Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
UPS Inc.'s proposed $6.8 billion buy-out of Dutch express delivery firm TNT Express may be experiencing more than just a passing squall.
On Friday, Atlanta-based UPS said it received a "statement of objections" from the European Commission (EC), the executive body of the European Union, to the proposed purchase of TNT Express, based in Hoofddorf.
In a statement released Friday, UPS said the document—the contents of which have been kept confidential—"addresses the competitive effects of the intended merger on Europe's international express market."
UPS called the document a routine part of the 27-member EC's regulatory review process and said that both companies are expected to respond to regulators' concerns within the next couple of weeks.
Peggy Gardner, a UPS spokeswoman, said the EC statement "helps to further focus the areas of discussion moving forward" and that it doesn't "prejudge the outcome."
Still the statement of objections has forced UPS to extend the deadline to complete the transaction for the second time since both companies formally agreed to the deal on March 19. The initial deadline was Aug. 31, which was then pushed back to Nov. 9 due to competitive concerns raised in Europe. On Friday, UPS said the deadline has now been extended to early 2013. Initially, UPS had not anticipated any regulatory static over the deal.
UPS said it remains committed to the acquisition. The issue is likely to be raised tomorrow during UPS' scheduled analyst call to discuss its third-quarter results. Given the hush-hush climate surrounding the deal, however, it is likely executives will provide no new information.
The main sticking point could be a disagreement over the size of the European parcel market. That wouldn't be surprising, since analysts have proffered conflicting market share estimates since the transaction was announced in February. One estimate that appears to stick was made by New York-based investment firm Wolfe Trahan & Co., which pegged TNT Express as the market leader with 18 percent, followed by DHL Express with 16 percent, UPS with 14 percent, and FedEx Corp. with 4 percent.
The EC's review process comes as the Euro-zone grapples with a major financial crisis mostly afflicting its southern region. Given the current turbulence, David G. Ross, transport analyst at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., surmised that the EC might be loath to approve any transaction that eliminates a competitor from the market. Ross added, however, that the body rarely vetoes deals like this one.
He did speculate that as a condition of approving the deal, the EC might require a divestiture of assets in countries where the two firms have significant market concentration. He would not comment on which countries would be ripe for divestiture.
UPS said in its statement that parcel competition in Europe is already brisk because it involves "multiple players who offer similar services." UPS said the combined entity would actually enhance the continent's competitive landscape by creating a "more efficient logistics market."
TNT Express' strength is its intra-European business, though it also serves the intra-China, Southeast Asian, and Brazilian markets. Its U.S. operations are confined to connecting the country to international markets. And even there, the company's footprint is almost nonexistent.
Ross, for one, is not keen on the deal, saying that beyond the cost of the purchase, the subsequent integration would be expensive and more difficult to execute than UPS assumes. UPS already has a significant and profitable presence in Europe, and the company would be better off growing its Asian and Brazilian operations in-house instead of buying TNT Express' "second-rate operations" in those markets, he said.
Keep away from FedEx?
Many of those following the deal have speculated that UPS' move on TNT Express was partly motivated by a desire to keep it out of FedEx's hands and block its rival from establishing a major foothold in Europe via a major acquisition.
FedEx, for its part, has expressed no interest in a counter-offer, saying it could grow nicely in Europe through organic expansion and smaller, more targeted acquisitions known in the trade as "tuck-ins."
The other major player in the market, DHL, has been silent on its intentions so far. Experts say it is doubtful DHL will make a bid for TNT Express for fear of raising the ire of European antitrust regulators. However, DHL and its owner, German postal and logistics giant Deutsche Post, wield significant influence in Brussels. Both could use their combined heft to either get the deal blocked or force conditions on UPS that could dilute the impact of controlling more than 30 percent of the intra-European parcel market.
DHL could have other, more personal motivations to block a UPS-TNT Express deal. In 2003, UPS opposed DHL's proposed acquisition of Airborne Express, then the third-largest U.S. parcel carrier. The transaction was eventually approved. According to those close to the transaction, UPS' opposition still rankles, even though in retrospect DHL would have been better off walking away as the acquisition set the stage for six years of multi-billion dollar losses that eventually led DHL to abandon the domestic U.S. market.
If the current deal is blocked, it would be hard to fathom TNT Express' staying independent for long as its competitiveness has faltered in recent years. When the company was split off from the Dutch postal system in May 2011, rumors swirled that it was put on a standalone basis to prep it for sale. By mid-2011, TNT Express' stock had plunged to multi-year lows as it sustained large losses due to the contraction in Europe and operating costs that spiraled out of control.
In addition, Marie-Christine Lombard, who was CEO at the time the deal was announced, suddenly resigned at the end of September to pursue interests outside the industry. The timing of her decision was not warmly received by the company's supervisory board. "It is regrettable that Marie-Christine has decided to leave TNT Express now," said Antony Burgmans, its chairman, at the time her resignation was announced.
These events seem to have affected the company's internal culture as well. A parcel industry executive who spoke on condition of anonymity said inertia has set in as TNT Express waits to be sold. In the meantime, the company risks becoming—if it already hasn't--the fourth player in a three-chair European parcel game.
"I think TNT had been on cruise control for a long time just waiting to be sold to somebody, and therefore has lost vision and mission and internal leadership," the executive said. "The senior guys just want their [compensation] packages so they can get on with life."
