Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Forklift fleet management software provides a wealth of information that helps companies optimize lift truck safety, productivity, maintenance, and operating costs. Most solutions fall into one of two camps: those that track vehicles' and drivers' activities, and those that track maintenance and repair activities and costs. They range from relatively simple spreadsheets to sophisticated systems that remotely monitor lift trucks' inner workings. Some are sold on a stand-alone basis for a monthly per-truck fee by independent developers, while others are provided by forklift manufacturers and dealers as part of a fleet management or maintenance contract.
Most of these programs are not difficult to use. What can be hard, though, is figuring out how to take full advantage of the software's many capabilities. We asked providers of fleet management services and software for advice on how to make the most of this technology. Here, in no particular order, are some of their recommendations.
1. Get buy-in from operators and managers. Forklift operators are often suspicious of systems that track vehicles' and drivers' activities. They may feel threatened by the close oversight and worry about being disciplined for mistakes. Explaining the system's potential benefits to operators, such as improved regulatory compliance, training, and safety, can help to overcome such concerns, says Arun Patel, president of Access Control Systems.
Managers often have trouble accepting fleet management systems, too. Some may think of data collection and analysis as an additional, unwanted burden, instead of a useful tool for carrying out their primary job responsibilities. To make the case, it's helpful to show how using the software could improve their own key performance indicators (KPIs), such as return on investment (ROI), operating costs, and damage rates.
But that's not always enough. Tell a fleet manager that the data show he needs fewer trucks than he's been running for the past 20 years, for instance, and he's likely to feel that his competence is being questioned. "A lot of times, people take [the software's conclusions] as a personal affront," says Joe LaFergola, manager of business and information solutions for The Raymond Corp. A better way to frame the message, he says, is to tell the manager, "It's not that you did it wrong in the past. It's that technology has improved so much that you can do the same or more work with fewer vehicles."
In fact, it's difficult to get full buy-in from operators and managers without recognizing and acknowledging the value of their knowledge and experience. "The best decisions are usually a blend of both data and personal experience ... otherwise, you won't get the results you intended," says Nick Adams, senior manager of fleet management services at Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (MCFA), which represents Mitsubishi Forklift Trucks, Cat Lift Trucks, and Jungheinrich.
Nevertheless, cautions Scott McLeod, president of Fleetman Consulting, an independent forklift fleet management and procurement company, "Data is an input, and unless you have an argument as to why the data is not relevant, you have to accept the data."
2. Keep on training. Vendors say it doesn't take much training to learn to use fleet management software. Sometimes, though, users need additional instruction in basic tasks such as how to access and review reports. In such cases, a live online seminar using the customer's actual data can improve their comfort level, says Jim Gaskell, director of global Insite products for Crown Equipment Corp. "After they get used to it and it's familiar, then it becomes routine—and that's what you want, to make it routine," he says.
Even after users are familiar with the software, additional training will help them learn more about the software's capabilities, including functions that are specific to safety, maintenance, or other subject areas. In addition, says Patel, once users have hands-on experience with the system, they often have questions that didn't come up during the initial training.
Be sure, too, that anyone responsible for data entry is at least familiar with forklifts and maintenance procedures, McLeod advises. That person must understand how to sort the repair orders into the proper categories—recognizing, for example, what should go under planned maintenance and what belongs in repairs, he says. Otherwise, you could end up basing decisions about replacing trucks on inaccurate information.
3. Be disciplined and consistent. Consistent, timely data collection and entry is necessary in order to get an accurate, up-to-date picture of operating and maintenance costs. That's not a big issue with systems that automatically gather data from the trucks or those that depend on forklift dealers to produce maintenance reports. But for software that requires users to gather and enter data themselves, it takes discipline to stick with it day in and day out. It's not uncommon for that effort to peter out after a couple of years, particularly when there are personnel changes.
Consistency in collecting, measuring, and evaluating data is critical for multifacility installations, says Adams of MCFA. If facility managers handle those tasks differently, companies will end up setting policies and making decisions based on invalid comparisons.
Furthermore, says Crown's Gaskell, when everyone is handling data consistently, it ensures accurate benchmarking of cost drivers. "Without that, you can't see that your operation in one state is paying twice as much [for maintenance] as someone two states over—and both of them think they're getting a good deal because they don't have a yardstick to measure against," he says.
Centralized review and decision making, in concert with local managers, will help to ensure that data analysis and the resulting decisions are sound, says Adams. Central oversight will also compensate for fleet managers' varying degrees of experience, which can influence asset decisions. "The word 'objectively' comes to mind," he says.
