If you're using conventional systems designed to handle cases, the answer is no. Here are some things you can do to prepare your operations for e-fulfillment.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
When retailers first began dabbling in e-commerce—whether as a pure play or as a supplement to their brick-and-mortar operations—they often were able to get away with handling order fulfillment manually. But now, as online retailing explodes, they're finding that approach just doesn't cut it. In order to keep up with the increase in volume and the demand for faster turnaround times, they have to automate. At the very least, they have to put in conveyors and sortation systems.
But as they do so, many companies are discovering that the systems that work well for supplying brick-and-mortar stores aren't a good fit with direct-to-consumer operations. That's because the characteristics of e-commerce orders are very different from their store-based counterparts.
These differences have a number of implications for fulfillment operations. First, when you're shipping directly to consumers instead of stores, the volume of orders is going to be higher. Second, instead of transporting cases or broken cases, conveyors and sortation systems have to be able to handle individual items. On top of that, there's packaging. In a bid to cut costs, more companies are choosing to mail out e-commerce orders in polybags or envelopes rather than corrugated boxes, according to Stephen Cwiak, vice president and general sales manager at conveyor manufacturer Interroll.
THE RIGHT FIT
All of these characteristics have a big impact on what type of conveyors you use or how you use them. For instance, small items, soft goods, and items packaged in bags or envelopes typically aren't a good fit with conventional roller conveyors.
"Because you can't rely on the item's having a large, firm, flat-bottomed surface, there's a potential that the item will end up going up and down between every roller," explains Tim Kraus, product manager for line sortation at systems integrator Intelligrated. As a result, he says, small things could get stuck between rollers, and you don't have as much control of the movement of the bagged items as you might like.
In comparison to roller units, belted conveyors provide a better ride for small and bagged items, making them a good match for e-commerce. However, they typically cost more than the more popular roller conveyors. And not every company is willing to shell out for the more expensive systems, especially if they already have a roller conveyor that they're hoping to repurpose for e-commerce operations.
One way to get around this is to batch-pick items into a tote, according to Kelly Reed, a partner with the consulting firm Tompkins International. The totes can then be transported by traditional roller conveyors to a unit sortation system or put-to-order module, where the items are allocated to individual orders and packaged.
After the orders are packed, orders in cartons can be separated from those packed in polybags or envelopes, Reed says. The polybag or envelope orders can be deposited back into a tote and routed to a shipping sorter, where they can be manually sorted for shipment.
Not only are totes an economical option for companies looking to make use of existing equipment, but they're also a good fit for those retailers that sell a mix of products. One such company is online women's fashion retailer JustFab. Most of the company's volume consists of shoes, which can be easily transported on roller conveyors in shoeboxes. But the company also sells soft goods, such as jeans, purses, and accessories. For these items, the company uses totes. (See sidebar for more on JustFab's fulfillment operations.)
The majority of JustFab's orders are packed in corrugated cartons. The remainder are polybagged and handled manually, using a process similar to the one described by Reed. "Polybags are such a small percentage of our business that we chose not to [automate] it," says Bert Hooper, JustFab's vice president of operations. "We tote up our sealed polybags and send them to a manual shipping station, where our employees apply shipping labels and sort them into gaylords [large reusable corrugated containers used for shipping]."
If a facility has no choice but to use roller conveyor for transporting small bagged items, Kraus recommends that the rollers have tighter roller centers than the standard three to four inches. He also suggests setting any sensors used with the conveyor to detect small items.
On top of that, the company should pay particular attention to catch points—places on the conveyor's frame where the bags might get snagged. These include corners, guardrail "transition" areas, and areas where one piece of sheet metal overlaps another. Rigid cartons are less likely to get snagged or drag on these points than a bag, which conforms to the shape of whatever you set it on, says Kraus.
SORT IT ALL OUT
As is the case with conveyors, the best sortation systems for brick-and-mortar fulfillment may not be the best ones for e-commerce fulfillment.
Mitch Johnson, director of systems development for Hytrol Conveyor Co., notes that typically, sorters in DCs that supply retail stores are set up to handle 200 orders. This works well in a store fulfillment environment, where those 200 orders may contain thousands of items. But in an e-commerce operation, the average order only contains 1.5 items. If your systems can only process 300 items, you aren't going to be able to keep up with the volume and velocity requirements of e-commerce, Johnson warns. "So you have to look at different ways to do it."
To handle that kind of volume, Johnson suggests using sortation systems that offer a lot of sort points in a small area, like a tilt-tray sorter or a cross-belt sorter.
