Visibility across the supply chain is about more than transportation optimization. It can help reduce risks, promote better inventory management, and much more.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
It's a given that supply chains have become more complex as they have become more global. It's also a given that competitive pressures demand that those managing supply chains look for ways to reduce costs, reduce risks, shorten cycle times, and obtain more accurate forecasts. It requires the agility to shift gears quickly as circumstances change.
Managing all that across an elongated supply chain also requires the ability to know what is happening from end to end and to quickly react to changes. That requires visibility to all the critical nodes in the chain—suppliers, carriers, customs brokers, and bankers, to name a few.
True end-to-end multi-enterprise visibility may be a ways off for most companies. However, technology and events are converging in ways that make it no longer a far-fetched notion.
"This should be on the radar of leadership," says Greg Kefer of GT Nexus, which provides a cloud-based collaboration platform for shippers, carriers, and other supply chain participants. "I would be stunned if companies are not looking at their supply chains after the events in Japan and Thailand." While the effects of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and floods in Thailand are still reverberating among supply chains worldwide, those companies that got out in front of the crisis and were able to react swiftly fared better than those that could not adjust their networks. "The whole notion of operational excellence depends on vertical operational excellence," Kefer argues.
"That goes right to shareholder value. Companies win on the strength of their supply chain operations," he says. And that, in turn, demands greater visibility into exactly what is happening throughout the chain, he adds.
Visibility allows speed
Bill McBeath, chief research officer for ChainLink Research, a Newton, Mass-based supply chain research firm, has looked closely at trade logistics visibility and what it can do for companies with complex international supply chains. He argues those tools not only can help manage transportation but can also support the financial components that drive the whole system.
Late last year, McBeath wrote an article for the ChainLink Research website ("Supply Chain Financial Network Platforms: Trade-Logistics-Visibility") on how supply chain visibility can accelerate cycle time by providing business partners with crucial information. In the piece, which focused on the financial aspects of visibility, he noted, "trade-logistics-visibility platforms can help by providing lenders with detailed visibility into the status of various milestones in production, shipment, delivery, and inspection. ... By having near real-time visibility and access to documents confirming the achievement of milestones (e.g. successful inspection), instead of waiting for paper documents to arrive, banks can improve payment processing speeds, accuracies, and efficiencies."
McBeath claims that end-to-end visibility back through the supply base opens a lot of doors for managers. In an interview with DC Velocity, he said, "It enables a lot of different things. For example, if you want to do performance improvements, you can see where the bottlenecks are, where the breakdowns in processes are."
Visibility into events as they happen allows managers to respond to them quickly, McBeath says. "If you get alerts early, you can do a better job of adjusting the plan or looking for alternative ways to solve the problem."
He gives an example of how visibility across the supply chain, including lenders, could work to reduce cycle times. "If you look in particular at smaller Asian suppliers, they may not have the cash flow or credit financing they need for raw materials," he says. "If they need to wait for sufficient down payment to have the cash on hand to order raw materials, that slows down the whole process. Visibility helps in a couple of ways. If lenders have a history of the performance of the supplier and the supplier has a firm order, they can put those together. They are more likely to forward money to the supplier." That allows the vendor to order materials sooner, leading to earlier production and thus a shorter order cycle time.
Visibility can also help accelerate payables once the goods are delivered. On the consignee end, McBeath says, the ability to provide a final clean invoice at the time of delivery can speed up payments. "In a traditional system, the paper goes back to the office, and it's a week or more before you're ready to invoice," he says. "Using some of those mobile and tracing technologies, you can improve cash flow."
Visibility allows agility
Lorcan Sheehan, senior vice president of marketing of ModusLink Global Solutions, points to the consumer electronics industry as one whose operations could be improved with greater multi-enterprise visibility. Typically, he says, consumer goods companies place orders with contract manufacturers 13 weeks out, providing time to acquire components and schedule manufacturing. For offshore manufacturers, add another six weeks for transit time. That long lead time makes adjusting to changes in demand or other market shifts a real dilemma.
"In many cases, companies are planning and making decisions in June or July for selling in November," he says. "You need visibility and a good understanding of what is happening with demand and where in the pipeline you can make different decisions."
In the past, he says, making adjustments has been slowed by the essentially sequential nature of communications: the retailer contacted the distributor, who then contacted the DC and on upstream to the contract manufacturer and its suppliers. Allowing all parties to see shifts in demand as they occur can allow faster adjustments to inventory plans, Sheehan says.
