Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Every business sector has a tipping point. For the cluster of companies providing regional parcel shipping services in the United States, the tipping point may very well have been Jan. 30, 2009.
On that date, DHL Express, one of the "Big Three" parcel companies, ceased domestic operations, effectively ceding the $55 billion a year market to FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc. With DHL gone, parcel shippers feared it would just be a matter of time before the two behemoths leveraged their duopoly status to raise rates, jack up fees for add-on services, and generally behave in ways that resembled a 1,600-pound pachyderm rather than two 800-pound gorillas.
In the Boston suburb of Woburn, Mass., James A. Berluti, president and CEO of Eastern Connection, a regional parcel firm whose network extends from Maine to Virginia, also saw the writing on the wall. He realized that, at some point, the marketplace would demand a third-party player to check the actions of the big boys, especially since DHL had been the low-price provider. Barring the entry of another large national carrier, a scenario deemed highly unlikely, established regional players like Eastern Connection would need to step up and fill the void, he reasoned.
Nearly three years later, much of what parcel shippers envisioned has come true. FedEx and UPS have raised their base rates in almost identical fashion; increased the number of "accessorials"—add-on charges for services beyond basic transportation—and hiked prices on those as well; changed the formula for measuring the dimensions of light-density packages in a way that has led to double-digit rate increases on non-compliant shippers, and begun phasing out relationships with third-party consultants retained by shippers to help them save money on parcel services.
The search for alternatives
In the meantime, Berluti's vision has also come to fruition: As shippers have begun to weary of the duopoly's practices and to seek alternate remedies, the regional carriers' value proposition has never seemed more relevant.
DHL's exit "would become the most important event in the history of the regionals," said Berluti, who co-founded his firm in 1983.
As it happens, FedEx and UPS have become the regionals' best marketing tools. "The strategy of the big two has opened the door for regional carriers to get a more welcome reception from shippers than they have in the past," said Douglas O. Kahl, a consultant with TranzAct Technologies Inc., an Elmhurst, Ill.-based transportation consultancy.
Added Craig Heurung, who heads sales for Spee-Dee Delivery Service Inc., a St. Cloud, Minn.-based regional carrier that serves eight states in the Midwest, "some our best leads are driven to us by FedEx and UPS."
Heurung said most of Spee-Dee's business comes from FedEx and UPS customers disenchanted with the rapid proliferation of accessorial charges that can significantly drive up the total shipping tab. "People are simply sick and tired of the add-on fees that they continue to pile on," said Heurung, noting that the increases in accessorial fees are in many cases outpacing the hikes in transportation charges.
The regional difference
The regionals don't pretend to be all things to all shippers. They don't have the resources to map out a national footprint supported by the high-tech tools demanded by many large shippers to manage their shipment visibility. The U.S. Southeast—and particularly Florida—currently lacks any significant regional carrier presence.
While there are no firm figures because the regionals are privately held, it is estimated the sector's total revenue is about $500 million a year, a fraction of FedEx's and UPS's total annual revenue of about $90 billion. On average, UPS moves as many packages and envelopes in two days as the largest regional carrier will handle in a year.
In addition, regional carriers can't gain much traction among larger shippers because they already enjoy significant volume-based discounts from either FedEx or UPS. As a result, the regionals focus on small to mid-sized shippers who often lack the leverage to get price breaks from the two giants.
However, the composition of the regionals' networks allows them to do what FedEx and UPS generally can't or won't do: provide next-day ground deliveries at distances up to 400�450 miles, and do it without an abundance of accessorial charges. FedEx and UPS, by contrast, require their shippers to upgrade to costlier air services if they want a shipment delivered the next business day at those distances.
For example, Phoenix-based OnTrac, which serves eight Western states, charges a tariff rate of $5.99 for delivering a package the next business day from Los Angeles and San Francisco, a distance of about 400 miles. FedEx and UPS would charge about $36.00 for the same shipment delivered via air by 10: 30 a.m. the next business day, and a bit over $30.00 for next-afternoon delivery.
