Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Combine a successful entrepreneur and businessman, an industry ripe for consolidation, and a cluster of small businesses that may be ready to sell out at the right price, and, if nothing else, it could create the most compelling stew of activity the U.S. transportation industry has seen in some time.
Stirring the pot will be 55-year-old Bradley S. Jacobs, a balding, bespectacled Providence, R.I., native. Jacobs may lack the visibility of such buy-out artists as Carl C. Icahn and William A. Ackman, but he has prospered greatly in his own right by starting and running businesses in three other industries: energy, equipment rental, and solid waste.
Now, Jacobs has set his sights on transportation, specifically the $50 billion-a-year truck brokerage sector, where third parties help shippers locate available truck capacity, among other services.
Last year, Jacobs led a team that invested $150 million in cash in a non-asset-based expedited transportation company called Express-1 Expedited Solutions Inc. He renamed the company XPO Logistics and installed himself as CEO. From this platform, Jacobs aims to construct a $5 billion to $6 billion-a-year powerhouse mostly by unifying a scattered truck brokerage segment through a combination of acquisitions and organic expansion XPO refers to as "cold starts."
Jacobs, who opened an office late last year in Phoenix, envisions launching about 20 cold-start offices over the next 18 months to three years. He said he expects each location to generate between $25 million and $200 million in revenue a year.
In addition, Jacobs projected that XPO would make five to seven brokerage acquisitions a year. XPO had not made any acquisitions as of this writing, though Jacobs said in other interviews that he has talked to about 100 potential acquirees.
Jacobs said XPO has about $70 million in cash and a $10 million line of credit that could be expanded if necessary. The combination of cash and credit availability should get XPO through the first phase of acquisitions and cold starts, which, if business grows as Jacobs hopes, will result in a near-doubling of XPO's current annual revenue to about $400 million.
XPO will also look to build a presence in other non-asset-based operations, like freight forwarding and time-critical transportation, Jacobs said. However, the bulk of his efforts will be focused on truck brokerage.
A major wager Jacobs' bet is big and, in the eyes of many, unprecedented. No one recalls a transportation logistics company of this size (XPO is expected to report about $225 million in annual revenue in 2011) achieving a 20- to 30-fold increase in its top line in five years.
"It's quite a challenge, and it will take a lot of acquisitions to build out the [revenue] model and hit those goals," said Evan Armstrong, president of Armstrong & Associates, a Stoughton, Wis.-based consultancy that follows the third-party logistics and truck brokerage sectors and has done consulting and advisory work for XPO.
Charles W. Clowdis Jr., managing director, transportation advisory services for consultancy IHS Global Insight, said there aren't many truck brokers with net revenues—gross revenues minus purchased transportation costs—in the millions of dollars for XPO to roll up into a multi-billion enterprise. Clowdis said there might be a large block of owners willing to sell to XPO, but only at an appropriate multiple of earnings that meets their exit requirements.
Then there's the competition. Besides the established companies like C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.—with the industry's largest brokerage operation—and Echo Global Logistics, truckload carriers are muscling into the brokerage segment as a way to round out their product offerings. XPO could also face competition from the executives of the companies it buys out unless the sellers sign ironclad non-compete contracts, Clowdis said.
Beyond the buyouts and the cold starts, XPO's success will hinge on everyday execution, namely the ability to maintain and strengthen relationships with shippers and carriers, and to develop a solid IT network that extends real-time visibility to all of its customers and service providers. XPO plans to have one IT platform extending across its brokerage, freight forwarding, and expedited transport businesses.
Jacobs recognizes that potholes lie ahead. For example, the marketplace may not welcome a potentially disruptive player to the game, and the capital markets may not be healthy enough to support XPO's funding needs. "The risks are there, and they are not trivial," he said in a recent interview with DC Velocity.
XPO's publicly traded shares took a hit in the fall after the company reported a $5.38 per-share third-quarter loss. The stock price fell steadily through November, though it had recovered some of its losses by the middle of December.