Sheehan, whose company provides third-party supply chain design and execution services globally, says that visibility is crucial to adjusting to "shocks to the system," such as the events in Japan or Thailand.
"When tier-two or -three suppliers are affected, you have to be able to react quickly," he says. "The company that first realizes there is a disruption will be the one able to secure [manufacturing or transportation] capacity."
Visibility improves yield
That applies as well to transportation. The ability to see and manage freight in transit enables local managers to do a more effective job of allocating labor and other resources at DCs or stores, notes Kefer of GT Nexus. And it allows quick shifts based on demand.
Ann Marie O'Connor, retail industry marketing leader for RedPrairie, a developer of supply chain software, points out that visibility into goods in transit allows retailers in particular to reallocate goods on the fly. That's particularly important to the fast fashion segment of the industry, where styles have a short life cycle before they become outdated—and must be sold at a discount once they become passé.
The segment generally has a six- to eight-week cycle from order to required delivery. The ability to see inventory in transit, on store shelves, and in storerooms can enable managers to quickly align current demand with supply, regardless of the channel of consumption.
"What inventory visibility enables is for companies to protect gross margin," she says.
A small gain can be more significant than it might at first appear. Stephen Craig of EnVista, a supply chain consulting firm, notes that a good retailer that might normally have a 92 percent in-stock rate for most goods might get to 96 percent by getting visibility into out-of-sync shipments. "If you look at an increase in gross margin as a result of 2 percent, that 2 percent in many industries is pretty high."
He says that systems like MercuryGate's transportation management system, a system EnVista works with frequently, can set up a purchase order confirmation with vendors and then track whether vendors hit specific milestones even prior to shipping and send reminder e-mails at specific points in the cycle to ensure goods move on time.
He says it is relatively simple to establish an Internet pOréal that provides visibility into orders for vendors, carriers, and DCs.
The promise and the reality
All this is very promising. The problem is, while the vision for integrated end-to-end visibility may be compelling, the reality is that achieving it is very difficult across a global supply chain. And lack of visibility continues to complicate business supply chains. Kefer of GT Nexus gives the example of one U.S.-based retailer trying to set up shop in Asia. Because of a lack of visibility into its Asian supply chain, the company has been forced, at least for a while, to ship goods made in Asia to the United States for re-export back across the Pacific.
"I've got to believe the money being spent is staggering," Kefer says. But he is confident this company will figure it out—once it has better view into its Asian suppliers.
McBeath says advanced companies have a good handle on monitoring international transportation, sometimes down to real-time GPS data, for goods still on the water, on trucks, or in intermodal containers, but that the same level of insight into their suppliers is more problematic.
"In the best case, they have systems in place providing alerts when something is not on track. In terms of visibility into factories, some companies have that visibility into suppliers, but in many cases, those depend on the supplier to key in the status." In only a relatively few cases, he says, do systems update each other.
Greg Kefer of GT Nexus makes much the same point. "In reality, very few companies have a single monitoring system across the supply chain or value chain that gets all the companies they deal with on the same page."
The difficulty, he says, is linking all the partners. "It is tough to solve the technology [challenges]," he says. "Most software systems, ERP systems, order management systems are installed software. When you try to hook up networks through data grids, there are a lot of files flying around, but no one is looking at them."
But the visibility is coming. Kefer contends that the development of cloud technologies will eventually enable the end-to-end supply chain visibility. "The analogy we use is Facebook or LinkedIn," he says. "When you change jobs, once upon a time you had to send everyone the information. If you were lucky, 30 percent of your network would update. Now, you can go to LinkedIn and change your profile.
"We apply the same information model to the supply chain, but the information is on inventory, ETA, documents attached to the inventory, line items attached to that inventory as it moves through manufacturing, logistics, and even final payment. You get the full picture rather than a few pixels."
Accomplishing that can be daunting. "Companies are still trying to solve their TMS and ERP software [problems]," Kefer says. "But we think the cloud is a game changer." Like McBeath, he says the key will be linking supplier, carrier, banking, and other systems. And the more extended the network, the more valuable it becomes."
And therein lies the difficulty. While most major transportation carriers have the capability, suppliers are "a different beast," Kefer says. "There is still a long way to go. There could be 400,000 suppliers in Asia. A lot of them don't have systems. But if they are hooked to the Internet, they can still interact."
Broader visibility is on its way. Kefer returns to the social network metaphor: "The value of Facebook or eBay is the network. The value is there's a billion people in it. That's the game we're in right now, getting that network density."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.