Lean management aims to eliminate waste, add value, and achieve the best quality. When applied properly, it can do all that and bring about huge labor-related improvements as well.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Warehouse and distribution center managers spend a lot of time trying to figure out how to handle the greatest amount of product in as little time as possible, with the highest level of service, and at the lowest possible cost. Yet despite their best efforts, they may still overlook opportunities to achieve that goal.
That's because even in the most efficient facilities, there is waste to be found: wasted motion, wasted time, wasted inventory, and more. One way to root out waste—defined as anything that does not provide value—is through the kind of continuous improvement program associated with Lean, the process management discipline that grew out of the famed Toyota Production System.
Lean is a formal approach to process management that aims to eliminate waste, add value, and achieve the best quality by using dozens of standard techniques and tools. These fall into the broad categories of visual communication of information, process mapping, process control, and identification and elimination of defects. Some of the best-known lean tools and techniques include value-stream mapping (a diagram of the material and information flows required to bring a product from order to delivery); just-in-time production (making and delivering the exact amount needed, when and where it's needed); the "5 Ss" (five principles of an organized workplace); work leveling (ensuring consistent type and quantity of work over a period of time to avoid batching and backlogs); kaizen (continuous improvement); and Plan-Do-Check-Act (an improvement cycle that consists of proposing a process change, implementing the change, measuring the results, and taking appropriate action).
Lean is not just for manufacturing, however; its techniques and tools can be adapted to almost any type of operation. In warehouses and DCs, it can improve efficiency, inventory, safety, and costs, say experts in the discipline. And because Lean changes the way people think about processes and communication, it can be especially effective in helping facilities use warehouse labor more efficiently and cost-effectively. It's a complex subject that requires formal training to master, but the following will provide a general idea of how lean principles can have a huge impact on warehouse labor.
A GOOD FIT
What makes a concept originally developed in the auto industry a good fit for warehouses and DCs? For one thing, Lean's objectives are similar to those of warehouse and DC operators, says Timothy Sroka, senior manager-lean operations for third-party logistics service provider (3PL) Menlo Worldwide Logistics. "The goal of the Toyota Production System is lowest cost, highest quality, shortest leadtime. You want that in a warehouse, too," he says.
For another, the seven wastes that lean management seeks to eliminate are all present in warehouses and DCs. They include (with examples):
Transportation (driving a forklift without a load)
Defects (time spent fixing work done incorrectly, such as mispicks)
Inventories (piling staged product in locations that create congestion)
Motion (temporarily placing inbound pallets on the floor instead of directly into storage)
Wait time (waiting to load or unload trucks)
Overproduction (making or ordering more product than is needed or before there is demand for it)
Overprocessing (performing steps in a process like packing and shipping that are unnecessary)
Some companies have added other wastes to that list. Those interviewed for this story named unused employee creativity or knowledge and overengineering (applying a complex solution when a simple one would suffice) as warehousing-related wastes they try to avoid.
In addition, lean management is appropriate for any kind of process that includes a lot of steps—and warehousing and distribution certainly fits that profile, says Charlie Jacobs, director of global process management for APL Logistics (APLL). "When you apply Lean, you identify what adds value and what doesn't," he says. "In most cases, you're lucky if you can truly say that 15 to 20 percent of the steps add value."
Ultimately, lean management aims to create a culture of continuous improvement that engages employees at all levels—especially those who perform the work processes—in identifying waste and developing and implementing remedies. But it's also applicable to the warehouse at a tactical level, says Robert Martichenko, CEO of LeanCor, a 3PL that manages dedicated warehouses and consults on lean deployments for other companies. "One of the core elements of lean management is to establish a continuous flow from the time an order is received to the time it's fulfilled," he explains. "Lean is a strategy that can create velocity inside a warehouse."
THE LINK WITH LABOR
In a warehouse, every type of waste has an impact on labor in one way or another, says Mike Wilusz, director of warehouse operations for Menlo Worldwide Logistics. If everyone in a facility can develop "the eyes to see waste" and identify ways to eliminate it, it will have an immediate and direct impact on labor costs, he says.
