Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Forklift fleet management software provides a wealth of information that helps companies optimize lift truck safety, productivity, maintenance, and operating costs. Most solutions fall into one of two camps: those that track vehicles' and drivers' activities, and those that track maintenance and repair activities and costs. They range from relatively simple spreadsheets to sophisticated systems that remotely monitor lift trucks' inner workings. Some are sold on a stand-alone basis for a monthly per-truck fee by independent developers, while others are provided by forklift manufacturers and dealers as part of a fleet management or maintenance contract.
Most of these programs are not difficult to use. What can be hard, though, is figuring out how to take full advantage of the software's many capabilities. We asked providers of fleet management services and software for advice on how to make the most of this technology. Here, in no particular order, are some of their recommendations.
1. Get buy-in from operators and managers. Forklift operators are often suspicious of systems that track vehicles' and drivers' activities. They may feel threatened by the close oversight and worry about being disciplined for mistakes. Explaining the system's potential benefits to operators, such as improved regulatory compliance, training, and safety, can help to overcome such concerns, says Arun Patel, president of Access Control Systems.
Managers often have trouble accepting fleet management systems, too. Some may think of data collection and analysis as an additional, unwanted burden, instead of a useful tool for carrying out their primary job responsibilities. To make the case, it's helpful to show how using the software could improve their own key performance indicators (KPIs), such as return on investment (ROI), operating costs, and damage rates.
But that's not always enough. Tell a fleet manager that the data show he needs fewer trucks than he's been running for the past 20 years, for instance, and he's likely to feel that his competence is being questioned. "A lot of times, people take [the software's conclusions] as a personal affront," says Joe LaFergola, manager of business and information solutions for The Raymond Corp. A better way to frame the message, he says, is to tell the manager, "It's not that you did it wrong in the past. It's that technology has improved so much that you can do the same or more work with fewer vehicles."
In fact, it's difficult to get full buy-in from operators and managers without recognizing and acknowledging the value of their knowledge and experience. "The best decisions are usually a blend of both data and personal experience ... otherwise, you won't get the results you intended," says Nick Adams, senior manager of fleet management services at Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (MCFA), which represents Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks, Cat Lift Trucks, and Jungheinrich.
Nevertheless, cautions Scott McLeod, president of Fleetman Consulting, an independent forklift fleet management and procurement company, "Data is an input, and unless you have an argument as to why the data is not relevant, you have to accept the data."
2. Keep on training. Vendors say it doesn't take much training to learn to use fleet management software. Sometimes, though, users need additional instruction in basic tasks such as how to access and review reports. In such cases, a live online seminar using the customer's actual data can improve their comfort level, says Jim Gaskell, director of global Insite products for Crown Equipment Corp. "After they get used to it and it's familiar, then it becomes routine—and that's what you want, to make it routine," he says.
Even after users are familiar with the software, additional training will help them learn more about the software's capabilities, including functions that are specific to safety, maintenance, or other subject areas. In addition, says Patel, once users have hands-on experience with the system, they often have questions that didn't come up during the initial training.
Be sure, too, that anyone responsible for data entry is at least familiar with forklifts and maintenance procedures, McLeod advises. That person must understand how to sort the repair orders into the proper categories—recognizing, for example, what should go under planned maintenance and what belongs in repairs, he says. Otherwise, you could end up basing decisions about replacing trucks on inaccurate information.
3. Be disciplined and consistent. Consistent, timely data collection and entry is necessary in order to get an accurate, up-to-date picture of operating and maintenance costs. That's not a big issue with systems that automatically gather data from the trucks or those that depend on forklift dealers to produce maintenance reports. But for software that requires users to gather and enter data themselves, it takes discipline to stick with it day in and day out. It's not uncommon for that effort to peter out after a couple of years, particularly when there are personnel changes.
Consistency in collecting, measuring, and evaluating data is critical for multifacility installations, says Adams of MCFA. If facility managers handle those tasks differently, companies will end up setting policies and making decisions based on invalid comparisons.
