Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
UPS Inc. and leaders of the Teamsters Union late last night reached tentative five-year labor
contracts covering nearly 250,000 unionized employees at UPS and the company's less-than-truckload (LTL) unit, UPS Freight.
The tentative agreements, which still must be ratified by the rank-and-file, covers about 240,000 Teamster members working
in Atlanta-based UPS' small-package operations and another 10,000 to 12,000 union workers at UPS Freight. Combined, it represents
the largest collective-bargaining agreement in North America.
In a statement last night, the Teamsters said union representatives from UPS and UPS Freight will soon meet
to review the respective agreements. Following that, ballots will be sent to members who will then vote by mail.
The results are expected by mid-June, the union said.
The tentative agreements come slightly more than three months before the scheduled July 31 expiration dates of
both contracts. If ratified by the members, the new contracts will take effect Aug. 1.
Each side was eager to get the deals done long before their deadlines. The first formal communication
over the contracts took place last August, much earlier than it has in the past.
In its statement, the Teamsters said UPS and UPS Freight workers will receive "substantial pay raises," and
the company will spend more on its pension and health and welfare contributions. Included in the UPS tentative
agreement is a "significant increase" in the starting wage rate for part-time small-package workers, the union said.
The union would not disclose any specifics. DC Velocity reported in late March that the union, which had proposed a
five-year contract, sought a $1-per-hour wage increase in each of the contract years and a $1.50-per-hour annual
increase from current levels to cover pension and health benefits. The current contract, reached in 2007, calls
for a $1 an hour annual increase in the company's contribution benefits.
The union also proposed at the time an increase in part-time starting pay to $15 an hour from the current $8.50 an hour.
The tentative agreement requires UPS to create more than 2,000 full-time jobs over the life of the contract by
combining part-time positions into full-time slots. First included in the 1997 contract signed after the Teamsters shut down
UPS for 15 days that summer with a nationwide strike, the language had required the company to create 20,000 full-time jobs
between 1998 and 2008. The Teamsters, and in particular the dissident group Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), have said
UPS has not done all it could in the past 15 years to create that many full-time positions.
Under the UPS Freight tentative agreement, workers will make lower co-payments for health insurance, and
part-time workers will have the "ability" to become full-timers, according to the Teamster statement. All
laid-off UPS Freight road drivers will be put back to work, a provision the union said will settle the issue
of management's practice of subcontracting out driving duties. Ken Paff, national organizer for TDU, said in
an interview earlier this year that UPS subcontracts about half of UPS Freight's driving duties and subcontracts
over-the-road service for the small-package unit, although not as much.
The proposed agreement shifts 140,000 small-package workers to Teamster-controlled health plans from
company-sponsored plans, according to the union statement. The move maintains "current strong benefits"
for all UPS Teamsters, the union said.
Health care had become a wedge issue during the talks. Ken Hall, head of the Teamsters' small-package division,
vowed repeatedly that active unionized UPS employees would not pay anything toward their health insurance premiums.
As of today, there has been no comment on what operational changes, if any, have come from the agreements. Of note is
UPS' "SurePost" program, where it tenders parcels to the U.S. Postal Service for "last-mile" delivery from the local post
office to mostly residential destinations. The program, designed for e-commerce shipments from online merchants to residences,
is an inexpensive way for businesses to reach the largest number of residential addresses with orders for online merchandise.
SurePost has gained significant traction since the last UPS-Teamster contract in 2007, mirroring the explosive rise of e-commerce
since then.
The post-holiday demand for deliveries to support e-commerce, both in forward and reverse shipping patterns, helped
drive solid increases in UPS' first-quarter domestic package volume, revenue, and profit results, the company said when
it released its quarterly numbers yesterday.
In January, Hall demanded that UPS propose language that would protect Teamsters jobs in return for the union's
continued cooperation with the program. Paff said at the time that much of the work is done by low-paid sorters and
loaders who build pallets, each containing hundreds of packages, for delivery by UPS drivers to the closest local post
office. Paff said the union doesn't want to end the program but have more of a role in the transportation component of it.
In separate statements, the heads of each group lauded the agreements. "These agreements are a 'win-win-win' for our people,
customers, and shareholders," said Scott Davis, UPS chairman and CEO. "The fact that we have reached agreements well before our
current contracts expire is a testament to the skills and determination of all those involved in these negotiations."
"These tentative agreements are shining examples to the entire country of a hugely successful company that thrives because
of its unionized workers," said James P. Hoffa, Teamster general president.
FLURRY OF ACTIVITY
The announcement caps a busy week for UPS. Besides reporting its quarterly results, the company announced Wednesday
that it planned to buy 700 tractors fueled by liquefied natural gas (LNG) over the next 20 months. The vehicles, which
run on fuel believed to be 30 to 40 percent cheaper than traditional diesel, will perform local pickups and operate between
UPS hubs in 10 states, the company said.
The planned purchase adds to the 112 LNG-powered vehicles UPS already has in its fleet. UPS did not say how much it will
spend for the rigs or who will be the manufacturer. Cummins Inc. will supply the engines, according to a UPS spokeswoman.
UPS will also spend $18 million to build LNG refueling stations in Knoxville, Nashville, and Memphis, Tenn., as well as Dallas.
UPS already has five LNG refueling facilities in its U.S. network.
On Thursday, UPS said it acquired CEMELOG Zrt, a Hungarian pharmaceutical logistics company, for an undisclosed sum. The
transaction, expected to close by the end of June, puts UPS in the Eastern and Central European health care segment for the
first time. Up until now, UPS served the region's health care market through its main health care distribution campus in the
Netherlands and its own transportation network.
The CEMELOG purchase is the first European health care acquisition UPS has made since late 2011, when it acquired the
Italian firm Pieffe.
The acquisition adds 255,000 square feet of health care distribution space to UPS's current European network, the company
said. Worldwide, UPS operates 41 health care distribution facilities with 6.4 million square feet of capacity.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."