While they may not displace Southern California as the key logistics hub for the western United States, these three regions are on the rise: Dallas/Fort Worth; Reno, Nev.; and Quincy, Wash.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
When one thinks of an ideal West Coast venue for a "logistics cluster," Quincy, Wash., doesn't spring to mind.
Rather, the default location is the area of Southern California stretching from the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach eastward to the warehouse-rich "Inland Empire." The corridor offers superior infrastructure, a critical mass of third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), and a large pool of potential employees, the ingredients for an ideal "logistics cluster," a term popularized by Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Yossi Sheffi in his book Logistics Clusters: Delivering Value and Driving Growth.
"If you are importing and 50 percent or more of your product is coming into the Port of Long Beach or Los Angeles, you need to be close to the port, even though real estate costs will be high and so will labor costs," says Tom Patterson, senior vice president, West Coast operations, for Saddle Creek Logistics Services, a Lakeland, Fla.-based 3PL.
But many of Saddle Creek's clients have found that because of its huge geography, the West cannot be efficiently served from Southern California alone, says Patterson. In addition, high property prices and traffic congestion have sent businesses searching for more cost-effective locations. Three of those are Dallas/Fort Worth; Reno, Nev.; and, yes, the central Washington hamlet of Quincy, Wash.—population, as of 2010: 6,750.
DALLAS/FORT WORTH
The Dallas/Fort Worth area has been "on a little bit of a rush" lately when it comes to the building of distribution centers, according to Mike Rosa, senior vice president of economic development for the Dallas Regional Chamber.
Rosa rattles off just a few of the deals that have been inked in the past 18 months: a 951,000-square-foot e-fulfillment center for retailer Kohl's, a 300,000-square-foot parts distribution center for BMW, and a 513,000-square-foot regional warehouse for L'Oreal Group.
Much of the increased industrial activity is driven by the law of large numbers. The Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex is the fourth most populous metro area in the country with 7 million people.
But the region has more going for it than just population. "Our strength really comes when we layer on top of that our transportation connectivity," says Rosa.
The highway system around the area provides transportation corridors stretching both north and south (Interstate 35W, which runs from Mexico to Canada) and east and west (including Interstate 20 and Interstate 30). The Dallas-Fort Worth area is a hub of rail activity, with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) lines from the Port of Long Beach and the Union Pacific Corp. line from Houston converging there. The area also has a strong air-cargo capability. In addition to the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, which saw 329,000 tons of cargo move through it in 2012, the area is home to the world's first dedicated industrial airport, Fort Worth Alliance Airport.
Dallas also benefits from a pro-business environment with a favorable tax culture, a large employee pool, and a temperate climate.
"But all that doesn't matter if you don't have a building or someone who can build a building," says Rosa. According to Rosa, one way that Dallas sets itself apart from competing regions is the level of sophistication that exists in its real estate development community. Developers in the area are well versed in what it takes to construct sophisticated logistics industrial parks like the 9,600-acre Alliance Global Logistics Hub, an inland port connected to the Alliance airport. "We look ahead at developing industrial areas and industrial parks that meet the needs of shippers now and in the future," Rosa says.
RENO, NEV.
A tongue-in-cheek slogan for the Reno, Nev., area might be "Western Nevada: We're not California." Indeed, a company can get its goods from a distribution center in Reno to anywhere in California within a one-day drive—all the while avoiding the high taxes and heavy regulation that California is infamous for.
"We compete extremely well against California because of our tax base here," says Stan Thomas, executive vice president of marketing and competitive expansion for the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada. "There's no corporate tax or state income tax. Our utilities are less than California's, and our unemployment insurance is less. Also, our property taxes are a little bit lower."
Reno can also serve 10 other western states with a one-day drive, says Thomas—even the hard-to-reach Pacific Northwest. The area is a hub for UPS Inc. and FedEx Corp. as well as regional parcel carrier OnTrac. It is also served by all major trucking companies as well as the BNSF and Union Pacific.
