Coming soon to a fleet near you: ultra-clean lifting machines
The EPA's stringent Tier 4 final emissions restrictions will apply to all diesel-powered lift trucks by the end of next year. How will the rules affect your fleet?
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
For those of us of a certain age, the word "diesel" evokes images of smelly, soot-spewing vehicles clogging highways and crawling around construction sites. Future generations, though, are unlikely to have those same associations. Thanks to stringent emissions control regulations issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), it won't be long before the exhaust from diesel engines is clean and clear.
Many people are familiar with those regulations as they apply to over-the-road trucks. But they also apply to diesel-powered "nonroad" vehicles, including the heavy-duty lift trucks typically used outdoors. The first level of emissions restrictions for diesel-powered lift trucks—designated Tier 1—went into effect in 1997. Over the next decade, Tier 2 and Tier 3 as well as Tier 4 interim rules were introduced.
But even stricter standards are looming. The next iteration, the Tier 4 final standards, mandate that harmful emissions from diesel-powered lift trucks be reduced by more than 90 percent compared with emissions levels before the regulations were first imposed.
Here's a look at what those rules require, how manufacturers are responding, and what they will mean for fleet operators.
RULES OF THE NONROAD
The main components of vehicle emissions are particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbons (HC), and carbon monoxide (CO). Of these, only PM (soot, or "black smoke") and NOx are currently regulated by the EPA, according to J.B. Mayes, manager, counterbalanced product management for the Hyster Co.
Tier 4 interim regulations require that diesel engine manufacturers reduce PM exhaust emissions by 96 percent and NOx emissions by 76 percent compared with the Tier 1 standards, Mayes says. The Tier 4 final regulations reduce NOx emissions by 94 percent compared with the Tier 1 standards.
That last mandate, as they say, is a doozy: According to the lift truck manufacturers we spoke to for this article, moving from Tier 4 interim to Tier 4 final compliance will be difficult and expensive. "The EPA's objective is that whatever we shoot out of the exhaust should be cleaner than what we take in," says Tim Webb, manager, product development for Hyundai Construction Equipment Americas Inc. "Everybody can get to that, but the problem will be the components and the cost for modification of the diesel engine."
Compliance deadlines are keyed to engine output in kilowatts (also expressed as horsepower). For lift trucks rated up to 75 hp, the Tier 4 final standards went into effect Jan. 1, 2013. The deadline for engines rated between 174 and 750 hp is Jan. 1, 2014, and for those between 75 and 173 hp, the deadline is Jan. 1, 2015. Only engines manufactured on or after those dates are affected.
DESIGN CHALLENGES
For lift truck manufacturers, the challenge is to redesign their products to comply with the regulations but without compromising fuel efficiency, performance, or durability.
Most of the lift truck makers are partnering with engine manufacturers such as Cummins, Perkins, Kubota, and Deutz. (A notable exception is Toyota, which is producing its own Tier 4 final engine.) The engine manufacturers are using a variety of technologies to meet emissions requirements. The most common include:
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, which break down NOx into nitrogen and oxygen by mixing a reagent (called diesel exhaust fluid, or DEF) into the exhaust gas flow in a catalytic converter.
Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), which dilutes the oxygen in the combustion chamber, lowering the combustion peak temperature and reducing the formation of NOx. The lower temperature increases particulate matter, which must be filtered out.
Diesel particulate filters (DPF), which trap particulate matter from the exhaust and burn it off to prevent soot from being released into the air.
Diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), which convert carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons to water vapor and carbon dioxide.
Turbochargers, which help small, lower-emission engines generate more horsepower.
Each lift truck manufacturer must decide which combination of technologies will work best with its models and the applications for which they were designed. Hyundai, for example, will use diesel particulate filters in its 1.5- to 3.3-ton trucks and a diesel oxidation catalyst/selective catalytic reduction combination for larger trucks. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (MCFA) chose diesel particulate filters for its Cat lift trucks and Mitsubishi forklift trucks lines. For its largest trucks, Hyster will use exhaust gas recirculation with a diesel particulate filter. Toyota's 8-Series trucks feature a new electronic common-rail fuel injection system that works with an intercooled turbocharger and a diesel oxidation catalyst. And Crown Equipment's Hamech V811 Series trucks are equipped with a diesel oxidation catalyst system. (See sidebar for a list of some of the Tier 4 models that are now available or will be shortly.)
