Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In a famous scene from the 1967 film "The Graduate," a man approaches recent college graduate Benjamin Braddock at a party and whispers one word of advice in Braddock's ear about his future career:
"Plastics."
In that spirit, one can almost envision Benjamin Franklin, the founder of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), pulling Paul Vogel, USPS's president and chief marketing and sales officer, aside at a function and whispering one word in Vogel's ear about the post office's direction:
"Parcels."
Unlike Braddock, who recoiled at the idea of choosing plastics as a career, the 61-year-old Vogel, who runs all sales, marketing, and domestic and international product development and management, would likely be receptive to Franklin's advice. Though far from being the tail that wags the postal dog, parcels are becoming an increasingly critical part of the quasi-governmental agency's present, and more importantly, its future.
"It's a growth area," Vogel said in a recent interview with DC Velocity. "The shipping industry is doing well for us."
Vogel has good reason to be upbeat about USPS's place in the parcel world. The growth of online commerce from all sources—computers, mobile devices, and social media—plays to the strength of the USPS's infrastructure, which is built around handling packages weighing one to five pounds—the typical weight range of an online shipment—and delivering it to any address in the United States at a lower cost than its private rivals can.
And there is more of that growth expected to come. According to Forrester Research and Booz & Co., the value of all U.S. online sales—excluding groceries—will hit $324 billion by 2015, up from $204 billion in 2011. Those projections do not include the cost—and potential revenue—involved in handling the returns of products bought online.
Vogel said he's focused on strengthening USPS's niche, which is moving large quantities of parcels from merchants, fulfillment houses, and parcel consolidators to millions of residences. By contrast, Vogel is steering the agency away from the corporate business-to-business parcel category dominated by its rivals, and its partners: FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc.
"I am a harsh realist," he said. "Our strength is with the consumer and the small business."
Vogel also believes USPS is in the sweet spot of the shipping segment. "I would question how much the [business-to-business] market is growing," he said. Vogel said USPS speaks regularly with businesses that would like to enter or expand into the consumer market but have yet to do so or as yet have made minimal strides.
Wanted: new business
The surge in online shopping and shipping can't come soon enough for USPS, which desperately needs new revenue sources to offset the declines in products like first-class mail that are being cannibalized by digital transactions.
In its fiscal 2012 first quarter, which ended Dec. 31, USPS said revenue for its "shipping services," which encompass Express Mail and Priority Mail, International Mail, and the fast-growing product called "Parcel Select"—where packages are inducted by shippers and consolidators deep into the postal system for the final delivery to the consignee—hit $2.8 billion, an increase of $179 million, or 7 percent, over the fiscal 2011 period. The increase was due in part to greater online buying—and shipping—activity during the holidays.
However, those gains were dwarfed by a combined $650 million revenue decline in first-class mail and the bulk mail service for printed matter and advertising known as "standard mail," USPS said. Revenue for first-class mail, which contributes two-thirds of USPS's profit, declined 4.1 percent from the year-earlier period. Total mail volume declined by 6 percent.
First-class mail's future seems none too bright. It will account for 37 percent of total volumes in 2016, down from 44 percent in 2011, according to agency data. Its revenue contribution will drop to 41 percent from 49 percent in that period. Due to the weakness in first-class mail, total USPS revenue is expected to drop to $62 billion by 2016, down from $66 billion in 2011.
In a government filing accompanying the first-quarter results, USPS said the decline in its most profitable product, combined with congressional restrictions on entering new lines of business, could keep it revenue-challenged for many years to come. "There currently is no foreseen revenue growth solution that would completely resolve the Postal Service's financial problems," it wrote.
The multiyear outlook for shipping is somewhat different. By 2016, shipping services will account for nearly 20 percent of USPS's revenue, up from 16.1 percent in 2011, according to USPS data. The volume contribution, however, will be virtually unchanged, with shipping accounting for 1.7 percent of total volumes by 2016 compared with 1.6 percent in 2011. Today, shipping contributes 9.5 percent to USPS's annual profit.