In addition to volume, the type of packaging used will affect the choice of sorter. If you're just handling cartons, Reed recommends using a sliding-shoe sorter. This type of sorter is well suited to the small, mostly lightweight cartons that are common in e-commerce operations, he says. Sliding-shoe sorters also work well when you're routing a high volume of goods or totes to different order processing or consolidation areas, says Clint Lasher, divisional president, engineering and integration, Oak Lawn (Ill.) for systems integrator Wynright. For lower volumes, a pop-up sortation system would work well, he says. JustFab, for example, is using a pop-up wheel divert sorter.
If you're sorting bagged items, however, things change—including the criteria you use to decide what type of sorter to deploy. According to Kraus, with cartons, you only have to know the size of the cartons, the range of carton sizes, and the rigidity of the cartons. With bags, you not only need to know the size of the bag, but also the size and rigidity of the item(s) inside the bag and how closely the size of the item or items matches the size of the bag. "If it's a large bag with very small items, that becomes more difficult to handle because there are more catch points and a bigger opportunity for snags," he says.
The rigidity of the bag itself also plays a role, says Kraus. Most direct-to-consumer orders use a very thin polybag with no structure or rigidity. In those cases, Kraus says, a loop-type sorter, such as a tilt tray, cross belt, or bomb bay, is a good choice, assuming the operation or layout will accommodate it. Another good choice is a positive line-type sorter, such as a sliding shoe, pusher, or sweep divert. However, friction-based line sorters, such as pop-up wheels, pop-up rollers, or angled roller belting, do not work as well because of the bag's lack of structure or rigidity, Kraus says.
Interroll's Cwiak specifically recommends cross-belt sorters for handling polybagged items. A cross-belt sorter does a good job of sorting soft goods without their becoming tangled or being mishandled, which is known to happen with narrow-belt sorters, sliding-shoe sorters, and tilt-tray sorters, he says.
TIME FOR A PARADIGM SHIFT?
Although analyzing equipment needs is an important part of the process, there's more to preparing an operation for e-commerce than modifying or replacing the conveyors and sortation systems, cautions Steve Schwietert, vice president of integrated systems sales for systems integrator TGW. Schwietert strongly urges DCs to re-examine their entire paradigm for picking, packing, and shipping items. For example, he argues that goods-to-person systems, such as automated storage and retrieval systems and miniloads, are much better suited to e-commerce than traditional picking methods.
Conveyors, of course, will still be needed to transport goods to and from those systems. Indeed, Lasher says that e-commerce fulfillment will require a lot more routing conveyors to ensure goods are moved around the warehouse in an intelligent fashion.
Motor-driven roller conveyors work well for transporting goods into and out of goods-to-person systems because they're easy to deploy and control, Schwietert says. And because they're modular, they give users the flexibility to change configurations as needs shift, says Lasher.
The paradigm shift may extend beyond simply redesigning your distribution center. For example, Johnson of Hytrol says he can envision a day when retailers—in an effort to respond to demands for same-day delivery—install automated equipment like conveyors and sortation systems in the stores themselves. In this scenario, store employees would pick orders from the site's inventory for customers to pick up the same day.
Whether or not these dreams become reality, this much is clear. E-commerce fulfillment presents both challenges and opportunities. And it has likely changed the fulfillment game for good.
Justfab: From carts to conveyors
When it comes to the front-end selling experience, the online women's retailer JustFab has always been tech savvy, with a Web operation that pushes monthly recommendations for shoes and handbags tailored to a customer's personal style. On the back end, however, the pure-play e-commerce retailer was—until recently—anything but high tech.
Bert Hooper, the retailer's vice president of operations, recalls that when he joined the company in June 2011, its Louisville, Ky., warehouse was an entirely manual operation. While that worked well enough when the company was starting out, it was becoming increasingly clear JustFab would have to automate in order to stay competitive. "You get to the point where it's costing you too much money to manually process the order," says Hooper.
JustFab needed to reduce its variable labor cost per unit and its cycle times in order to stay in the game. In addition, it had to come up with a more efficient way to handle multiple unit orders (when a customer orders more than one item at a time) than simply sending associates out to collect items on carts. After weighing its options, it installed 1,500 feet of conveyor and sortation systems from Intelligrated, along with various other systems.
Today, JustFab's DC associates pick directly onto the conveyor system. The orders then travel to the sortation system, which diverts multi-unit orders back to the "binning" area to collect the remaining items, and sends single-unit orders and completed orders on to the packing area.
The sortation system has six divert lanes for multi-unit orders, with 200 bins per divert lane. This means the company can have up to 1,200 multi-unit orders in the system at one time, flowing between picking, packing, and shipping. This is in addition to the 1,000 single-unit orders that the system is concurrently handling.
As a result of the shift to the new system, JustFab has been able to keep up with the rapid increase in volume. Since 2011, the company has grown from an operation with 200,000 units in inventory that processed 2,000 orders per day to one that handles 1 million units of inventory and 8,000 orders a day.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."