When Xerox and its 3PL needed to improve the accuracy of export data filings, they thought it would mean costly changes to a warehouse management system. Instead, they found a much simpler way.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Implementing changes to software can be like opening the proverbial can of worms. For one thing, the interconnected nature of business systems today means that revisions or upgrades in one area will almost certainly lead to changes elsewhere. For another, what appears on the surface to be a simple matter—adding new fields to a report, for instance—may end up requiring costly and time-consuming reprogramming.
That was a concern at the Groveport, Ohio, distribution center operated by the third-party logistics company (3PL) Genco on behalf of Xerox. In order to improve the accuracy of government-mandated export filings, the facility would have to change the way it collected and entered data for those reports. But that raised the prospect of expensive revisions to the warehouse management system (WMS) that contained some of the required information.
Fortunately, a collaborative effort involving the shipper, the 3PL, and a software developer led to a simpler solution: an easy-to-use "app" for the WMS that allows anyone to create accurate filings—no special programming or export management expertise required.
ON TIME BUT ERROR-PRONE
The Groveport DC exports Xerox-brand printers, cartridges, and other printer supplies worldwide, much of it destined for Asia and South America as well as Canada and Europe. The facility ships approximately 4,000 order lines per month in full and partial containers, according to Xerox's Ron Tegner, manager, indirect channel strategic partnerships and supply chain support. In the past, those shipments often were delayed because the export information submitted to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) contained errors.
The U.S. government requires exporters to file certain pieces of information via the Automated Export System (AES) operated by CBP. AES enables exporters to electronically submit data that used to be included on the paper Shippers Export Declaration, such as shipper, destination, Harmonized Tariff System identification number, export carrier, transportation mode, and voyage or flight number. As soon as AES receives that information, the system validates its accuracy and completeness; it also confirms that the information meets the requirements of other federal agencies, such as the Bureau of the Census and the departments of State and Commerce. If all is correct, AES then generates a confirmation message. If not, the system sends an error message to the party that filed the data.
Xerox was initiating timely AES filings, which Genco prepared and ADSI, a third-party shipping system, transmitted to AES. But the method used for creating the reports frequently led to mistakes. The problem was that the operation was relying on a particular screen in Genco's proprietary D-Log Plus warehouse management system to capture the necessary information.
"The screen didn't have enough checks and balances to tell whether the data was correct and complete," recalls Jim Rubino, Genco's senior vice president of systems. "We were relying on people to remember certain things and to enter them correctly. It required someone who was very knowledgeable about export declarations and processes sitting at the screen. That wasn't a reality for this operation." Not to mention that any process that relies on manual intervention is likely to introduce errors and omissions, he adds.
And that's exactly what happened. "We were seeing spelling errors and incomplete or missing data being sent to AES," Tegner says. "For example, air shipments did not always include flight numbers." Consequently, AES kicked back error messages, and shipments were delayed while Genco's staff addressed the errors and resubmitted the filings. This also left the shipper vulnerable to possible fines.
That could not continue, of course, so Genco's information system experts called in DMLogic, a software developer and systems integrator, to help find a solution. Although Genco had developed D-Log Plus in-house, it collaborates with DMLogic on installations and integration—the "care and feeding" of the WMS, as Rubino puts it.
FOLLOW THE WIZARD
The solution was to automate and integrate the collection of export shipment information, the validation of that information, and the creation of the AES filing. Initially, the Genco and DMLogic systems experts planned to build new functionality into D-Log Plus. But, Rubino says, "We very quickly saw that was going to become a bit invasive into the WMS and that it would require a lot of changes to user interfaces and to background logic." Such changes would also make it more difficult and costly to implement upgrades and do other maintenance tasks down the road. Was there another way to achieve the same objectives, but without making major modifications to the WMS?
The DMLogic team thought there was. They suggested using stepLogic, a tool for software developers that interfaces with a WMS but does not change it. Instead, it replaces development tasks with configuration steps. "StepLogic is comparable to a software 'wizard.' It leads you through the various steps to set up a screen and to query a database," explains LeeAnn Dawson, director of information technology for DMLogic.
Genco's Rubino describes stepLogic as a "software accelerator tool" that enables the rapid implementation of changes with little or no programming. "That was the beauty of it. It didn't require a programmer to figure this out," he says. What it did require was a "superuser"—someone with a thorough knowledge of Xerox's export operations—to define the rules for retrieving the appropriate information for each input field and then put those rules into stepLogic in the right sequence so the program would guide the user through the process without missing any steps. "It asks the user question 1, and then based on that answer, it asks the next question," he explains. "It makes sure that all questions are answered and that all questions that need to be asked are asked."
But it doesn't require export expertise to answer those questions. The WMS alerts users—Genco employees at the distribution center—when an export shipment is ready and thus requires an AES submission. To input the information used by AES, users choose from options on drop-down menus. "The screen provides lists of legitimate values, instead of the former process of manually typing data into text boxes," Tegner explains. That change has completely eliminated spelling and other errors, such as incorrect spacing and place names that differ from the format required by AES.
Exactly which questions are asked depends on the nature of the shipment. "You're almost following a script," Dawson says. "If you have an air shipment to Puerto Rico, then you need to be prompted for certain information. That query will follow a different path than it would for an ocean shipment to China."
When all questions have been satisfactorily answered, the data flows to ADSI's system, which electronically submits the AES filing to customs. ADSI also uses the data as well as some additional information it pulls from D-Log Plus to create export documentation, such as shipping labels and customs invoices, Dawson says.
NEW AND DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS
Since implementing the new system, AES filing errors have essentially been eliminated. "We went from getting daily calls to I can't tell you the last time I had a call about an AES issue," Dawson says. Xerox and Genco were also pleased with the flexibility the software tool offers, including the ability for superusers to reconfigure screens and menus in a matter of minutes, without incurring programming costs.
The shipper and 3PL have worked on developing new applications of the stepLogic platform, including an app that allows multiple countries of origin to be entered and tracked for a single stock-keeping unit (SKU), Tegner says. Just last month, the distribution center deployed a stepLogic app in a completely different area: managing the divert lanes for an automated print-and-apply system.
Rubino believes this type of software tool has many potential applications. "From a user standpoint, it's intriguing because it's very configurable and anyone can do it. It's an interesting concept, and we're looking at where else we might use it."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."