The regulations have created some design challenges for lift truck manufacturers, says Jason Provancher, director of IC (internal combustion) product development and engineering at Crown Equipment Corp., which makes diesel-powered lift trucks under its Hamech brand. Components like the canister-shaped diesel particulate filters and the containers required to hold and burn oxidation catalysts take up space inside a truck, and it can be difficult to make room for them in a small lift truck, he notes. Manufacturers may also have to redesign the inner workings and exterior cowlings and panels to accommodate changes in the size and positioning of exhaust pipes, hoses, cables, and other components, says Lucas Dumdie, a product line manager at MCFA.
Another concern is the effect of overheating on the combustion process and the changes in emissions levels this can bring. Toyota, for one, has introduced an improved cooling system with the ability to reduce power usage automatically to help prevent overheating and maintain the proper emissions levels, according to Mark Faiman, a product manager for Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc. (TMHU).
Typically, operators must stop the truck and wait while accumulated particulates burn off. That's a productivity-buster, says Dumdie. So some manufacturers have found ways to carry out that process while the truck is running, without overheating. The Perkins-built engines in Mitsubishi's and Cat's Tier 4 final trucks, for example, heat up the DPF and automatically burn off soot while the vehicle is in operation.
Diesel lift trucks are designed for heavy-duty applications, so manufacturers that opt for smaller engines (which use less fuel and therefore, produce lower emissions) can't compromise power or lifting capacity. Toyota addressed that by incorporating a new electronic common-rail fuel injection system and an intercooled turbocharger into its fuel-sipping four-cylinder engine. Thanks to these and other design changes, the new model provides greater torque and as much horsepower as the previous inline six-cylinder engine, says Cesar Jimenez, TMHU's national product planning manager.
Fuel and lubricating oil are another consideration with Tier 4-compliant engines. Because sulfur can severely damage catalytic converters, low-emissions engines require ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuel, Provancher says. Although ULSD is in wide use, it may not be readily available everywhere lift truck fleets operate, he observes.
As for engine oil, because the emissions control systems generate more heat and the ash residue left when lube oil burns off during combustion can foul particulate filters, CJ-4 lubricant is recommended for engines using DPF and EGR systems, says Webb. "CJ-4 is more resistant to heat and produces less ash," he explains, which in most cases prolongs the interval between cleanings.
BUYERS BE AWARE
Initial purchase prices for Tier 4 final lift trucks will be higher than those for their Tier 3 predecessors. That's not surprising considering the additional costs engine and lift truck makers have incurred over the past decade, Provancher says. It's too early to say what Tier 4 final pricing could or should be over the long term, he continues, "but realistically, there's a good substitute with LPG (liquefied petroleum gas), and the market is only going to bear so much when it comes to purchase price." In the short term, there will be opportunities to buy less-expensive, lower-tier trucks, but he expects that supply will dry up in about a year.
Lift truck makers counter that the fuel savings from their Tier 4 final models compared with their previous models should offset the higher prices. Hyundai and Hyster, for instance, expect to boost average fuel efficiency by 10 percent and 15 percent, respectively, in the models they've scheduled for rollout. Mitsubishi and Cat, meanwhile, have both achieved a 22-percent improvement in fuel consumption. But Toyota may be the champion when it comes to fuel savings: The company is citing a 30-percent average reduction in fuel consumption for its 8-Series diesel trucks compared with the previous model.
Those improvements are due not only to hotter-burning, more efficient engines, but also to manufacturers' concerted efforts to cut fuel consumption—and thus, the total cost of ownership—through such innovations as regenerative braking, automatic engine shut-off, idle management, and on-demand hydraulic, cooling, and power steering. But there could be hidden costs. Engines that use selective catalytic reduction technology require a reagent called diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) that is approximately one-third urea and two-thirds water. "Trucks utilizing this technology require separate DEF tanks and regular fill-ups, creating additional costs for the user," Mayes notes.
