Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
How badly did FedEx Corp. stock get beaten up during the global equities sell-off of Sept. 22?
So badly that David G. Ross, analyst for Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., wrote in a research note that traders and investors didn't just sell FedEx shares. The market, in his words, "continued to puke the stock."
Ross' depiction was as accurate as it was vivid. The Memphis-based giant announced before the U.S. market opened last Thursday that its fiscal first quarter results had come in slightly below the company's expectations. This announcement compelled some traders, speculators, and investors to begin selling the company's stock in droves the minute they heard the opening bell. At one point during the trading day, FedEx stock had fallen to $64.55, a decline of almost $8 a share from the prior day's close. At the close of Sept. 22, the stock had settled at $66.58. The stock is now more than $30 a share below its 52-week high of $98.33 set on July 7.
The reason why Fedex stock was hammered on Sept. 22 was the surprisingly subpar performance of the company's air express division, which represents close to 60 percent of FedEx's revenue and is seen as a proxy for U.S. and global economic activity. Domestic express volumes fell 3 percent year-over-year, while the company's "international priority" business—which accounts for nearly one-third of all of FedEx's revenue—contracted by 4 percent due to a slowdown of airfreight volumes out of Asia. The sequential (quarter over quarter) decline of 8.4 percent in international volumes was the biggest such drop in at least 10 years, according to Jon A. Langenfeld, analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co.
The weakness in FedEx's international air business reflects a continued deterioration in global airfreight volumes. Langenfeld said in a research note that industry contacts have noted persistent weakness in Asian air export volumes with declines continuing into September, which is the first month of FedEx's fiscal second quarter.
Gary Schultheis, senior vice president, airfreight Americas for DHL Global Forwarding, the world's largest airfreight forwarder, echoes those comments. "We have not seen any major increase in tonnage out of Asia," he said. "As a result, we question whether there will be a peak [shipping] season or not. If there is one, it will be very short."
not all bad news
While the market was fixated on FedEx's disappointing air express numbers, they chose to ignore what were solid results from its other operating units. The company's ground parcel unit reported a 16-percent increase in revenue, with volumes up 5 percent and yields—driven by a stronger parcel-pricing environment—up 9 percent. FedEx Freight, the company's less-than-truckload division, reported a 5-percent revenue increase, with yields up 11 percent on a 7-percent drop in volumes as the unit continued to shed unprofitable or marginally profitable business.
Ross, the Stifel, Nicolaus analyst, said the Thursday selloff reflected the market's "disbelief" in the company's revised earnings-per-share targets for its 2012 fiscal year. In spite of the air freight division's recent performance, Fedex has reduced its original projections for 2012 by only 1.5 percent from those it made in June.
Unlike the market, Ross seems to agree with Fedex's reassessment. He said Stifel, Nicolaus sees "this period of market turmoil as a good time to take or increase a position in a global growth company that is gaining market share, with good management and strong pricing." Ross set a 12-month price target of $111 on FedEx shares.
William Greene, lead transportation analyst for Morgan Stanley & Co., said investors reacted negatively, believing that the company's full year earnings-per-share results will be at the low end of expectations. But Greene said FedEx management is betting on a re-acceleration of volumes in the second half of its fiscal year after what will likely be a second fiscal quarter as sluggish as the first.
Greene said investors should remain cautious over the near term as the macroeconomic environment bottoms out. However, he said that FedEx's stock price already reflects a conservative outlook for the business and that an expected improvement in international business should help boost the company's valuation.
Langenfeld of Robert W. Baird also advanced a bullish outlook, saying improved domestic parcel demand and pricing trends, combined with rising barriers to entry in the global express industry, outweigh near-term concerns about industry and macroeconomic weakness.
Noting that global air cargo volumes should rise by 5 percent to 6 percent a year over the long term, Langenfeld said FedEx should benefit from companies' continued push for globalization and market demand for sophisticated integrated logistics offerings supported by a strong information technology network.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.