Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Teamsters union leaders, including General President James P. Hoffa, did not know until late April that
YRC Worldwide Inc. had made an informal and unsolicited offer to acquire rival Arkansas Best Corp., even though
the takeover proposal was discussed and approved weeks before by a YRC board that includes two members appointed
by the Teamsters, according to a well-placed source.
One of those union-appointed members is Harry J. Wilson, a renowned financier who today is chairman and CEO of
MAEVA Group LLC, a New York-based corporate restructuring firm. In February, MAEVA signed a potential multi-million
dollar contract with YRC for advisory services in "connection with one or more potential transactions and/or strategic
initiatives."
According to a Feb. 21 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), MAEVA signed a contract with
YRC, effective Feb. 1, to perform advisory services in "connection with one or more potential transactions and/or
strategic initiatives" that YRC may pursue.
According to the filing, MAEVA is to be paid $250,000 in monthly fees for the next four months from the date
of the filing. The firm would also receive a maximum of $5.5 million in what YRC called "completion fees." The
agreement expires on Dec. 31 unless extended by mutual consent or terminated by YRC with 30 days written notice,
according to the filing.
The other Teamster-appointed member is Douglas O. Carty, co-founder and chairman of Switzer-Carty Transportation Inc.,
a Canadian company specializing in school bus transportation services.
In an e-mail today to DC Velocity, Wilson said his firm followed the proper legal guidelines in disclosing
the agreement with YRC. Wilson added that the Teamsters were "directly informed of the retention" to ensure they were
aware of it. He declined to comment on whether he notified the union at or around the time that YRC's board approved
the buyout plan, citing confidentiality of board discussions.
In an e-mailed statement yesterday, YRC said the buyout offer was "fully vetted by its management and board," and
it was their "mutual conclusion that it was very much in the interest of all shareholders and stakeholders."
According to the source, on or about April 29, the union became aware of a March 25 letter from James L. Welch to
Arkansas Best President and CEO Judy McReynolds referencing a March 22 face-to-face meeting between the two executives
to discuss a possible business combination. The meeting was held at Arkansas Best's corporate headquarters in Fort Smith, Ark.
The Teamsters, which also represent ABF workers, reacted angrily to word of the possible buyout. Hoffa said in a statement
Friday that it was "unconscionable" that YRC would move on a possible acquisition of Arkansas Best while the union and ABF were
in the midst of highly charged and sensitive contract talks. "This interference in the collective bargaining process is an
affront to all of the hardworking men and women at both companies," Hoffa said.
The source said Hoffa was effectively blindsided by news of the takeover talks. Teamsters spokesman Galen Munroe said
the union would have no comment beyond last Friday's statement.
On May 3, ABF and the Teamsters' international union agreed on a tentative five-year contract. Leaders of Teamster
locals representing ABF workers will meet early next week to review the proposal. If the locals approve it, the compact
will be mailed to ABF's rank-and-file for a ratification vote.
The Teamsters' biggest concern appears to be that without a ratified collective bargaining agreement in place, ABF workers
would fall under a less-generous YRC compact if the two companies were combined. The union also worries that a merger would
leave many of the 7,500 ABF Teamsters out in the cold because YRC workers would likely be chosen to fill the same job applied
for by two candidates.
News of the takeover talk was first reported on DC Velocity's website last Wednesday. That evening, Arkansas Best
issued a statement confirming it was approached in late March by YRC about a possible acquisition of ABF but told YRC in early
April that it wasn't interested at that time. Arkansas Best cited, among other things, intense negotiations with the Teamsters
over a new collective bargaining agreement with ABF that the company has said repeatedly would be critical to its efforts to
remain competitive. ABF has the highest labor costs in the less-than-truckload (LTL) industry.
The companies have not spoken since early April, Arkansas Best said in its statement.
Welch said in a statement the next day that YRC wants to buy all of Arkansas Best, whose businesses include ABF—which
accounts for about 80 percent of overall revenue—and Panther Expedited Services, the nation's second largest expedited
transportation provider. According to the source, YRC floated an informal proposal for Arkansas Best of $18 a share. Near the
close of trading on Wednesday, Arkansas Best's market capitalization stood at slightly more than $432 million.
Welch told other media outlets (he would not speak to DC Velocity) that a transaction would add significant traffic
density to the combined LTL network. Welch added that after a two-year effort to revamp YRC's operations to improve efficiencies
and drive down costs, it was time for the company to take a bold growth-oriented step.
WILSON'S ROLE?
What's unknown is the level of Wilson's involvement, if any, in a potential YRC-ABF transaction. Wilson, a renowned
41-year-old money manager, was chosen to YRC's board by the Teamsters in the wake of a major restructuring that kept
YRC out of bankruptcy at the end of 2009. The union, which represents approximately 25,000 YRC workers, was awarded
two board seats and a chunk of heavily diluted YRC stock in return for 15-percent wage concessions and a dramatic
cut in the company's pension contributions.
Overland Park, Kan.-based YRC was allowed to suspend pension contributions from mid-2009 until the start of 2011, when
it resumed them at only one-fourth of historical levels. The company isn't expected to restore full contributions until 2015
at the earliest.
Wilson worked for Goldman, Sachs & Co. and the Blackstone Group, two of the finance industry's heavyweights, and was
then named partner at private equity firm Silver Point Capital before retiring at 36. He served on President Barack Obama's
auto industry crisis task force and played a key role in the restructuring of General Motors Corp. after the automaker's
mid-2009 bankruptcy filing.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."