Even after setting up a sophisticated supplier communication portal, Ingersoll Rand experienced delays obtaining inventory visibility. An RFID system changed all that.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
As anyone who has tried kanban will tell you, just-in-time production demands up-to-the-minute information on the whereabouts of inbound parts and materials. Because the manufacturer keeps very little inventory on hand in the plant, there's virtually no room for error. Operations managers require assurances that the material needed to keep the factory up and running will be delivered on schedule. And that means full visibility into incoming shipments.
A case in point is Ingersoll Rand, which uses kanban scheduling at a plant operated by its Trane air conditioning and heating systems division in Tyler, Texas. To obtain the necessary visibility, the company three years ago set up an online pOréal to provide a central communication platform with suppliers. Through that digital pOréal, Ingersoll Rand was able to obtain real-time visibility into the inventory on hand at suppliers throughout the world.
But there were still some hiccups in the information flow. For instance, the company had no quick way of determining whether the right materials had been delivered when a truck arrived at the facility. Under the process it had in place, workers had to record the receipt of incoming goods by scanning bar-code labels. It could take as long as 30 minutes to scan all the items in the back of a truck.
Thirty minutes might not seem like a long time, but in a kanban operation, that's a fairly serious delay. The manufacturer began searching for a swifter solution—which it eventually found in radio-frequency identification (RFID).
Better visibility through RFID
A business of Ingersoll Rand Co., Trane makes residential air conditioner and heat pump condensers at the Tyler plant. As part of its operation, it brings in materials such as compressors, electrical components, packaging, plastics, refrigeration units, and raw components from more than 100 suppliers. More than half of those suppliers are based in the United States, while another third are located across the border in Mexico and a small fraction in Asia.
The establishment of the online pOréal in 2008 was an attempt to streamline communications with those suppliers. "Prior to setting that up, we had multiple systems for [exchanging] information with suppliers," says Michael Smith, the multi-site material and supply chain leader for Ingersoll Rand's Tyler operations. "We had spreadsheets, e-mail messages, and EDI [electronic data interchange] systems. We wanted a common communication system."
While setting up the pOréal was a step in the right direction, the company expects its new RFID program to take performance to the next level. In June, Ingersoll Rand began working with some key suppliers to place tags on inbound shipments. The tags in this case are passive devices made by Alien Technology of Morgan Hill, Calif.
Now, when a trailer arrives at the Tyler plant, it passes by an antenna that reads the RFID tag. Information encoded in the tag is then uploaded to the electronic pOréal and made available for immediate viewing.
The time savings have been downright impressive. Smith says instead of taking half an hour, it now takes about five minutes to record the arrival of inventory and update the inventory status on the pOréal.
Tag teams
Currently, about 25 of Ingersoll Rand's 110 suppliers are tagging their shipments. These include several local Texas and Mexican suppliers as well as vendors who feed products through a consignment warehouse in Tyler operated by a third-party logistics company (3PL). Under this arrangement, vendors send trailer loads of product to the consignment warehouse, which, in turn, sends smaller lots of parts and components to the factory upon request. Typically, it applies the RFID tags to items just prior to shipping.
Not all of the shipments from these vendors are suitable for tagging, however. Some items—like shipments of metals or components that arrive in metal tubs—aren't being tagged because metal can interfere with the signal transmission. "The tag itself is an antenna, and when you touch metal, you can short out the antenna," Smith explains.
Shipments that aren't suitable for tagging are recorded the traditional way—by scanning a bar code. All incoming materials—including those with RFID labels—carry a bar code because Ingersoll Rand requires them for auditing purposes.
As for the project's cost, Ingersoll Rand got off lightly. The company already had antennas on hand that it had purchased for another project but never used. As a result, Smith says, setting up the receiving dock to read RFID tags only cost it $20,000.
The suppliers bear the cost of the tags, which Smith says run to about a dime apiece. So far, none of the suppliers have balked at the requirement, he says. That's because the suppliers have an incentive—prompt payment for their materials. Once the information from the tag gets sent to the pOréal and is reconciled with the invoice, the supplier gets approved for payment. "If the suppliers do the job right with RFID, they get paid on time," Smith says.
Ingersoll Rand is reaping savings as well. For one thing, the automatic recording process has enabled it to reassign two receiving workers to other tasks. Overall, Smith estimates that the RFID implementation will save the company something on the order of $120,000 a year.
More RFID in the future
Next year, Ingersoll Rand plans to extend the use of RFID to all members of its supply base as well as to additional manufacturing plants. It also wants to begin tagging individual items—as opposed to boxes or entire trailerloads—to achieve unit-level visibility. "We want to be able to see each and every component and manage all those components," Smith says.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.