As business boomed, two specialty apparel companies found themselves struggling with order fulfillment. Linking up with the right 3PLs took care of that.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Third-party warehousing and distribution operations may be as old as the logistics industry, but no one would argue they've reached market saturation. In fact, the explosive growth of outsourcing has emerged as one of the most significant trends in logistics over the past two decades.
It appears the trend has not yet run its course. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of the shippers surveyed for The 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study said they planned to increase their use of third-party logistics service providers (3PLs). The study, conducted by Capgemini Consulting, Penn State University, and others, was released last October.
This probably comes as little surprise to most logistics professionals. The advantages of using third parties, or logistics service providers, are manifold, ranging from reducing brick-and-mortar assets and labor to more strategic issues around such things as serving specific geographies or taking advantage of expertise outside a firm's basic core competency.
The two stories that follow give a sense of why companies make the move to logistics service providers. The first is an account of how Cutter & Buck, a specialized West Coast apparel company, took advantage of a major 3PL's location to serve its Eastern corporate customer base. The second tells how Xterra, a small company that markets wetsuits to triathlon athletes, initially turned part of its distribution over to a third party, then eventually outsourced its entire fulfillment operation.
A WINNING STRATEGY
Cutter & Buck, a Seattle-based company best known for its golf-inspired apparel (it is a preferred provider for the PGA of America), is a major supplier of branded merchandise to corporations: think the golf jacket embroidered with a company logo offered at a corporate event.
Until 2010, the company fulfilled its nationwide orders from its 150,000-square-foot distribution center in Renton, Wash. But with much of its corporate clientele located in the eastern United States, the company had difficulty balancing the cost of fulfillment with customers' demands for expedited service.
The problem wasn't with merchandise ordered by its college and professional golfer customers, or with its direct-to-consumer and retail customers' orders; Cutter & Buck handles its own embroidery for those customers, and the company is satisfied that the system works well. The difficulty it faced was meeting the requirement for blanks (unembroidered goods) destined for the East Coast, where 80 percent of its corporate customers are located. Those customers, who manage the embroidery separately, demand fast shipping and low transportation costs.
The challenge lay with Cutter & Buck's biggest channel, the corporate channel, says Rick Martinez, the company's director of distribution. "The industry standard for the corporate channel," he says, "is that you will ship the same day and that either a third-party embroidery house or the customer will receive its shipment within two days and that freight cost will be anywhere from free to minimal."
Meeting the demand for two-day shipping out of Renton to the East Coast required using expedited freight and discounting the freight costs to customers, Martinez explains. "That was OK for the customer, but not necessarily what we were looking for," he says. The company faced a Hobson's choice: use ground shipping that was too slow to meet customer demands, or rely on faster, premium-priced services that ate heavily into Cutter & Buck's margins.
With its East Coast business poised for growth, Cutter & Buck decided it would be better off moving part of its distribution closer to the customers. The company initially considered opening its own fulfillment center on the East Coast but was deterred by the upfront investment required. Instead, it began searching for a suitable third-party logistics service provider.
Martinez says he had three priorities in choosing a 3PL. For starters, he wanted a partner that already had experience in apparel fulfillment. He also wanted a vendor that operated a multi-client facility, with the ability to leverage its workforce and equipment across several accounts to accommodate shifts in seasonal demand. "I had a background in working with a 3PL with multiple accounts and got to see how good that can be for both parties," he says.
But the biggest consideration of all was the provider's technical capabilities. Martinez says his number one requirement was that the third party be able to integrate easily with Cutter & Buck's existing warehouse management software (WMS), a system supplied by Manhattan Associates, as well as provide tracking for all shipments.
THE RIGHT STUFF
Martinez's search for the right partner eventually led him to the third-party logistics arm of parcel delivery giant UPS. UPS operates a fulfillment complex in Hebron, Ky., that looked to be a good fit with Cutter & Buck's requirements. Not only is it a multi-client facility specializing in apparel and footwear, but the Hebron operation would also be able to provide the coverage Cutter & Buck needed on the East Coast. Shipments from the Hebron campus, UPS says, can reach 70 percent of the U.S. population with two-day ground service.
On top of that, UPS would be able to accommodate Cutter & Buck's technology requirements. The company was able to assure the apparel maker that it could integrate the Manhattan WMS with UPS's WorldShip shipping application as well as provide the necessary tracking with its Quantum View Manage system.
Cutter & Buck signed an agreement with UPS in the spring of 2010, with the aim of having the Hebron facility begin receiving goods in November of that year and begin shipping in January 2011—a schedule UPS and Cutter & Buck were able to meet.
ABOVE-PAR SERVICE
Today, the golf apparel vendor is one of six customers using Hebron, with 40,000 square feet dedicated to its operation. Should it someday need room for expansion, that will be no problem, says UPS. The Hebron operation overall has three facilities totaling about 2.2 million square feet.
UPS downloads orders from Cutter & Buck hourly. Under terms of its agreement with the golf apparel maker, it must ship orders received as late as 5 p.m. Pacific the same day. On average, the Hebron facility processes about 250 shipments daily, comprising about 5,000 units.
By all accounts, the move was a winner. By shifting its East Coast distribution to the UPS campus in Hebron, Cutter & Buck is now able to reach all of its major corporate customers within two days, Martinez says. "That positions us to minimize freight cost and be much more responsive than we could be out of Renton," he says.
At present, the Hebron facility ships products for Cutter & Buck that do not require value-added services such as embroidery. That means nearly all of the shipments from Hebron go to third-party distributors who handle further embroidery and customization. Cutter & Buck continues to handle any orders that include embroidery from the Renton facility.
