Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Over the years, Mark E. Richards has done a lot of thinking about the right way to choose a third-party logistics service provider—thinking he has now distilled into a simple six-step process.
In formulating those steps, Richards has drawn on his vast experience in logistics, having worked in the field for more than 30 years. His first job was with a multicity public warehouse company, Distribution Centers Inc. He went on to work for such companies as Nabisco, Gillette, and Oral-B. He is currently the vice president of Associated Warehouses, a consortium of more than 50 third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) operating over 110 million square feet of space in North America and Europe.
Throughout his career, Richards has been actively involved with industry groups like the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), and International Warehouse Logistics Association (ILWA). He was appointed to the CSCMP executive committee at the 1999 Annual Conference and served as chairman of the board of directors during 2005 and 2006.
Richards met recently with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald to talk about how he fell into the profession and the six keys to win-win shipper/third-party relationships.
Q: What led you to seek a career in logistics and supply chain management?
A few weeks later, his company contacted me and asked if I would be interested in interviewing. Again, I said, "Thank you, but no thank you." They said, "Well, how about if you consider it a practice interview?" The next thing I knew I was working for Distribution Centers Inc. and Ken Ackerman.
Q: What changes have you seen over the past 30 years in the way businesses approach logistics and supply chain management? A: More and more organizations are recognizing the critical role that logistics plays. One manifestation of that is Tom Friedman's assertion in one of his books that those companies that have the most effective and efficient supply chains are the ones that will "win." So here you have a general publication that is recognizing the importance of supply chain. Another popular expression of it is the advertisements that we see on TV now. Thirty years ago, you wouldn't have seen "I love logistics" and UPS and others promoting logistics.
Q: Do you think the failure to stay on top of emerging technologies could put a company at a competitive disadvantage? A: Definitely. There are so many things that will revolutionize what we do and how we do it. Take robotics, for instance—the idea of a $20,000 investment in a robot that could handle picking and packing in a distribution center. I can also see a day where you have a third-party distribution center become a farm of sorts that would contain many, many 3D printers and all the ingredients that go into that printer. Someone places an order and that third party prints it, packs it, and ships it.
Q: What's the value of being active in industry associations like WERC, CSCMP, and IWLA? A: You have to not only take from the profession but also give back to that profession and be willing to invest yourself in hopefully making the profession better than when you entered it. My father and mother raised me with the whole idea of giving back. Even beyond that, I just believe that none of us has all the answers. I have been involved because I knew that it would expose me to different perspectives, different thinking, and different experiences and that could only be good for my personal development.
Q: You have come up with a six-step process for selecting a third-party provider that allows everybody to win. Could you summarize those six steps for us? A: One of the first steps is to understand yourself. Someone will contact us saying they need help looking for a third party and what's the price. I'll say, "Well, we can get to that, but can you tell me what you are trying to do with this and what your objectives are? Why are you even thinking about outsourcing?" Really, the first step is understanding who you are as a company and what your objectives are.
Another key is getting as many people as possible within the organization involved in the process. There again, I see people that want to outsource, and they start down that path but with minimal or no involvement from people in human resources or IT or finance or sales and marketing. To me, that is a mistake. You get those people involved from day one and your solution can be so much better.
Q: What are the next steps? A: Another key part is communications. Remember, you cannot overcommunicate. I'm a believer in communicating in a variety of ways: via phone, via text, via e-mail, via printed material. As you do that, you will be amazed. You have to kind of chuckle, "My goodness, I've said that to you, shared that with you six times and you are just now hearing it?" Because that is how we all are.
When you go to select a third party, another key consideration is the culture and cultural fit. That's probably the most important factor. You can teach anybody a technical process, but if there isn't a cultural fit, the result is not going to be as good as it could be. Part of that is asking questions that you might not typically think of. You need to be asking more of the "soft stuff" to understand the organization from a cultural standpoint and again, getting people involved in that process. It shouldn't be a one-person process. You should have other people visit the facility.
Q: And the next step? A: The next step concerns the implementation process. It's an area that I think a lot of people take pretty lightly. They need to have a plan that everybody can rally around and agree upon.
The final step is maximizing the results. Now that you have this partner, you really need to consider it an extension of your company and treat it just as you would someone within your organization. You need to share your expectations. You need to train. You need to have ongoing contact and communication with them, and you need to celebrate successes. I am a big believer in that.
Q: What advice would you offer a young person considering a career in logistics and supply chain management? A: Be actively involved and always give. When you give of yourself, you will be amazed at what comes back.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."