Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Now that UPS Inc. has proposed to ante up $6.4 billion for TNT Express, will FedEx Corp. see its chief rival and raise it a few billion dollars?
Atlanta-based UPS's unexpected and unsolicited Feb. 17 bid for TNT Express prices the offer at 9 euros a share, or $11.87 a share in U.S. currency. TNT Express's rejection of the UPS proposal sets up a possible bidding war between the two U.S.-based parcel giants for the Dutch delivery concern, one of the big four global parcel players.
At stake is no less than possible domination of the intra-European delivery market by UPS—and whether FedEx, or the third big global competitor, DHL Express, will let it happen.
TNT controls 18 percent of the intra-European parcel market, according to estimates from New York investment firm Wolfe, Trahan & Co. DHL is second with 16 percent, followed by UPS with 14 percent. FedEx brings up the rear with just 4 percent market share, according to the firm.
FedEx has been a minor presence in Europe since its decision 20 years ago to exit the intra-continental market and focus its European business on inter-continental routes serving its major commerce centers. The Memphis-based giant has made scant effort in the past two decades to expand its intra-European network, so it may simply take a pass on TNT, especially if UPS hikes its offer—talks between UPS and TNT are ongoing—and pushes FedEx to the limits of its cash hoard.
FedEx had slightly under $1.9 billion in available cash as of the end of its fiscal 2012 second quarter in November 2011, according to investment firm Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. UPS, by contrast, had $4.13 billion at the end of its 2011 third quarter in September.
RAISING THE STAKES
Edward Wolfe, co-founder of Wolfe Trahan, believes that FedEx will join the bidding fray at a higher price than UPS's initial offer and that UPS will also make a higher bid than what is on the table. Wolfe estimates that FedEx could bid up to $17.15 a share without having to issue stock to finance the deal. UPS could bid as high as $19.79 a share without incurring higher borrowing costs, Wolfe said.
A FedEx bid could be designed more to keep TNT Express out of UPS's hands than to have it enter FedEx's embrace, Wolfe intimated. FedEx "could be boxed out of Europe for a long time" if UPS buys TNT, Wolfe said in a research note. A FedEx spokesman declined comment.
DHL, which controls DHL Express, has also remained quiet on the developments. DHL may shy away from a bid for TNT Express for fear of raising the ire of European antitrust regulators. Jerry Hempstead, who runs an Orlando, Fla.-based parcel consultancy bearing his name, doesn't expect DHL to make a bid, expecting it instead to lobby the EU in an attempt to block a UPS takeover.
Hempstead, who held top U.S. sales posts at the old Airborne Express and then DHL, said UPS tried to prevent DHL from buying Airborne in 2003. The deal eventually went through, setting the stage for a six-year debacle that resulted in DHL's losing billions of dollars in a failed effort to gain U.S. parcel market share. DHL ceased domestic U.S. operations in January 2009.
TNT's strength is its integrated intra-European air and ground network. It also has an intra-China business, as well as exposure in Southeast Asia and Brazil. Its inter-continental business focuses on service to and from Europe, though it does operate from the United States to international points. It also operates a U.S.-Europe service in concert with trucking and logistics giant Con-way Inc.
ALL EYES ON UPS
Hempstead believes that UPS will prevail, saying its balance sheet is stronger than FedEx's and it could up the bid for TNT Express with relatively light financial strain. Hempstead also believes DHL will not step in because it is reluctant to do another major deal following the fiasco with Airborne.
Rob Martinez, president and CEO of San Diego-based parcel consultancy Shipware LLC, concurs that UPS's stronger cash position will help it carry the day. Martinez believes UPS will "modestly" boost its initial offer, at which time TNT Express will agree to terms with UPS.
Hempstead cautions, however, that TNT Express should not get too aggressive, noting that UPS's top management, led by Chairman and CEO Scott Davis and CFO Kurt Kuehn, are conservative in nature and do not have a habit of overpaying for anything.
"If [TNT Express] tries to jerk UPS around, I could see UPS taking its cash hoard off the table and saying, in perfect Dutch, 'Hasta la vista, baby!'" said Hempstead. "Davis and Kuehn are not to be trifled with."
The UPS offer, if consummated, would be by far the largest acquisition in its history. Until now, UPS's largest deal was its $1.2 billion purchase of less-than-truckload carrier Overnite Transportation Co. in 2005.
The UPS bid comes a little more than a year after TNT split its mail and express businesses, creating a stand-alone entity for parcel deliveries.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."