Respondents to DC Velocity 's 2012 Outlook Survey were evenly divided on where the U.S. economy was headed this year. But most are still upping their budgets for transportation services.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Three years after the official end of the Great Recession, there's no clear consensus among DC VELOCITY's readers on where the economy is headed in 2012. Respondents to our annual Outlook reader survey were almost equally divided in their opinions: positive, negative, or simply not sure. That same uncertainty is reflected in their views of their own companies' revenue prospects and in their overall logistics budgets. In fact, there was only one thing almost all of the 189 respondents to this year's survey agreed on: Oil prices will head up in 2012.
Just 39 percent of the respondents to the online poll, which was conducted in November, said they were optimistic about the direction the U.S. economy would take in 2012. That's the lowest percentage since our 2009 survey, when just 23 percent expressed optimism about the economy. It's also a significant drop from the percentage of respondents who were upbeat about the economic outlook for 2011 (52 percent) and 2010 (56 percent).
Meanwhile, about one-third of this year's survey respondents (34 percent) said they were pessimistic about business conditions in 2012, up from 22 percent last year. And here's that nagging sense of uncertainty: 27 percent said they were unsure what would happen, about the same as last year's 26 percent.
When it came to their own companies' prospects for 2012, opinion was once again almost evenly divided among survey takers. Thirty-four percent said they anticipated strong sales growth, while 35 percent foresaw flat revenues. Another 25 percent thought company sales would be weak. Six percent said they simply didn't know.
Survey respondents held out even less hope for overall U.S. economic growth. Almost half (49 percent) said they believed that growth would be weak, and 38 percent said they thought it would be flat. A paltry 10 percent predicted strong growth, and 4 percent said they had no idea.
As for the respondents themselves, the largest share worked for distributors, at 33 percent, followed by manufacturers, with 31 percent. The remainder worked for logistics service providers (18 percent), retailers (10 percent), or other types of businesses (8 percent).
*Note: Survey respondents were allowed to select more than one response.
Budget creep
Respondents seemed a little more definite when it came to their transportation spending plans. More than half (55 percent) said they expected to spend more for transportation services in 2012 than they had in 2011. Another 33 percent predicted their spending on transportation would remain the same, 6 percent anticipated a decrease, and 6 percent said they weren't sure. Of those who plan to spend more, 52 percent forecast an increase of 3 to 5 percent over what they spent in 2011. One-fourth anticipate spending just 1 to 2 percent more, and 15 percent expect an increase in the neighborhood of 5 to 9 percent. Only 8 percent foresaw an increase of 10 percent or more.
The projected increase in transportation spending is most likely related to respondents' views on where oil prices are headed. The vast majority—89 percent—said they were concerned that oil prices would rise in 2012, which would presumably result in higher freight rates.
Even so, only 40 percent of survey takers said their overall spending on logistics and related products and services (including material handling equipment, information technology, and freight transportation) would increase in 2012. Another 44 percent said their overall logistics expenditures would remain the same as in 2011, and 11 percent forecast a decline. The remaining 5 percent were unsure.
Among those respondents who expect to boost their overall logistics spending, the biggest share—43 percent—said their budget would rise by 3 to 5 percent compared with 2011. About one-fifth (21 percent) expected an increase of just 1 to 2 percent. But others forecast a bigger jump: 16 percent said they expect to spend 5 to 9 percent more than last year, and a full 20 percent said their budgets would increase by more than 10 percent.
As was the case in the 2010 and 2011 surveys, less-than-truckload (LTL) services topped the readers' list of planned transportation purchases. Seventy-six percent of survey takers said they planned to buy LTL services in 2012. About 65 percent said they would buy small-package shipping services, while 60 percent said they planned to use truckload carriers. (See Exhibit 1 for the full breakdown by mode.)
Investments on tap
Transportation, of course, isn't the only service readers purchase. Some 40 percent of the survey participants also buy contract logistics services. Of those respondents who use third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), 26 percent said they planned to increase their use of contract services in 2012. Sixty-one percent said their use of 3PLs would stay the same, while 13 percent expected to cut back on outsourcing. Readers have some flexibility when it comes to changing their outsourcing plans: Of those who use 3PLs, 88 percent said the average length of their contracts is three years or less.
