If your handheld computers take a lot of abuse, maybe it's time for "rugged" devices. Here's a look at what makes them so tough, when they make economic sense, and why sometimes they're the only way to go.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Would you ever take a handheld computer into a swimming pool, drop it from the top of a climbing wall, run it over with a dirt bike, or use it as a hockey puck? Of course not! Yet some manufacturers of "rugged" handheld computers have produced videos showing their products being manhandled in those and other startling ways.
Those fanciful scenarios might seem extreme—after all, how many warehouse associates go swimming or play ice hockey during their shifts? But the tongue-in-cheek demonstrations make a valid point: Some warehousing and transportation environments are remarkably tough on handheld devices, and it pays to have equipment that can stand up to abuse.
The added durability comes at a price, of course, but in certain applications, rugged equipment might well prove the most cost-effective choice. Here's a look at what qualifies a device as "rugged" and the types of applications where these units make economic sense.
What makes a device rugged?
Rugged handheld computers are designed to work where they'll be exposed to potentially damaging conditions, such as bad weather, shocks and drops, high or low temperatures, and particulates like dust or sand. According to systems integrator Barcoding Inc. and handheld computer manufacturer Psion, five factors determine whether a handheld computer qualifies as a rugged device: the outer shell, the keypad, the display, the internal components, and the accessories.
The outer shell absorbs impact and prevents penetration by contaminants. Each shell carries an Ingress Protection (IP) Code rating that consists of two digits. The first refers to the level of protection against solid objects, and the second refers to protection against liquids. The lowest IP rating would be "11"—protected against a solid object greater than 50mm (about 2 inches) in diameter—a hand, for instance—and against falling drops of water, with limited ingress of water allowed. The highest rating would be "68"—no dust penetration, and protected against long periods of immersion in water under pressure. The highest-rated handheld computers for warehouse and transportation applications on the market today are rated IP 67—dust-tight and able to withstand immersion in water at depths of up to one meter (about 3.3 feet).
Keypads must be designed for use in all sorts of conditions. For example, the buttons have to be big enough that someone wearing gloves—think of people who work outdoors in winter or in refrigerated warehouses—can accurately enter data, says Mike Wills, vice president, North American sales, for Psion.
Because rugged handhelds have a long lifespan, keypads must remain readable for many years. Some common ways manufacturers increase wear resistance and prevent fading include molding graphics on the underside of the keys, using colored plastics instead of painted markings, and applying a protective coating over painted symbols. Another method is to use lasers to etch images from top to bottom of the keypad, so that numbers and letters clearly show through even after years of use, says Bruce Stubbs, director of industry marketing for Intermec, which makes rugged devices.
Data displays must be easy to read in all conditions. Touchscreens, made of polycarbonate plastic or specially strengthened glass, are often used to display information. Plastic is a good choice for devices that are exposed to severe drops and impacts to the touchscreen, or used in applications (such as handling some foods and pharmaceuticals) where glass is prohibited in the vicinity of the product. Glass is best for devices with graphically based software that relies heavily on the touchscreen, say Barcoding Inc. and Psion. Recent advances in strengthened glass production have made this material more suitable for rugged devices.
Internal components are specially strengthened and are surrounded by buffering space to prevent damage when a device is dropped or knocked around. The batteries not only hold a charge longer, but they also have a longer lifespan—up to two years, rather than the typical six months for non-rugged devices, according to Stubbs.
And finally, accessories such as docking stations, mounting hardware, and add-on grips should meet the same standards for ruggedness and reliability as the mobile device itself.
Some devices are "ruggedized" at the time of final configuration with protective reinforcements that add weight and bulk to the product, says Ron D'Ambrosio, president and CEO of rugged device manufacturer Glacier Computer. A better choice, he says, is one that's designed for ruggedness "from the inside out." For example, using a thicker substrate in the circuit board provides more stability and less flexing and vibration while the computer is in use.
It's important that the components be manufactured from the right materials for the application, says Khalid Kidari, director of product management and marketing for DAP Technologies, which makes rugged devices. Depending on the product and the application, lightweight alloys and metals are best for some parts, while plastic that flexes when the device is dropped, so that the plastic absorbs the energy of the impact, is best for others. Devices that are frequently exposed to moisture or salt air should be free of metal that could rust and corrode.
When should you use rugged devices?
Distribution activities, including transportation, freight yard management, direct store delivery, and field service and repair, are ideal for rugged handhelds, says Intermec's Stubbs. In fact, any application where the devices will routinely be exposed to heat, cold, rain, wind, dust, dirt, salt air, and so forth calls for rugged devices. Standard commercial or light-duty industrial equipment simply won't stand up to those conditions. Batteries will quickly run out, screens won't refresh fast enough, and the inner workings will get clogged up or permanently damaged by contaminants.