Maintenance costs should not be much higher, according to the lift truck makers. Depending on the type of emissions equipment, infrequent or even no cleaning (in the case of DOC systems) will be required. Some diesel particulate filters, for instance, could go 4,000 hours or more before they need cleaning. But the Tier 4 final engines are highly electronic and thus "more complex than the diesel engines of yore," says MCFA's Dumdie. "As a result, they are a lot different to troubleshoot."
There's speculation that the advent of ultra-clean diesel engines could cause a shift in the lift truck market. For one thing, when pricing eventually comes down, there may not be as big a cost difference between electric and IC trucks as there is now, Webb suggests. "I think we'll see a more level playing field for the initial cost of a truck, battery, and charger versus the initial cost of a diesel truck."
The Tier 4 final engines, moreover, will be clean enough to use indoors in some areas, making them appropriate for at least a few applications where they've long been barred. Diesels could also become more attractive in California, where the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has imposed fleetwide emissions limits. Instead of having to replace older trucks with electrics or other power sources to keep a fleet's total emissions below the applicable limits, Toyota's Faiman says, buyers could purchase the powerful diesels they want and still be in compliance with the regulations.
That situation could soon spread to other states. The EPA has delayed approving CARB's diesel emissions rules for now, Faiman says, but if and when it does, other states with strict air-quality-attainment goals could follow California's lead and adopt fleet emissions averaging, too.
Where to learn more
There are many information resources available that explain the complex emissions control regulations for lift trucks. Here are some we found helpful:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Emission Standards Reference Guide for compression-ignited nonroad vehicles provides an overview and includes links to the regulations for lift trucks.
The California Air Resources Board's "Diesel Programs and Activities" page includes everything you need to know about California's emissions restrictions.
Hyster's "2011 Tier 4 interim/Stage IIIB Emissions Standards" white paper explains and compares the different emissions control methods.
Tier 4 final lift trucks
Every manufacturer of diesel-powered lift trucks is working to develop models that comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's Tier 4 final emissions control regulations. Here's a quick look at some that are already on the market or will be very shortly.
Cat Lift Trucks says its DP40N1 and DP55N1 series of 8,000- to 12,000-pound capacity diesel pneumatic-tire lift trucks provide a 21.6-percent increase in fuel efficiency. The diesel particulate filter (DPF) will automatically regenerate, and the Perkins 854F engine will not require any ash service.
Crown Equipment'sHamech V811 Series pneumatic-tire forklift offers lifting capacities of up to 11,000 pounds for a variety of outdoor applications. Its Deutz TD 3.6-liter engine is equipped with a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) exhaust system that is maintenance-free and does not require periodic service.
The first of Hyundai's extensive line of Tier 4 final lift trucks will be available in the fourth quarter of 2013; the others will debut in 2014 and 2015. Trucks of up to 3.3 tons will use a diesel particulate filter (DPF) system. Larger vehicles will use a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system.
Hyster's H80-120FT Series of Tier 4 final lift trucks will feature an efficient Kubota 3.8-liter engine with exhaust gas recirculation and a diesel particulate filter. The pneumatic-tire forklifts will handle the toughest duty with lifting capacities ranging from 8,000 to 12,000 pounds.
Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks' FD40N1-FD55N1 series of 8,000- to 12,000-pound capacity diesel pneumatic-tire forklifts provide a 21.6-percent increase in fuel efficiency. The diesel particulate filter (DPF) on the Perkins 854F engine does not require any ash service and automatically regenerates during normal operation.
Toyota Industrial Equipment's 8-Series pneumatic-tire trucks handle loads of 8,000 to 17,500 pounds and feature a Toyota-built four-cylinder engine with a diesel oxidation catalyst, an electronic common-rail fuel-injection system, and an intercooled turbocharger. The 8-Series offers on average 30-percent lower fuel usage with as much horsepower and greater torque than its six-cylinder predecessor.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.