Jerry Hempstead, who held high-level U.S. sales posts at the old Airborne Express and DHL Express and now heads a parcel consultancy bearing his name, said parcel volumes at USPS will never reach the levels required to overcome the financial damage done by the loss of first-class and standard mail. "Even if they doubled the number of parcels overnight, it's such a small contribution to their income statement that it's like a pimple on the butt of an elephant," he said.
Steve Rifai, managing director at Dymo Endicia, a Palo Alto, Calif.-based firm that provides automated workflow solutions to large postal users, agreed that the parcel business, in and of itself, will not cure USPS's ills. "However, without parcels, the problems will be much more difficult for USPS to overcome," he said.
Rifai said Endicia's customers tendered $1.5 billion of parcel business to USPS in 2011. That figure is expected to grow by between $300 million and $400 million in 2012, he said. Rifai forecast that parcels will eventually bring in half of all new postal revenue on an annual basis.
Improving the proposition
USPS, which estimates that it handles 29 percent of all U.S. shipping volumes, said it is being as aggressive as possible to boost its shipping value proposition. It has developed flat-rate packaging configurations for its Express Mail and Priority Mail products, allowing users to cram as much material as will fit in a box for a flat rate shipped anywhere in the United States.
Megan O. Brennan, who as USPS's executive vice president and chief operating officer oversees what may be the nation's most complex distribution network, said she and her team are also exploring the possibility of expediting delivery schedules of Priority Mail, which are currently marketed as two- to three-day deliveries. "We want to stretch our capabilities to see how much of the second-day network we can advance into the overnight mail system," she said in an interview.
USPS has begun marketing its first-class mail parcel product—bulk shipments of individual pieces weighing less than 13 ounces—in the free market, rather than keeping it protected from competition, as has been the case for many decades. USPS said the shift will give it more pricing flexibility and align all of its so-called competitive products in one portfolio.
However, Hempstead warned that if USPS decides to raise prices on the product—which accounts for more than 40 percent of its total parcel business—it could lose the historical price advantage over FedEx and UPS and may see that business migrate away.
USPS has also launched regional delivery services for Priority Mail and Parcel Select shipments that allow users to ship their products over shorter distances, a dramatic departure from USPS's traditional model of long-distance shipping.
In the case of the regional service for Parcel Select, USPS is trying to attract low- to medium-volume shippers tendering shipments moving within 300 miles.
The product is an effort to capture a larger share of lightweight ground parcel traffic traveling across shorter distances. About 45 percent of all ground shipments handled by private parcel carriers weigh five pounds or less, according to data from SJ Consulting, a Pittsburgh-based consultancy. Of those, one-third move less than 300 miles, according to the firm.
FedEx and UPS are heavy users of the service because it enables them to pursue more e-commerce transactions without the cost of dispatching a truck and driver to low-density residential areas.
Postal executives said Parcel Select's low costs give merchants the financial latitude to offer free shipping to online customers at a relatively small expense to them. According to data from consultancy IMS Worldwide Inc., three out of every four online orders are canceled if customers are not promised free shipping.
Vogel acknowledges the need of online retailers to provide free shipping in order to stay competitive. However, he said it puts additional pressure on USPS to drive down costs on what is already a low-margin product.
"The term I've learned to hate is 'free shipping,'" he joked.
Cutting out lag time
From an operations standpoint, postal observers said, the agency needs to improve in the areas of online tracking and in ensuring that parcels parked at the facility where they are scheduled to be given to the letter carrier leave the unit the day they arrive—and if they don't, that shippers see exception reports almost in real time to find out why it didn't happen.
Currently, letter carriers scan packages at delivery but must wait until they return to the delivery unit to upload the data into the postal computers. That time lag, which could sometimes be several hours depending on the carrier's schedule and road conditions, is considered unacceptable in today's time-compressed, data-driven world. It also drives up a shipper's customer service costs, observers contend.
USPS is working on the issue, and even its detractors said it is making strides to add technology that enables real-time tracking.
In the case of moving parcels quickly out the delivery door, Rifai of Dymo Endicia said USPS has developed a system where officials at its Washington, D.C., headquarters get daily data feeds from delivery units that enable the agency to monitor its performance. "They now have the visibility at HQ to see which [delivery units] are performing and which aren't," he said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."