Waiting is one of the biggest labor-related wastes inside a warehouse. "Typically, either people are waiting on orders or orders are waiting on people," Martichenko says. Both are costly: If people are waiting for orders, you have labor that's not being utilized or being productive, and if orders are waiting for people, those workers will have to work harder and faster, and thus become stressed and overburdened—or they will have to work overtime—in order to catch up, he explains. The lean principle that can address that kind of waste is work leveling; that is, controlling the flow and timing of activity to create level, unvarying demand during the available work time.
Here's an example of how work leveling can improve warehouse labor efficiency: At one LeanCor customer's facility, the 3PL works with suppliers and trucking companies to schedule inbound deliveries so that an approximately equal number of pallets are delivered each hour during the two shifts. Standardized work processes—another lean tool—ensure that everyone does a particular task in the most efficient way. "By doing that, we are leveling the flow, so people can work at a consistent pace and there's less need for overtime. They are not overburdened, but they're not waiting either," he explains. As a result, the facility is seeing labor savings of as much as 30 percent, Martichenko reports.
In another example, lean analysis tools helped an APLL customer cut labor and waiting time on a loading dock. The customer had two teams picking orders, placing them on pallets, and then loading them into trailers at adjacent doors after each pallet was audited for accuracy. On paper, dedicating teams to a dock door might look efficient, but both teams had a lot of downtime waiting for orders to be picked and for the auditor to complete the reviews, Jacobs recalls. Through line balancing (leveling the workload so that the timing and volume were consistent) and analyzing "takt time" (the rate at which work must be done in order to meet demand), APLL determined that the warehouse could handle the same amount of pallets in the same time with less labor. After changing the timing and flow, the facility now has one team for two dock doors; they load one trailer while the auditor checks the pallets for the other. While it isn't possible to completely eliminate waiting time, those changes did cut out the equivalent of some 60 hours of waiting time each week, and the two "excess" workers were reassigned to order picking, Jacobs says.
One of the most basic lean tools is the "spaghetti chart," which maps out the path a product takes during a particular process and visually shows the motion required. That can help warehouse operators identify overly complex processes, enabling them to reduce labor costs by addressing wastes like overprocessing and unnecessary transportation.
This type of analysis is especially helpful when there are numerous handoffs in a process. Menlo's Wilusz tells of one operation that shipped via parcel carrier. Order pickers would gather items and drop them off at a sorting station. Someone there would sort and consolidate the orders, and someone else would pack them. Another person would run the packages through the parcel shipping meter and stage them for shipping. As a result, inventory would build up between each handoff.
An analysis conducted by the warehouse associates showed that eliminating those handoffs and creating a continuous flow would save labor and time. Now, each worker follows the packages through every stage—picking, packing, running the packages across the meter, and staging them for shipping. That eliminated waiting time, and minor changes to the shipping area layout helped to prevent congestion. The end result, Wilusz says, was a reduction in labor of 25 percent and a per-order leadtime that's 50 percent shorter on average.
WHAT'S IN IT FOR ME?
Two questions are likely to come to mind for anyone who is considering bringing lean practices to a warehouse or DC: If lean analysis shows that less labor is required for specific tasks, how do you get employees to support those changes? And is it necessary to have a full-blown lean program already in place, or is it possible to apply selected aspects of it to cut warehouse labor costs?
All of the experts interviewed for this article agreed on three things in regard to employee buy-in. First, reducing headcount should never be the goal of a lean initiative, and no full-time employee should ever be laid off because of one. Instead, warehouses and DCs can adjust their use of temporary labor, wait for staffing levels to drop through normal attrition, or reassign associates to open positions.
Second, contributions from the people who actually do the work are an integral part of any lean initiative. They know what actually happens, and they are in the best position to identify waste and implement improvements. Their active participation in a multilevel team is a critical success factor and will also encourage them to accept change.
And third, honest communication about the expected benefits for them, their employer, and their customers is important. While the benefits for the employer may be obvious, associates need to know that lean warehouse initiatives have personal benefits for them: a cleaner, safer workplace; less physical stress and time pressure; recognition for their ideas and achievements; and often, more business and therefore, greater job security and opportunities for promotions. Says Jacobs: "The excellence of a project equals the quality of the solution times the acceptance of that solution."
As for whether lean projects can be done piecemeal or should only be implemented as part of a comprehensive companywide initiative, all agree that the latter is preferable by far. Lean is and should be a pervasive and permanent culture—not a limited-time project—that works for everybody at every level, Martichenko argues.
