Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The decisive rejection yesterday by YRC Worldwide Inc.'s unionized workers of the company's proposed five-year contract
extension was more than a referendum on the merits of the proposal. It was a referendum on the past four years.
Since 2009, the less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier's 26,000-member rank and file have agreed to multiple concessionary
agreements to keep their employer alive. The givebacks have resulted in reduced wages and vastly diminished pensions. For
workers who may have owned company stock before 2009, an agreement reached on New Year's Eve of that year to swap $530 million
in debt for $1 billion in new equity—while it kept the company out of bankruptcy—diluted the value of their holdings
to virtually nothing. What remained for the workers were their paychecks, their health insurance, and a pension that had been cut
by 75 percent.
Still, their wages were decent compared to what employees of non-union truckers took in. Health coverage was inexpensive and
generally considered excellent. Some pension was better than none. And in a still-shaky economy, they had jobs with some degree of
security.
That's what made yesterday's results so striking. Not only did the rank-and-file reject the proposed five-year contract
extension, but they did so by a 4,400-vote margin out of about 19,000 ballots counted. With YRC financially vulnerable, with
customers anxious over its fate, and with rivals expected to begin circling for profitable business, it's likely many workers
knew they could be putting their jobs on the line with their votes.
But for long-suffering YRC union employees, the line had finally been crossed. They had seen their company survive a near-death
experience, begin what appeared to be an ascendancy under new management, endure a botched network realignment at its largest unit
that led to the firing of the unit's CEO, and were shocked to hear that the company without their knowledge had offered to buy
most, if not all, of its largest union rival, Arkansas Best Corp., parent of ABF Freight System Inc.
According to several workers, the rank and file might have agreed to a straightforward extension of the current contract, which
runs until March 2015. Given all they have gone through, though, the demand for additional concessions accompanying the extension
proved to be too much to swallow, they said.
Stephen J. Walski, a Joliet, Ill.-based driver for YRC's Holland regional subsidiary, said workers might have ratified the
extension if it didn't call for more givebacks or if it was the first time YRC had ever sought concessions. With neither being
the case, the time had come to say no, he said.
"The majority of us love what we do, we take pride in it, and we work hard 12- to 14-hour days to service our customers, but
there comes a time when enough is enough," Walski, an 18-year veteran, said in an e-mail.
Walski said the company's proposal for workers to forego wage increases in the first two years in return for lump-sum bonuses,
combined with a continued 15-percent wage reduction that is in the current contract, would cost the typical worker thousands of
dollars by 2019. Those calculations include the impact of wage increases that start in the third year, he said.
Workers were upset with the company over language requiring them to be with the company for at least 11 years to qualify for
three-weeks vacation, for freezing the wages of non-driver union workers, and for requesting that up to 6 percent of driver work
be eligible for subcontracting, Walski said. They were particularly peeved that there was no proposed change in the company's
pension contributions, currently at one-fourth what they were prior to the round of concessions in 2009, he added.
LET DOWN BY LEADERSHIP
Workers also felt let down by Teamster leadership, claiming it never bargained with YRC for a better deal. Much of the
wrath was directed at Tyson Johnson, head of the union's freight division. Ken Paff, national organizer of the Teamsters
for a Democratic Union (TDU), a dissident group, said Johnson refused to negotiate with YRC because he knew members would
balk at any more concessions.
Paff said YRC workers were left to "fend for themselves" by the leadership's inaction, a scenario that marks one of the biggest
leadership failures in the 15-year tenure of General President James P. Hoffa.
A source close to the Teamster hierarchy said Johnson and others were in a no-win situation because YRC's lenders were
demanding concessions in return for restructuring $1.4 billion in company debt while the rank-and-file were in no mood for
further givebacks.
"[Johnson] could have negotiated a deal somewhat like this, sent it to the members, and they would have said, 'Why did you come
to us with this piece of s**t?'" said the source.
"The issue is the debt, and there is nothing we can do to change that," the source said. "Anything we're doing right now is on
the margins."
STATE OF SHOCK
The outcome of the vote stunned the company, which had been confident that the extension would be ratified. A research
firm hired by YRC to poll the rank and file concluded that most members favored ratification, according to a well-placed
union source.
YRC CEO James L. Welch had said that contract ratification was essential for the company's lenders to agree to restructure its
$1.4 billion debt package currently being carried at crushing double-digit interest rates. Without a contract extension in hand,
there would be no deal with the banks. No deal with the banks would scuttle management's best-laid financial plans, which include
cutting its debt by $300 million by issuing $250 million in new common stock and converting $50 million of debt for equity, as
well as an agreement to receive $1.15 billion in two five-year loans to help refinance its debt load at more attractive terms.
All of this, however, was contingent upon ratification of the contract extension, which Welch said would help YRC achieve about
$100 million in annualized cost savings.
Welch has vowed there will be no bankruptcy filing. But the implication was clear that labor held the key to the company's
fate, at least in the near term. No one can remember a trucker that has ever emerged from bankruptcy protection; virtually all
that go bankrupt go out of business.
In a statement this morning, Welch blamed the vote's outcome on the timing of the Dec. 23 announcement about the two loan
agreements. The news was made public after most Teamsters had mailed in their ballots, Welch said. As a result, they didn't have
the full facts needed to make an informed decision, he said. Welch declined further comment other than to say the company
continues to talk to all stakeholders.
At this point, time is not on anyone's side. The first principal payment on the debt, $69 million, is due Feb. 15. The company
is believed to have available resources to make that payment. But YRC has a $326 million payment scheduled for September 2014 and
another $678 million by March 2015. Then there's the 800-pound gorilla perched in the corner: $2 billion or more of unfunded
pension liabilities that, at some point, must be met.
Paff of TDU called on Hoffa to immediately begin simultaneous talks with YRC management and with its lenders, a strategy that
should have been followed all along instead of first working out financing deals and then hoping for a ratification vote. Parallel
discussions are the only way labor will have any leverage to save Teamster jobs without gutting the contract, Paff said.
In 2009, Hoffa's backing and orchestrating of the debt-for-equity swap were instrumental in saving YRC. Now, As Hoffa almost assuredly steps into the YRC fray again, he might be reminded of an auspicious milestone next week. On Jan. 15, 1964, his father, James R. Hoffa, signed the first National Master Freight Agreement covering more than 400,000 workers in the
freight industry. The agreement, which brought workers under a collective umbrella for the first time, was the senior Hoffa's
crowning achievement and represented Teamster power—and freight influence—at its zenith.
Today, after three decades of mergers, bankruptcies, and the encroachment of non-union carriers that has decimated the
Teamster freight division, his son will go to work to rescue the largest survivor of the once-mighty fiefdom.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.