4. Properly prioritize information. Information overload, a common worry among users, can discourage people from making full use of the software's many capabilities. One way to prevent that is to clearly define each user's roles and responsibilities, and then provide them with only the information they actually need to carry out those responsibilities.
I.D. Systems President Ken Ehrman favors a "cookbook approach" centered on a guidebook that identifies the roles that will be affected by the technology; specifies which reports and graphs the person performing each role should look at, and at what intervals; and recommends actions to take based on those reports. For example, a safety manager should be alerted immediately to problems with critical items on the OSHA operator checklist, while the fleet manager may only need to get that information weekly in order to look at safety trends, he explains.
Still, fleet management software makes so much information available that it's easy to lose sight of what's most important. Mike McKean, fleet sales and marketing manager for Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A. Inc., recommends that fleet managers focus on the reasons the company decided to take on the fleet optimization project in the first place. "It could be that you have too many trucks ... or you want to reduce the cost of avoidable damage," he says. Whatever it is, that's what you need to focus on as the primary objective, McKean says. "That doesn't mean you can't look at secondary issues, but you should identify priorities and then phase in others."
McLeod cautions, however, that the time and effort spent obtaining some types of data may outweigh the cost benefits to be gained from analyzing it. "I would challenge fleet managers to stay away from the 'nice to know' information, because in many cases, it simply is not going to give them adequate payback," he says.
Where to learn more
Both forklift manufacturers and independent software developers offer fleet management software and systems. Here's where to learn more about some of the fleet management technology products on the market today.
5. Start small and take it slow. Once fleet managers start seeing opportunities for improvement, they may be eager to introduce changes quickly. But moving too fast could disrupt operations and elicit pushback from employees. Raymond's LaFergola suggests starting with small initiatives that require little effort or change, and then moving on to broader efforts.
Don't start those big projects without all the necessary data in hand, though. "In order for you to properly analyze the fleet, you have to look at it over your company's business cycle," LaFergola says. "When you optimize, analyze at least six months, including the busiest time of the year, but a full year of data that lets you see the ebb and flow of business is better."
For a multifacility implementation, conducting a pilot program at one warehouse or DC will help users narrow the scope of the project, establish pre-launch and launch plans, work out any bugs, and set benchmarks for consistency, McKean says. He also suggests putting together a policy and procedures manual based on that experience. "Now you have a template you can take and roll out to other facilities," he says. "It reduces risk."
6. Make people accountable. The ability of fleet management software to take data and generate reports is impressive, but to get a return on their investment, users have to take action based on what they learn. The best way to ensure they do that, says Ehrman, is to hold them accountable for making improvements in fleet costs, asset utilization, safety, maintenance, and any other major areas of concern.
All fleet management software programs have exception reporting and alert functions, and some vendors will prompt users either electronically or with a phone call if they fail to take action in response to an event. In addition to monitoring such short-term actions, Ehrman says, it's important to notify users when they fail to make improvements over the longer term. If progress—or the lack of it—in cost control and productivity is clearly visible to both users and management, he says, it encourages the responsible parties to take action and solve problems.
MEANINGFUL CHANGE
Because fleet management software provides companies with a seemingly endless array of data and reports, it can be tempting for fleet managers to think that the software itself will solve all their problems. But that's not very realistic. The purpose of the software, McLeod says, is to track costs in a meaningful way to help fleet managers make meaningful decisions. Any cost savings or other improvements will depend not on the software or the data itself, but on how the user analyzes it and responds.
The New York-based industrial artificial intelligence (AI) provider Augury has raised $75 million for its process optimization tools for manufacturers, in a deal that values the company at more than $1 billion, the firm said today.
According to Augury, its goal is deliver a new generation of AI solutions that provide the accuracy and reliability manufacturers need to make AI a trusted partner in every phase of the manufacturing process.
The “series F” venture capital round was led by Lightrock, with participation from several of Augury’s existing investors; Insight Partners, Eclipse, and Qumra Capital as well as Schneider Electric Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures. In addition to securing the new funding, Augury also said it has added Elan Greenberg as Chief Operating Officer.
“Augury is at the forefront of digitalizing equipment maintenance with AI-driven solutions that enhance cost efficiency, sustainability performance, and energy savings,” Ashish (Ash) Puri, Partner at Lightrock, said in a release. “Their predictive maintenance technology, boasting 99.9% failure detection accuracy and a 5-20x ROI when deployed at scale, significantly reduces downtime and energy consumption for its blue-chip clients globally, offering a compelling value proposition.”