Furthermore, says Crown's Gaskell, when everyone is handling data consistently, it ensures accurate benchmarking of cost drivers. "Without that, you can't see that your operation in one state is paying twice as much [for maintenance] as someone two states over—and both of them think they're getting a good deal because they don't have a yardstick to measure against," he says.
Centralized review and decision making, in concert with local managers, will help to ensure that data analysis and the resulting decisions are sound, says Adams. Central oversight will also compensate for fleet managers' varying degrees of experience, which can influence asset decisions. "The word 'objectively' comes to mind," he says.
4. Properly prioritize information. Information overload, a common worry among users, can discourage people from making full use of the software's many capabilities. One way to prevent that is to clearly define each user's roles and responsibilities, and then provide them with only the information they actually need to carry out those responsibilities.
I.D. Systems President Ken Ehrman favors a "cookbook approach" centered on a guidebook that identifies the roles that will be affected by the technology; specifies which reports and graphs the person performing each role should look at, and at what intervals; and recommends actions to take based on those reports. For example, a safety manager should be alerted immediately to problems with critical items on the OSHA operator checklist, while the fleet manager may only need to get that information weekly in order to look at safety trends, he explains.
Still, fleet management software makes so much information available that it's easy to lose sight of what's most important. Mike McKean, fleet sales and marketing manager for Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A. Inc., recommends that fleet managers focus on the reasons the company decided to take on the fleet optimization project in the first place. "It could be that you have too many trucks ... or you want to reduce the cost of avoidable damage," he says. Whatever it is, that's what you need to focus on as the primary objective, McKean says. "That doesn't mean you can't look at secondary issues, but you should identify priorities and then phase in others."
McLeod cautions, however, that the time and effort spent obtaining some types of data may outweigh the cost benefits to be gained from analyzing it. "I would challenge fleet managers to stay away from the 'nice to know' information, because in many cases, it simply is not going to give them adequate payback," he says.
Where to learn more
Both forklift manufacturers and independent software developers offer fleet management software and systems. Here's where to learn more about some of the fleet management technology products on the market today.
5. Start small and take it slow. Once fleet managers start seeing opportunities for improvement, they may be eager to introduce changes quickly. But moving too fast could disrupt operations and elicit pushback from employees. Raymond's LaFergola suggests starting with small initiatives that require little effort or change, and then moving on to broader efforts.
Don't start those big projects without all the necessary data in hand, though. "In order for you to properly analyze the fleet, you have to look at it over your company's business cycle," LaFergola says. "When you optimize, analyze at least six months, including the busiest time of the year, but a full year of data that lets you see the ebb and flow of business is better."
For a multifacility implementation, conducting a pilot program at one warehouse or DC will help users narrow the scope of the project, establish pre-launch and launch plans, work out any bugs, and set benchmarks for consistency, McKean says. He also suggests putting together a policy and procedures manual based on that experience. "Now you have a template you can take and roll out to other facilities," he says. "It reduces risk."
6. Make people accountable. The ability of fleet management software to take data and generate reports is impressive, but to get a return on their investment, users have to take action based on what they learn. The best way to ensure they do that, says Ehrman, is to hold them accountable for making improvements in fleet costs, asset utilization, safety, maintenance, and any other major areas of concern.
All fleet management software programs have exception reporting and alert functions, and some vendors will prompt users either electronically or with a phone call if they fail to take action in response to an event. In addition to monitoring such short-term actions, Ehrman says, it's important to notify users when they fail to make improvements over the longer term. If progress—or the lack of it—in cost control and productivity is clearly visible to both users and management, he says, it encourages the responsible parties to take action and solve problems.
MEANINGFUL CHANGE
Because fleet management software provides companies with a seemingly endless array of data and reports, it can be tempting for fleet managers to think that the software itself will solve all their problems. But that's not very realistic. The purpose of the software, McLeod says, is to track costs in a meaningful way to help fleet managers make meaningful decisions. Any cost savings or other improvements will depend not on the software or the data itself, but on how the user analyzes it and responds.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."