Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
If you think about it, choosing the right type of lift truck is not very different from seeking the perfect mate. In both cases, reliability and trustworthiness are prized characteristics. And—fairy tales about peasants marrying royalty aside—the ability to "fit in" and operate effectively in a particular environment is a major consideration.
With so many classes and categories of lift trucks on the market, though, matching the right equipment to an application can be a challenge. So, will you need Yenta, the matchmaker in "Fiddler on the Roof," to help you find "the one"? Probably not. But before you can begin to screen candidates, you'll have to do plenty of research. Here are some guidelines for gathering that information, analyzing it, and making a decision.
FIRST, GET THE FACTS
The most basic information required includes a profile of what you're moving: what kinds of products, packages, and containers; their weights, heights, lengths, and widths; whether they're palletized; whether they require special handling; and how many of each type of item is handled per shift. You'll also need basic vehicle data like actual run times, usage in hours, maintenance records, and energy consumption (battery amps or volume of gas), says Keith Allmandinger, senior marketing manager at Komatsu Forklift U.S.A.
Next, document the warehouse environment, says Bill Pfleger, president of Yale Distribution, a subsidiary of NACCO Materials Handling Group. Floor conditions, inclines or ramps, doorways, temperature, moisture, and so forth all affect the lift choice, he notes. He also advises conducting a power study to determine whether internal combustion or electric power is most suitable for the environment.
Assess the density and type of storage—rack type, configuration, and height; the type and velocity of products stored in them; and aisle widths, intersections, travel paths, and other features that affect vehicle travel. Then comes product velocity, or throughput: how many units must be moved per hour or shift.
Track exactly what your lift trucks do, and where and how they do it. "Think in terms of the product lifecycle and movement for a particular customer," recommends Greg Mason, warehouse product consultant, Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (MCFA). That might include how and where a particular product will be received, put away, and then picked and shipped, he says.
As for where to find all this diverse data, managers can tap a variety of sources. A warehouse management system (WMS) can provide insight into throughput, including pallets per hour and the velocity of individual stock-keeping units (SKUs). Hour meters can determine how much traveling and lifting trucks are doing, data loggers attached to batteries can measure energy usage, and fleet management software can generate detailed performance reports for individual vehicles and operators as well as for different classes of trucks.
But it would be a mistake to rely entirely on technology. You simply can't make an informed decision without site surveys or assessments by technically knowledgeable observers, including the forklift dealer's representative and someone from your own team—"the site survey guy who knows the lift truck and the guy with the need," as Clark Simpson, product marketing engineer for Clark Material Handling Co., puts it.
Indeed, local dealers—and for large projects, a material handling consulting engineer—should be involved in site surveys. They're trained to conduct and interpret the results of those assessments, and they can apply what they've learned from previous projects to your situation. You'll also need input from your warehouse operations team, and speaking with lift truck operators is critical. "They're the ones who live and breathe this, and they typically have very good insight into productivity levels," Mason says.
Site assessments, including demographic and time-study application surveys, are essential because they provide an accurate picture of what's actually happening on the warehouse floor—not just what the numbers **ital{say} is happening. For instance, a software-generated report might indicate that a lift truck has a high utilization rate, says Bill Pedriana, director of sales for Big Joe Forklifts. But what it might not show is that the operator is using the vehicle for personal transportation. That kind of qualitative information, obtainable only through direct observation, can reveal opportunities to make big gains in efficiency.
How much information should you gather? The most important thing is to cover not just normal periods but also your least busy and your peak times, says Susan Comfort, product manager, narrow-aisle products marketing for The Raymond Corp. But don't limit yourself to thinking about the past, she cautions. "You should also anticipate future needs. For example, if your business changes, then its peak demand might also change."
