Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The federal government's new rules governing a commercial truck driver's hours of service (HOS)
has reduced median driver wages by between 3.2 and 5.6 percent by cutting the number of hours in a
driver's workweek, according to a survey by the National Transportation Institute (NTI), a Kansas
City-based consultancy.
The survey, to be released later this month, canvassed 412 trucking firms. Specific wage reductions
will depend on the nature of the job and the types of services that drivers perform, according to Gordon
Klemp, founder and president of NTI.
NTI estimates align closely with projections by Cameron Holzer, president of CRST Expedited, which announced
earlier this month a $10 million wage increase over the next 12 months covering about 4,000 drivers. The increases,
which take effect tomorrow, are the largest in the Cedar Rapids, Ia.-based truckload transportation and logistics carrier's
58-year history. CRST Expedited is the largest unit of the $1.3 billion concern CRST International.
Holzer said the increases are aimed in part at offsetting the roughly 5-percent wage hit its drivers have taken as
a result of HOS compliance. Holzer wouldn't comment on driver wages at his company. It is believed that base wages for
truckload drivers range between $48,000 and $55,000 a year.
The hours-of-service rules were written in December 2011 and enforced 18 months later. The rules reduce a driver's
seven-day workweek by 15 percent to 70 hours from 82 hours. For the first time ever, drivers have limits placed on their
traditional 34-hour minimum restart period, requiring it to occur once every seven days and to include two rest periods
between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m. over two consecutive days. The 2011 rule bars truckers from driving more than eight hours without
first taking at least a 30-minute break. The rule left unchanged language allowing drivers to operate 11 consecutive hours
behind the wheel; safety advocates had hoped the agency would reduce it to 10 hours.
The rules were the subject of a fierce legal battle pitting the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), which
wrote and enforced the rules, against the unlikely alliance of safety groups and the American Trucking Associations (ATA).
However, in early August a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., let stand virtually all of the FMCSA rules, effectively
ending the legal fight.
To accommodate the rules, CRST Expedited uses two-driver "sleeper" teams that operate dry van services over a median length of
haul of 1,400 miles. A typical sleeper team can make a 1,000 to 1,200-mile run in a 24-hour period while still meeting HOS
guidelines, according to Charles W. Clowdis Jr., managing director-transportation for consultancy IHS Global Insight.
EXPEDITED VS. NONEXPEDITED
Expedited shipments are time-sensitive in nature and can command as much as a 50-percent rate premium over shipments not needing
rush deliveries, according to Clowdis. Shippers are willing to pay more for urgent, time-definite deliveries, and CRST Expedited
will be able to embed the higher labor costs in its rates, Clowdis said. Holzer said customers understand CRST Expedited's
position and are willing to tolerate higher rates. Perhaps not surprisingly, Holzer said the wage increases would not apply
to drivers working for CRST's nonexpedited operation.
Holzer said the increases are also designed to retain CRST Expedited's existing drivers and to add about 200 new drivers to its
fleet. CRST Expedited is experiencing driver shortages in California, the Midwest, and Texas, Holzer said. "We will hire from most
any region at this time," he said in an e-mail.
Wage increases will continue beyond this year, and top performers can see their wages rise well above the median per-driver
rate, Holzer added.
OVERDUE FOR RATE INCREASE?
The last time industrywide driver wages rose appreciably was in 2004 and 2005 when they increased by about 20 percent over
the two years, according to Noel Perry, a principal for Transport Fundamentals, a consultancy. The gains were fueled by a
tight market for drivers and by an economic boomlet propelled by what was in retrospect a pyrrhic rise in housing-related
activity. A freight recession which began in 2006, the collapse of the housing market, and the financial crisis and subsequent
recession forced drivers to effectively give back half of those gains, Perry said.
Perry, who for several years has forecast an acute driver shortage by the middle of the decade, said the market is overdue
for a sustained upward spike in rates as a result. Besides a reduced labor pool, freight demand is "moderately positive," Perry
said. In addition, fleet operators have been unusually reluctant in the past few years to push through wage increases, he said.
Carrier executives burned by the downturn have focused more on controlling costs rather than on adding capacity or boosting the
revenue line with price hikes, according to Perry.
A quarterly carrier survey issued last week by consultancy Transport Capital Partners found that conservative habits die hard.
The number of carriers expecting capacity additions of less than 5 percent has risen to 45 percent today from 22 percent in
February 2011. The number of respondents that expected to increase capacity fell to between 6 and 10 percent today from 25
percent in February 2011, according to the survey.
Part of that reluctance may be due to a change in shipper views of end demand. A quarterly survey of shippers from investment
firm Morgan Stanley & Co. found that 45 percent plan to reduce inventory over the next six months. In June, the last time shippers
were polled, the figure stood at 39 percent. About 19 percent of respondents said they plan to boost inventories, up from 17
percent in the June survey. The firm said the decline in shipment activity correlates with shippers' projections that capacity
will loosen among all transport modes.
But even if capacity eases, will that be enough to offset the scarcity of labor? Klemp of NTI said the pool of qualified
drivers remains very shallow and few new drivers are entering the trade. The situation is so critical that recruiting managers
are making "exceptions" to their base driver qualifications criteria just to put drivers in the seats, he said. The anecdotal
evidence is supported by NTI's survey results that show a decline in the minimum experience levels of driver candidates, Klemp
said.
The difficulty in retaining truckload drivers is exacerbating the problem. The ATA said last week that the annualized turnover
rate at large truckload fleets—defined as carriers with more than $30 million in annual revenue—rose to 99 percent in
the second quarter, up two percentage points from first quarter numbers. This pushed the turnover rate to its highest point since
the third quarter of 2012 and just above the annual rate of 98 percent in 2012, ATA said. Klemp expects the third-quarter turnover
rate to hit 100 percent.
Rates will need to head higher as fleets pay more to retain good drivers in a tightening market, Bob Costello, ATA's chief
economist, said in a statement. Klemp added that perhaps never before in trucking's long history has driver retention strategy
been as important as it is today.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."