Lean management aims to eliminate waste, add value, and achieve the best quality. When applied properly, it can do all that and bring about huge labor-related improvements as well.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Warehouse and distribution center managers spend a lot of time trying to figure out how to handle the greatest amount of product in as little time as possible, with the highest level of service, and at the lowest possible cost. Yet despite their best efforts, they may still overlook opportunities to achieve that goal.
That's because even in the most efficient facilities, there is waste to be found: wasted motion, wasted time, wasted inventory, and more. One way to root out waste—defined as anything that does not provide value—is through the kind of continuous improvement program associated with Lean, the process management discipline that grew out of the famed Toyota Production System.
Lean is a formal approach to process management that aims to eliminate waste, add value, and achieve the best quality by using dozens of standard techniques and tools. These fall into the broad categories of visual communication of information, process mapping, process control, and identification and elimination of defects. Some of the best-known lean tools and techniques include value-stream mapping (a diagram of the material and information flows required to bring a product from order to delivery); just-in-time production (making and delivering the exact amount needed, when and where it's needed); the "5 Ss" (five principles of an organized workplace); work leveling (ensuring consistent type and quantity of work over a period of time to avoid batching and backlogs); kaizen (continuous improvement); and Plan-Do-Check-Act (an improvement cycle that consists of proposing a process change, implementing the change, measuring the results, and taking appropriate action).
Lean is not just for manufacturing, however; its techniques and tools can be adapted to almost any type of operation. In warehouses and DCs, it can improve efficiency, inventory, safety, and costs, say experts in the discipline. And because Lean changes the way people think about processes and communication, it can be especially effective in helping facilities use warehouse labor more efficiently and cost-effectively. It's a complex subject that requires formal training to master, but the following will provide a general idea of how lean principles can have a huge impact on warehouse labor.
A GOOD FIT
What makes a concept originally developed in the auto industry a good fit for warehouses and DCs? For one thing, Lean's objectives are similar to those of warehouse and DC operators, says Timothy Sroka, senior manager-lean operations for third-party logistics service provider (3PL) Menlo Worldwide Logistics. "The goal of the Toyota Production System is lowest cost, highest quality, shortest leadtime. You want that in a warehouse, too," he says.
For another, the seven wastes that lean management seeks to eliminate are all present in warehouses and DCs. They include (with examples):
Transportation (driving a forklift without a load)
Defects (time spent fixing work done incorrectly, such as mispicks)
Inventories (piling staged product in locations that create congestion)
Motion (temporarily placing inbound pallets on the floor instead of directly into storage)
Wait time (waiting to load or unload trucks)
Overproduction (making or ordering more product than is needed or before there is demand for it)
Overprocessing (performing steps in a process like packing and shipping that are unnecessary)
Some companies have added other wastes to that list. Those interviewed for this story named unused employee creativity or knowledge and overengineering (applying a complex solution when a simple one would suffice) as warehousing-related wastes they try to avoid.
In addition, lean management is appropriate for any kind of process that includes a lot of steps—and warehousing and distribution certainly fits that profile, says Charlie Jacobs, director of global process management for APL Logistics (APLL). "When you apply Lean, you identify what adds value and what doesn't," he says. "In most cases, you're lucky if you can truly say that 15 to 20 percent of the steps add value."
Ultimately, lean management aims to create a culture of continuous improvement that engages employees at all levels—especially those who perform the work processes—in identifying waste and developing and implementing remedies. But it's also applicable to the warehouse at a tactical level, says Robert Martichenko, CEO of LeanCor, a 3PL that manages dedicated warehouses and consults on lean deployments for other companies. "One of the core elements of lean management is to establish a continuous flow from the time an order is received to the time it's fulfilled," he explains. "Lean is a strategy that can create velocity inside a warehouse."
THE LINK WITH LABOR
In a warehouse, every type of waste has an impact on labor in one way or another, says Mike Wilusz, director of warehouse operations for Menlo Worldwide Logistics. If everyone in a facility can develop "the eyes to see waste" and identify ways to eliminate it, it will have an immediate and direct impact on labor costs, he says.
Waiting is one of the biggest labor-related wastes inside a warehouse. "Typically, either people are waiting on orders or orders are waiting on people," Martichenko says. Both are costly: If people are waiting for orders, you have labor that's not being utilized or being productive, and if orders are waiting for people, those workers will have to work harder and faster, and thus become stressed and overburdened—or they will have to work overtime—in order to catch up, he explains. The lean principle that can address that kind of waste is work leveling; that is, controlling the flow and timing of activity to create level, unvarying demand during the available work time.
Here's an example of how work leveling can improve warehouse labor efficiency: At one LeanCor customer's facility, the 3PL works with suppliers and trucking companies to schedule inbound deliveries so that an approximately equal number of pallets are delivered each hour during the two shifts. Standardized work processes—another lean tool—ensure that everyone does a particular task in the most efficient way. "By doing that, we are leveling the flow, so people can work at a consistent pace and there's less need for overtime. They are not overburdened, but they're not waiting either," he explains. As a result, the facility is seeing labor savings of as much as 30 percent, Martichenko reports.