Pedriana agrees that it's valuable to look at historical data but adds a caveat: Business practices are changing so quickly, he says, that if you go too far back, you may not capture what's actually happening today. He further suggests regular communication with upper management about strategic plans—information that could affect DC operations but often isn't shared until late in the game. "Too often, higher-ups will start some strategic initiative, and they assume the engineers and the warehouse managers will come up with a solution to make it work," he says. "If they had known about it in advance, they could have planned for it." (For more about choosing lift trucks for a planned facility, see sidebar.)
WHAT DO THE DATA TELL YOU?
Once the data are in hand, it's time to evaluate the information. Who should be involved? "A misapplied piece of equipment can be costly in many ways, and the key to making the right decision is having the team members involved in the process who have a vested interest in the equipment's productivity," Pfleger says.
That could include the plant or warehouse manager, shift supervisors, the maintenance manager, service technicians, the safety manager, and the lift truck operators who will be performing the activities in question. In addition, says Komatsu's Allmandinger, the company controller and "green" project managers increasingly are involved. Finally, the consulting engineer and prospective lift truck suppliers can provide insight into what the data mean and how they translate into a truck choice.
Why so many players? Because each one will have a different focus, explains Andy Smith, senior marketing product manager at Crown Equipment Corp. Shift supervisors will focus on inefficiencies, while warehouse managers might think about business cycles; they may also be aware of a contract that's about to expire or a new one that could influence the type of truck required. Technicians, fleet managers, and forklift operators will know what detracts from the current fleet's performance. The local forklift provider can help to consolidate and prioritize their concerns, and then put together a proposal based on that input, he explains.
The team will consider what tasks (for instance, picking, putaway, and loading/unloading trailers) and activities (such as lifting and horizontal travel) the lift trucks are currently doing, what they **ital{should} be doing, and what will be expected of them in the future. They will also examine the physical demands and constraints on trucks and operators, plus their efficiency and cost performance. The aim is to uncover inefficiencies, safety issues, and excessive costs—all signs of a possible mismatch between a truck and a particular application, or that the truck you plan to buy won't be a good fit. Just a few examples of what the analysis might turn up:
Trucks that move into a rack should be lifting 25 percent of the time, says Comfort. If they're being used more for horizontal transport, then it could be more cost-effective and efficient to position those trucks near the racks and use a different type of vehicle to shuttle loads to and from the racks.
Lift trucks that may be at home elsewhere in the warehouse may be totally inappropriate for loading and unloading trailers. A standard two-rail mast that's designed to provide maximum visibility will puncture the roof of the trailer before the load reaches the necessary height for travel and must not be used for loading and unloading, Simpson explains. Designs that allow for simultaneous movement of load and rails have a similar problem, he says.
It sounds simple: For low lifts and horizontal transport, a sit-down counterbalanced truck is the obvious choice; if you have to go higher, then some type of reach truck usually is best. But even when the former is the case, if the aisle length and width and the turning space at intersections are too tight for the bigger forklift to maneuver efficiently, it will slow throughput and create a safety hazard. "You have to understand all of the tradeoffs, such as aisle size versus productivity," Smith says.
If workers have to wait for a forklift driver to pick up assembled pallets and deliver them to another location nearby, you're wasting time and money while creating a safety hazard, says Pedriana of Big Joe. It might be better to substitute a walkie stacker: Workers can use the smaller vehicle as a lift table and then deliver the finished pallet themselves to the next location, rather than have an operator drive heavy equipment where people are working.
ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL
All of the experts consulted for this article have seen warehouses try to skimp on costs by using one type of truck for as many applications as they can. That might work for a small facility that performs just a few activities for a limited set of items, Comfort says. But in most cases, it doesn't pay to go that route.
For one thing, if a particular type of lift truck doesn't have the correct rated capacity and/or the correct attachments for every type of load it will carry, the lift truck may become unstable and tip over, resulting in injury or even death to the driver and bystanders, says Simpson. Furthermore, treating a lift truck as a jack-of-all-trades could place stresses on the lift truck that it wasn't designed to handle, thereby shortening its life, he says.
