Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The decisive rejection yesterday by YRC Worldwide Inc.'s unionized workers of the company's proposed five-year contract
extension was more than a referendum on the merits of the proposal. It was a referendum on the past four years.
Since 2009, the less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier's 26,000-member rank and file have agreed to multiple concessionary
agreements to keep their employer alive. The givebacks have resulted in reduced wages and vastly diminished pensions. For
workers who may have owned company stock before 2009, an agreement reached on New Year's Eve of that year to swap $530 million
in debt for $1 billion in new equity—while it kept the company out of bankruptcy—diluted the value of their holdings
to virtually nothing. What remained for the workers were their paychecks, their health insurance, and a pension that had been cut
by 75 percent.
Still, their wages were decent compared to what employees of non-union truckers took in. Health coverage was inexpensive and
generally considered excellent. Some pension was better than none. And in a still-shaky economy, they had jobs with some degree of
security.
That's what made yesterday's results so striking. Not only did the rank-and-file reject the proposed five-year contract
extension, but they did so by a 4,400-vote margin out of about 19,000 ballots counted. With YRC financially vulnerable, with
customers anxious over its fate, and with rivals expected to begin circling for profitable business, it's likely many workers
knew they could be putting their jobs on the line with their votes.
But for long-suffering YRC union employees, the line had finally been crossed. They had seen their company survive a near-death
experience, begin what appeared to be an ascendancy under new management, endure a botched network realignment at its largest unit
that led to the firing of the unit's CEO, and were shocked to hear that the company without their knowledge had offered to buy
most, if not all, of its largest union rival, Arkansas Best Corp., parent of ABF Freight System Inc.
According to several workers, the rank and file might have agreed to a straightforward extension of the current contract, which
runs until March 2015. Given all they have gone through, though, the demand for additional concessions accompanying the extension
proved to be too much to swallow, they said.
Stephen J. Walski, a Joliet, Ill.-based driver for YRC's Holland regional subsidiary, said workers might have ratified the
extension if it didn't call for more givebacks or if it was the first time YRC had ever sought concessions. With neither being
the case, the time had come to say no, he said.
"The majority of us love what we do, we take pride in it, and we work hard 12- to 14-hour days to service our customers, but
there comes a time when enough is enough," Walski, an 18-year veteran, said in an e-mail.
Walski said the company's proposal for workers to forego wage increases in the first two years in return for lump-sum bonuses,
combined with a continued 15-percent wage reduction that is in the current contract, would cost the typical worker thousands of
dollars by 2019. Those calculations include the impact of wage increases that start in the third year, he said.
Workers were upset with the company over language requiring them to be with the company for at least 11 years to qualify for
three-weeks vacation, for freezing the wages of non-driver union workers, and for requesting that up to 6 percent of driver work
be eligible for subcontracting, Walski said. They were particularly peeved that there was no proposed change in the company's
pension contributions, currently at one-fourth what they were prior to the round of concessions in 2009, he added.
LET DOWN BY LEADERSHIP
Workers also felt let down by Teamster leadership, claiming it never bargained with YRC for a better deal. Much of the
wrath was directed at Tyson Johnson, head of the union's freight division. Ken Paff, national organizer of the Teamsters
for a Democratic Union (TDU), a dissident group, said Johnson refused to negotiate with YRC because he knew members would
balk at any more concessions.
Paff said YRC workers were left to "fend for themselves" by the leadership's inaction, a scenario that marks one of the biggest
leadership failures in the 15-year tenure of General President James P. Hoffa.
A source close to the Teamster hierarchy said Johnson and others were in a no-win situation because YRC's lenders were
demanding concessions in return for restructuring $1.4 billion in company debt while the rank-and-file were in no mood for
further givebacks.
"[Johnson] could have negotiated a deal somewhat like this, sent it to the members, and they would have said, 'Why did you come
to us with this piece of s**t?'" said the source.
"The issue is the debt, and there is nothing we can do to change that," the source said. "Anything we're doing right now is on
the margins."
STATE OF SHOCK
The outcome of the vote stunned the company, which had been confident that the extension would be ratified. A research
firm hired by YRC to poll the rank and file concluded that most members favored ratification, according to a well-placed
union source.
YRC CEO James L. Welch had said that contract ratification was essential for the company's lenders to agree to restructure its
$1.4 billion debt package currently being carried at crushing double-digit interest rates. Without a contract extension in hand,
there would be no deal with the banks. No deal with the banks would scuttle management's best-laid financial plans, which include
cutting its debt by $300 million by issuing $250 million in new common stock and converting $50 million of debt for equity, as
well as an agreement to receive $1.15 billion in two five-year loans to help refinance its debt load at more attractive terms.
All of this, however, was contingent upon ratification of the contract extension, which Welch said would help YRC achieve about
$100 million in annualized cost savings.
Welch has vowed there will be no bankruptcy filing. But the implication was clear that labor held the key to the company's
fate, at least in the near term. No one can remember a trucker that has ever emerged from bankruptcy protection; virtually all
that go bankrupt go out of business.
In a statement this morning, Welch blamed the vote's outcome on the timing of the Dec. 23 announcement about the two loan
agreements. The news was made public after most Teamsters had mailed in their ballots, Welch said. As a result, they didn't have
the full facts needed to make an informed decision, he said. Welch declined further comment other than to say the company
continues to talk to all stakeholders.
At this point, time is not on anyone's side. The first principal payment on the debt, $69 million, is due Feb. 15. The company
is believed to have available resources to make that payment. But YRC has a $326 million payment scheduled for September 2014 and
another $678 million by March 2015. Then there's the 800-pound gorilla perched in the corner: $2 billion or more of unfunded
pension liabilities that, at some point, must be met.
Paff of TDU called on Hoffa to immediately begin simultaneous talks with YRC management and with its lenders, a strategy that
should have been followed all along instead of first working out financing deals and then hoping for a ratification vote. Parallel
discussions are the only way labor will have any leverage to save Teamster jobs without gutting the contract, Paff said.
In 2009, Hoffa's backing and orchestrating of the debt-for-equity swap were instrumental in saving YRC. Now, As Hoffa almost assuredly steps into the YRC fray again, he might be reminded of an auspicious milestone next week. On Jan. 15, 1964, his father, James R. Hoffa, signed the first National Master Freight Agreement covering more than 400,000 workers in the
freight industry. The agreement, which brought workers under a collective umbrella for the first time, was the senior Hoffa's
crowning achievement and represented Teamster power—and freight influence—at its zenith.
Today, after three decades of mergers, bankruptcies, and the encroachment of non-union carriers that has decimated the
Teamster freight division, his son will go to work to rescue the largest survivor of the once-mighty fiefdom.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."