Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
A case in point is Afghanistan, a nation that's been living through some sort of civil strife continuously since the 1970s. As the current war winds down (U.S. and international troops are scheduled to depart by the end of 2014), Afghanistan is left contemplating an uncertain future. Years of conflict have taken their toll on the country, leaving much of its physical infrastructure damaged or destroyed. Before its citizens can get on with their lives, a lot of rebuilding will need to take place.
That may not be as simple as it might sound. There are no Home Depots or True Values—that is to say, retail operations with broad reach that stock the tools and supplies needed for building projects. In fact, it's not uncommon to hear stories about construction delays caused by shortages of basic supplies. When advised it would take weeks to get a required item, a building engineer at one project reportedly said, "What we really need is an Ace store around here."
He may soon get his wish. Earlier this year, the Afghanistan Investment and Reconstruction Task Force, an office in the U.S. Department of Commerce, announced that Ace Hardware had reached an agreement with an Afghan corporation to open a franchise in that country. The deal calls for the nation's first Ace Hardware store to open in Mazar-e Sharif, in the northern part of the country, in early 2014. Eventually, the companies expect to open 15 outlets across Afghanistan.
ALL IN THE FAMILY
Ace's partner in the endeavor is Safi & Safi Enterprises, the latest spin-off from the Safi Group, a conglomerate owned and operated by the Safi family. Long prominent in Afghanistan, the family has investments in oil, steel, real estate, and hotels, according to **ital{The Wall Street Journal.} The enterprise also owns an airline, Safi Airways, and is involved in construction businesses, the largest property development project in Afghanistan, and logistics-related ventures. Today, the Safi name is among the most widely recognized in the nation's private sector. According to officials at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, "The Safis are one of the top families, for sure."
Partnering with local talent is nothing new for Ace Hardware. "We go in with local entrepreneurs who already know the landscape and are used to operating in the country," Bob Moschorak, president of Ace Hardware International, told CNBC. "You have to align yourself always with the right partners; otherwise you are always doomed [to] failure."
The Safis, too, are bullish on the new venture. "What better business than one that provides the tools to help rebuild a society in need of infrastructure?" said Najib Safi, the managing owner of Safi & Safi Enterprises, in an interview with NBC News.
SPOTLIGHT ON LOGISTICS
Press reports suggest that the Safis expect to invest $40 million to $50 million in the Ace Hardware expansion. A significant portion of that will go toward logistics—which will come as no surprise to anyone in the industry. While the business opportunity seems vibrant, the backbone of retail sales lies in logistics. If you can't put it on the shelf reliably, you can't sell it.
But getting it to the shelf won't be easy. Ace's closest distribution center is in Dubai, more than 1,000 miles from Mazar-e Sharif as the crow flies. And there's no easy way to move freight between the two locations. In theory, you could ship from Dubai via Iran, but for a variety of obvious reasons, that option is not available.
That leaves Pakistan as the best alternative. While it's a relatively easy 750-mile sea journey from Dubai to the Port of Karachi in Pakistan, from there, things get dicey. Points of entry into Afghanistan from Pakistan by ground are limited to a handful of mountain passes. The most direct route for intermodal cargo shipped via the Port of Karachi to northern Afghanistan is through the Khyber Pass. However, shippers who use this route have to accept both delay and risk, with attacks, hijackings, and pilferage commonplace. As for the timing, Ace sees a best-case transit time from Karachi to Kabul of about two weeks but is expecting four weeks to be more typical.
Yet it can be done. "Somehow, the successful Afghan businesspeople are able to move things around the country," says Thomas Muenzberg, a foreign commercial service officer at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Kabul. "There are logistics companies that know how to deal with that."
Ace has come to much the same conclusion. "The Safis know more about getting product into Afghanistan than we do," says Brian Cronenwett, vice president, international distribution and logistics at Ace Hardware International.
Ace is taking full advantage of that knowledge. While the company is working closely with its franchisee to manage the transportation network, the inbound shipments to Afghanistan are the responsibility of the Safis. Title transfers when the shipment launches. That takes much of the risk off Ace's shoulders and takes the issue of security out of its hands.
One thing that will work to the Safis' advantage here is the broad sourcing leeway Ace gives its franchisees. The company permits them to incorporate locally made products into their inventory, so long as they meet corporate quality standards—a freedom the Safis could leverage to reduce the amount of cargo they must import through Dubai.
"That got our attention because in that way we can support our local industry and sort of motivate them to bring in their products," Karim Safi, another member of the family, told CNBC. Left unsaid is the advantage of shorter supply lines and avoidance of international border crossings.
MANAGING RISK
All this goes a long way toward explaining why, unlike most retail startups, the Safis chose to begin by opening a distribution center, rather than a store. The distribution facility, which is located in Kabul, will hold buffer stock. For most of us, "just-in-case" inventory is evil, but most of us aren't trying to establish a pipeline with the logistics uncertainty associated with a war zone.
The Safis' grand plan calls for the buildout of its own local sourcing and distribution network, connected to the Ace global network. The Kabul facility, which began receiving shipments this summer, will serve as the anchor for that distribution network. As for how much inventory the site will house, Cronenwett expects the franchisees to adopt a conservative approach to stocking at the outset. "My hunch would be they will start with about 8,000 to 10,000 SKUs."
The next step will be the opening of the store in Mazar-e Sharif in 2014. The franchisee says it chose the location for reasons of both security and geography. "The right place for us was Mazar-e Sharif because it's a secure city and there are a lot of other regional places we can target from there," Najib Safi said in the NBC interview.
As for what's next, the Safis plan to open a second store in Kabul and perhaps Herat after that. And that may be just the start: While the franchise agreement only covers Afghanistan, future northward expansion into the central Asian nations of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan is possible.
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."