Reverse logistics operations are particularly prone to hazmat violations because employees aren't always aware they're handling hazardous goods. Here's how to minimize risk to your operation.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
It's no secret that managing the product returns supply chain is different from handling the traditional outbound, or "forward" logistics, function—a fact that makes "reverse logistics" daunting to many practitioners.
You can add this to the list of challenges: Many returns contain hazardous materials, an inconvenient truth that often goes unnoticed by retailers.
For manufacturers, this is generally not a problem. They know their products' properties and handle returns in compliance with the laws and regulations that govern hazmat transportation, distribution, and storage. Retailers' employees, though, don't always recognize the potential hazards inherent in some consumer products. As a result, they may unknowingly violate federal laws and regulations.
Such ignorance puts companies at risk for penalties, lawsuits, employee injury, and property damage. And the risk isn't going away. Due to retailers' increasingly liberal returns policies, the volume of hazardous consumer goods in the reverse logistics stream is likely to increase, according to experts. Consumers' "voracious appetite for consumer electronics and the shrinking lifespan of these devices" means that hundreds of millions of potentially hazardous products are returned or discarded annually on a worldwide basis, says Joe King, vice president of sales, aftermarket solutions, for third-party logistics service provider ModusLink.
That's why it's more important than ever that reverse logistics operations be fully compliant with hazmat laws and regulations, not only at the warehouse or returns center but also at the retail store level. Costly though that may be, the potential consequences of failing to ensure compliance—possibly life-threatening injuries to employees and customers, lawsuits, enormous fines, and damage to facilities—are far worse.
Here's a look at the extent of this troubling situation, the reasons behind it, and what can be done about it.
For more information ...
Here are some resources for information on reverse logistics for hazardous products.
The Council on Safe Transportation of Hazardous Articles (COSTHA), an industry association that promotes regulatory compliance and safety, has launched a reverse logistics initiative and is working with retailers and government agencies to improve awareness, safe handling, and regulatory compliance. The group's recommendations to the U.S. Department of Transportation are available on its website.
The American Public University, an online educational institution, and its associated American Military University, periodically offer courses on reverse logistics, including one for hazardous materials. For details, click here and here.
The Dangerous Goods Advisory Council advocates for responsible regulation and safe transportation of dangerous goods. Note: The organization's website is being revamped, so some information about training and other services may be temporarily unavailable.
Wait—that's hazardous?
A surprising number of consumer products are regulated as hazardous materials. Some, like household cleaners and solvents, are fairly obvious, says Keith Anderson, senior director of regulatory compliance for Inmar, a third-party logistics company. But the average person may not think of items like health and beauty care products, aerosols, and batteries as hazardous, he says.
Most consumer electronics, including televisions, cameras, mobile handsets, computer monitors, and printers, contain materials that could be considered hazardous, says King. "Televisions, for example, are built with electronic circuit boards, glass, and color cathode ray tubes (CRTs), which often contain hazardous materials such as lead and mercury, as well as lesser-known toxins like cadmium, chromium, antimony, beryllium, and brominated flame retardants," he explains.
Sometimes only parts of consumer goods are subject to regulation, says Robert Jaffin, who teaches an online course in hazmat reverse logistics for the American Public University. Seemingly innocuous components like the toner in printer cartridges or the ink in dry-erase markers become a health and regulatory risk when a commercial entity accepts them as returned goods, he says.
Some items that were not subject to regulation when purchased by the consumer may be hazardous when they are returned, notes Jack Currie, administrator of the Council on Safe Transportation of Hazardous Articles (COSTHA) and president of the regulatory compliance firm Currie Associates. Examples include construction, camping, and lawn and garden equipment powered by gasoline, kerosene, or propane. If these machines have been used, then there will be fuel, oil, and—most dangerous of all—volatile vapor in the fuel tanks, fuel lines, and engines, he says.
Regulated products that were properly packaged, documented, and handled when shipped to a retailer's distribution center often aren't recognized as hazmats when consumers return them. That's partly due to a lack of awareness among store associates, many of whom are working in part-time, seasonal, or high-turnover positions and may not have been fully trained in hazmat regulatory compliance or even overlooked altogether.
As a result, Currie says, it's common for customer service or stockroom associates to toss hazardous (and frequently incompatible) items in any handy cardboard box or returnable tote, and then return them—undeclared, unprotected, and often mislabeled—to a warehouse or distribution center.
The presence of hazardous materials in returned consumer goods poses both legal and safety risks for reverse logistics operations, experts say. However, steps can be taken to minimize those risks and comply with applicable regulations. While not a comprehensive list, the following tips from the experts we consulted for this article can get a company headed in the right direction:
Follow the same hazmat policies and procedures you use in forward logistics in your reverse logistics operations. All of the legal and safety requirements that apply to outbound shipments also apply to returns. That includes documentation, labeling, packaging, transportation, mitigation and safety plans, and training, Anderson says. Make sure the returned-goods areas of facilities have the necessary safety equipment, and that insurance coverage reflects these hazmat-related activities and conditions, Jaffin advises.
Train the right people. Experts recommend that anybody who could be called on to handle returned consumer goods, whether at a customer service desk, in a stockroom, in transportation, or at the warehouse or returns center, receive job-appropriate hazmat safety training.
Teach employees to recognize "red flags." Rather than focus on specific products, think in terms of categories that are likely to contain hazardous materials. Employees should know, for example, that all lighting, aerosols, home electronics, cleaning supplies, pet care products, perfumes and nail polishes, and lawn and garden care products—to name just a few—could contain hazardous materials, and they should handle all such returns accordingly.
Pay attention to packaging. Whether at the customer service desk, in the stockroom, or at the shipping dock, employees need to know they can't randomly toss an assortment of items into any available box, Currie says. Returned consumer goods containing hazardous materials must be properly packaged and secured in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations before they're sent to a warehouse or returns center. Jaffin points out that companies are required by law to report improperly packaged hazmat shipments to DOT. "You have accepted considerable responsibility if you receive and open those shipments," he warns.
Segregate incompatible merchandise. Train store and stockroom associates to separate products that could produce a dangerous reaction. Currie cites one case where retail associates shipped a drum containing water-activated fumigants together with bottles of cleaning fluids to a returns center. A single leak would have released toxic gas—with potentially fatal consequences for anyone who opened the drum at the warehouse. And don't package food or consumables with "ORM-D" items—consumer packaged goods classified as hazardous by DOT. Because of the risk of contamination, the consumables may no longer be fit for use and will have to be destroyed.
Be aware that some returned consumer goods must be treated as hazardous waste. Because returned items that are leaking, damaged, or have expired must sometimes be classified as hazardous waste, a hazardous waste program should be in place at the retail location, DC, and reverse logistics operation, recommends Anderson of Inmar. That will require registration as a hazardous waste generator, employee training, a designated hazardous waste storage area, and compliance with a number of specific regulatory requirements.
Send in the experts. Even with training, retail associates who handle customer returns may need additional support to ensure they're complying with all of the applicable regulations. Some consumer product manufacturers help out by providing approved packaging and instructions for returns, while some power equipment makers send out contractors to clean fuel systems in returned merchandise before it's shipped anywhere. Consider sending consultants, third-party logistics specialists, or your own in-house experts to conduct audits and train associates at the store level. Or you may decide to hand returns management over to a third party. But don't assume that all reverse logistics services are handling your materials properly, cautions King of ModusLink. Ask for copies of documented procedures—not just for direct providers, but also for their vendors, he says.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."