The ease of reaching major western markets has made the area particularly attractive to businesses engaged in e-commerce distribution, as well as to retail, pharmaceutical, and nutraceutical companies. Currently, there are 74 million square feet of warehousing and distribution space in the Western Nevada area, which includes Reno, Sparks, and Tahoe, according to Thomas. Companies with large distribution centers in the area include traditional brick-and-mortar retailers like JC Penney and Toys R Us as well as e-commerce merchants like Amazon.com and Diapers.com. The trendy retailer Urban Outfitters has its imports brought from the Port of Los Angeles or Long Beach to its distribution center in Reno and shipped from there, rather than locating a facility near the ports.
While Reno's position on the logistics map may be what attracts companies, it's the ease of doing business that keeps them there, sometimes expanding to include manufacturing or even their corporate headquarters, according to Thomas. He notes the speed in which companies can obtain state and city licenses (within one day) and building permits (within three to four weeks). The DC itself can get built in six months, he says.
QUINCY, WASH.
If you're looking for a green spot for your warehouse or distribution center, you might want to consider Quincy, Wash.
Quincy offers access to hydropower from dams along the Columbia and Snake rivers. The energy source is both environmentally friendly—hydropower is carbon neutral—and inexpensive. "Grant County [where Quincy is located] has some of the cheapest hydropower rates in the country," says Patrick Boss, vice president of public affairs and business development for the Port of Quincy.
According to an analysis by the site selection firm Boyd Co. Inc., electricity in Quincy is priced at 2 cents per kilowatt, compared with 15 cents per kilowatt in Chicago. Because of the hydropower dams, there is also significant electrical infrastructure in Grant County. "For a little town of 7,000 people, that means there's more power per capita than probably any other place in the world," Boss says.
The low cost and plentiful supply of energy is an attractive feature for companies requiring cold storage facilities, such as those associated with the state's ubiquitous agriculture industry. According to Boss, many crops that need refrigeration are located within a 70- to 80-mile radius of Quincy. "If a massive 1 million-square-foot cold storage distribution center wanted to locate here and it needed 10 megawatts of energy, that would be nothing," Boss says.
Another sign of Quincy's potential for green distribution is its growing importance as a rail intermodal hub for central Washington. Quincy is 10 miles north of Interstate 90, which runs from Seattle to Boston. It is also located on a BNSF main line that serves the city six days a week. When the Port of Quincy Intermodal Terminal was built, the intent was for the goods to be shipped by rail to the Port of Seattle for export to Asia. While the initiative never panned out, the port did find a market for long-haul eastbound shipments. Today, BNSF's "Cold Train Express Refrigerated Intermodal Service" brings shipments of mostly fresh foods and perishables from Quincy to 19 states and one Canadian province. The expedited service reaches Chicago in four days and Boston in six to seven, says Boss. On the backhaul, the service carries dry goods to be distributed across the Northwest.
All of this green can save a company a lot of green, according to consultancy Boyd Co., which studied the costs of operating a 500,000-square-foot DC in various western locations. The study found it would cost $14.1 million to operate the facility in Quincy, compared with $20.7 million in Los Angeles.
For more information ...
Want to learn more about the logistics clusters mentioned in this article? Here's where to find more information:
Dallas
Dallas Regional Chamber: This economic development organization's website provides facts about the Dallas-Fort Worth area and locating there, including information on the region's transportation infrastructure.
AllianceTexas: Information about the Alliance Global Logistics Hub, a key inland port in the region, includes a drayage calculator.
Reno, Nev.
EDAWN or the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada: This private/public partnership is committed to recruiting companies to the Greater Reno-Sparks-Tahoe area. Its website contains helpful information about the region's workforce and taxes/incentives as well as a building and sites database and case studies of companies that have found success there.
Quincy, Wash.
Port of Quincy: The inland port's website contains information on locating a business in Quincy, Wash.; the intermodal terminal; and the port's cold train service.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."