But even an ordinary warehouse can be tougher on handhelds than you might think, Kidari warns. "If a warehouse is fairly clean and there's little or no dust, then you don't really need full protection and can get away with light industrial devices," he says. A typical warehouse environment, though, has plenty of dust from cardboard and from unsealed concrete floors, he adds.
There's also the danger of damage from impact. Consider the likelihood of damage from forklift collisions. And if warehouse associates are picking or putting away items at anything other than floor level, then it's inevitable that the handheld devices they use will be dropped from on high.
The degree of risk is also an important consideration, says D'Ambrosio of Glacier Computer. Fixed-mount devices that are attached to a forklift or other vehicle are exposed to tough but predictable conditions. But mobile devices, he notes, may encounter a variety of potentially damaging environments, and they must be able to withstand all of them.
Physical conditions are not the only factor to consider. "It's really the business environment that dictates the degree of ruggedness required," observes Psion's Wills. Buyers should ask themselves how dependent their business is on the device's reliable, consistent operation. "The more mission-critical the device is, the more rugged it needs to be," he says. "What would happen to your business if it were not usable?"
Why they make economic sense
Rugged handhelds cost considerably more than standard commercial equipment—often twice as much, depending on the model and the customer's requirements. In addition to design and materials costs, the amount of testing and certifications required raise manufacturers' costs, D'Ambrosio says.
But the list price is simply a starting point, and a host of other factors affect the total cost of ownership for a rugged device. For one thing, users will need to buy fewer of them, rugged equipment makers say. "You have to consider that with a non-ruggedized device, the first time you drop it you'll have to replace it, which means you'll have to keep many extra pieces of equipment on hand," says Wills. "With rugged handhelds, you'll just need a few spares."
For another, rugged handhelds can improve productivity. According to the manufacturers, they rarely fail, and if they do break down, their modular design makes most repairs quick and easy. Their extended battery life also ensures reliable performance throughout the length of a shift and beyond.
In the past, the typical lifespan for ruggedized handheld computers ranged from three to six years, but now it's not unusual for them to last much longer. The manufacturers consulted for this article reported handhelds that are still running after six years or more of around-the-clock operation, including some that are still going strong after 15 years. This longevity makes rugged handhelds an attractive capital investment. "With most customers buying equipment outright on a three-year depreciation cycle," says Psion's Wills, "anything beyond that is free money."
The exotic and the everyday
Considering the abuse that rugged handheld devices are able to take, it's not surprising to find them in some unusual applications. Loggers use them with bar-coded tags on trees that are ready to harvest, growers use them to track produce from field to distribution center, and they even see duty in a brewery, where they safely undergo daily washdowns with a hose along with the rest of the brewing equipment.
But it's not necessary to be in some exotic line of business to consider an investment in ruggedized handheld computers. No matter what type of operation you run, if reliability, productivity, and a return on your investment are high priorities, then rugged devices are worth a look.
What about tablets and iPhones?
There's been a lot of hype recently about the use of consumer devices like smartphones and tablet computers in warehousing and distribution applications. Those devices have their supporters—mostly for their convenience and low initial cost—but many observers dismiss them as being too fragile to handle the vibration, falls, and other impacts that are part and parcel of warehouse operations.
However, ruggedized tablets are now making inroads in the mobile device market. Some users like them because they find the bigger screen easier to read, especially for reading large quantities of data or graphics like maps and technical drawings.
Versatility is another attraction. Because the tablets' functionality resides in the software, users gain flexibility, says Khalid Kidari, director of product management and marketing for DAP Technologies, which includes both rugged tablets and handhelds in its product lineup. One example is differing keyboard views. "Sometimes you might want to display numbers or just alpha keys. That's flexibility you do not get with a physical keyboard." Other advantages cited by vendors include the ability to access multiple software and communications technologies in a single device, and the productivity gained by using one device to carry out a variety of functions.
But can tablets be made rugged enough for a warehouse environment? Manufacturers contend that the external and internal components are as tough as those for handhelds, and that recent advances in glass manufacturing make it possible to sufficiently ruggedize one of the most expensive and vulnerable components of the device: the touchscreen.
Not all manufacturers—or their customers—are convinced that tablets will prove to be reliable enough for warehouse applications. "I think [the adoption of tablets for industrial use] is something that's inevitably going to happen," Bruce Stubbs, director of industry marketing for Intermec, which manufactures rugged handhelds. "But you have to balance ruggedness with cost, so I suspect it's not going to happen as quickly as some think." A more likely scenario, he believes, is that tablets will catch on in applications like field service and transportation but will prove to be inadequate for harsh industrial environments.
Who makes rugged handhelds?
A number of manufacturers design and produce rugged handheld computers for warehouse and transportation applications. The following list, while not exhaustive, includes some of the better-known vendors:
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."