Kimberly-Clark helped to pioneer the concept of collaborative supply chains. The benefits have been so great that the practice is now sweeping through Europe.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Nine years ago, when Kimberly-Clark Corp. launched a collaborative distribution trial with Lever Fabergé (now Unilever's Home and Personal Care unit) in the Netherlands, company managers had no idea that they were trailblazing what would become a supply chain best practice in Europe. In that first experiment, the two companies made joint deliveries to customers, with each company filling half of each truck.
With that early effort, Kimberly-Clark pioneered the concept of collaborative distribution, also known as shared or collaborative supply chains, a practice that is now sweeping Europe. In a shared supply chain, two or more companies use the same distribution facility and transportation services to serve mutual customers. This practice reduces costs for manufacturers and provides more frequent replenishment for retailers.
Kimberly-Clark's venture with Lever Fabergé in the Netherlands encouraged other companies to take the plunge into shared distribution. "It was the starting point for what is now known as collaborative supply chains in Europe," says Peter Surtees, Kimberly-Clark's director of supply chain for Europe. "Collaboration now is a big thing in Europe, especially for CPGs (consumer packaged goods companies)." The concept of shared supply chains has proved so attractive, in fact, that a nonprofit organization has been formed in Europe to foster such collaboration among other CPG companies, retailers, and third-party logistics companies.
For Kimberly-Clark, its positive experience with collaborative distribution in the Netherlands prompted the consumer goods giant to extend that program to additional countries and business partners. Here is a look at how the program works and what the company has accomplished to date.
More deliveries, same cost
Kimberly-Clark, a 140-year-old company headquartered in Irving, Texas, makes an assortment of personal care products, including such well-known items as Kleenex facial tissues, Huggies diapers, and Scott's paper towels. In 2011, it reported worldwide revenue of $20.8 billion from sales in more than 175 countries.
In Europe, Kimberly-Clark sells its products in 45 countries and operates 15 factories. Finished goods are stored in 32 distribution centers, all of which are operated by third-party logistics (3PL) companies.
Back in 2003, some retailers in the Netherlands were trying to restock store inventory based on point-of-sale data, which would allow them to make replenishment decisions based on actual customer transactions. As part of that initiative, the retailers wanted to increase the frequency of deliveries and resupply stores by replenishing only what had been sold. But this did not jibe with Kimberly-Clark's practice of delivering in full truckloads. "Our Dutch customers did not want full truckloads," Surtees says. "They really wanted us to deliver more frequently to align to point-of-sale data, so we would be replenishing more in real time."
The question facing Kimberly-Clark, Surtees says, was this: How can we shorten the replenishment cycle and stop delivering full truckloads without incurring additional transportation costs?
The solution, Surtees and his team decided, would be to team up with another company that was making shipments to those same retail stores. If Kimberly-Clark and its partner split a truckload, with each filling half a trailer, both companies could increase delivery frequency without increasing transportation costs.
Kimberly-Clark approached the cosmetics manufacturer Lever Fabergé about the idea. The two companies conducted a successful trial with Makro, which operates a chain of warehouse club stores in the Netherlands. The experiment produced other benefits besides transportation savings: It also demonstrated that by shortening cycle time for deliveries, collaborative distribution could reduce store inventories while increasing on-shelf availability of products. "When we did the trial with Makro, there was a 30-percent reduction in the value of the products that they were storing," Surtees says. "We also got an out-of-stock reduction of 30 percent."
After the trial, Kimberly-Clark and Lever Fabergé agreed that if they wanted to expand their collaboration, they would need to engage a third-party logistics company to operate a shared distribution center and handle transportation on their behalf. In 2003, they entered into an agreement with Hays Logistics (now part of Kuehne & Nagel) to build a shared distribution center in Raamsdonksveer, the Netherlands.
While Hays was constructing the 46,000-square-meter (495,000-square-foot) facility, Kimberly-Clark and Lever Fabergé went to their mutual customers and asked for their support. "If [our Dutch customers] wanted us to do this, they had to make sure to work with us, and they had to order Unilever and Kimberly-Clark on the same day on the same truck," Surtees says.
