Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
It used to be that communities were less than eager to see a distribution center locate within their borders. But these days, things have changed, according to John H. Boyd of the Boyd Co. Inc., a consulting firm that specializes in site selection. "Instead of 'not in my backyard,' communities are now courting DCs to come to their area," he says.
That attitude adjustment stems partly from a realization that the types of jobs associated with a distribution center have changed, says Boyd. Chambers of commerce and economic development authorities have come to understand that DCs bring more than just low-paying manual labor jobs to the area; they also provide employment for technical and support personnel.
As a result, more and more regions are touting their strengths as centers of logistics activity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Yossi Sheffi, who recently wrote a book on the subject, calls these hubs "logistics clusters," which he defines as areas where many logistics activities take place in close proximity. According to Sheffi, in a logistics cluster, both logistics service providers and the logistics operations of manufacturers, retailers, and distributors congregate around a port, airport, rail facility, or a location close to major population centers.
This is the first in a series of articles looking at some of these emerging logistics clusters. While most logistics professionals are familiar with hubs like Memphis, Tenn.; California's Inland Empire; and Columbus, Ohio, our series will look at locations that may not be on their radars yet. (For more on Ohio's role as a logistics hub, see the article "High on Ohio.")
The first article in our series looks at three emerging logistics clusters in the Midwest: the bistate Kansas City area, St. Louis, and Will County, Ill.
For more information ...
Want to learn more about the logistics clusters mentioned in this article? Here's where to find more information:
Kansas City
KC SmartPort: This not-for-profit group is an excellent source of information about logistics opportunities in the 18-county bistate Kansas City region.
"Kansas City: Logistics powerhouse?": Senior editor Mark Solomon's online article looks at the city's efforts to become a supply chain success story.
St. Louis
St. Louis Regional Chamber: This group connects business and civic communities in the 16-county bistate region. The chamber has identified "transportation and distribution" as one of the five industry clusters that the region is committed to strengthening.
Will County, Ill.
CenterPoint Properties: The property management company and developer of the CenterPoint Intermodal Center provides information on the center—including a drayage calculator—on its website.
Will County Center for Economic Development: This organization brings together public and private groups to encourage business development in the county. Its website offers detailed information about the inland port.
KANSAS CITY
Kansas City has long been known as a transportation hub. That's no surprise given that the city is crisscrossed by major highway, rail, air, and barge routes.
Now, the city is pushing to become known as a center of international trade as well. Located in the geographic center of North America, Kansas City is situated midway between Mexico and Canada. It has an aggressive foreign trade zone (FTZ) program and ranks first in the country in FTZ space, according to the development group KC SmartPort. It also has one of the largest U.S. Customs presences in the country in terms of fiscal clearance, says Chris Gutierrez, president of KC SmartPort.
Furthermore, the existing transportation infrastructure has been undergoing expansion in recent years. For example, the Norfolk Southern, BNSF, and Kansas City Southern railroads have all opened major intermodal facilities in the area. BNSF is set to open an additional one in the third quarter of 2013.
In the past five years, Kansas City has also made a concerted effort to strengthen its workforce's supply chain skills. In addition to the degree and certificate programs offered at local four-year universities and community colleges, the city has reached out to local high schools. KC SmartPort and local community colleges have collaborated with the city's "Prep-KC" program on efforts to go into high schools and spread the word about college and job opportunities in the supply chain. Students can then take a two-week course post-graduation and become a certified logistics associate, which qualifies them for an entry-level warehouse position.
While the city may not boast as many mega-distribution centers as you'll find in Chicago or Dallas, almost all of the major retailers operate DCs or warehouses here, including Wal-Mart (which has two distribution facilities), Home Depot, Target, and JC Penney. The city is also attracting more e-commerce and consumer goods companies. Camping and outdoor product company Coleman, for example, recently opened a 1.3 million-square-foot DC in Kansas City.