The company said the third-quarter loss was due to accounting charges relating to Jacobs' initial $150 million investment, the expense of building out the IT network and physical infrastructure, and the cost of recruiting high-end personnel.
XPO's executive team includes Greg Ritter, who built the brokerage business of truckload giant Knight Transportation after spending 22 years at C.H. Robinson; Scott Malat, who was Goldman, Sachs & Co.'s senior equity transportation analyst; and Richard M. Metzler and Thomas Connolly, who combined have decades of mergers and acquisitions experience in the transportation and finance fields, respectively.
"Begging to be consolidated" Despite the risks, Jacobs believes the characteristics of the truck brokerage business are so favorable as to make the potential negatives seem minor. Perhaps the sector's strongest lure to an entrepreneur like Jacobs is its extreme fragmentation. There are approximately 10,000 licensed truck brokers in the United States, but only about 25 have annual gross revenues—revenues before the cost of purchased transportation—of more than $200 million.
C.H. Robinson is on track to generate more than $10 billion in gross revenues in 2011. Robinson's 2011 net revenue, which includes the cost of transportation, will be about $1.5 billion if current patterns hold. The next 29 biggest brokers have combined net revenues of about $1.9 billion, according to Armstrong & Associates.
Many truck brokers, though successful, remain small because they lack the working capital to fund a meaningful expansion. It is this wide net of modestly sized brokers—those with $30 million to $200 million in annual gross revenue—that Jacobs has targeted.
Jacobs said the number of small brokers fighting for market share means the brokerage business is "just begging to be consolidated." He added, "Small companies are more valuable to me as part of a larger company than they are to the actual owners who control them."
The sector has also shown a long-running pattern of above-trend growth, regardless of macroeconomic conditions. For years, it has grown two to three times faster than annualized gross domestic product, and it continues to do so.
Jacobs figures broker services will remain in demand as many small to mid-sized shippers that lack dedicated shipping departments increasingly turn to third parties to help them find the best deals from the approximately 250,000 trucking companies that ply the nation's roads. He contends that, over time, XPO and others will find themselves competing for a larger pie than what exists today.
"I am making a bet that the way transportation is purchased today by smaller shippers is inefficient," he said. "And I am making a bet that a growing percentage of shippers will use brokers because it is more efficient."
In addition, the brokerage model is easily scalable because it is so sales driven, and it operates with significant variable costs, meaning a manager can get to critical mass of network capacity without a massive fixed investment. Jacobs followed this approach in growing his four prior companies, and he is not about to stop with XPO.
"Brad realizes you need to have scale to build capacity, and this is something he is very good at," said Armstrong.
A long entrepreneurial history At mid-life, Jacobs is poised for what could end up being the biggest of his many paydays. At 23, Jacobs co-founded Amerex Oil Associates Inc., a New Jersey-based oil brokerage firm, and served as its CEO until the firm was sold in 1983. The next year, he moved to England and founded Hamilton Resources (UK) Ltd., an oil trading company. Using most of his savings and a $1 billion line of credit, he built the company into a $1 billion-a-year enterprise.
In 1989, he founded United Waste Systems, Inc., which became the United States' fifth largest solid waste company before it was acquired by United Waste Services in 1997 for $2.5 billion, including debt. In 1997, he founded United Rentals Inc., which had become the world's largest equipment rental company by the time Jacobs stepped down from day-to-day management a decade later.
Jacobs said his prior endeavors required significant transportation and supply chain experience, the ability to meld acquisitions and organic expansion, and a mastery of information technology to connect multiple offices in disparate locations across a single network. Those skills will be heavily utilized as he goes where few in the transportation field have gone before.
Ben Gordon, managing director of BG Strategic Advisors, a Palm Beach, Fla.-based logistics mergers and acquisitions advisory firm, thinks it would be foolish to sell Jacobs short. "We think Brad is likely to be very successful," Gordon said. "We believe in his strategy."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."