The money supports the firm’s approach of "Hybrid Autonomous Mobile Robotics (Hybrid AMRs)," which integrate the intelligence of "Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)" with the precision and structure of "Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)."
According to Anscer, it supports the acceleration to Industry 4.0 by ensuring that its autonomous solutions seamlessly integrate with customers’ existing infrastructures to help transform material handling and warehouse automation.
Leading the new U.S. office will be Mark Messina, who was named this week as Anscer’s Managing Director & CEO, Americas. He has been tasked with leading the firm’s expansion by bringing its automation solutions to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, retail, food & beverage, and third-party logistics (3PL).
Supply chains continue to deal with a growing volume of returns following the holiday peak season, and 2024 was no exception. Recent survey data from product information management technology company Akeneo showed that 65% of shoppers made holiday returns this year, with most reporting that their experience played a large role in their reason for doing so.
The survey—which included information from more than 1,000 U.S. consumers gathered in January—provides insight into the main reasons consumers return products, generational differences in return and online shopping behaviors, and the steadily growing influence that sustainability has on consumers.
Among the results, 62% of consumers said that having more accurate product information upfront would reduce their likelihood of making a return, and 59% said they had made a return specifically because the online product description was misleading or inaccurate.
And when it comes to making those returns, 65% of respondents said they would prefer to return in-store, if possible, followed by 22% who said they prefer to ship products back.
“This indicates that consumers are gravitating toward the most sustainable option by reducing additional shipping,” the survey authors said in a statement announcing the findings, adding that 68% of respondents said they are aware of the environmental impact of returns, and 39% said the environmental impact factors into their decision to make a return or exchange.
The authors also said that investing in the product experience and providing reliable product data can help brands reduce returns, increase loyalty, and provide the best customer experience possible alongside profitability.
When asked what products they return the most, 60% of respondents said clothing items. Sizing issues were the number one reason for those returns (58%) followed by conflicting or lack of customer reviews (35%). In addition, 34% cited misleading product images and 29% pointed to inaccurate product information online as reasons for returning items.
More than 60% of respondents said that having more reliable information would reduce the likelihood of making a return.
“Whether customers are shopping directly from a brand website or on the hundreds of e-commerce marketplaces available today [such as Amazon, Walmart, etc.] the product experience must remain consistent, complete and accurate to instill brand trust and loyalty,” the authors said.
When you get the chance to automate your distribution center, take it.
That's exactly what leaders at interior design house
Thibaut Design did when they relocated operations from two New Jersey distribution centers (DCs) into a single facility in Charlotte, North Carolina, in 2019. Moving to an "empty shell of a building," as Thibaut's Michael Fechter describes it, was the perfect time to switch from a manual picking system to an automated one—in this case, one that would be driven by voice-directed technology.
"We were 100% paper-based picking in New Jersey," Fechter, the company's vice president of distribution and technology, explained in a
case study published by Voxware last year. "We knew there was a need for automation, and when we moved to Charlotte, we wanted to implement that technology."
Fechter cites Voxware's promise of simple and easy integration, configuration, use, and training as some of the key reasons Thibaut's leaders chose the system. Since implementing the voice technology, the company has streamlined its fulfillment process and can onboard and cross-train warehouse employees in a fraction of the time it used to take back in New Jersey.
And the results speak for themselves.
"We've seen incredible gains [from a] productivity standpoint," Fechter reports. "A 50% increase from pre-implementation to today."
THE NEED FOR SPEED
Thibaut was founded in 1886 and is the oldest operating wallpaper company in the United States, according to Fechter. The company works with a global network of designers, shipping samples of wallpaper and fabrics around the world.
For the design house's warehouse associates, picking, packing, and shipping thousands of samples every day was a cumbersome, labor-intensive process—and one that was prone to inaccuracy. With its paper-based picking system, mispicks were common—Fechter cites a 2% to 5% mispick rate—which necessitated stationing an extra associate at each pack station to check that orders were accurate before they left the facility.
All that has changed since implementing Voxware's Voice Management Suite (VMS) at the Charlotte DC. The system automates the workflow and guides associates through the picking process via a headset, using voice commands. The hands-free, eyes-free solution allows workers to focus on locating and selecting the right item, with no paper-based lists to check or written instructions to follow.
Thibaut also uses the tech provider's analytics tool, VoxPilot, to monitor work progress, check orders, and keep track of incoming work—managers can see what orders are open, what's in process, and what's completed for the day, for example. And it uses VoxTempo, the system's natural language voice recognition (NLVR) solution, to streamline training. The intuitive app whittles training time down to minutes and gets associates up and working fast—and Thibaut hitting minimum productivity targets within hours, according to Fechter.