Menlo's Sroka agrees, and says that Menlo "treats Lean as part of our DNA." Lean is a systematic approach, and its principles are most effective when tied to an overall system, he says. "You could pick and choose and apply certain aspects, but there's the question of sustainability over the long term," he adds. Without the commitment to continuous improvement and all that it entails, things will eventually stall and revert to less efficient, more costly practices.
LABOR AS VALUE CREATOR
Lean is not easy to implement, but when done properly, it can transform a company's culture, not to mention the way a warehouse or DC operates. "Managers make decisions based on experience, but Lean takes you to places they hadn't thought of," Jacobs says.
But any warehouse or DC that tries to use lean principles solely to cut labor costs will fail to achieve the full benefits of the system. "Lean views labor not as a commodity but as something that has value," Wilusz says. "It allows you to do amazing things beyond just lowering costs; you can get more value from labor so that you can do more for your customers."
Ultimately, Sroka says, a systematic approach to Lean will reveal that there's no perfect warehouse and that every operation has room for continuous improvement. "The more experience you gain and the more you learn to see waste, the more you will see opportunities to make improvements," he says.
Editor's note: There are many excellent sources of information about Lean both in print and online, and many highly trained consultants who can help companies follow a lean path. A source we turned to frequently for this article was the Lean Enterprise Institute's website and its illustrated glossary, "Lean Lexicon."
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
That challenge is one of the reasons that fewer shoppers overall are satisfied with their shopping experiences lately, Lincolnshire, Illinois-based Zebra said in its “17th Annual Global Shopper Study.”th Annual Global Shopper Study.” While 85% of shoppers last year were satisfied with both the in-store and online experiences, only 81% in 2024 are satisfied with the in-store experience and just 79% with online shopping.
In response, most retailers (78%) say they are investing in technology tools that can help both frontline workers and those watching operations from behind the scenes to minimize theft and loss, Zebra said.
Just 38% of retailers currently use AI-based prescriptive analytics for loss prevention, but a much larger 50% say they plan to use it in the next 1-3 years. That was followed by self-checkout cameras and sensors (45%), computer vision (46%), and RFID tags and readers (42%) that are planned for use within the next three years, specifically for loss prevention.
Those strategies could help improve the brick and mortar shopping experience, since 78% of shoppers say it’s annoying when products are locked up or secured within cases. Adding to that frustration is that it’s hard to find an associate while shopping in stores these days, according to 70% of consumers. In response, some just walk out; one in five shoppers has left a store without getting what they needed because a retail associate wasn’t available to help, an increase over the past two years.
The survey also identified additional frustrations faced by retailers and associates:
challenges with offering easy options for click-and-collect or returns, despite high shopper demand for them
the struggle to confirm current inventory and pricing
lingering labor shortages and increasing loss incidents, even as shoppers return to stores
“Many retailers are laying the groundwork to build a modern store experience,” Matt Guiste, Global Retail Technology Strategist, Zebra Technologies, said in a release. “They are investing in mobile and intelligent automation technologies to help inform operational decisions and enable associates to do the things that keep shoppers happy.”
The survey was administered online by Azure Knowledge Corporation and included 4,200 adult shoppers (age 18+), decision-makers, and associates, who replied to questions about the topics of shopper experience, device and technology usage, and delivery and fulfillment in store and online.
An eight-year veteran of the Georgia company, Hakala will begin his new role on January 1, when the current CEO, Tero Peltomäki, will retire after a long and noteworthy career, continuing as a member of the board of directors, Cimcorp said.
According to Hakala, automation is an inevitable course in Cimcorp’s core sectors, and the company’s end-to-end capabilities will be crucial for clients’ success. In the past, both the tire and grocery retail industries have automated individual machines and parts of their operations. In recent years, automation has spread throughout the facilities, as companies want to be able to see their entire operation with one look, utilize analytics, optimize processes, and lead with data.
“Cimcorp has always grown by starting small in the new business segments. We’ve created one solution first, and as we’ve gained more knowledge of our clients’ challenges, we have been able to expand,” Hakala said in a release. “In every phase, we aim to bring our experience to the table and even challenge the client’s initial perspective. We are interested in what our client does and how it could be done better and more efficiently.”