But that could change. Martinez says his company may consider adding embroidery services at the Hebron facility in the future, although it is not a high priority.
If it should decide to take that path, UPS will be ready. Alan Amling, marketing director for UPS's logistics and distribution business, says it is a service that UPS could take on. The facility already provides other customers with a variety of value added services, he says, including kitting, packaging, and preparation of store-ready displays.
STICK TO WHAT YOU KNOW
Like Cutter & Buck, Xterra Wetsuits is an apparel company that found itself struggling with distribution problems brought on by rapid growth. Established in 2001, Xterra Wetsuits markets wetsuits to triathlon athletes. Its name derives from its role as a licensee of Xterra, a separate company that sponsors off-road triathlons and trail runs both in the United States and around the world.
In the early years, the company managed its direct-to-consumer business from a small warehouse in the San Diego area. But as the company grew, fulfilling orders became more vexing. To illustrate the kind of growth Xterra has experienced, Brian Walters, a co-owner and former president of the company, notes that when the current owners acquired the company in 2007, sales ran to about 3,000 units a year. By 2010, sales had soared to 36,000 units across 200 stock-keeping units. "That growth was difficult to manage," he says. (Current volume is closer to 30,000 units after the company shed its least expensive and least profitable product line.)
Like Cutter & Buck, Xterra sought help from a third-party logistics service provider. "We wanted to be a wetsuit company, not a warehouse company," Walters says.
Xterra initially went with ProLog Logistics, a small San Diego-based third party, hiring the 3PL to handle part of its fulfillment operations. When Lakeland, Fla.-based Saddle Creek Corp., a larger 3PL, acquired ProLog in late 2010, Xterra stayed with Saddle Creek.
A SIMPLE SOLUTION
Walters credits Saddle Creek with helping solve one of its biggest distribution problems. In the early days, he says, Xterra took a kind of hybrid approach to fulfillment, handling some orders on its own, handing off others to ProLog, and turning over still others to a third party in the United Kingdom. "We confused efficiency with simplicity," Walters says. "We wanted to be close to everybody. But we quickly realized we did not have the systems to adequately manage inventory and warehousing."
Shortly after Saddle Creek acquired ProLog, Walters says, it began working with its new client to consolidate its operations. One of the first steps was choosing a location for national fulfillment. The problem was, while many of Xterra's clients are in California, most of its customers are on the East Coast. After some consideration, the two decided to consolidate operations at a Saddle Creek facility in Lexington, Ky., a location closer to most of Xterra's customers. "That's our center of gravity," says Walters.
Once the decision was made, the two parties swung into action. "Within a short time, we moved everything to Lexington and got everything in one place," Walters says. Today, all of Xterra's fulfillment is handled out of the Lexington facility.
The arrangement has provided Xterra with a number of advantages. For one thing, consolidating distribution operations at a single site allows Xterra to minimize inventory levels and the time it takes orders to reach customers. For another, it has led a reduction in shipping rates. Saddle Creek was able to use its market power to obtain better small parcel shipping rates than Xterra could do on its own, Walters reports.
In addition, packaging specialists at the 3PL helped develop a Tyvek bag for the wetsuits that took up substantially less space than the corrugated boxes formerly used, saving on both warehouse space and shipping costs. Walters says that a quarter of Xterra Wetsuits' storage costs were for storing the boxes it used previously.
"They made us think about packaging in a different way," Walters says. "There was a lot of cost in making, shipping, and storing the boxes." He adds that the bag can also be resealed, making returns easier for customers.
SUCCESSFUL RELATIONSHIPS
Cutter & Buck and Xterra Wetsuits are two examples of what students of the 3PL industry see as a continuing trend toward outsourcing important, but not core, business functions. The 2012 3PL study found that most often, firms outsource logistics activities that are "transactional, operational, and repetitive," while keeping strategic, customer-facing, and IT-intensive operations close to home.
What bodes particularly well for 3PLs is another finding of that study: The vast majority of shippers—88 percent—view their relationships with 3PLs as successful.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
The Florida logistics technology startup OneRail has raised $42 million in venture backing to lift the fulfillment software company its next level of growth, the company said today.
The “series C” round was led by Los Angeles-based Aliment Capital, with additional participation from new investors eGateway Capital and Florida Opportunity Fund, as well as current investors Arsenal Growth Equity, Piva Capital, Bullpen Capital, Las Olas Venture Capital, Chicago Ventures, Gaingels and Mana Ventures. According to OneRail, the funding comes amidst a challenging funding environment where venture capital funding in the logistics sector has seen a 90% decline over the past two years.
The latest infusion follows the firm’s $33 million Series B round in 2022, and its move earlier in 2024 to acquire the Vancouver, Canada-based company Orderbot, a provider of enterprise inventory and distributed order management (DOM) software.
Orlando-based OneRail says its omnichannel fulfillment solution pairs its OmniPoint cloud software with a logistics as a service platform and a real-time, connected network of 12 million drivers. The firm says that its OmniPointsoftware automates fulfillment orchestration and last mile logistics, intelligently selecting the right place to fulfill inventory from, the right shipping mode, and the right carrier to optimize every order.
“This new funding round enables us to deepen our decision logic upstream in the order process to help solve some of the acute challenges facing retailers and wholesalers, such as order sourcing logic defaulting to closest store to customer to fulfill inventory from, which leads to split orders, out-of-stocks, or worse, cancelled orders,” OneRail Founder and CEO Bill Catania said in a release. “OneRail has revolutionized that process with a dynamic fulfillment solution that quickly finds available inventory in full, from an array of stores or warehouses within a localized radius of the customer, to meet the delivery promise, which ultimately transforms the end-customer experience.”
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.