Readers are planning to continue investing in warehousing and material handling products and services in the coming year. The top choices: racks and shelving (51 percent), lift trucks (45 percent), batteries and battery handling products (37 percent), safety products (36 percent), and dock products (34 percent).
They also intend to invest in technology. At the top of their shopping list were warehouse management systems (WMS), with 27 percent, and transportation management systems (TMS), with 24 percent. But it appears readers won't just be buying supply chain execution software this year. Twenty-one percent of survey takers said they planned to purchase business intelligence applications, software designed to help users analyze and improve their end-to-end supply chains. Inventory optimization software (19 percent), planning and forecasting software (18 percent), and demand planning apps (14 percent) were also popular choices.
Reining in costs
Although there was no real consensus among survey respondents about the economic outlook, readers aren't just sitting back and waiting to see what happens. Given the events of the past year—earthquakes, floods, civil unrest in the Middle East, and unpredictable oil prices—it's no surprise they're taking steps to rein in costs in 2012.
Readers appear to be sticking with tried-and-true methods to keep their logistics spending under control. Forty-one percent said they would consolidate more shipments into truckloads, and the same number said they expected to renegotiate with carriers. Nearly as many—36 percent—said they planned to cut back on express shipments. Another popular approach to controlling costs is a supply chain network redesign, cited by 26 percent of survey takers. Other favored tactics included shipping orders less frequently to customers, using fewer carriers, and switching more shipments from truck to rail. (See Exhibit 2.)
And finally, there's one glimmer of good news in all this cost-cutting: Just 7 percent said they planned to cut costs by laying off workers.
That changing landscape is forcing companies to adapt or replace their traditional approaches to product design and production. Specifically, many are changing the way they run factories by optimizing supply chains, increasing sustainability, and integrating after-sales services into their business models.
“North American manufacturers have embraced the factory of the future. Working with service providers, many companies are using AI and the cloud to make production systems more efficient and resilient,” Bob Krohn, partner at ISG, said in the “2024 ISG Provider Lens Manufacturing Industry Services and Solutions report for North America.”
To get there, companies in the region are aggressively investing in digital technologies, especially AI and ML, for product design and production, ISG says. Under pressure to bring new products to market faster, manufacturers are using AI-enabled tools for more efficient design and rapid prototyping. And generative AI platforms are already in use at some companies, streamlining product design and engineering.
At the same time, North American manufacturers are seeking to increase both revenue and customer satisfaction by introducing services alongside or instead of traditional products, the report says. That includes implementing business models that may include offering subscription, pay-per-use, and asset-as-a-service options. And they hope to extend product life cycles through an increasing focus on after-sales servicing, repairs. and condition monitoring.
Additional benefits of manufacturers’ increased focus on tech include better handling of cybersecurity threats and data privacy regulations. It also helps build improved resilience to cope with supply chain disruptions by adopting cloud-based supply chain management, advanced analytics, real-time IoT tracking, and AI-enabled optimization.
“The changes of the past several years have spurred manufacturers into action,” Jan Erik Aase, partner and global leader, ISG Provider Lens Research, said in a release. “Digital transformation and a culture of continuous improvement can position them for long-term success.”
Women are significantly underrepresented in the global transport sector workforce, comprising only 12% of transportation and storage workers worldwide as they face hurdles such as unfavorable workplace policies and significant gender gaps in operational, technical and leadership roles, a study from the World Bank Group shows.
This underrepresentation limits diverse perspectives in service design and decision-making, negatively affects businesses and undermines economic growth, according to the report, “Addressing Barriers to Women’s Participation in Transport.” The paper—which covers global trends and provides in-depth analysis of the women’s role in the transport sector in Europe and Central Asia (ECA) and Middle East and North Africa (MENA)—was prepared jointly by the World Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the International Transport Forum (ITF).
The slim proportion of women in the sector comes at a cost, since increasing female participation and leadership can drive innovation, enhance team performance, and improve service delivery for diverse users, while boosting GDP and addressing critical labor shortages, researchers said.
