Take an ideal location and an engaged business community, throw in some world-class barbeque, and Kansas City may have the recipe for 21st century supply chain success.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It rests on America's logistics axis, the focal point for much of the nation's freight moving in any direction. It handles more rail tonnage than any city in the country and more rail cars than any city except Chicago. It is bisected by two major interstate highways: I-35 running north to south, and I-70 from east to west. Its airport handles more cargo than any facility covering a six-Midwestern-state radius other than O'Hare International Airport. Its bi-state, 18-county region boasts more road lane capacity than any of comparable size, which might explain why "rush hour" is a largely alien concept even though more than 2 million people call it home.
It also serves up the meanest barbeque anywhere in creation.
Yet Kansas City, Mo., remains one of the world's most overlooked commerce centers, a reality not lost on its devoted community of business leaders and civic boosters. Upon arrival, visitors will usually be greeted by a boisterous "Welcome to Kansas City!" followed by, "Is this your first time here?" with the tacit understanding that the reply is often affirmative.
Kansas City's image has long been that of a "large small city" dwarfed by Chicago, 500 miles to the northeast, and by its sister city on Missouri's eastern rim, St. Louis, with the latter having a reputation for being more cosmopolitan than Kansas City and with stronger ties to East Coast culture and commerce.
None of that seems to bother the locals. They revel in Kansas City's label as the original "cow town," a phrase coined decades ago after the preponderance of cattle roaming its streets. As they see it, their city's central location makes it—not Chicago or St. Louis—the natural eastern gateway to the west, as well as the ideal northern consolidation point for truck and rail service supporting the booming U.S.-Mexico trade.
Yet for all its strengths as a rail center, Kansas City still lacks the established gateway status of a city like Chicago, where all seven North American Class I railroads come together. Patrick Ottensmeyer, executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Kansas City Southern Inc. (KCS), the Kansas City-based railway, said it is more efficient for shippers and carriers to go direct into Chicago without the need for an interchange at Kansas City.
Still, Ottensmeyer said that, in many cases, Kansas City is the "perfect set-up" for rail movements, especially given its position as a median point for north-south traffic moving between the upper Midwest and Mexico. To leverage the region's pre-eminence as a source of animal protein products, KCS is considering a "shuttle" service at Kansas City under which the railroad would load beef and poultry shipments brought in by truck and then ship it southbound to Mexico, Ottensmeyer said. KCS would carry Mexican produce on the northbound leg, he said.
Chris J.F. Gutierrez, president of KC SmartPort, a non-profit economic and logistics development organization, said Kansas City actually benefits from having Chicago considered a rival for supply chain projects. "Most supply chain professionals know the difficulty of congestion, labor, and other factors that challenge them in Chicago," Gutierrez said in an e-mail to DC Velocity. "Kansas City does not have these issues and offers a competitive option for [a] company to consider."
Gutierrez said that when Kansas City is in the running as a site for a new manufacturing or distribution center, "we rarely are competing against Chicago."
Location, location...
When it comes to attracting industrial development, however, Kansas City still has some work to do. Local financial institutions, by and large, adhere to very conservative lending practices. As a result, there is little, if any, so-called speculative development of industrial properties. While that served the city in good stead during the economic downturn, it has made it hard to aggressively and creatively market a property to a business looking to quickly expand or relocate into an existing facility.
But the city's many supply chain strengths can offset the impact of its lenders' practices. When the Coleman Co. Inc., the Wichita, Kan.-based maker of outdoor products, looked to build a 1.5 million-square-foot distribution center—its largest ever—it chose Kansas City, even though St. Louis made a more "financially favorable" proposal, according to Rob Tecco, Coleman's director of distribution.
Kansas City got the nod because of its abundant labor pool, a friendly pro-business climate, and a superior transport network to support Coleman's receiving and distribution, said Tecco. "We think we have a better transportation piece" in Kansas City, he said.
It didn't hurt that the facility was constructed and in move-in condition for Coleman within 10 months after it committed to Kansas City, Tecco added. Coleman moved into the DC in October 2009.
Kansas City's proximity to major consumer markets also drove Pure Fishing Inc., one of the world's leading makers of fishing tackle equipment, to build a 400,000-square-foot distribution center there in 2008, according to Jeff Kisling, vice president, North America logistics and services. "Kansas City was the place to be from a cost perspective and from an inventory perspective," he said.
Kisling said Pure Fishing's goods can be delivered anywhere in the United States from its DC in three days or less. This is critical for serving West Coast anglers, who make up a good chunk of the company's customer base, he said.
"We can take an order on Monday, ship it out on Tuesday, and our West Coast customers can receive it on Friday in time for the weekend," Kisling said. "St. Louis is too far east" to consistently hit those delivery targets, he added.
Municipal support
Logistics has also been embraced at the municipal level. Perhaps the most striking example is in the western suburb of Olathe, Kan., where over the past 40 years its residents have helped finance—in conjunction with federal and state funding—the construction of four interchanges off I-35. The first three focused on retail and office development. The fourth, and last, was dedicated to industrial development. It opened three years ago.
Tim McKee, president of the Olathe Chamber of Commerce, said the projects have yielded financial benefits far in excess of their costs. "For each interchange that we have built, we have seen private investment of more than $1 billion," he said.
But perhaps the most ringing endorsement to date of Kansas City's increasing relevance on the logistics map can be found in Edgerton, Kan., about 25 miles southwest of the city off I-35. There, workers are erecting an intermodal and distribution complex that will occupy more than 7 million square feet and cost about $750 million, 80 percent of which will be funded through private sources. An additional $100 million in public money will be spent on infrastructure such as access roads around the park.
The project, considered one of the most important development efforts in the history of Kansas, is expected to create more than 13,000 direct and indirect jobs statewide and generate about $1.7 billion in tax revenue over a 20-year period, according to state estimates.
Anchoring the complex will be a $250 million intermodal yard being built by BNSF Railway. The BNSF terminal, slated to open in the fourth quarter of 2013, will replace a smaller facility near the city and become a linchpin of the railroad's southern corridor connecting Chicago and the Southwest. At full capacity, the facility will be able to handle 1.5 million intermodal "lifts" per year, compared with 313,621 lifts handled at the existing facility in 2011. A lift is defined as one trailer or container being placed on or taken off a rail car.
Ground was broken at the BNSF facility in mid-March, and the project is expected to take about 22 months to complete. For BNSF executives, the contrast between the progress at Edgerton and an ongoing project in Southern California, which is in its eighth year of development and remains mired in bureaucratic and environmental red tape, could not be starker.
"We have to get your spirit out there," remarked John Lanigan, BNSF's executive vice president and chief marketing officer, at a conference in Kansas City in early April.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."