Pressure to improve customer service and in-stock rates is pushing more companies to abandon the "consolidation" model in favor of a flexible, agile network of regional distribution centers.
By the end of the 20th century, inventory had become about as welcome to most corporate comptrollers as a telecom analyst at an ethics convention. Though acknowledged to be a necessary evil, it was still viewed as that balancesheet line item that tied up a lot of the corporation's cash and required a lot of expensive space to house. To tame the inventory monster, U.S. business went into overdrive, striving to keep inventories lean, operating in just-in-time (JIT) mode and consolidating distribution centers.
At least, that's what we thought. But the reality is, well, something completely different. Warehouse space actually stands at an all-time high. "Today, there's more square footage of warehouse space than at any point in U.S. history," Ted Scherck, president of the Colography Group, told a session at the annual Council of Logistics Management conference.
Scherck's assertion is corroborated by an analysis conducted by warehousing provider ProLogis of the 42 major markets in which it competes. That study showed that warehousing space increased to 3.4 billion square feet in 2002, up from some 3.1 billion two years ago. "The occupancy rate has likely declined in the last two years," says John Siebel, president and COO of North America at ProLogis, "but the gross square footage has increased."
The hard truth is that although inventory reduction receives a lot of lip service, inventory levels in many industries have stayed the same or increased over the long term. That trend is particularly evident with finished goods. "Management has cleaned up [its] production and ordering processes for raw materials, but [it has] less control of finished goods," says Jim Ginter, professor of marketing at Ohio State University's Max Fisher College. Ginter, who headed up a study that examined various types of inventories across major industries over a 20-year period ending in 1999, adds that the apparel, grocery and medical products industries,in particular, recorded inventory increases. By contrast, real decreases were found in finished-goods inventories for electronics and computers, due in large part to the supply chain model made famous by Dell.
Also contributing to the more-not-less inventory phenomen on may be the proliferation of product varieties offered in recent years. Plus, vendor-managed inventory, JIT and other drives to improve the supply chain management process at many companies have, as Ginter puts it, placed "power increasingly downstream, at the retail level, nearer to the customer." This means inventory gets thrown back upstream. And it has to be warehoused somewhere.
When "pull" is the trigger
Another development that is helping kick regional warehousing into high gear is the growing popularity of "pull" demand chains, whereby stock replenishment is triggered by consumer demand (i.e.,sales) rather than, say, manufacturers' promotions. It's pretty much a given that if this model is to succeed, inventories need to be maintained close to their point of sale—which typically means in regional warehouses.
One company that has adopted this strategy is Best Buy, the nation's largest consumer electronics retailer. Best Buy has gone to great lengths to minimize its response time when a need is defined at the store."If we had a great day of sales," says Chas Scheiderer, Best Buy's senior vice president of logistics,"we need to get products back on the shelf."
Although it's a national retailer, Best Buy relies heavily on regional distribution,distributing products to stores from six general merchandise DCs (distribution centers) around the country, with an additional East Coast facility slated to open in the first half of this year. These facilities all support the continually expanding roster of Best Buy stores—there were 538 at press time—as well as the Musicland group of stores, which include Sam Goody, Suncoast and Media Play. Best Buy distributes media such as CDs and DVDs from a dedicated entertainment facility in the Midwest. In addition, it operates several other DCs that are dedicated to large - ticket items such as appliances and big - screen TVs where deliveries are cross - docked, moving swiftly to stores or directly to customers.
To guarantee the best possible ground service, Best Buy uses a dedicated fleet through a long - term agreement with a truckload (TL) carrier that picks up shipments from vendors and delivers products to the stores on a twice - weekly basis with room to tweak deliveries as needed. It also uses contract carriers as needed or inselect markets on a regular basis.
Going postal
Another high - profile company that has become a convert to regional distribution is Amazon.com. As a renegade dot-com startup in the mid 1990s, Amazon.com used one Seattle-area facility to serve the country as the first online bookseller.
Over the last few years, however, as its business model has morphed from that of a dot-com fulfillment company to that of a giant retailer, Amazon.com invested in state-ofthe-art DCs and boosted its product mix. The company now sells not only books, but also apparel, toys, electronics and even hardware, whether via marketing agreements, partnerships or acquisition.
Today, six Amazon.com DCs dot the country, including a large facility in Nevada and two in Kentucky. (Amazon.com shuttered its Seattle DC in early 2001.) "We try to perform mathematical modeling to determine which are the fastestmoving products and which DCs those products should be in," says Carrie Peters, an Amazon.com spokeswoman.
"All DCs are located close to airports or transportation hubs," Peters adds, which allows the e-tailer to ship items within 24 hours of order receipt. It makes no guarantees, but most items are received by the customer within two to three days via its carrier partners UPS and the U.S. Postal Service (or via FedEx if the customer requests premium delivery service).
Down the road
The shift toward regional distribution has implications for the trucking industry as well.An analysis by the Colography Group reveals that shippers are pulling back on their use of long-haul less-than-truckload (LTL) moves. Though the long-haul segment is experiencing only moderate average annual growth and intermediate-distance moves of 600 to 1,800 miles are actually declining, short-haul LTL moves of 600 miles or less (in one-way movements) are seeing high growth rates.
At the same time, companies are moving consolidated or truckload shipments along longer-haul routes, according to year-over-year trend data from a study conducted annually among several hundred large shippers by the University of Tennessee, Georgia Southern University and Cap Gemini Ernst & Young. Mary Holcomb, associate professor of logistics at the University of Tennessee, suggests that improved supply chain management, primarily stemming from the use of transportation planning and load optimization software, is driving the trend. Another contributing factor may well be the increased use of third-party logistics providers (3PLs), which are masters of load consolidation.
Ultimately, Scherck of Colography Group sees more companies developing what he calls "an optimal mix of strategically located inventory and short-haul distribution." He cites the example of a large home-products retailer that keeps fewer windows and doors in stock than it used to. But that doesn't mean it has cut back on its use of warehousing space. Instead, it relies on direct shipments from its DC to the consignee." It's true that efficient supply chains change the number, location and physical layout of storage space," Scherck notes, "but this does not mean that storage space goes away."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."