Respondents to DC Velocity 's 2012 Outlook Survey were evenly divided on where the U.S. economy was headed this year. But most are still upping their budgets for transportation services.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Three years after the official end of the Great Recession, there's no clear consensus among DC VELOCITY's readers on where the economy is headed in 2012. Respondents to our annual Outlook reader survey were almost equally divided in their opinions: positive, negative, or simply not sure. That same uncertainty is reflected in their views of their own companies' revenue prospects and in their overall logistics budgets. In fact, there was only one thing almost all of the 189 respondents to this year's survey agreed on: Oil prices will head up in 2012.
Just 39 percent of the respondents to the online poll, which was conducted in November, said they were optimistic about the direction the U.S. economy would take in 2012. That's the lowest percentage since our 2009 survey, when just 23 percent expressed optimism about the economy. It's also a significant drop from the percentage of respondents who were upbeat about the economic outlook for 2011 (52 percent) and 2010 (56 percent).
Meanwhile, about one-third of this year's survey respondents (34 percent) said they were pessimistic about business conditions in 2012, up from 22 percent last year. And here's that nagging sense of uncertainty: 27 percent said they were unsure what would happen, about the same as last year's 26 percent.
When it came to their own companies' prospects for 2012, opinion was once again almost evenly divided among survey takers. Thirty-four percent said they anticipated strong sales growth, while 35 percent foresaw flat revenues. Another 25 percent thought company sales would be weak. Six percent said they simply didn't know.
Survey respondents held out even less hope for overall U.S. economic growth. Almost half (49 percent) said they believed that growth would be weak, and 38 percent said they thought it would be flat. A paltry 10 percent predicted strong growth, and 4 percent said they had no idea.
As for the respondents themselves, the largest share worked for distributors, at 33 percent, followed by manufacturers, with 31 percent. The remainder worked for logistics service providers (18 percent), retailers (10 percent), or other types of businesses (8 percent).
*Note: Survey respondents were allowed to select more than one response.
Budget creep
Respondents seemed a little more definite when it came to their transportation spending plans. More than half (55 percent) said they expected to spend more for transportation services in 2012 than they had in 2011. Another 33 percent predicted their spending on transportation would remain the same, 6 percent anticipated a decrease, and 6 percent said they weren't sure. Of those who plan to spend more, 52 percent forecast an increase of 3 to 5 percent over what they spent in 2011. One-fourth anticipate spending just 1 to 2 percent more, and 15 percent expect an increase in the neighborhood of 5 to 9 percent. Only 8 percent foresaw an increase of 10 percent or more.
The projected increase in transportation spending is most likely related to respondents' views on where oil prices are headed. The vast majority—89 percent—said they were concerned that oil prices would rise in 2012, which would presumably result in higher freight rates.
Even so, only 40 percent of survey takers said their overall spending on logistics and related products and services (including material handling equipment, information technology, and freight transportation) would increase in 2012. Another 44 percent said their overall logistics expenditures would remain the same as in 2011, and 11 percent forecast a decline. The remaining 5 percent were unsure.
Among those respondents who expect to boost their overall logistics spending, the biggest share—43 percent—said their budget would rise by 3 to 5 percent compared with 2011. About one-fifth (21 percent) expected an increase of just 1 to 2 percent. But others forecast a bigger jump: 16 percent said they expect to spend 5 to 9 percent more than last year, and a full 20 percent said their budgets would increase by more than 10 percent.
As was the case in the 2010 and 2011 surveys, less-than-truckload (LTL) services topped the readers' list of planned transportation purchases. Seventy-six percent of survey takers said they planned to buy LTL services in 2012. About 65 percent said they would buy small-package shipping services, while 60 percent said they planned to use truckload carriers. (See Exhibit 1 for the full breakdown by mode.)
Investments on tap
Transportation, of course, isn't the only service readers purchase. Some 40 percent of the survey participants also buy contract logistics services. Of those respondents who use third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), 26 percent said they planned to increase their use of contract services in 2012. Sixty-one percent said their use of 3PLs would stay the same, while 13 percent expected to cut back on outsourcing. Readers have some flexibility when it comes to changing their outsourcing plans: Of those who use 3PLs, 88 percent said the average length of their contracts is three years or less.
Readers are planning to continue investing in warehousing and material handling products and services in the coming year. The top choices: racks and shelving (51 percent), lift trucks (45 percent), batteries and battery handling products (37 percent), safety products (36 percent), and dock products (34 percent).
They also intend to invest in technology. At the top of their shopping list were warehouse management systems (WMS), with 27 percent, and transportation management systems (TMS), with 24 percent. But it appears readers won't just be buying supply chain execution software this year. Twenty-one percent of survey takers said they planned to purchase business intelligence applications, software designed to help users analyze and improve their end-to-end supply chains. Inventory optimization software (19 percent), planning and forecasting software (18 percent), and demand planning apps (14 percent) were also popular choices.
Reining in costs
Although there was no real consensus among survey respondents about the economic outlook, readers aren't just sitting back and waiting to see what happens. Given the events of the past year—earthquakes, floods, civil unrest in the Middle East, and unpredictable oil prices—it's no surprise they're taking steps to rein in costs in 2012.
Readers appear to be sticking with tried-and-true methods to keep their logistics spending under control. Forty-one percent said they would consolidate more shipments into truckloads, and the same number said they expected to renegotiate with carriers. Nearly as many—36 percent—said they planned to cut back on express shipments. Another popular approach to controlling costs is a supply chain network redesign, cited by 26 percent of survey takers. Other favored tactics included shipping orders less frequently to customers, using fewer carriers, and switching more shipments from truck to rail. (See Exhibit 2.)
And finally, there's one glimmer of good news in all this cost-cutting: Just 7 percent said they planned to cut costs by laying off workers.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.