Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
If the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) finds itself not ready for e-commerce prime time, it won't be for lack of effort or imagination.
After many months of planning, USPS in early August took the wraps off the most ambitious remake of its "Priority Mail" delivery service in more than three decades. The initiative is the Postal Service's boldest step yet to frame its future as the primary shipping conduit of online commerce instead of as the share-draining monopoly carrier of the nation's first-class mail.
For the first time, Priority Mail users are able to select a day-definite delivery, whether it be one, two, or three days out. USPS will offer free shipment tracking and free packaging, as well as free insurance coverage of either $50 to $100 a shipment, depending on how the order is placed. Shipping rates, at least for now, will remain the same. USPS's long-time overnight-delivery service, "Express Mail," has been rebranded "Priority Mail Express," ostensibly to get the public and the shipping community accustomed to the name.
By bundling transport, tracking, insurance, and packaging into one rate, USPS is trying to position itself as the value proposition of choice for the growing number of e-merchants that lack the volume clout of a goliath like Amazon.com. It signals USPS's clear intention to skim off short-haul, lightweight traffic—an e-commerce shipment's DNA—from rivals FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc. It also underscores how serious the Postal Service is about increasing its presence in, if not eventually dominating, the e-commerce delivery space. E-commerce shipping in the U.S. business-to-consumer segment grew 32 percent in 2012 over 2011 levels, according to The Colography Group Inc., an Atlanta-based consultancy. The growth rate for 2013 is shaping up to be similar to that of 2012, Colography said.
USPS will no doubt promote the cost benefits that come with not having any fuel surcharges or the array of add-on delivery fees—such as extended delivery surcharges and address-correction charges, to name just two—that often bedevil companies shipping with FedEx and UPS. USPS will continue to offer Saturday deliveries as part of the basic Priority Mail service, something its rivals do not.
TAILORED TO E-COMMERCE
The service will be sold into business-to-business (B2B) channels as well as the core business-to-consumer (B2C) segment, according to Postmaster General Patrick R. Donahoe. Satish Jindel, founder and head of SJ Consulting, a Pittsburgh-based consultancy, said it would appeal to small to mid-sized B2B customers, though bigger B2B players with large-scale volumes are unlikely to be interested.
Analysts say USPS has shrewdly positioned the revamped delivery network to align with the supply chain characteristics of e-commerce. Next-day service will be available within a radius of, say, 100 miles, a distance that may become the norm for e-shipments as consumers and businesses demand deliveries sometimes within hours, and merchants increase their distribution density in response. Shipments moving 150 miles or farther will probably be delivered in two days. The typical e-commerce shipment weighs between one and five pounds, with four pounds being the average, analysts say. USPS traditionally excels at moving lighter-weight shipments over shorter hauls, they contend.
What's more, USPS stands to benefit by not imposing a so-called minimum charge for its shipments. By contrast, FedEx and UPS assess "minimums" on all parcels. The minimum charges apply even on large national accounts that receive sizable discounts based on volumes tendered. In addition, most of the discounts are skewed toward heavier shipments moving over relatively longer distances, not the lightweight stuff moving in shorter hauls, analysts say. Exploiting its rivals' pricing behavior could work to USPS's advantage, they contend.
Yet selling customers on USPS's pricing advantages may not be as easy as it sounds. Mark S. Schoeman, Colography's president, said many FedEx and UPS shippers either don't understand how their discounts are being applied, or, if they are aware, can't sift through their complicated shipping mix effectively enough to get a handle on it. "Shippers have yet to realize the extent to which the minimums are clipping their discounts," he says.
SAVINGS IN THE NUMBERS
Analysts say Priority Mail could save shippers some serious money. Jerry Hempstead, head of Orlando, Fla.-based consultancy Hempstead Consulting, crunched numbers to compare the per-package cost for a Priority Mail "Commercial Plus" customer—which ships at least 100,000 pieces per year—with the cost of UPS's ground-delivery service to a residence. He found that USPS's rates were 20.8 percent lower for a one-pound shipment, 18.54 percent lower for a two-pound shipment, 16.78 percent for a three-pound shipment, and 7.34 percent for a four-pound shipment. Hempstead's calculations assume that UPS maintains its minimum charges and discounts its rates, fuel surcharges, and residential delivery charges each by 50 percent.