EXPECTED RESULTS REALIZED
Key benefits of the project include a reduction in mispicks—which have dropped to zero—and the elimination of those extra quality-control measures Thibaut needed in the New Jersey DCs.
"We've gotten to the point where we don't even measure mispicks today—because there are none," Fechter said in the case study. "Having an extra person at a pack station to [check] every order before we pack [it]—that's been eliminated. Not only is the pick right the first time, but [the order] also gets packed and shipped faster than ever before."
The system has increased inventory accuracy as well. According to Fechter, it's now "well over 99.9%."
IT projects can be daunting, especially when the project involves upgrading a warehouse management system (WMS) to support an expansive network of warehousing and logistics facilities. Global third-party logistics service provider (3PL) CJ Logistics experienced this first-hand recently, embarking on a WMS selection process that would both upgrade performance and enhance security for its U.S. business network.
The company was operating on three different platforms across more than 35 warehouse facilities and wanted to pare that down to help standardize operations, optimize costs, and make it easier to scale the business, according to CIO Sean Moore.
Moore and his team started the WMS selection process in late 2023, working with supply chain consulting firm Alpine Supply Chain Solutions to identify challenges, needs, and goals, and then to select and implement the new WMS. Roughly a year later, the 3PL was up and running on a system from Körber Supply Chain—and planning for growth.
SECURING A NEW SOLUTION
Leaders from both companies explain that a robust WMS is crucial for a 3PL's success, as it acts as a centralized platform that allows seamless coordination of activities such as inventory management, order fulfillment, and transportation planning. The right solution allows the company to optimize warehouse operations by automating tasks, managing inventory levels, and ensuring efficient space utilization while helping to boost order processing volumes, reduce errors, and cut operational costs.
CJ Logistics had another key criterion: ensuring data security for its wide and varied array of clients, many of whom rely on the 3PL to fill e-commerce orders for consumers. Those clients wanted assurance that consumers' personally identifying information—including names, addresses, and phone numbers—was protected against cybersecurity breeches when flowing through the 3PL's system. For CJ Logistics, that meant finding a WMS provider whose software was certified to the appropriate security standards.
"That's becoming [an assurance] that our customers want to see," Moore explains, adding that many customers wanted to know that CJ Logistics' systems were SOC 2 compliant, meaning they had met a standard developed by the American Institute of CPAs for protecting sensitive customer data from unauthorized access, security incidents, and other vulnerabilities. "Everybody wants that level of security. So you want to make sure the system is secure … and not susceptible to ransomware.
"It was a critical requirement for us."
That security requirement was a key consideration during all phases of the WMS selection process, according to Michael Wohlwend, managing principal at Alpine Supply Chain Solutions.
"It was in the RFP [request for proposal], then in demo, [and] then once we got to the vendor of choice, we had a deep-dive discovery call to understand what [security] they have in place and their plan moving forward," he explains.
Ultimately, CJ Logistics implemented Körber's Warehouse Advantage, a cloud-based system designed for multiclient operations that supports all of the 3PL's needs, including its security requirements.
GOING LIVE
When it came time to implement the software, Moore and his team chose to start with a brand-new cold chain facility that the 3PL was building in Gainesville, Georgia. The 270,000-square-foot facility opened this past November and immediately went live running on the Körber WMS.
Moore and Wohlwend explain that both the nature of the cold chain business and the greenfield construction made the facility the perfect place to launch the new software: CJ Logistics would be adding customers at a staggered rate, expanding its cold storage presence in the Southeast and capitalizing on the location's proximity to major highways and railways. The facility is also adjacent to the future Northeast Georgia Inland Port, which will provide a direct link to the Port of Savannah.
"We signed a 15-year lease for the building," Moore says. "When you sign a long-term lease … you want your future-state software in place. That was one of the key [reasons] we started there.
"Also, this facility was going to bring on one customer after another at a metered rate. So [there was] some risk reduction as well."
Wohlwend adds: "The facility plus risk reduction plus the new business [element]—all made it a good starting point."
The early benefits of the WMS include ease of use and easy onboarding of clients, according to Moore, who says the plan is to convert additional CJ Logistics facilities to the new system in 2025.
"The software is very easy to use … our employees are saying they really like the user interface and that you can find information very easily," Moore says, touting the partnership with Alpine and Körber as key to making the project a success. "We are on deck to add at least four facilities at a minimum [this year]."