To drive solutions, the researchers today unveiled the Women in Transport (WiT) Network, which is designed to bring together transport stakeholders dedicated to empowering women across all facets and levels of the transport sector, and to serve as a forum for networking, recruitment, information exchange, training, and mentorship opportunities for women.
Initially, the WiT network will cover only the Europe and Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa regions, but it is expected to gradually expand into a global initiative.
“When transport services are inclusive, economies thrive. Yet, as this joint report and our work at the EIB reveal, few transport companies fully leverage policies to better attract, retain and promote women,” Laura Piovesan, the European Investment Bank (EIB)’s Director General of the Projects Directorate, said in a release. “The Women in Transport Network enables us to unite efforts and scale impactful solutions - benefiting women, employers, communities and the climate.”
Oh, you work in logistics, too? Then you’ve probably met my friends Truedi, Lumi, and Roger.
No, you haven’t swapped business cards with those guys or eaten appetizers together at a trade-show social hour. But the chances are good that you’ve had conversations with them. That’s because they’re the online chatbots “employed” by three companies operating in the supply chain arena—TrueCommerce,Blue Yonder, and Truckstop. And there’s more where they came from. A number of other logistics-focused companies—like ChargePoint,Packsize,FedEx, and Inspectorio—have also jumped in the game.
While chatbots are actually highly technical applications, most of us know them as the small text boxes that pop up whenever you visit a company’s home page, eagerly asking questions like:
“I’m Truedi, the virtual assistant for TrueCommerce. Can I help you find what you need?”
“Hey! Want to connect with a rep from our team now?”
“Hi there. Can I ask you a quick question?”
Chatbots have proved particularly popular among retailers—an October survey by artificial intelligence (AI) specialist NLX found that a full 92% of U.S. merchants planned to have generative AI (GenAI) chatbots in place for the holiday shopping season. The companies said they planned to use those bots for both consumer-facing applications—like conversation-based product recommendations and customer service automation—and for employee-facing applications like automating business processes in buying and merchandising.
But how smart are these chatbots really? It varies. At the high end of the scale, there’s “Rufus,” Amazon’s GenAI-powered shopping assistant. Amazon says millions of consumers have used Rufus over the past year, asking it questions either by typing or speaking. The tool then searches Amazon’s product listings, customer reviews, and community Q&A forums to come up with answers. The bot can also compare different products, make product recommendations based on the weather where a consumer lives, and provide info on the latest fashion trends, according to the retailer.
Another top-shelf chatbot is “Manhattan Active Maven,” a GenAI-powered tool from supply chain software developer Manhattan Associates that was recently adopted by the Army and Air Force Exchange Service. The Exchange Service, which is the 54th-largest retailer in the U.S., is using Maven to answer inquiries from customers—largely U.S. soldiers, airmen, and their families—including requests for information related to order status, order changes, shipping, and returns.
However, not all chatbots are that sophisticated, and not all are equipped with AI, according to IBM. The earliest generation—known as “FAQ chatbots”—are only clever enough to recognize certain keywords in a list of known questions and then respond with preprogrammed answers. In contrast, modern chatbots increasingly use conversational AI techniques such as natural language processing to “understand” users’ questions, IBM said. It added that the next generation of chatbots with GenAI capabilities will be able to grasp and respond to increasingly complex queries and even adapt to a user’s style of conversation.
Given their wide range of capabilities, it’s not always easy to know just how “smart” the chatbot you’re talking to is. But come to think of it, maybe that’s also true of the live workers we come in contact with each day. Depending on who picks up the phone, you might find yourself speaking with an intern who’s still learning the ropes or a seasoned professional who can handle most any challenge. Either way, the best way to interact with our new chatbot colleagues is probably to take the same approach you would with their human counterparts: Start out simple, and be respectful; you never know what you’ll learn.
With the hourglass dwindling before steep tariffs threatened by the new Trump Administration will impose new taxes on U.S. companies importing goods from abroad, organizations need to deploy strategies to handle those spiraling costs.