Kansas City does have one type of facility that no other location can offer: large underground warehouses. Scattered across the region, these warehouses, which total approximately 20 million square feet, were created from old limestone mines. Because they are situated underground, they're able to maintain a constant temperature all year long. "This leads to higher productivity rates and lower cost to operate, because you don't need heat and air conditioning," says Gutierrez.
ST. LOUIS
For many years now, St. Louis has marketed itself as the geographic center of the country, making it a logical location for a distribution facility. "We are the largest metropolitan area that is closest to the geographic center of the United States as well as the population center of the United States," says James Alexander, vice president, global client solutions, for the St. Louis Regional Chamber of Commerce. "We are also within 600 miles of about half of the manufacturing plants in the U.S.; that's a little more than a day's truck drive."
As further evidence of St. Louis' central location, consider this: The city is the westernmost terminus of the major Eastern railroads (CSX and Norfolk Southern), and the easternmost terminus of the major Western railroads (BNSF and UP).
If location is the number one reason why companies choose the St. Louis area for their DCs, the city's transportation infrastructure is second. In addition to the four railroads named above, St. Louis is served by the Kansas City Southern and Canadian National, making it the third-largest rail center in the country.
St. Louis is also the nation's third-largest inland port. Alexander notes that it's not only the northernmost "ice free" port on the Mississippi River, but that it also offers some advantages from a barge operator's point of view. "There are no locks and dams between St. Louis and New Orleans, so the barge operators can build very large tows," he explains. "Anywhere north or west of here, you have to deal with locks and dams, so the size of your tows is restricted."
On top of that, the city is bisected by four major interstate highways (I-55, I-44, I-70, and I-64) and is served by five regional airports (although three of them deal mainly in personal and corporate aircraft).
St. Louis also benefits from competitive labor costs. Approximately 80,000 people in the area are employed in transportation or material movement jobs, and the median hourly wage is $13.83, compared with the national median of $14.06. "So we've got a very skilled workforce, and we also have a workforce that is very competitive in terms of wages," says Alexander.
Currently, there are roughly 5,400 warehouses and DCs located in the St. Louis region, totaling 245 million square feet. Companies that operate facilities in the area include Unilever, Hershey's, Procter & Gamble, Anheuser Busch, Graybar, and Walgreens.
WILL COUNTY, ILL.
When you think of ports, Will County, Ill., probably is not the first place that pops to mind. But the county, located 40 miles southwest of downtown Chicago, is home to the nation's largest inland port, which is also the third-busiest port in the United States, according to Brian McKiernan, senior vice president of CenterPoint Properties, which manages the sites.
The inland port contains two large intermodal facilities: the Union Pacific Joliet Intermodal Terminal in Joliet, Ill., and BNSF Logistics Park-Chicago in Elwood, Ill. The two facilities are minutes away from I-80, which runs from San Francisco to the New York metropolitan area, and 1-55, which runs from Louisiana to Chicago.
Opened in 2003 (Elwood) and 2010 (Joliet), the two intermodal centers boast state-of-the-art facilities and roads. The intermodal center currently has approximately 17 million square feet of warehousing space and serves companies such as Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Georgia Pacific, Honda, and McKesson.
As for what makes Will County an appealing location for warehouses and DCs, it's all about efficiency. According to McKiernan, it takes 70 to 100 hours for freight to travel from the West Coast to rail facilities in Joliet and Elwood, Ill., on the western edge of Chicago. It takes another 70 to 100 hours for freight to travel by rail from Joliet or Elwood to the eastern edge of Chicago, he says.
By locating their distribution facilities at the intermodal center, which is just a quarter mile from the rail yard, companies can bypass the congestion in Chicago. Plus, the yard is designed for easy access, according to McKiernan. "You don't have any residential development off of the rail yard," he says, "so you are able to get through the yard and out on the highways as efficiently as possible."
Coming up: In the May issue, DC VELOCITY will look at emerging logistics hubs in the U.S. Southeast.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."