In another example, lean analysis tools helped an APLL customer cut labor and waiting time on a loading dock. The customer had two teams picking orders, placing them on pallets, and then loading them into trailers at adjacent doors after each pallet was audited for accuracy. On paper, dedicating teams to a dock door might look efficient, but both teams had a lot of downtime waiting for orders to be picked and for the auditor to complete the reviews, Jacobs recalls. Through line balancing (leveling the workload so that the timing and volume were consistent) and analyzing "takt time" (the rate at which work must be done in order to meet demand), APLL determined that the warehouse could handle the same amount of pallets in the same time with less labor. After changing the timing and flow, the facility now has one team for two dock doors; they load one trailer while the auditor checks the pallets for the other. While it isn't possible to completely eliminate waiting time, those changes did cut out the equivalent of some 60 hours of waiting time each week, and the two "excess" workers were reassigned to order picking, Jacobs says.
One of the most basic lean tools is the "spaghetti chart," which maps out the path a product takes during a particular process and visually shows the motion required. That can help warehouse operators identify overly complex processes, enabling them to reduce labor costs by addressing wastes like overprocessing and unnecessary transportation.
This type of analysis is especially helpful when there are numerous handoffs in a process. Menlo's Wilusz tells of one operation that shipped via parcel carrier. Order pickers would gather items and drop them off at a sorting station. Someone there would sort and consolidate the orders, and someone else would pack them. Another person would run the packages through the parcel shipping meter and stage them for shipping. As a result, inventory would build up between each handoff.
An analysis conducted by the warehouse associates showed that eliminating those handoffs and creating a continuous flow would save labor and time. Now, each worker follows the packages through every stage—picking, packing, running the packages across the meter, and staging them for shipping. That eliminated waiting time, and minor changes to the shipping area layout helped to prevent congestion. The end result, Wilusz says, was a reduction in labor of 25 percent and a per-order leadtime that's 50 percent shorter on average.
WHAT'S IN IT FOR ME?
Two questions are likely to come to mind for anyone who is considering bringing lean practices to a warehouse or DC: If lean analysis shows that less labor is required for specific tasks, how do you get employees to support those changes? And is it necessary to have a full-blown lean program already in place, or is it possible to apply selected aspects of it to cut warehouse labor costs?
All of the experts interviewed for this article agreed on three things in regard to employee buy-in. First, reducing headcount should never be the goal of a lean initiative, and no full-time employee should ever be laid off because of one. Instead, warehouses and DCs can adjust their use of temporary labor, wait for staffing levels to drop through normal attrition, or reassign associates to open positions.
Second, contributions from the people who actually do the work are an integral part of any lean initiative. They know what actually happens, and they are in the best position to identify waste and implement improvements. Their active participation in a multilevel team is a critical success factor and will also encourage them to accept change.
And third, honest communication about the expected benefits for them, their employer, and their customers is important. While the benefits for the employer may be obvious, associates need to know that lean warehouse initiatives have personal benefits for them: a cleaner, safer workplace; less physical stress and time pressure; recognition for their ideas and achievements; and often, more business and therefore, greater job security and opportunities for promotions. Says Jacobs: "The excellence of a project equals the quality of the solution times the acceptance of that solution."
As for whether lean projects can be done piecemeal or should only be implemented as part of a comprehensive companywide initiative, all agree that the latter is preferable by far. Lean is and should be a pervasive and permanent culture—not a limited-time project—that works for everybody at every level, Martichenko argues.
Menlo's Sroka agrees, and says that Menlo "treats Lean as part of our DNA." Lean is a systematic approach, and its principles are most effective when tied to an overall system, he says. "You could pick and choose and apply certain aspects, but there's the question of sustainability over the long term," he adds. Without the commitment to continuous improvement and all that it entails, things will eventually stall and revert to less efficient, more costly practices.
LABOR AS VALUE CREATOR
Lean is not easy to implement, but when done properly, it can transform a company's culture, not to mention the way a warehouse or DC operates. "Managers make decisions based on experience, but Lean takes you to places they hadn't thought of," Jacobs says.
But any warehouse or DC that tries to use lean principles solely to cut labor costs will fail to achieve the full benefits of the system. "Lean views labor not as a commodity but as something that has value," Wilusz says. "It allows you to do amazing things beyond just lowering costs; you can get more value from labor so that you can do more for your customers."
Ultimately, Sroka says, a systematic approach to Lean will reveal that there's no perfect warehouse and that every operation has room for continuous improvement. "The more experience you gain and the more you learn to see waste, the more you will see opportunities to make improvements," he says.
Editor's note: There are many excellent sources of information about Lean both in print and online, and many highly trained consultants who can help companies follow a lean path. A source we turned to frequently for this article was the Lean Enterprise Institute's website and its illustrated glossary, "Lean Lexicon."
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.