Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Skeptics once may have considered the movement toward sustainable practices in American business to be a temporary detour from business as usual. To make those practices, well, sustainable, they argued, required more than a social conscience. They required a payoff on the bottom line.
That is exactly what has happened. Companies that have embraced sustainability and implemented new practices and technologies in a careful and rational fashion have realized not only environmental and social benefits but financial benefits as well.
"Companies are starting to recognize that things can be done be in a sustainable way ... that could save money and affect the bottom line," says Richard Bank, a director of the Washington, D.C.-based Sustainable Supply Chain Foundation. The organization supports research to identify best practices and technologies aimed at furthering sustainable practices in supply chains.
The companies that continue to take the initiative to adopt sustainable practices and programs across their supply chains are some of the biggest names in international business—companies like Walmart, UPS, and W.W. Grainger.
Now, a major trade group for third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) has joined the cause. Earlier this year, the International Warehouse Logistics Association (IWLA) announced its own program. Called the Sustainable Logistics Initiative, the new program was developed by IWLA in concert with the Sustainable Supply Chain Foundation.
IWLA says the new initiative is the first of its kind. It is not a certification program like LEED, the U.S. Green Building Council's accreditation program, but rather a way for participants to demonstrate their progress toward more sustainable operations. The initiative is designed specifically for warehouses and DCs, not broader transportation and logistics companies. "One of the commonalities of our 500 or so members is that we all operate big warehouse boxes," says IWLA chairman Linda Hothem. "Our focus is inside the box."
Making change, box by box
IWLA announced its initiative in July and subsequently made it available to its membership base. Hothem, who is CEO of Pacific American Group and a senior adviser to Matson Global Distribution Services Inc., says the idea grew out of conversations among the group's executive committee members about the market's increasing interest in all things green.
Third-party service providers are seeing growing demands from customers and potential customers for evidence of sustainability efforts, says Bank. "Companies big and small are asking and in some cases demanding that [3PLs] have sustainability programs before issuing a contract," he says. "This program will give customers some sense of assurance that 3PLs are engaged in sustainability."
Conversations on how to demonstrate that opened the door to developing the program. "We were bemoaning the fact that the industry did not have any metrics [on sustainability]," Hothem says. "The construction industry had LEED, but in logistics, we really don't have any of those metrics or any sort of certification process. We decided to take the initiative to determine what the logical metrics would be."
More than green
Although the program started out as a green initiative, its scope has since expanded beyond environmental stewardship. Hothem credits Dale Rogers, a professor at Rutgers University who has conducted numerous studies on sustainable supply chains, with persuading the group to adopt a broader focus. "Dale steered us away from 'green' and steered us into the sustainability camp," she says. The difference: While green initiatives focus primarily on carbon footprint issues, sustainability also takes into account social responsibility and corporate good citizenship.
"Sustainability involves people," Hothem says. "It is more subjective, but we are looking at some quantitative measures like safety, training, and development." Sustainable measures can also include things like community service and charitable donations, she adds.
Enrollment in the new program is done on a facility-by-facility basis. Participants first fill out an online questionnaire for each facility they want to register, providing data on energy use, recycling, water consumption, community service, and more. A representative from the Sustainable Supply Chain Foundation will then visit the facility to verify those numbers.
Once the responses have been validated, the numbers provide the benchmarks against which subsequent performance improvements are measured. Facilities will be able to achieve silver, gold, or platinum status by demonstrating progress against their own benchmarks. The program does not use cross-industry—or even cross-company—comparisons.
Hothem explains that this allows for the wide variance in warehouse operations—for instance, energy use for refrigerated warehouses would vary markedly from non-refrigerated buildings. "There are so many variables, it's hard to measure one against another," she says. By allowing members to establish their own benchmarks, the Sustainable Logistics Initiative sidesteps those issues, she says. "You'll measure what you've done on your own rather than versus what your neighbor does."
Immediate benefits
As for the program's cost, ILWA members pay a $200 enrollment fee for the first facility and $50 for each subsequent site. There's an additional $1,000 charge for the assessment by the Sustainable Supply Chain Foundation.
Although the program carries a cost, IWLA leaders believe the initiative will lead to immediate benefits for members. It will allow them to tout their participation in an industry best-practices initiative. And as facilities achieve specific sustainability goals, they can promote their newly attained silver, gold, or platinum status.
Left unsaid, but likely equally important as more business adopt sustainability goals, is that the members can assure their old and new customers that they, too, are on board with the movement.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."