Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
It's good to be in logistics. Or at least that's what the results of DC Velocity's 2012 Salary Survey suggest. Of the 602 readers who participated in our survey, 86 percent said they were satisfied with their career and would recommend it to someone entering the workforce.
What's behind the high level of job satisfaction? Part of it is surely financial. According to the survey results, our reader's average salary is $106,311 and the median salary is $90,000. (For a breakdown of average salary by position, see Exhibit 1.) That's up 6 percent from the average salary reported in last year's survey. Indeed, 65 percent of respondents reported that their paychecks were fatter this year than last, with an average increase of 7 percent.
While a six-figure salary is nothing to turn up your nose at, those numbers actually sound low to Susan Rider, president of the consulting firm Rider & Associates LLC. For supervisor positions, she is seeing salaries that run $10,000 higher than the average reported in our survey, and for the more senior positions (directors, vice president, president), she generally sees salaries that are $50,000 to $75,000 higher.
How to increase your worth
If you're looking to boost your pay, our survey results indicate there may be some steps you can take to increase your earning power. They are as follows:
Move to a bigger company. As Exhibit 2 indicates, larger companies (particularly those with over 5,000 employees) tend to pay higher salaries. (To provide as accurate a comparison as possible, Exhibit 2 only looks at the average salary for managers, as nearly half of all respondents are managers.)
Take a job that reaches outside the distribution center. While 66 percent of respondents said they had direct or indirect management control or influence over warehousing/distribution center operations, this was not the path to the big bucks. Those who reported having responsibility for warehousing or distribution center operations have the lowest average salary by job responsibility (see Exhibit 3).
Develop specialized skills. On the other side of the spectrum, those who had management control or influence over import/export operations reported the highest salaries. Rider says this isn't surprising. "Government regulation, terrorism, and Homeland Security continue to compel a certain amount of knowledge and specialization. But the number of people who have that knowledge is limited," she explains.
Other specialized skills in high demand include international supply chain experience, lean management, and FDA and U.S. Department of Agriculture validation expertise, Rider says. She adds that employers are also seeking people who have proficiency with warehouse management systems.
The survey also showed that those responsible for fleet operations out-earned most of their peers. Rider suspects that rising fuel prices and growing capacity concerns have made companies more willing to pay for expertise in this area.
Stick around. If you haven't achieved your target salary yet, you just might need a few more years of experience. Responses to the salary survey show that in general, the more experience you have in logistics, the higher your salary—particularly for those who have more than 20 years of experience. The one anomaly seems to be respondents who have less than five years of experience in logistics, whose average salary of $99,890 was higher than expected. (See Exhibit 4.) Similarly, Exhibit 5 shows that the older the respondent, the higher the salary (until respondents hit age 65, when many might be in a semi-retired state).
But don't wear out your welcome. While the survey does seem to indicate that companies reward loyalty, that seems to be true only to a certain point. Average salary rises along with tenure at a company until about year 15, when the average salary levels off and then drops a bit. (See Exhibit 6.)
Be male. This may sound glib, but the sobering fact remains that men in the logistics field are still out-earning women. The first DC Velocity salary survey back in 2006 noted that discrepancy, and things haven't changed much in the past six years. This year, females made up 10 percent of the survey respondents, and their average salary ($76,572) was significantly lower than the average salary of their male counterparts ($109,787).
"I have to say that the supply chain/warehousing/logistics world is a little behind the times," says Rider. "I also think it has something to do with the fact that women are still in lower-level positions as supervisors and managers. It took us a while as women to break into the industry, and we are still working our way up."
But the gap does not appear to be narrowing. In the 2007 survey, female managers on average earned 22 percent less than males ($65,774 vs. $80,225). In 2012, female managers on average earned 25 percent less than their male counterparts ($73,167 vs. $91,366). Furthermore, slicing the data by age or years of logistics experience produced no change in the results.
Go back to school. While an advanced degree comes with a high price tag these days, it also translates into a higher average salary. Respondents with a master's degree or higher reported an average salary of $141,287, compared with $104,020 for those with a bachelor's degree and $85,280 for a high school diploma. Likewise, certifications for specialized skills are carrying much more weight than they used to, says Rider.
One factor that does not seem to have much effect on salary is region of the country. It's hard to see any patterns when you look at the last three years' worth of data from the survey. (See Exhibit 7.) However, salaries may be higher in areas that are considered logistics hubs, such as Columbus, Ohio; Memphis, Tenn.; and Louisville, Ky., says Rider. She speculates that may be the reason why she sees higher salaries than those reported in DC Velocity's survey.
It's not all about the Benjamins
While money is important, it was not what the majority of readers mentioned when asked what they liked most about their job. Instead, they said they enjoyed solving the ever-changing challenges they confronted on a daily basis. As one respondent noted, "The job is the same, but it is different ever day."
Also, many mentioned that they liked the people or teams they work with and the interaction with different departments, customers, and suppliers. While it may sound trite, this underlines an important point. Logistics isn't just about shipping product; it's about managing relationships—with fellow employees as well as with other departments, suppliers, partners, and customers.
Indeed, companies highly value logistics professionals with communication and management skills, says Rider. "The soft skills of managing and motivating people are a huge priority for companies," she says. "Particularly as young millennials are proving to be challenging for older generations from a management perspective. How you work with the younger workforce is different. You can't continue to do what you've always done and be successful."
Another factor that may be contributing to job satisfaction is logistics' growing influence in many companies. Just under 70 percent of respondents reported that the number of functions they manage has risen in the past three years. Many said their favorite thing about their job was the level of autonomy that they had and the ability to make decisions that affect the company's bottom line.
But that added responsibility comes with a downside. When asked what they didn't like about their jobs, respondents cited long hours, too much travel, and increased stress. Forty-five percent of respondents said they work more than 50 hours a week, and 37 percent said the number of hours they work has increased. And while many enjoy a feeling of autonomy, others are still fighting to get the ear of C-level executives.
Keep 'em happy
The relatively high pay is indicative of the fact that people with logistics and supply chain expertise are in a unique position at the moment. Despite all the talk of a "jobless recovery," logistics and supply chain skills are still in high demand. Indeed, as business rebounds, companies may need to take a closer look at what they need to do to hold onto good employees.
Rider says that for younger workers, quality-of-life factors are more important than they've been to previous generations. While older workers may not care so much about whether there's an Xbox in the break room or whether the company has a soccer team, a fun work environment that creates a sense of camaraderie is important to younger workers. And workers of all ages are more interested in flex time and alternative working arrangements, such as the flexibility to work from home, says Rider.
The good news for employers is that what people want is not necessarily more money. "It's appreciation, challenge, and culture," says Rider. "And these are things that are easy for companies to do if they focus on it."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.