Consultant Patrick Anthonissen, who at the time was the project leader for Lever Fabergé, says that the two manufacturers showed the warehouse to their retailer customers to help persuade them of the venture's value. "We invited many of our customers to the warehouse and explained the advantages," he recalls. "This was received well by the retailers and in my opinion, was a very good example of how the supply chain can contribute to sales."
With the backing of their customers, the two companies began their joint distribution initiative later that year. Both Kimberly-Clark and Lever Fabergé processed their own customer orders and then relayed that information to Hays Logistics. The third-party logistics company then used that information to pull both companies' products from the warehouse and ship full truckloads.
Layer picking brings labor savings
Today, the original partners continue to collaborate in the Netherlands, where they have 127 shared customers. Kimberly-Clark and Unilever make 80 percent of their deliveries in the Netherlands through this shared supply chain, and shared deliveries account for 93 percent of Kimberly-Clark's sales volume in that country.
When the program got under way, each truckload would be split fairly evenly between Kimberly-Clark's and Unilever's goods. Today, because other manufacturers are also using the distribution center, Kimberly-Clark's products sometimes constitute only one-third of the truckload. "Kuehne & Nagel have other customers in the same distribution network, so we can be a little more flexible," says Surtees.
In addition to the benefits Kimberly-Clark and its customers realized from the beginning—more frequent replenishment without increased transportation costs, lower store inventory costs, and fewer out-of-stocks—the manufacturer has also achieved a significant reduction in handling costs in the distribution center. That reduction came about in large part because Hays invested in material handling automation to expedite handling and save on labor.
Both Kimberly-Clark's and Unilever's customers want to receive mixed-case pallets, but assembling them is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. To speed up that process at the Raamsdonksveer distribution center, Hays invested in layer-picker equipment, which was furnished by Univeyor, according to Anthonissen. This type of equipment uses vacuum suction to lift a layer of cases from a pallet and transfer those boxes to another pallet. Switching from a manual process to an automated one produced notable savings. "By combining the two [companies'] volumes, we were able to automate to take out 16 percent of the handling costs," Surtees says.
Trust and rapport
After the Netherlands operation had validated the concept of a shared supply chain, it was a few years before Kimberly-Clark replicated its success elsewhere in Europe. The main reason the company waited so long was that it wanted to be sure it selected the right manufacturer to partner with. "We talked to other companies in the United Kingdom, Spain, and Italy Ã�âïÿýÃ�æ and it took us a long time to find the right partner," Surtees says. "The right partner is not just somebody with the right volumes. It's also [a matter of] finding a company with the right culture—somebody you can work with, somebody you actually trust. This is a bit like getting married, in some respects."
Finally, in 2006, Kimberly-Clark began collaborating with the cereal manufacturer Kellogg Co. in some parts of England and Scotland. Kimberly-Clark believed that Kellogg was a good match, and that the two had the right "trust and rapport," Surtees says.
Kimberly-Clark operates distribution centers in the north and south of England, while Kellogg manufactures in the north. In a test run, Kellogg started shipping to a Kimberly-Clark distribution facility located in Northfleet, which is east of London. There, Kellogg's products were cross-docked and mixed in with Kimberly-Clark's goods, and both company's products were then loaded onto a truck for delivery to small customers in London and southeastern England.
That trial worked so well that it has become a permanent arrangement, and Kellogg now reciprocates for Kimberly-Clark's deliveries north of the city of Birmingham, located in the center of the country. Kimberly-Clark stores its products in Kellogg's distribution center in Trafford Park, near Manchester. Just as in the southeast, the two partners assemble and move full truckloads to small retailers in that region.
Getting the program started with Kellogg in England was somewhat easier than establishing the shared supply chain in the Netherlands because both companies were already working with the same third-party logistics company, TDG. That meant that both manufacturers already had the necessary capabilities for electronically sharing information with the 3PL. "Setting this up was relatively straightforward with both of us being [TDG] customers," Surtees says.
