USPS, regional parcel carrier OnTrac to launch "last-mile" delivery service in late summer
Offering to challenge big three parcel carriers in the West; news comes as USPS announces plans to keep Saturday delivery for parcels but not for first-class mail.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Western regional parcel carrier OnTracwill launch a delivery
service later this year in conjunction with the U.S. Postal Service, a move that will give retailers a
fourth major package delivery option in a territory of 60 million buyers.
The service, which hasn't been formally named, is slated to begin in late August or early to mid-September,
according to Mark Magill, director of business development for Phoenix-based OnTrac. The company has hired Andy
Webber—who had been vice president of operations for DHL Global Mail, a unit of DHL—to head operations
for the new venture.
OnTrac has been granted authority by USPS to begin the service and will spend the next few months putting
the necessary equipment and systems in place to launch in late summer, according to Magill.
OnTrac currently serves seven Western states, and its network goes as far east as Colorado. An eighth state,
Idaho, comes online March 4. Most notable is OnTrac's presence in California, the nation's most populous state,
where it serves every ZIP code. OnTrac serves the major metro areas in the other states.
The initiative comes as USPS announced today it plans to end Saturday deliveries of first-class mail starting
the week of Aug. 5, a move that it will save $2 billion a year. However, in a change of plans, USPS said it would
maintain Saturday deliveries of packages, an acknowledgment of parcel's growing relevance to the quasi-government
agency's future. Parcel's growth is being driven in large part due to the explosion in e-commerce transactions.
"Over the past several years, the Postal Service has advocated shifting to a five-day delivery schedule for mail
and packages," Postmaster General Patrick R. Donahoe said today in announcing the change. "However, recent strong growth
in package delivery (14-percent volume increase since 2010) and projections of continued strong package growth throughout
the coming decade led to the revised approach to maintain package delivery six days per week."
An announcement to end Saturday first-class mail deliveries was long expected, especially as USPS continues to lose
volumes to electronic diversion, a trend that is likely secular in nature. However, the timing caught some by surprise,
especially since Donahoe made no mention of it when he spoke late last week before the Parcel Shippers Association. There
may also be Congressional backlash as politicians concerned about constituent reaction may argue that such a cutback be
addressed through legislation and not through administrative fiat.
The OnTrac-USPS service will be patterned after the relationships USPS has developed over the past few years with the
three major parcel carriers: FedEx Corp., UPS Inc. and, to a lesser extent, DHL Express. Under the service, known within
USPS as "Parcel Select," the carriers pick up and aggregate
large volumes of parcels from retailers and e-tailers, induct the parcels deep into the USPS distribution network, and have
the Post Office make the "last-mile" deliveries, mostly to residential destinations. By law, USPS must deliver to every
address in the United States.
For the past four years, OnTrac has partnered with USPS on a last-mile offering but has only made the service available
to parcel consolidators, firms that aggregate shipments for retailers and rely on OnTrac's intraregional distribution network
because they don't have their own. The new service signals a major change because OnTrac can now pursue large retailers for
their traffic and, in many cases, bypass the consolidators.
"We want to play in the big leagues," Magill told DC Velocity in an interview yesterday.
In mid-October, the company opened a 400,000-square-foot distribution center (DC) in Commerce, Calif., just east of
Los Angeles. The opening of the DC essentially served as the catalyst for the new service because OnTrac can now offer
larger retailers shipping across the West an integrated pick-up, distribution, and delivery solution in concert with USPS,
according to Magill.
OnTrac's relatively limited coverage area enables it to make next-day ground deliveries at distances of up to 500 miles,
something the larger carriers cannot or will not do. Yet the company's network, which stretches from Washington State in the
northwest to Arizona in the southwest, is expansive enough to allow it to provide next-day deliveries that encompass a NAFTA
(North America Free Trade Agreement)-like geography.
By leveraging its territorial advantage, OnTrac's service will undercut the big carriers on both price and time-in-transit,
according to Magill. For example, OnTrac offers next-day ground deliveries from Los Angeles and San Francisco, a 400-mile trek,
at a tariff charge of about $6.00. UPS and FedEx do not offer next-day ground deliveries in that lane, so a next-day delivery
would have to move by air at a much higher price, Magill said.
The same type of differential would extend into the USPS venture, Magill said. All three delivery companies would offer
second-day deliveries to the final destinations, but OnTrac's economies of scale would enable it to price its service well
below its larger rivals, he said.
Regional carrier executives have said their operating models are well suited to support e-commerce growth as retailers
refine their delivery offerings and look to move merchandise in compressed time windows over shorter distances but without
paying for expensive air services.
The USPS' "Parcel Select" service has been priced inexpensively relative to the carriers' own closed-loop services,
in part because of the low rates offered by USPS for its portion of the delivery. Online retailers find the model
particularly attractive because the cheap rates give them the flexibility to offer dramatically discounted, or in
many cases, free shipping to their customers.
USPS is taking advantage of the model's success. Effective Jan. 27, it increased Parcel Select rates by between
7 and 10 percent. "[This move] raises the floor on [busness-to-consumer] pricing quite significantly, in our view,"
said Douglas O. Kahl, executive consultant at transport and logistics consultancy TranzAct Technologies Inc., based
in Elmhurst Ill.
For the carriers, the sizable volume increases under the service apparently are sufficient enough to absorb the low yields,
or revenue per package, generated by each shipment. The revenue per package for FedEx's service, known as "SmartPost," is $1.81,
according to TranzAct data culled from FedEx reports. By contrast, FedEx generates $8.77 in revenue for the typical shipment
moving on its "FedEx Ground" ground-parcel service, and between $11.65 and $22.31 in revenue for the average shipment moving
on its air and international delivery product known as "FedEx Express," the consultancy said.
In its fiscal 2013 second quarter, which ended Nov. 30, FedEx said SmartPost's average daily volume increased 17 percent
year-over-year, primarily due to the growth in e-commerce. Net revenue per package increased by two percent due to a change
in service mix and to rate increases, both of which were partially offset by higher postage rates.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
DAT Freight & Analytics has acquired Trucker Tools, calling the deal a strategic move designed to combine Trucker Tools' approach to load tracking and carrier sourcing with DAT’s experience providing freight solutions.
Beaverton, Oregon-based DAT operates what it calls the largest truckload freight marketplace and truckload freight data analytics service in North America. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but DAT is a business unit of the publicly traded, Fortune 1000-company Roper Technologies.
Following the deal, DAT said that brokers will continue to get load visibility and capacity tools for every load they manage, but now with greater resources for an enhanced suite of broker tools. And in turn, carriers will get the same lifestyle features as before—like weigh scales and fuel optimizers—but will also gain access to one of the largest networks of loads, making it easier for carriers to find the loads they want.
Trucker Tools CEO Kary Jablonski praised the deal, saying the firms are aligned in their goals to simplify and enhance the lives of brokers and carriers. “Through our strategic partnership with DAT, we are amplifying this mission on a greater scale, delivering enhanced solutions and transformative insights to our customers. This collaboration unlocks opportunities for speed, efficiency, and innovation for the freight industry. We are thrilled to align with DAT to advance their vision of eliminating uncertainty in the freight industry,” Jablonski said.