Supply chain execution software can expect strong sales in the next several years as companies replace aging systems and respond to new priorities prompted by the recession.
While other industries struggled during the recent recession and sluggish recovery, supply chain management (SCM) software companies for the most part were able to maintain sales. As the economy revives and companies look to increase productivity, the SCM software market will be well positioned for even greater growth.
At Gartner Research, we are optimistic about sales growth in that market for the next several years because of the results of recent user studies. For the past four years, Gartner has conducted an annual survey of the wants and needs of supply chain management organizations. That study provides a picture of the current and projected business climate facing those organizations.
The 2011 study found the business climate ripe for investment in supply chain technologies. Exhibit 1 shows that some users planned to invest in upgrades and new implementations in a variety of applications.
Changing priorities
While demand continues to be strong, it is driven by different needs than those that have influenced sales in the past. In the two most recent Gartner studies, supply chain management organizations reported that they are now making more strategic decisions about what applications to invest in. In the past, they exhibited a myopic obsession with having the latest software features. Now, they are more interested in choosing applications that target their priorities while addressing the barriers to achieving those goals.
According to the survey results, the priorities for supply chain organizations have changed during the last few years, while the barriers to success have not. Improving productivity and efficiency has surpassed reducing costs as the number-one priority for respondents. Meanwhile, demand variability, complexity, and lack of visibility were again identified as the most significant barriers to achieving an organization's goals and objectives.
Why the change in priorities? When the recession hit, many SCM organizations initially used brute force to drive down costs. Now, they hope to maintain those low costs while also growing their businesses. The only way they can achieve this, however, is by improving efficiency and productivity. For this reason, companies are expressing interest in supply chain execution technologies like warehouse management systems (WMS) and transportation management systems (TMS) that target process efficiency.
Demand for wms increases
Even through the recent recession, demand for warehouse management systems remained surprisingly strong. Demand was projected to increase even further until at least the beginning of 2012.
The majority of new WMS engagements in North America and Western Europe are replacements of aging or technologically obsolete systems. Although an added cost, these replacements are needed to improve companies' overall efficiency as well as the agility and adaptability of their systems and processes. Additionally, many WMS users need to replace their old systems because the older systems' technical architecture cannot compete in today's fast-paced marketplace. Consequently, while they could add a stand-alone capability like labor management to their legacy WMS, the desire for greater agility justifies a complete overhaul.
Our clients also state that they are looking to new systems to drive additional productivity improvements. Along these lines, there is increased interest in productivity-improving capabilities like labor management, task interleaving, slotting, yard management, dock scheduling, and performance management.
This need for system replacements and enhanced productivity is driving significant WMS sales in mature markets such as North America and Europe. Emerging markets in other parts of the world will see sales increase but at a somewhat slower pace. This is largely because the lower cost of labor in those countries creates less motivation to use technology to cut costs. Additionally, the types of applications that these companies are interested in are much different than those that are currently popular in more mature markets. In emerging markets, process control and things like order and document accuracy and on-time shipment are higher priorities than productivity.
Gartner also anticipates accelerating demand worldwide for WMS delivered through a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model, in which the buyer "rents" online use of the application. We believe that demand will increase now that the core functionality of SaaS warehouse management systems is approaching parity with on-premise WMS. In addition, since enterprise resource planning (ERP) vendors now offer credible WMS, they will benefit from global market growth, particularly in warehouse environments that are not very complex or sophisticated.
Changes in TMS market
Transportation management systems will also continue to witness growth beyond 2013. Historically, the prime justification for purchasing a TMS has been cost reduction. As the freight market shifts from favoring the shipper to favoring the carrier, however, the justification for a TMS will rest on how it can help shippers to secure capacity, handle capacity constraints, collaborate with carriers, and manage rate volatility. The paradigm must evolve from simply reducing costs to managing cost volatility in an era of scarce capacity.
Changing conditions in the marketplace will also alter what features users will be looking for in a TMS. For example, costs will be harder to handle in the near future as fuel costs remain volatile, carriers raise rates, and hours-of-service rule changes increase detention penalties. These factors will put more emphasis on rating engines, performance management, more sophisticated route-planning tools, and the ability to manage complex models like rail or intermodal freight.
TMS is also one of the strongest supply chain management markets for SaaS. Demand is already robust, and it shows signs of increasing. The need to support a carrier network and the model's total cost of ownership make SaaS an attractive option, although demand for on-premise versions remains strong as well. To date, demand has been largely concentrated in North America, but we are now seeing increased interest and growth potential across the globe.
The business challenges facing supply chain organizations require innovative solutions, and that's creating a fertile environment for investment in SCM software. Accordingly, we expect the adoption of supply chain technology to accelerate over the next few years, resulting in a projected return to double-digit growth.
Editor's note: This story first appeared in the 2011 special bonus issue of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, a journal of thought leadership for the supply chain management profession and a sister publication to AGiLE Business Media's DC Velocity. Readers can obtain a subscription by joining the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (whose membership includes the Quarterly's subscription fee). Subscriptions are also available to non-members for $89 a year. For more information, visit www.SupplyChainQuarterly.com.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."