"These are big savings and at least worth a look for a shipper," especially those looking to compete against a company like Amazon, Hempstead says. Hempstead, normally not given to hyperbole and hardly a USPS advocate, says the new strategy is "brilliant."
FedEx's and UPS's competitive options are limited, according to Jindel of SJ Consulting. One counter-strategy would be to trumpet their stellar 97 to 98 percent on-time performances and promote the money-back guarantees that accompany their service offerings, he says. However, the companies may not want to highlight the feature because it raises the specter of shipment losses and because "no one pays much attention anyway" to the money-back guarantees, although the language is embedded in the shipper-carrier contracts.
As solid as the strategy appears to play, the devil, as always, is in the implementation details. USPS will need to sync its pickups to accommodate the production schedules of businesses functioning in an increasingly demanding world. Schoeman says that although USPS has the tools and flexibility to make it work, it is not there yet. It remains to be seen if USPS "can execute on a consistent pattern of pickups," he says.
PERCEPTION PROBLEMS
This is the latest service change in Priority Mail since it was launched in 1968. For years, it was marketed as a two-day delivery service. However, in the 1990s, USPS began promoting it as a two- to three-day delivery service after studies showed that an uncomfortably large number of shipments were not delivered in two days.
That move may have created more problems than it solved. By publicly hedging its bets on delivery windows, USPS left the impression that it lacked visibility into its shipping pipeline. "By setting a two- to three-day delivery range, USPS conveyed to people that it didn't really know" about the status of its packages, says Schoeman. That has created uncertainty among users of all stripes. It's a perception that must be addressed and eliminated if USPS is to capture the shipping dollars of e-merchants and customers that need to know precisely when their packages will arrive, analysts say.
Ironically, the analysts who follow the agency said it always had enough data to know when goods would be delivered. "They have great visibility," says Jindel of SJ Consulting. "They just have to share it with the marketplace."
ADDING TO THE TOP LINE
USPS executives estimate the revamped service will add $500 million a year in revenue to an organization that generates about $63 billion annually. It is also likely to accelerate the momentum in USPS's "shipping and packages" segment, of which Priority Mail is a part. In a report filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission on its fiscal third quarter (which ended June 30), USPS said revenue for "shipping and packages" increased 8.8 percent to nearly $3 billion. That accounts for slightly less than 20 percent of all revenue for the quarter. Volumes for the segment grew 7.1 percent from the same period a year ago, USPS said.
However, USPS knows that the gains in shipping services cannot offset the declines in first-class mail revenue and volume caused by the growth of digital mailing options. In its fiscal third-quarter filing, it said that revenues from the shipping and package segment "would have to grow at a substantially higher rate in order to replace the contribution of first-class mail," which is its most profitable segment.
Virtually no one sees that occurring any time soon, if ever.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
The Florida logistics technology startup OneRail has raised $42 million in venture backing to lift the fulfillment software company its next level of growth, the company said today.
The “series C” round was led by Los Angeles-based Aliment Capital, with additional participation from new investors eGateway Capital and Florida Opportunity Fund, as well as current investors Arsenal Growth Equity, Piva Capital, Bullpen Capital, Las Olas Venture Capital, Chicago Ventures, Gaingels and Mana Ventures. According to OneRail, the funding comes amidst a challenging funding environment where venture capital funding in the logistics sector has seen a 90% decline over the past two years.
The latest infusion follows the firm’s $33 million Series B round in 2022, and its move earlier in 2024 to acquire the Vancouver, Canada-based company Orderbot, a provider of enterprise inventory and distributed order management (DOM) software.
Orlando-based OneRail says its omnichannel fulfillment solution pairs its OmniPoint cloud software with a logistics as a service platform and a real-time, connected network of 12 million drivers. The firm says that its OmniPointsoftware automates fulfillment orchestration and last mile logistics, intelligently selecting the right place to fulfill inventory from, the right shipping mode, and the right carrier to optimize every order.
“This new funding round enables us to deepen our decision logic upstream in the order process to help solve some of the acute challenges facing retailers and wholesalers, such as order sourcing logic defaulting to closest store to customer to fulfill inventory from, which leads to split orders, out-of-stocks, or worse, cancelled orders,” OneRail Founder and CEO Bill Catania said in a release. “OneRail has revolutionized that process with a dynamic fulfillment solution that quickly finds available inventory in full, from an array of stores or warehouses within a localized radius of the customer, to meet the delivery promise, which ultimately transforms the end-customer experience.”
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.