If your handheld computers take a lot of abuse, maybe it's time for "rugged" devices. Here's a look at what makes them so tough, when they make economic sense, and why sometimes they're the only way to go.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Would you ever take a handheld computer into a swimming pool, drop it from the top of a climbing wall, run it over with a dirt bike, or use it as a hockey puck? Of course not! Yet some manufacturers of "rugged" handheld computers have produced videos showing their products being manhandled in those and other startling ways.
Those fanciful scenarios might seem extreme—after all, how many warehouse associates go swimming or play ice hockey during their shifts? But the tongue-in-cheek demonstrations make a valid point: Some warehousing and transportation environments are remarkably tough on handheld devices, and it pays to have equipment that can stand up to abuse.
The added durability comes at a price, of course, but in certain applications, rugged equipment might well prove the most cost-effective choice. Here's a look at what qualifies a device as "rugged" and the types of applications where these units make economic sense.
What makes a device rugged?
Rugged handheld computers are designed to work where they'll be exposed to potentially damaging conditions, such as bad weather, shocks and drops, high or low temperatures, and particulates like dust or sand. According to systems integrator Barcoding Inc. and handheld computer manufacturer Psion, five factors determine whether a handheld computer qualifies as a rugged device: the outer shell, the keypad, the display, the internal components, and the accessories.
The outer shell absorbs impact and prevents penetration by contaminants. Each shell carries an Ingress Protection (IP) Code rating that consists of two digits. The first refers to the level of protection against solid objects, and the second refers to protection against liquids. The lowest IP rating would be "11"—protected against a solid object greater than 50mm (about 2 inches) in diameter—a hand, for instance—and against falling drops of water, with limited ingress of water allowed. The highest rating would be "68"—no dust penetration, and protected against long periods of immersion in water under pressure. The highest-rated handheld computers for warehouse and transportation applications on the market today are rated IP 67—dust-tight and able to withstand immersion in water at depths of up to one meter (about 3.3 feet).
Keypads must be designed for use in all sorts of conditions. For example, the buttons have to be big enough that someone wearing gloves—think of people who work outdoors in winter or in refrigerated warehouses—can accurately enter data, says Mike Wills, vice president, North American sales, for Psion.
Because rugged handhelds have a long lifespan, keypads must remain readable for many years. Some common ways manufacturers increase wear resistance and prevent fading include molding graphics on the underside of the keys, using colored plastics instead of painted markings, and applying a protective coating over painted symbols. Another method is to use lasers to etch images from top to bottom of the keypad, so that numbers and letters clearly show through even after years of use, says Bruce Stubbs, director of industry marketing for Intermec, which makes rugged devices.
Data displays must be easy to read in all conditions. Touchscreens, made of polycarbonate plastic or specially strengthened glass, are often used to display information. Plastic is a good choice for devices that are exposed to severe drops and impacts to the touchscreen, or used in applications (such as handling some foods and pharmaceuticals) where glass is prohibited in the vicinity of the product. Glass is best for devices with graphically based software that relies heavily on the touchscreen, say Barcoding Inc. and Psion. Recent advances in strengthened glass production have made this material more suitable for rugged devices.
Internal components are specially strengthened and are surrounded by buffering space to prevent damage when a device is dropped or knocked around. The batteries not only hold a charge longer, but they also have a longer lifespan—up to two years, rather than the typical six months for non-rugged devices, according to Stubbs.
And finally, accessories such as docking stations, mounting hardware, and add-on grips should meet the same standards for ruggedness and reliability as the mobile device itself.
Some devices are "ruggedized" at the time of final configuration with protective reinforcements that add weight and bulk to the product, says Ron D'Ambrosio, president and CEO of rugged device manufacturer Glacier Computer. A better choice, he says, is one that's designed for ruggedness "from the inside out." For example, using a thicker substrate in the circuit board provides more stability and less flexing and vibration while the computer is in use.
It's important that the components be manufactured from the right materials for the application, says Khalid Kidari, director of product management and marketing for DAP Technologies, which makes rugged devices. Depending on the product and the application, lightweight alloys and metals are best for some parts, while plastic that flexes when the device is dropped, so that the plastic absorbs the energy of the impact, is best for others. Devices that are frequently exposed to moisture or salt air should be free of metal that could rust and corrode.
When should you use rugged devices?
Distribution activities, including transportation, freight yard management, direct store delivery, and field service and repair, are ideal for rugged handhelds, says Intermec's Stubbs. In fact, any application where the devices will routinely be exposed to heat, cold, rain, wind, dust, dirt, salt air, and so forth calls for rugged devices. Standard commercial or light-duty industrial equipment simply won't stand up to those conditions. Batteries will quickly run out, screens won't refresh fast enough, and the inner workings will get clogged up or permanently damaged by contaminants.
