficiencies, save it about
$100 million a year. There is little doubt that a chunk of those savings will come on the backs of workers, especially since
major wage and pension cutbacks already in effect will be unchanged.
For union employees at YRC's profitable regional division, the hurt of continued concessions is amplified by the bitterness
of feeling like the proverbial good son punished for the sins of the father. The elder, in this case, is YRC Freight, the
company's long-haul division, which has been an operating and financial mess since the old Yellow Transportation Co. bought
rival Roadway Express in 2003 and launched what would become a disastrous, multiyear integration.
"It makes me sick to my stomach," said Stephen Walski, a Joliet, Ill.-based driver for Holland, one of YRC's regional carriers.
Walski, an 18-year employee who had opposed further concessions, said many workers were scared by management's threats that the
company would cease operations Feb. 1 if the revised offer was rejected. Walski said he was suspicious about the wide swing in
the margins of the two votes and charged the union and the company with lying to the workers.
WELCH'S CHALLENGE
In this climate of mistrust, the burden falls squarely on YRC CEO James L. Welch to reassure anxious shippers,
boost the morale of deflated workers, and fend off thrusts by rivals poised to pick off profitable accounts if the
revised deal fell through. Welch will have several gusts of tailwind, namely a better—though hardly robust—economy;
a more disciplined pricing environment that will deter competitors from underbidding YRC for business; and a still-solid terminal
network with prime locations in markets like Chicago. YRC is also past a botched summertime network realignment of YRC Freight
that caused service disruptions, ratcheted up costs, and helped lead to the removal of Jeffrey A. Rogers as the unit's CEO.
Welch, who has since taken over the helm of the unit, said its operating metrics are back to where they were prior to the
start of the restructuring.
YRC also enjoys, from a wage standpoint at least, a seeming cost advantage over its two unionized rivals: ABF Freight System,
a unit of Fort Smith, Ark-based Arkansas Best Corp., and UPS Freight, the LTL division of Atlanta-based UPS Inc. According to SJ
data, the top rate for a YRC Freight driver in central Pennsylvania is $21.10 an hour. The top rates for ABF and UPS Freight
drivers are $22.72 and $26.65 an hour, respectively. The regional data is representative of the nationwide wage differential
between the carriers. Over the past three months, ABF and UPS Freight reached new collective-bargaining agreements with the Teamsters.
Satish Jindel, founder and president of SJ consulting, however, cautions that the data excludes the impact of health, welfare,
and benefit contributions as well as work-rule changes, all of which can add or subtract to the total cost of a carrier's
operations. Thus, there is no certainty that UPS Freight has the highest costs even though it pays the highest wages, he said.
YRC, which currently controls about 9 percent of U.S. LTL capacity, also has what is believed to be a loyal cluster of big
customers, including The Home Depot Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the Boeing Co., and broker and third-party logistics giant C.H.
Robinson Worldwide Inc. Welch said in an interview yesterday that YRC was regularly communicating with customers about operational
scenarios but was not addressing financial issues with them.
A top-level transportation executive who asked not to be identified said it was in the shippers' best interests for YRC to
remain on the road. "None of these guys want YRC to fail. It will cause panic and it will trigger chaos on multiple fronts,"
the executive said prior to the results of the second vote.
The most significant takeaway from this wrenching and seemingly endless saga is that YRC has gained financial breathing space,
increased its operating maneuverability, and cast its lenders off its back. However, the company still has significant mountains
to climb. It is a high-cost, unionized player in a largely low-cost, nonunion environment. It has old terminals and an aging
fleet—although a fleet's age is less important for LTL carriers that don't log as many miles as their truckload brethren.
One day, it will have to make good on a multibillion dollar pension nut. It still has a billion-dollar debt load, though it
will be carried at lower interest expense than before. And those who've walked this road for the past five years know that
YRC has made similar pledges of improvement before, only to return to the precipice.
Still, Jindel—who during YRC's darkest days in 2009 said that the company would survive while others wrote it
off—believes that Welch is a strong and competent leader who now finally has the tools he needs to make YRC
sustainable. "He has a very long runway to land safely on and bring people home," he said.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.