The Port of Miami has fought an uphill battle to compete with rivals for Florida-bound international sea freight. The expanded Panama Canal may level the playing field.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Bill Johnson has glimpsed the Holy Grail in his own backyard, and he is determined—come hell or deep water—to capture it.
Johnson, the hard-charging director of the Port of Miami, has spent the past five years looking into why so much of the Asian import cargo destined for Florida enters the country through ports outside the state. According to port data, only about 38 percent of Asian import traffic bound for Florida actually enters via the state's ports. About 36 percent enters through the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, 13 percent through the Port of Savannah (Ga.), and the remaining 13 percent through various other U.S. ports.
In particular, Johnson has focused on why Savannah, nearly 500 miles to the north, has been such a strong competitor for trans-Pacific cargoes destined for Central and Southern Florida. There are good reasons for Savannah's strength. Though it has a relatively shallow harbor depth of 42 feet, it remains one of only two East Coast seaports—the other being Norfolk—with on-dock rail connections to the two Eastern Class I railroads, CSX Corp. and Norfolk Southern Corp.
Savannah is also near the robust manufacturing areas of Southern Georgia and Northern Florida, where goods are shipped, usually by truck, into Florida's Central and Southern regions for distribution to a population approaching 13 million people.
Port officials acknowledge Miami has been outflanked by Savannah in the battle for the wallets of Florida's importers and exporters, and, by extension, the state's consumers. Johnson, for his part, said Miami has learned a lot from Savannah and plans to use that knowledge to beat the formidable Georgia port at its own game.
"The Florida ports have lost market share to Savannah over the years, and I intend to win that business back," he said in an interview. Port officials believe the state can recapture about one-third of the containerized traffic bound for markets within Florida but which arrives at out-of-state seaports.
A game-changer
The catalyst for Johnson's strategy is, not surprisingly, the opening of the expanded Panama Canal scheduled for August 2014. The $5.2 billion project will deepen the canal by as much as 10 feet, while new lock construction will enable it to accommodate ships built to carry a maximum of 12,600 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containers, up from a current maximum of 5,100 TEUs.
The expansion promises compelling economies of scale for the seagoing supply chain because carriers can move more containers per vessel through the canal than ever before. It could also permanently reshape shipping patterns if importers that normally bring Asian-originating ocean cargo in through West Coast ports for movement inland via surface transport instead opt for a less-costly all-water route for drop-off at East and Gulf Coast ports. Only 30 percent of all seagoing cargoes are discharged at points east of the Mississippi, although 70 percent of the U.S. population lives there.
Miami port officials estimate an all-water voyage from China to Miami takes 24 days, while a sailing into Los Angeles and cross-country rail service to Miami would take about 22 days and generally be more expensive.
In preparation for the canal expansion, Miami has embarked on a $150 million project—with half the funds coming from state taxpayers—to dredge its harbor and channel from its current 42-foot depth to the 50-foot depth needed to accommodate the larger "post-Panamax" ships. Perhaps just as important, the port is constructing the first on-dock rail terminal to be operational there in 20 years.
The rail terminal will be served exclusively by the Jacksonville-based Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) and will be used to transport cargo to points north and west of Miami, bringing the port within a one- to four-day delivery window of 70 percent of the U.S. population. The first train there will begin operating in the first quarter of 2012, but the service's real impact won't be felt until the opening of the expanded canal.
A shift in distribution patterns
Officials at Miami, which vies with Port Manatee on Florida's West Coast for the title of the closest U.S. port to the canal, believe the deepening of Miami's harbor and the launch of on-dock rail service will make it the first port of call for post-Panamax vessels. They also believe the expansion project will change the way goods are distributed within Florida, across the Southeast, and even into the nation's midsection.
"We will be able to serve markets like Atlanta and Charlotte in two days, and Memphis and Nashville in three days," said James Hertwig, FEC's president and CEO. FEC is also the exclusive on-dock rail provider at Fort Lauderdale's Port Everglades and the Port of Palm Beach farther to the north.
Between 12 million and 13 million people reside in Central and South Florida, making it the largest East Coast population center outside of the New York metropolitan area. Because of its large retiree and tourist population, however, the region is heavily skewed toward consumption, with relatively little production.
