Reverse logistics operations are particularly prone to hazmat violations because employees aren't always aware they're handling hazardous goods. Here's how to minimize risk to your operation.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
It's no secret that managing the product returns supply chain is different from handling the traditional outbound, or "forward" logistics, function—a fact that makes "reverse logistics" daunting to many practitioners.
You can add this to the list of challenges: Many returns contain hazardous materials, an inconvenient truth that often goes unnoticed by retailers.
For manufacturers, this is generally not a problem. They know their products' properties and handle returns in compliance with the laws and regulations that govern hazmat transportation, distribution, and storage. Retailers' employees, though, don't always recognize the potential hazards inherent in some consumer products. As a result, they may unknowingly violate federal laws and regulations.
Such ignorance puts companies at risk for penalties, lawsuits, employee injury, and property damage. And the risk isn't going away. Due to retailers' increasingly liberal returns policies, the volume of hazardous consumer goods in the reverse logistics stream is likely to increase, according to experts. Consumers' "voracious appetite for consumer electronics and the shrinking lifespan of these devices" means that hundreds of millions of potentially hazardous products are returned or discarded annually on a worldwide basis, says Joe King, vice president of sales, aftermarket solutions, for third-party logistics service provider ModusLink.
That's why it's more important than ever that reverse logistics operations be fully compliant with hazmat laws and regulations, not only at the warehouse or returns center but also at the retail store level. Costly though that may be, the potential consequences of failing to ensure compliance—possibly life-threatening injuries to employees and customers, lawsuits, enormous fines, and damage to facilities—are far worse.
Here's a look at the extent of this troubling situation, the reasons behind it, and what can be done about it.
For more information ...
Here are some resources for information on reverse logistics for hazardous products.
The Council on Safe Transportation of Hazardous Articles (COSTHA), an industry association that promotes regulatory compliance and safety, has launched a reverse logistics initiative and is working with retailers and government agencies to improve awareness, safe handling, and regulatory compliance. The group's recommendations to the U.S. Department of Transportation are available on its website.
The American Public University, an online educational institution, and its associated American Military University, periodically offer courses on reverse logistics, including one for hazardous materials. For details, click here and here.
The Dangerous Goods Advisory Council advocates for responsible regulation and safe transportation of dangerous goods. Note: The organization's website is being revamped, so some information about training and other services may be temporarily unavailable.
Wait—that's hazardous?
A surprising number of consumer products are regulated as hazardous materials. Some, like household cleaners and solvents, are fairly obvious, says Keith Anderson, senior director of regulatory compliance for Inmar, a third-party logistics company. But the average person may not think of items like health and beauty care products, aerosols, and batteries as hazardous, he says.
Most consumer electronics, including televisions, cameras, mobile handsets, computer monitors, and printers, contain materials that could be considered hazardous, says King. "Televisions, for example, are built with electronic circuit boards, glass, and color cathode ray tubes (CRTs), which often contain hazardous materials such as lead and mercury, as well as lesser-known toxins like cadmium, chromium, antimony, beryllium, and brominated flame retardants," he explains.
Sometimes only parts of consumer goods are subject to regulation, says Robert Jaffin, who teaches an online course in hazmat reverse logistics for the American Public University. Seemingly innocuous components like the toner in printer cartridges or the ink in dry-erase markers become a health and regulatory risk when a commercial entity accepts them as returned goods, he says.
Some items that were not subject to regulation when purchased by the consumer may be hazardous when they are returned, notes Jack Currie, administrator of the Council on Safe Transportation of Hazardous Articles (COSTHA) and president of the regulatory compliance firm Currie Associates. Examples include construction, camping, and lawn and garden equipment powered by gasoline, kerosene, or propane. If these machines have been used, then there will be fuel, oil, and—most dangerous of all—volatile vapor in the fuel tanks, fuel lines, and engines, he says.
Regulated products that were properly packaged, documented, and handled when shipped to a retailer's distribution center often aren't recognized as hazmats when consumers return them. That's partly due to a lack of awareness among store associates, many of whom are working in part-time, seasonal, or high-turnover positions and may not have been fully trained in hazmat regulatory compliance or even overlooked altogether.
As a result, Currie says, it's common for customer service or stockroom associates to toss hazardous (and frequently incompatible) items in any handy cardboard box or returnable tote, and then return them—undeclared, unprotected, and often mislabeled—to a warehouse or distribution center.
The presence of hazardous materials in returned consumer goods poses both legal and safety risks for reverse logistics operations, experts say. However, steps can be taken to minimize those risks and comply with applicable regulations. While not a comprehensive list, the following tips from the experts we consulted for this article can get a company headed in the right direction:
Follow the same hazmat policies and procedures you use in forward logistics in your reverse logistics operations. All of the legal and safety requirements that apply to outbound shipments also apply to returns. That includes documentation, labeling, packaging, transportation, mitigation and safety plans, and training, Anderson says. Make sure the returned-goods areas of facilities have the necessary safety equipment, and that insurance coverage reflects these hazmat-related activities and conditions, Jaffin advises.
Train the right people. Experts recommend that anybody who could be called on to handle returned consumer goods, whether at a customer service desk, in a stockroom, in transportation, or at the warehouse or returns center, receive job-appropriate hazmat safety training.
Teach employees to recognize "red flags." Rather than focus on specific products, think in terms of categories that are likely to contain hazardous materials. Employees should know, for example, that all lighting, aerosols, home electronics, cleaning supplies, pet care products, perfumes and nail polishes, and lawn and garden care products—to name just a few—could contain hazardous materials, and they should handle all such returns accordingly.
Pay attention to packaging. Whether at the customer service desk, in the stockroom, or at the shipping dock, employees need to know they can't randomly toss an assortment of items into any available box, Currie says. Returned consumer goods containing hazardous materials must be properly packaged and secured in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations before they're sent to a warehouse or returns center. Jaffin points out that companies are required by law to report improperly packaged hazmat shipments to DOT. "You have accepted considerable responsibility if you receive and open those shipments," he warns.
Segregate incompatible merchandise. Train store and stockroom associates to separate products that could produce a dangerous reaction. Currie cites one case where retail associates shipped a drum containing water-activated fumigants together with bottles of cleaning fluids to a returns center. A single leak would have released toxic gas—with potentially fatal consequences for anyone who opened the drum at the warehouse. And don't package food or consumables with "ORM-D" items—consumer packaged goods classified as hazardous by DOT. Because of the risk of contamination, the consumables may no longer be fit for use and will have to be destroyed.
Be aware that some returned consumer goods must be treated as hazardous waste. Because returned items that are leaking, damaged, or have expired must sometimes be classified as hazardous waste, a hazardous waste program should be in place at the retail location, DC, and reverse logistics operation, recommends Anderson of Inmar. That will require registration as a hazardous waste generator, employee training, a designated hazardous waste storage area, and compliance with a number of specific regulatory requirements.
Send in the experts. Even with training, retail associates who handle customer returns may need additional support to ensure they're complying with all of the applicable regulations. Some consumer product manufacturers help out by providing approved packaging and instructions for returns, while some power equipment makers send out contractors to clean fuel systems in returned merchandise before it's shipped anywhere. Consider sending consultants, third-party logistics specialists, or your own in-house experts to conduct audits and train associates at the store level. Or you may decide to hand returns management over to a third party. But don't assume that all reverse logistics services are handling your materials properly, cautions King of ModusLink. Ask for copies of documented procedures—not just for direct providers, but also for their vendors, he says.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.