“The past year has been unprecedented, with extreme weather events, heightened geopolitical tension and cybercrime destabilizing supply chains throughout the world. Navigating this year’s looming risks to build a secure supply network has never been more critical,” Corey Rhodes, CEO of Everstream Analytics, said in the firm’s “2025 Annual Risk Report.”
“While some risks are unavoidable, early notice and swift action through a combination of planning, deep monitoring, and mitigation can save inventory and lives in 2025,” Rhodes said.
In its report, Everstream ranked the five categories by a “risk score metric” to help global supply chain leaders prioritize planning and mitigation efforts for coping with them. They include:
Drowning in Climate Change – 90% Risk Score. Driven by shifting climate patterns and record-high temperatures, extreme weather events are a dominant risk to the supply chain due to concerns such as flooding and elevated ocean temperatures.
Geopolitical Instability with Increased Tariff Risk – 80% Risk Score. These threats could disrupt trade networks and impact economies worldwide, including logistics, transportation, and manufacturing industries. The following major geopolitical events are likely to impact global trade: Red Sea disruptions, Russia-Ukraine conflict, Taiwan trade risks, Middle East tensions, South China Sea disputes, and proposed tariff increases.
More Backdoors for Cybercrime – 75% Risk Score. Supply chain leaders face escalating cybersecurity risks in 2025, driven by the growing reliance on AI and cloud computing within supply chains, the proliferation of IoT-connected devices, vulnerabilities in sub-tier supply chains, and a disproportionate impact on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and the electronics industry.
Rare Metals and Minerals on Lockdown – 65% Risk Score. Between rising regulations, new tariffs, and long-term or exclusive contracts, rare minerals and metals will be harder than ever, and more expensive, to obtain.
Crackdown on Forced Labor – 60% Risk Score. A growing crackdown on forced labor across industries will increase pressure on companies who are facing scrutiny to manage and eliminate suppliers violating human rights. Anticipated risks in 2025 include a push for alternative suppliers, a cascade of legislation to address lax forced labor issues, challenges for agri-food products such as palm oil and vanilla.
That number is low compared to widespread unemployment in the transportation sector which reached its highest level during the COVID-19 pandemic at 15.7% in both May 2020 and July 2020. But it is slightly above the most recent pre-pandemic rate for the sector, which was 2.8% in December 2019, the BTS said.
For broader context, the nation’s overall unemployment rate for all sectors rose slightly in December, increasing 0.3 percentage points from December 2023 to 3.8%.
On a seasonally adjusted basis, employment in the transportation and warehousing sector rose to 6,630,200 people in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 1.7% from December 2023. Employment in transportation and warehousing grew 15.1% in December 2024 from the pre-pandemic December 2019 level of 5,760,300 people.
The largest portion of those workers was in warehousing and storage, followed by truck transportation, according to a breakout of the total figures into separate modes (seasonally adjusted):
Warehousing and storage rose to 1,770,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 0.2% from December 2023.
Truck transportation fell to 1,545,900 in December 2024 — down 0.1% from the previous month and down 0.4% from December 2023.
Air transportation rose to 578,000 in December 2024 — up 0.4% from the previous month and up 1.4% from December 2023.
Transit and ground passenger transportation rose to 456,000 in December 2024 — up 0.3% from the previous month and up 5.7% from December 2023.
Rail transportation remained virtually unchanged in December 2024 at 150,300 from the previous month but down 1.8% from December 2023.
Water transportation rose to 74,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 4.8% from December 2023.
Pipeline transportation rose to 55,000 in December 2024 — up 0.5% from the previous month and up 6.2% from December 2023.
Parcel carrier and logistics provider UPS Inc. has acquired the German company Frigo-Trans and its sister company BPL, which provide complex healthcare logistics solutions across Europe, the Atlanta-based firm said this week.
According to UPS, the move extends its UPS Healthcare division’s ability to offer end-to-end capabilities for its customers, who increasingly need temperature-controlled and time-critical logistics solutions globally.
UPS Healthcare has 17 million square feet of cGMP and GDP-compliant healthcare distribution space globally, supporting services such as inventory management, cold chain packaging and shipping, storage and fulfillment of medical devices, and lab and clinical trial logistics.
More specifically, UPS Healthcare said that the acquisitions align with its broader mission to provide end-to-end logistics for temperature-sensitive healthcare products, including biologics, specialty pharmaceuticals, and personalized medicine. With 80% of pharmaceutical products in Europe requiring temperature-controlled transportation, investments like these ensure UPS Healthcare remains at the forefront of innovation in the $82 billion complex healthcare logistics market, the company said.
Additionally, Frigo-Trans' presence in Germany—the world's fourth-largest healthcare manufacturing market—strengthens UPS's foothold and enhances its support for critical intra-Germany operations. Frigo-Trans’ network includes temperature-controlled warehousing ranging from cryopreservation (-196°C) to ambient (+15° to +25°C) as well as Pan-European cold chain transportation. And BPL provides logistics solutions including time-critical freight forwarding capabilities.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed. But it fits into UPS' long term strategy to double its healthcare revenue from $10 billion in 2023 to $20 billion by 2026. To get there, it has also made previous acquisitions of companies like Bomi and MNX. And UPS recently expanded its temperature-controlled fleet in France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Hungary.
"Healthcare customers increasingly demand precision, reliability, and adaptability—qualities that are critical for the future of biologics and personalized medicine. The Frigo-Trans and BPL acquisitions allow us to offer unmatched service across Europe, making logistics a competitive advantage for our pharma partners," says John Bolla, President, UPS Healthcare.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.