Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It's a typically oppressive mid-September afternoon in central Florida when Michael J. DelBovo straps
in behind the wheel of a demonstration tractor. DelBovo releases the handbrake, pushes the drive button,
and fires up his company's, and perhaps his industry's, future.
DelBovo, 49, is president of Saddle Creek Transportation, the transport arm of Lakeland, Fla.-based Saddle Creek
Logistics Services, a third-party logistics provider (3PL) with fingers in the asset- and non-asset-based transport,
warehousing, packaging, and fulfillment pies. Like most 3PLs, Saddle Creek has benefited from the secular trend of
businesses offloading more of their supply chain functions to outside specialists; since 1993, its revenues have
compounded annually by 10 percent, a growth rate the company sees continuing.
With about $260 million in annual revenue, privately held Saddle Creek flies under the radar
of bigger 3PLs. But there is one area where the company has gone where no one else yet has: a
make-or-break commitment to a natural gas-powered truck fleet.
In January, Saddle Creek rolled out 40 trucks powered by compressed natural gas (CNG). It has now
launched the second phase, with plans to bring 62 more CNG-powered trucks online by year's end. It has
invested about $17 million in the first 102 tractors alone.
In all, Saddle Creek operates 320 rigs, of which 220 of are company-owned and the rest controlled by owner-operators. It
expects to add 80 company-owned rigs by the end of next year, while keeping the owner-operated segment at 100. By the end of
2014, all of Saddle Creek's 300 company-owned rigs are expected to be powered by natural gas.
"No for-hire carrier has taken it as far as we have," DelBovo said in an interview at the company's Lakeland headquarters.
REASONS TO CONVERT
Saddle Creek cited a myriad of reasons for the conversion. CNG is cleaner-burning than diesel fuel and, as a
result, is more environmentally friendly. It's also a safer energy source. If a tank ruptures or is punctured,
the gas doesn't spill or ignite. It simply dissipates into the atmosphere.
Using CNG has also made Saddle Creek more appealing to some potential customers, according to the company. More shippers
are becoming environmentally aware, even to the point of including environmental requirements in requests for proposals.
Saddle Creek executives say the company's commitment to natural gas has given it an edge in contract bids—all other
capabilities with rivals being equal. "It's cracked open doors," said Brad M. Rolland, director of business development.
But the core factor—especially in a thin-margin industry where fuel has replaced labor as the biggest expense—is
economics. It costs $2.50 a gallon for Saddle Creek to fill up with CNG. Similarly the related liquefied natural gas (LNG) costs
about $2.80 a gallon. (LNG is created when the gas is cooled down in stages until liquefied and is then stored for shipping.) The
price of both fuels is pegged to natural gas futures prices, which as of mid-September traded at about $2.77 per million British
thermal units (BTU), according to mid-September data from the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA).
By contrast, the average cost of a gallon of diesel fuel stood at more than $4.08 a gallon, according to EIA data through Sept.
24. Since July 2, the start of the third calendar quarter, diesel prices have risen about 46 cents a gallon.
DelBovo calculates that at current diesel prices, it costs about $76,000 annually to fill up each tractor-trailer with diesel
fuel. By running on natural gas instead, DelBovo estimates that, after all costs are included, Saddle Creek saves the equivalent
of 20 cents a mile. This savings becomes significant when you consider that the company's rigs log, on average, about 110,000
miles a year.
THE INFRASTRUCTURE HURDLE
In addition to the cost to convert the rigs, Saddle Creek spent $3 million to erect a natural gas compression and fueling
facility on its Lakeland campus. The facility was built and is maintained by Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a Seal Beach,
Calif.-based natural gas provider for transportation.
Saddle Creek also uses a fueling depot at a public facility at Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, and it has access,
as do others, to Clean Energy's fueling network.
All of Saddle Creek's CNG fleet operate in the Southeast so drivers can have access to the Lakeland or Atlanta fueling depots.
The dynamics of the company's current fueling infrastructure illustrate the biggest hurdle for CNG use: the absence in large
swaths of the country of the pipelines required to move natural gas in its compressed form to fixed locations.
Saddle Creek has a ready supply of CNG because it has a pipeline that runs on its property. But most truck fleets aren't so
lucky. To encourage a faster conversion to natural gas, DelBovo said the federal government could create incentives to support
the build out of an extensive pipeline transmission network. Other than that, he believes the private sector is capable of
funding the entire conversion effort.
A LEAP OF FAITH
For Saddle Creek, which doesn't have shallow pockets but doesn't have a limitless supply of funds either, the
three-year project was a big and uncertain leap. There were questions about the costs, the integrity of largely
untested equipment, and whether a return on investment (ROI) could be achieved within an acceptable timeframe.
The challenge was compounded by the lack of data needed to measure and model the project's cost-effectiveness. In the end,
the company estimated a four-year ROI, assuming its rigs run their normal miles and diesel prices hover around $4.15 a gallon.
Saddle Creek delayed purchases of new or replacement rigs for several years so it could watch the marketplace evolve. This also
gave it time to husband resources until it was ready to move forward.
Fortunately for the company, the project coincided with the onset of a drilling and exploration boom that would unlock massive
quantities of shale oil and gas from regions such as the Bakken Formation in the Northern Plains and the Marcellus Shale running
through five eastern states. Convinced natural gas supplies would become more plentiful and prices would soon begin to plummet,
Saddle Creek decided to act.
Because there was no operational roadmap, Saddle Creek devised its own. The company equipped its first 40 tractors with four
tanks, while the next 62 rigs will come with five. Though the tanks are expensive propositions to build and to fuel, Saddle Creek
reasoned that drivers could log more miles between fill-ups and wouldn't have to worry about refueling until they reached Atlanta
or Lakeland.
Each tank has a 20-year useful life, meaning that with a four-year ROI the subsequent 16 years would be considered gravy.
The company is hoping that increased demand will help drive down the future costs of tanks and compressors.
Its custom-designed equipment required Saddle Creek to work closely with vendors such as truck manufacturer Freightliner,
engine maker Cummins Inc., and Allison Transmission Inc. Together, they are all walking down the same unmarked path. "We are
all learning," DelBovo said.
For drivers who spent entire careers driving diesel-powered trucks, Saddle Creek created an extensive list of "Frequently
Asked Questions" that they could refer to while on the road. The company even developed its own fuel surcharge formula, pegged
to prices quoted at the Henry Hub, a natural gas distribution hub in Louisiana that intersects with 13 pipelines and lends its
name to the pricing point for natural gas futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Saddle Creek said its gas surcharges are lower than present-day diesel surcharges. With diesel at $4.00 a gallon, fuel
surcharges add about 25 percent to a shipper's base rate, according to estimates from consulting company IHS Global Insight.
In making its investment, the company has bet that natural gas prices will remain historically low and that diesel prices will
stay elevated. DelBovo isn't concerned that natural gas prices have historically been much higher than they are today. "That was
before fracking [short for the extraction technique known as hydraulic fracturing]," he said.
As for diesel, Saddle Creek's internal forecasts project that $4 a gallon has become the price floor. Prices may fall below
that threshold for short periods, but they will quickly go back up and eventually head higher, according to the company's
forecasts. "This is the new normal we're in," DelBovo said.
While Saddle Creek firmly believes in the path it's chosen, it recognizes that being a pioneer is a double-edged sword: It
could put you in the pole position for years, or it could simply get you shot at first.
"This isn't for the faint of heart," DelBovo admitted. "And it's not for the guy who doesn't understand his costs very well."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."