But even an ordinary warehouse can be tougher on handhelds than you might think, Kidari warns. "If a warehouse is fairly clean and there's little or no dust, then you don't really need full protection and can get away with light industrial devices," he says. A typical warehouse environment, though, has plenty of dust from cardboard and from unsealed concrete floors, he adds.
There's also the danger of damage from impact. Consider the likelihood of damage from forklift collisions. And if warehouse associates are picking or putting away items at anything other than floor level, then it's inevitable that the handheld devices they use will be dropped from on high.
The degree of risk is also an important consideration, says D'Ambrosio of Glacier Computer. Fixed-mount devices that are attached to a forklift or other vehicle are exposed to tough but predictable conditions. But mobile devices, he notes, may encounter a variety of potentially damaging environments, and they must be able to withstand all of them.
Physical conditions are not the only factor to consider. "It's really the business environment that dictates the degree of ruggedness required," observes Psion's Wills. Buyers should ask themselves how dependent their business is on the device's reliable, consistent operation. "The more mission-critical the device is, the more rugged it needs to be," he says. "What would happen to your business if it were not usable?"
Why they make economic sense
Rugged handhelds cost considerably more than standard commercial equipment—often twice as much, depending on the model and the customer's requirements. In addition to design and materials costs, the amount of testing and certifications required raise manufacturers' costs, D'Ambrosio says.
But the list price is simply a starting point, and a host of other factors affect the total cost of ownership for a rugged device. For one thing, users will need to buy fewer of them, rugged equipment makers say. "You have to consider that with a non-ruggedized device, the first time you drop it you'll have to replace it, which means you'll have to keep many extra pieces of equipment on hand," says Wills. "With rugged handhelds, you'll just need a few spares."
For another, rugged handhelds can improve productivity. According to the manufacturers, they rarely fail, and if they do break down, their modular design makes most repairs quick and easy. Their extended battery life also ensures reliable performance throughout the length of a shift and beyond.
In the past, the typical lifespan for ruggedized handheld computers ranged from three to six years, but now it's not unusual for them to last much longer. The manufacturers consulted for this article reported handhelds that are still running after six years or more of around-the-clock operation, including some that are still going strong after 15 years. This longevity makes rugged handhelds an attractive capital investment. "With most customers buying equipment outright on a three-year depreciation cycle," says Psion's Wills, "anything beyond that is free money."
The exotic and the everyday
Considering the abuse that rugged handheld devices are able to take, it's not surprising to find them in some unusual applications. Loggers use them with bar-coded tags on trees that are ready to harvest, growers use them to track produce from field to distribution center, and they even see duty in a brewery, where they safely undergo daily washdowns with a hose along with the rest of the brewing equipment.
But it's not necessary to be in some exotic line of business to consider an investment in ruggedized handheld computers. No matter what type of operation you run, if reliability, productivity, and a return on your investment are high priorities, then rugged devices are worth a look.
What about tablets and iPhones?
There's been a lot of hype recently about the use of consumer devices like smartphones and tablet computers in warehousing and distribution applications. Those devices have their supporters—mostly for their convenience and low initial cost—but many observers dismiss them as being too fragile to handle the vibration, falls, and other impacts that are part and parcel of warehouse operations.
However, ruggedized tablets are now making inroads in the mobile device market. Some users like them because they find the bigger screen easier to read, especially for reading large quantities of data or graphics like maps and technical drawings.
Versatility is another attraction. Because the tablets' functionality resides in the software, users gain flexibility, says Khalid Kidari, director of product management and marketing for DAP Technologies, which includes both rugged tablets and handhelds in its product lineup. One example is differing keyboard views. "Sometimes you might want to display numbers or just alpha keys. That's flexibility you do not get with a physical keyboard." Other advantages cited by vendors include the ability to access multiple software and communications technologies in a single device, and the productivity gained by using one device to carry out a variety of functions.
But can tablets be made rugged enough for a warehouse environment? Manufacturers contend that the external and internal components are as tough as those for handhelds, and that recent advances in glass manufacturing make it possible to sufficiently ruggedize one of the most expensive and vulnerable components of the device: the touchscreen.
Not all manufacturers—or their customers—are convinced that tablets will prove to be reliable enough for warehouse applications. "I think [the adoption of tablets for industrial use] is something that's inevitably going to happen," Bruce Stubbs, director of industry marketing for Intermec, which manufactures rugged handhelds. "But you have to balance ruggedness with cost, so I suspect it's not going to happen as quickly as some think." A more likely scenario, he believes, is that tablets will catch on in applications like field service and transportation but will prove to be inadequate for harsh industrial environments.
Who makes rugged handhelds?
A number of manufacturers design and produce rugged handheld computers for warehouse and transportation applications. The following list, while not exhaustive, includes some of the better-known vendors:
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."