Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
If you're a trucker or private fleet manager looking for a predictably priced alternative source of fuel, truck maker Navistar International Corp. and natural gas advocate Clean Energy Fuels Corp. think they have a deal for you.
Ironically, how good that deal turns out to be will depend on doing one's best to predict the unpredictable.
In early February, Lisle, Ill.-based Navistar and Seal Beach, Calif.-based Clean Energy, cofounded by energy baron T. Boone Pickens, unveiled a joint program to provide incentives to truck owners, renters, and lessors to purchase new and more expensive vehicles powered by liquefied natural gas (LNG) or compressed natural gas (CNG), both of which are considered cheaper and more environmentally friendly than traditional diesel fuel.
Under the program, a user would agree to purchase a gas-powered vehicle manufactured by Navistar and then commit for five years to buying 1,000 gallons of natural gas per month. In return, Clean Energy would offer the user a $500 monthly rebate, which, over the five-year span, would offset the estimated $28,000 per-unit differential between buying a gas-powered truck and purchasing a new diesel-powered vehicle.
In addition, the user would pay for its natural gas fill-ups at a price 60 cents a gallon below the prevailing price of diesel fuel as calculated each week by the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA). As of April 9, the national average price for a gallon of diesel fuel stood at $4.148, according to EIA data. Thus, a customer would pay $3.55 a gallon for the first 1,000 gallons consumed during the month.
Users who need to buy in quantities that exceed the 1,000-gallon threshold in any given month would be charged Clean Energy's "retail" rate, which currently stands a shade below $2.90 a gallon, the company said.
Big savings potential
Based on estimates that a typical solo long-haul driver logs 12,000 miles a month, the program could deliver monthly savings of $1,200 per month between the rebate and the savings at fill-up, according to the companies. LNG-powered vehicles can run about 400 miles on a full tank. Vehicles powered by heavier CNG wouldn't get the same range with a full trailerload. Such vehicles are better suited to shorter trips within urban areas where they return to the same depot each day.
For fleet owners and operators uninterested in participating in the program, the alternative would be to pay for the gas-powered vehicles out of pocket and fill up at the pump at prevailing prices for either LNG or CNG. Based on the stunningly wide differential between natural gas and crude oil prices, that option, at least for now, sounds like the better bang for the buck.
Natural gas futures contracts are today trading at $1.98 per million British thermal units (BTUs). Futures prices have fallen about 50 percent in the past 12 months due to a mild North American winter that depressed energy demand and an increase in domestic exploration and development that has led to an abundance of gas inventories. More than 80 percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced. The balance is imported from Canada.
By contrast, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil futures prices, which are more influenced by global demand and by geopolitical factors, have hovered in the $103-a-barrel range for several months. Brené crude (a sweet, light crude oil), considered the world's benchmark, is trading at a 20 percent premium to WTI.
The current differential of "52 times" between market prices for natural gas and WTI oil is unprecedented; the ratio is historically between six and 12, according to Clean Energy. Many analysts believe the combination of factors that have already affected natural gas supply and demand could cause futures prices to fall even further in 2012 and beyond.
The market price for natural gas translates into a pump price of $2.50 a gallon for LNG and $2.25 for CNG.
Market uncertainties
James N. Harger, Clean Energy's chief marketing officer, said the company is marketing the service to companies skeptical that such a wide price gap between oil and natural gas will persist in the years ahead. From 1990 through 2012, natural gas futures prices averaged $4.01 per million BTU, reaching an all-time high of $15.35 in December 2005 in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita that shut off natural gas supply flows along the Gulf Coast, and hitting a record low of $1.05 in January 1992.
Each $1 per million BTU increase in natural gas prices would equal a 14- to 15-cent per-gallon price hike at the pump, according to Clean Energy's estimates. Thus, a spike to levels midway between the historical high and low price ranges could significantly narrow the gap between oil and natural gas, and make the Navistar-Clean Energy initiative more attractive, Harger said.
Perhaps mindful of all the market uncertainties, Clean Energy said it would allow customers to opt out of the agreement at any time without penalties, Harger said.
Navistar spokesman Stephen C. Schrier said the company will in late summer unveil a gas-powered line of vehicles in the mid-sized category. It plans to roll out gas-powered trucks in the heavy-duty, or "Class 8," category sometime in 2013, he said.
The natural gas highway
The initiative is the latest effort by Pickens, who turns 84 next month, to wean the nation off of imported oil and to use more natural gas. Several years ago, Pickens proposed a plan to invest $1 trillion in wind farms that would eventually replace natural gas as a primary energy source. Natural gas supplies would then be freed up to power trucks and other heavy-duty equipment. The proposal has made little headway due to the logistical challenges in locating wind turbines in congested urban areas.
Clean Energy operates hundreds of natural gas fueling stations nationwide and has a strong presence among intra-city transit agencies and waste-hauling companies, both of which have vehicles that operate in local service and depart from and return to the same locations each day.
The company is building what it calls "America's Natural Gas Highway," a national network of truck refueling stations. Harger said the company expects to have 70 stations operational by year-end and another 80 built by the end of 2013. A high-density gas-refueling infrastructure is considered the key to a successful transition by truck fleets from petroleum to natural gas consumption.
At this point, no companies have signed up for the joint program. Jerry Moyes, CEO of Phoenix-based Swift Transportation Co., the nation's largest truckload carrier by sales, attended the Feb. 1 program launch event at Navistar's Lisle headquarters in Lisle. According to published reports, Moyes said Swift is testing 16 natural gas-powered trucks, and said the success of the program depends on the density of the refueling infrastructure.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.