Expansion into France
The successful arrangement between Kimberly-Clark and Kellogg led to another shared supply chain initiative, this time in France. The partners launched a program in 2009 to serve the large French retailer, Carrefour, which was looking for opportunities to improve operations and reduce costs. "Carrefour is going down a similar journey of reducing cycle time and inventory," says Surtees. "Carrefour does not want to hold inventory at all."
There are two major differences between the shared supply chain operation in England and the one in France. First, Kimberly-Clark and Kellogg use different third-party logistics companies in France—Kellogg uses DHL while Kimberly-Clark uses the French company FM Logistic to run their respective distribution centers. However, because both 3PLs operate facilities near one another in the city of Orleans, a single truck can stop at both facilities. Now, trucks operated by the French 3PL Norbert Dentressangle stop at Kimberly-Clark's warehouse to pick up half a truckload and then move on to Kellogg's facility to pick up goods destined for Carrefour. (In late March 2011, Norbert Dentressangle completed its acquisition of TDG, the 3PL both manufacturers use in England.)
The second difference is that in France, Kimberly-Clark is responsible for maintaining inventory levels for both its own and Kellogg's products at Carrefour's distribution center. To handle the task of assembling full truckload shipments and running its vendor-managed inventory (VMI) program, Kimberly-Clark brought in a vendor-managed inventory company. "We use a vendor-managed inventory system that allows us to look into the customer's DCs and generate replenishment orders," Surtees says. "The VMI [company] does the ordering piece on behalf of Kellogg's and Kimberly-Clark."
Shared supply chains spread across Europe
In the near future, Kimberly-Clark hopes to expand its use of collaborative supply chains into other countries, including Belgium, Italy, and Germany. But the manufacturer is no longer alone in these efforts. Driven by retailers' needs, other CPG companies in Europe are starting to set up shared supply chains. The idea is catching on quickly, says Surtees. "Our customers want to drive stock from their supply chain and want to shorten the replenishment cycle." Furthermore, he says, "CPGs are signing on to the concept because they are trying to find ways of servicing the customer better while trying to reduce costs, particularly transportation."
There is so much interest, in fact, that several hundred manufacturers, retailers, and logistics service companies now belong to the organization European Logistics Users, Providers and Enablers Group (ELUPEG), which was formed to champion collaborative supply chains.
Although collaborative distribution is a hot trend right now, supply chain managers should think carefully before they get involved. What advice would Surtees give a company that wants to set up a collaborative supply chain? The most important thing, he believes, is to select the right partner. "You have to be cautious about who you get into a relationship with," he says, "because getting out of it once you have set it all up could be quite difficult."
In Surtees' view, it's also important for all parties in the shared supply chain, including the third-party logistics company, to have a "pragmatic way" of sharing the gains and benefits. For example, the deal Kimberly-Clark struck with Kuehne & Nagel in the Netherlands lets both companies share financial benefits. "The rate we are charged per case picked by Kuehne & Nagel is adjusted based on the volume picked on our behalf," he explains. "The savings flow through as a rate reduction." Kimberly-Clark also receives about one-third of the 16-percent cost reduction from the automated handling system mentioned earlier, also in the form of a rate reduction.
Finally, Surtees recommends using contract logistics service providers to facilitate the shared supply chain because they have experience dealing with multiple customers. Even though retailers are driving the move toward collaborative distribution in Europe today, he believes that 3PLs will play a greater role in fostering adoption of this practice in the future. "The logistics companies have access to the customer bases," he says. "They should be taking the lead in finding the right partners for the right operation."
Editor's note: This story first appeared in the Quarter 2/2011 edition of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, a journal of thought leadership for the supply chain management profession and a sister publication to AGiLE Business Media's DC Velocity. Readers can obtain a subscription by joining the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (whose membership dues include the Quarterly's subscription fee). Subscriptions are also available to non-members for $89 a year (print) or $34.95 (digital). For more information, visit www.SupplyChainQuarterly.com.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."