American companies with far-flung supply chains have been hanging for weeks in a “wait-and-see” situation to learn if they will have to pay increased fees to U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement agents for every container they import from certain nations. After paying those levies, companies face the stark choice of either cutting their own profit margins or passing the increased cost on to U.S. consumers in the form of higher prices.
The impact could be particularly harsh for American manufacturers, according to Kerrie Jordan, Group Vice President, Product Management at supply chain software vendor Epicor. “If higher tariffs go into effect, imported goods will cost more,” Jordan said in a statement. “Companies must assess the impact of higher prices and create resilient strategies to absorb, offset, or reduce the impact of higher costs. For companies that import foreign goods, they will have to find alternatives or pay the tariffs and somehow offset the cost to the business. This can take the form of building up inventory before tariffs go into effect or finding an equivalent domestic alternative if they don’t want to pay the tariff.”
Tariffs could be particularly painful for U.S. manufacturers that import raw materials—such as steel, aluminum, or rare earth minerals—since the impact would have a domino effect throughout their operations, according to a statement from Matt Lekstutis, Director at consulting firm Efficio. “Based on the industry, there could be a large detrimental impact on a company's operations. If there is an increase in raw materials or a delay in those shipments, as being the first step in materials / supply chain process, there is the possibility of a ripple down effect into the rest of the supply chain operations,” Lekstutis said.
New tariffs could also hurt consumer packaged goods (CPG) retailers, which are already being hit by the mere threat of tariffs in the form of inventory fluctuations seen as companies have rushed many imports into the country before the new administration began, according to a report from Iowa-based third party logistics provider (3PL) JT Logistics. That jump in imported goods has quickly led to escalating demands for expanded warehousing, since CPG companies need a place to store all that material, Jamie Cord, president and CEO of JT Logistics, said in a release
Immediate strategies to cope with that disruption include adopting strategies that prioritize agility, including capacity planning and risk diversification by leveraging multiple fulfillment partners, and strategic inventory positioning across regional warehouses to bypass bottlenecks caused by trade restrictions, JT Logistics said. And long-term resilience recommendations include scenario-based planning, expanded supplier networks, inventory buffering, multimodal transportation solutions, and investment in automation and AI for insights and smarter operations, the firm said.
“Navigating the complexities of tariff-driven disruptions requires forward-thinking strategies,” Cord said. “By leveraging predictive modeling, diversifying warehouse networks, and strategically positioning inventory, JT Logistics is empowering CPG brands to remain adaptive, minimize risks, and remain competitive in the current dynamic market."
With so many variables at play, no company can predict the final impact of the potential Trump tariffs, so American companies should start planning for all potential outcomes at once, according to a statement from Nari Viswanathan, senior director of supply chain strategy at Coupa Software. Faced with layers of disruption—with the possible tariffs coming on top of pre-existing geopolitical conflicts and security risks—logistics hubs and businesses must prepare for any what-if scenario. In fact, the strongest companies will have scenarios planned as far out as the next three to five years, Viswanathan said.
Grocery shoppers at select IGA, Price Less, and Food Giant stores will soon be able to use an upgraded in-store digital commerce experience, since store chain operator Houchens Food Group said it would deploy technology from eGrowcery, provider of a retail food industry white-label digital commerce platform.
Kentucky-based Houchens Food Group, which owns and operates more than 400 grocery, convenience, hardware/DIY, and foodservice locations in 15 states, said the move would empower retailers to rethink how and when to engage their shoppers best.
“At HFG we are focused on technology vendors that allow for highly targeted and personalized customer experiences, data-driven decision making, and e-commerce capabilities that do not interrupt day to day customer service at store level. We are thrilled to partner with eGrowcery to assist us in targeting the right audience with the right message at the right time,” Craig Knies, Chief Marketing Officer of Houchens Food Group, said in a release.
Michigan-based eGrowcery, which operates both in the United States and abroad, says it gives retail groups like Houchens Food Group the ability to provide a white-label e-commerce platform to the retailers it supplies, and integrate the program into the company’s overall technology offering. “Houchens Food Group is a great example of an organization that is working hard to simultaneously enhance its technology offering, engage shoppers through more channels and alleviate some of the administrative burden for its staff,” Patrick Hughes, CEO of eGrowcery, said.