Historically, goods bound for Central and South Florida have been produced in manufacturing centers in South Georgia or Northern Florida around Jacksonville. They would then usually be trucked—at a significant cost—down the lengthy peninsula to the southern part of the state, or be diverted west toward its center near Orlando. Generally, there are few backhaul opportunities due to the lack of manufacturing in the region.
The traffic imbalance is striking, according to various sources. Hertwig said that for every four loads headed south there is only one moving north. Charles W. Clowdis, managing director-transportation advisory services for consultancy IHS Global Insight, said the ratio is closer to five to one in favor of southbound loads.
But as more Florida-bound goods come from Asia, all that could change. Florida port interests believe that deepening Miami's harbor to handle post-Panamax vessels will open up the state's Southern and Central regions to an avalanche of Asian imports that can be whisked across Florida and into surrounding states, thus remedying the directional imbalance.
In a 2010 report, the Florida Chamber Foundation said the widening of the canal, along with the continued growth in Latin American and Caribbean markets that already use Miami as their main port of entry, offers Florida a "once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to transform its economy by becoming a global hub for trade, logistics, and export-oriented manufacturing activities." The state is located "at the crossroads" of east-west and north-south trade lanes that will be home to more than 1.1 billion consumers by 2030, the report said.
Miami, which is expected to handle 900,000 TEU containers in 2011, expects a doubling of its traffic to between 1.7 million and 2 million TEUs by 2020, and to between 3 million and 3.5 million TEUs by 2030. About half of the growth over the next decade will come from a general increase in waterborne commerce, with the remainder coming from stronger trade flows through an expanded canal, according to port officials.
Showdown with Savannah?
Still, it will not be easy to wrest market share away from Savannah. The Georgia port is in a geographically desirable position, capable of feeding western, northern, and southern destinations via rail and truck. Miami, by contrast, is at the end of a long peninsula and lacks Savannah's geographic advantages.
Johnson, however, argues that Miami's location is actually a benefit because of its proximity to Latin and Caribbean markets, as well as its strategic positioning in the middle of an enormous arc sweeping between Texas and Virginia.
Another potential shortcoming is that Miami's basin, unlike Savannah's, is too small to allow the post-Panamax vessels to turn around in the harbor to head out. Kevin T. Lynskey, the Port of Miami's assistant director for business development, said the port has come up with a plan to address that shortfall. He said the turning radius in the basin is being widened as part of the dredging project, and that the port should be able to handle the larger ships.
A Florida-based source close to the situation said Savannah's solid position as an on-dock rail feeder will make it a formidable impediment to Miami's plans for growth in the post-Panamax world. Miami "will get some traffic, but not to the degree that everyone expects," said the source, who asked not to be named.
Making connections
Yet developments are afoot that suggest the opposite. Private-sector interests have joined forces to develop Florida's first inland port—a facility designed to link the seaports, via road and rail, with a centralized warehouse and distribution cluster that will serve population centers throughout Florida and the Southeast United States. The 2,300-acre facility, located in southwest St. Lucie County about 90 miles from the Port of Miami and 50 miles from Port Everglades, will cost about $2 billion and take about 15 years to complete.
The first phase will be finished in 2014 to coincide with the expanded canal's opening and the completion of Miami's dredging project.
The inland port "will create an entirely new industrial model for Florida, ultimately providing a connection to direct on-dock rail service at Florida's key seaports, along with easy access to all major highways," said John Carver, who heads the ports, airports, and global infrastructure practice for Chicago-based real estate and logistics services giant Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL), which has been named the exclusive project advisor.
According to JLL data, there are 12 inland ports in operation across the United States. Each port shares several common characteristics, namely proximity to at least 3 million residents living within a 200-mile radius, a direct connection to a seaport via one of the four major Class I railroads, designated status as a Foreign Trade Zone, and access to an abundance of industrial real estate.
Florida is perhaps the most glaring hole in the inland port network, Carver said. "It's the only state in the country with this kind of volume that doesn't have a dedicated facility like this," he said.
Editor's Note: MODEX 2012, coming to Atlanta's Georgia World Congress Center February 6-9, will feature a keynote by Panama Canal Authority CEO Alberto Alemán Zubieta. He will be discussing the expansion of the Panama Canal and its impact on supply chains and global trade. For more information, go to www.modexshow.com.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."