Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The decisive rejection yesterday by YRC Worldwide Inc.'s unionized workers of the company's proposed five-year contract
extension was more than a referendum on the merits of the proposal. It was a referendum on the past four years.
Since 2009, the less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier's 26,000-member rank and file have agreed to multiple concessionary
agreements to keep their employer alive. The givebacks have resulted in reduced wages and vastly diminished pensions. For
workers who may have owned company stock before 2009, an agreement reached on New Year's Eve of that year to swap $530 million
in debt for $1 billion in new equity—while it kept the company out of bankruptcy—diluted the value of their holdings
to virtually nothing. What remained for the workers were their paychecks, their health insurance, and a pension that had been cut
by 75 percent.
Still, their wages were decent compared to what employees of non-union truckers took in. Health coverage was inexpensive and
generally considered excellent. Some pension was better than none. And in a still-shaky economy, they had jobs with some degree of
security.
That's what made yesterday's results so striking. Not only did the rank-and-file reject the proposed five-year contract
extension, but they did so by a 4,400-vote margin out of about 19,000 ballots counted. With YRC financially vulnerable, with
customers anxious over its fate, and with rivals expected to begin circling for profitable business, it's likely many workers
knew they could be putting their jobs on the line with their votes.
But for long-suffering YRC union employees, the line had finally been crossed. They had seen their company survive a near-death
experience, begin what appeared to be an ascendancy under new management, endure a botched network realignment at its largest unit
that led to the firing of the unit's CEO, and were shocked to hear that the company without their knowledge had offered to buy
most, if not all, of its largest union rival, Arkansas Best Corp., parent of ABF Freight System Inc.
According to several workers, the rank and file might have agreed to a straightforward extension of the current contract, which
runs until March 2015. Given all they have gone through, though, the demand for additional concessions accompanying the extension
proved to be too much to swallow, they said.
Stephen J. Walski, a Joliet, Ill.-based driver for YRC's Holland regional subsidiary, said workers might have ratified the
extension if it didn't call for more givebacks or if it was the first time YRC had ever sought concessions. With neither being
the case, the time had come to say no, he said.
"The majority of us love what we do, we take pride in it, and we work hard 12- to 14-hour days to service our customers, but
there comes a time when enough is enough," Walski, an 18-year veteran, said in an e-mail.
Walski said the company's proposal for workers to forego wage increases in the first two years in return for lump-sum bonuses,
combined with a continued 15-percent wage reduction that is in the current contract, would cost the typical worker thousands of
dollars by 2019. Those calculations include the impact of wage increases that start in the third year, he said.
Workers were upset with the company over language requiring them to be with the company for at least 11 years to qualify for
three-weeks vacation, for freezing the wages of non-driver union workers, and for requesting that up to 6 percent of driver work
be eligible for subcontracting, Walski said. They were particularly peeved that there was no proposed change in the company's
pension contributions, currently at one-fourth what they were prior to the round of concessions in 2009, he added.
LET DOWN BY LEADERSHIP
Workers also felt let down by Teamster leadership, claiming it never bargained with YRC for a better deal. Much of the
wrath was directed at Tyson Johnson, head of the union's freight division. Ken Paff, national organizer of the Teamsters
for a Democratic Union (TDU), a dissident group, said Johnson refused to negotiate with YRC because he knew members would
balk at any more concessions.
Paff said YRC workers were left to "fend for themselves" by the leadership's inaction, a scenario that marks one of the biggest
leadership failures in the 15-year tenure of General President James P. Hoffa.
A source close to the Teamster hierarchy said Johnson and others were in a no-win situation because YRC's lenders were
demanding concessions in return for restructuring $1.4 billion in company debt while the rank-and-file were in no mood for
further givebacks.
"[Johnson] could have negotiated a deal somewhat like this, sent it to the members, and they would have said, 'Why did you come
to us with this piece of s**t?'" said the source.
"The issue is the debt, and there is nothing we can do to change that," the source said. "Anything we're doing right now is on
the margins."
STATE OF SHOCK
The outcome of the vote stunned the company, which had been confident that the extension would be ratified. A research
firm hired by YRC to poll the rank and file concluded that most members favored ratification, according to a well-placed
union source.
YRC CEO James L. Welch had said that contract ratification was essential for the company's lenders to agree to restructure its
$1.4 billion debt package currently being carried at crushing double-digit interest rates. Without a contract extension in hand,
there would be no deal with the banks. No deal with the banks would scuttle management's best-laid financial plans, which include
cutting its debt by $300 million by issuing $250 million in new common stock and converting $50 million of debt for equity, as
well as an agreement to receive $1.15 billion in two five-year loans to help refinance its debt load at more attractive terms.
All of this, however, was contingent upon ratification of the contract extension, which Welch said would help YRC achieve about
$100 million in annualized cost savings.
Welch has vowed there will be no bankruptcy filing. But the implication was clear that labor held the key to the company's
fate, at least in the near term. No one can remember a trucker that has ever emerged from bankruptcy protection; virtually all
that go bankrupt go out of business.
In a statement this morning, Welch blamed the vote's outcome on the timing of the Dec. 23 announcement about the two loan
agreements. The news was made public after most Teamsters had mailed in their ballots, Welch said. As a result, they didn't have
the full facts needed to make an informed decision, he said. Welch declined further comment other than to say the company
continues to talk to all stakeholders.
At this point, time is not on anyone's side. The first principal payment on the debt, $69 million, is due Feb. 15. The company
is believed to have available resources to make that payment. But YRC has a $326 million payment scheduled for September 2014 and
another $678 million by March 2015. Then there's the 800-pound gorilla perched in the corner: $2 billion or more of unfunded
pension liabilities that, at some point, must be met.
Paff of TDU called on Hoffa to immediately begin simultaneous talks with YRC management and with its lenders, a strategy that
should have been followed all along instead of first working out financing deals and then hoping for a ratification vote. Parallel
discussions are the only way labor will have any leverage to save Teamster jobs without gutting the contract, Paff said.
In 2009, Hoffa's backing and orchestrating of the debt-for-equity swap were instrumental in saving YRC. Now, As Hoffa almost assuredly steps into the YRC fray again, he might be reminded of an auspicious milestone next week. On Jan. 15, 1964, his father, James R. Hoffa, signed the first National Master Freight Agreement covering more than 400,000 workers in the
freight industry. The agreement, which brought workers under a collective umbrella for the first time, was the senior Hoffa's
crowning achievement and represented Teamster power—and freight influence—at its zenith.
Today, after three decades of mergers, bankruptcies, and the encroachment of non-union carriers that has decimated the
Teamster freight division, his son will go to work to rescue the largest survivor of the once-mighty fiefdom.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."