The more variety, volume, and speed required, the more important specialized lift trucks become in order to avoid compromising cost, space utilization, and efficiency, Mason says. A high-throughput facility, for example, could benefit from using one type of lift truck for loading and unloading trucks, another for high-level order picking, and another for high-level full-pallet putaway. It could even use different trucks in the same area. For example, low-level picking could be done with inexpensive end-rider pallet trucks, while the more expensive counterbalanced forklifts handle second- or third-level picking.
Ultimately, the objective is to select the best truck for the application in terms of safety, efficiency, and total cost of ownership. Making the right choice depends on understanding not only what your lift trucks are doing now, but also what you **ital{want} them to do. "You have to know your warehouse operations, your operational metrics, and what spells success for you," says Smith.
That's why it helps to think of a lift truck as part of an overall business process, such as fulfillment, Pedriana says. The more efficient that process is, the more profitable it will be. If you scrutinize each of the tasks required to carry out that process and then apply differentiated equipment to optimize them, he says, the lift trucks you choose will be potential profit generators, not just an expense.
Made for each other
Usually lift truck buyers are evaluating equipment for an existing warehouse or DC. But what about when they're spec'ing for a facility that hasn't been built yet? That can be a golden opportunity to ensure that the facility and the trucks are truly made for each other, says Kenro Okamoto, a product support specialist at Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.
You might think warehouse layout designers would always consider equipment capabilities and limitations in their plans, but that's not the case, Okamoto says. For example, many companies try to squeeze as much racking with as much height as possible into a new building, yet that may make it impossible for forklift operators to efficiently handle the volume and type of products required, he says.
"I've seen warehouse designs that did not allow for safe maneuvering," Okamoto recounts. "You need enough space between aisles that trucks can turn in either direction, and you have to consider that operators will need to back up, move forward, pick up or put away product, and even make reverse turns in certain areas." For that reason, the layout designer may have to reduce the number of aisles.
A process called "application engineering" can prevent such problems by matching the measurements for the planned facility and material handling equipment with the right type of lift trucks to achieve maximum efficiency. This type of analysis also prevents costly conflicts. Okamoto cites the example of a proposed design with a low door height and high racking—a combination that could lead to problems if it turned out there were no lift trucks that could collapse low enough for the planned doorways and still reach high enough in the racks. An engineering analysis, however, would likely uncover the conflict early enough in the process to allow the building designer to tweak the plans.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
The Florida logistics technology startup OneRail has raised $42 million in venture backing to lift the fulfillment software company its next level of growth, the company said today.
The “series C” round was led by Los Angeles-based Aliment Capital, with additional participation from new investors eGateway Capital and Florida Opportunity Fund, as well as current investors Arsenal Growth Equity, Piva Capital, Bullpen Capital, Las Olas Venture Capital, Chicago Ventures, Gaingels and Mana Ventures. According to OneRail, the funding comes amidst a challenging funding environment where venture capital funding in the logistics sector has seen a 90% decline over the past two years.
The latest infusion follows the firm’s $33 million Series B round in 2022, and its move earlier in 2024 to acquire the Vancouver, Canada-based company Orderbot, a provider of enterprise inventory and distributed order management (DOM) software.
Orlando-based OneRail says its omnichannel fulfillment solution pairs its OmniPoint cloud software with a logistics as a service platform and a real-time, connected network of 12 million drivers. The firm says that its OmniPointsoftware automates fulfillment orchestration and last mile logistics, intelligently selecting the right place to fulfill inventory from, the right shipping mode, and the right carrier to optimize every order.
“This new funding round enables us to deepen our decision logic upstream in the order process to help solve some of the acute challenges facing retailers and wholesalers, such as order sourcing logic defaulting to closest store to customer to fulfill inventory from, which leads to split orders, out-of-stocks, or worse, cancelled orders,” OneRail Founder and CEO Bill Catania said in a release. “OneRail has revolutionized that process with a dynamic fulfillment solution that quickly finds available inventory in full, from an array of stores or warehouses within a localized radius of the customer, to meet the delivery promise, which ultimately transforms the end-customer experience.”
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.