The rate gap exists on shorter hauls as well. Spee-Dee charges a tariff rate of $3.67 for a one-pound package shipped from Minneapolis to Eau Claire, Wis., and delivered the next day, while UPS charges $5.12 for the same shipment.
Spee-dee and OnTrac have eight and 10 accessorial charges, respectively. FedEx and UPS, on the other hand, have an estimated 42 accessorials, and that's a conservative figure, according to The Colography Group Inc., a research and consulting firm based in Marietta, Ga.
Because of their focused service areas, the regionals can provide late pickups—sometimes up to 9 p.m.—and still deliver the goods the next day. Rick Jones, CEO of Austin, Texas-based Lone Star Overnight (LSO), which serves four states including every address in Texas, said the later pickups are a boon to his company's customers because it enables them to push more goods out the door per day.
The regional model also becomes more viable as the nation's supply chain itself becomes more regional in scope. Mark Magill, OnTrac's director of business development, said one of his largest customers, a retailer with a distribution facility on the East Coast, uses OnTrac's network as a mobile DC out West, enabling the retailer to tap into the carrier's service area of 60 million people without building a brick-and-mortar facility.
OnTrac's geography is so vast for a regional carrier that a customer can ship a package overnight from Bellingham, Wash., to Yuma, Ariz., achieving NAFTA-like next-day coverage for its deliveries, Magill said.
The top regionals agree they while they cannot replace FedEx and UPS, they can peel off business from the two that might be best suited to moving in regional networks. But their tactics differ. Spee-Dee touts its initial rate as its best offering and does not discount from there. Its rates are the same whether a parcel is delivered to a business or residence, according to Heurung.
Eastern Connection's tariff rates will match those of FedEx and UPS, but from there, the regional will discount its prices to undercut the big two. Lone Star, whose customer mix is somewhat different in that it is heavily skewed toward the business-to-business segment, will offer rates that, in some cases, are higher than FedEx's and UPS's. The company does offer an express product, "LSO Simple," which matches FedEx's and UPS's base rates but comes with the promise of no fuel surcharges or accessorials.
Jones of LSO said he shies away from serving the retail industry and instead focuses on sectors like legal and health care, which have better margins. He steers his company to clients and sectors with supply chain needs that go beyond the basic transportation solution. And unlike other regionals that have de-emphasized the more time-sensitive express service in favor of the much larger ground parcel business, Lone Star pushes its express products and lets the ground parcel category "come along for the ride," according to Jones.
The Lone Star CEO said he wants to avoid situations where his firm's value play is based on price alone. "I don't want to get into a commodity price war with multibillion dollar giants who can crush me," he said.
A national network?
For years, there has been talk among the major regionals of knitting together a unified national network to compete with FedEx and UPS. Until now, the extent of their cooperation has been to share information that would, for example, allow Eastern Connection to refer a customer to OnTrac if the shipper needed a regional presence out West.
Berluti of Eastern Connection said that although there is no specific timetable, the development of a national network is "absolutely going to happen." He said the "marketplace needs a third player because the duopoly is not working for the customer. The regionals are interested, and the shipping community is as well."
There is no shortage of obstacles, however. They range from building a uniform IT system, to establishing a presence in the Southeast, to working out revenue-sharing issues, to harmonizing disparate product lines among the various players.
The regionals have "different billing systems, different accounting and tracking systems, and different tracking algorithms," said Jerry Hempstead, who runs the Orlando, Fla.-based Hempstead Consulting and was a top U.S. sales executive with DHL and the former Airborne Express, which DHL bought in 2003.
Hempstead said DHL tried to convert Airborne's customers to DHL's tracking, billing, and shipment rating systems, only to encounter enormous problems in the execution. The failed conversion "killed the Airborne acquisition," Hempstead said. "The wheels just fell off."
Berluti said regional carrier executives are mindful of the challenges and are working diligently to remove them. He noted that Eastern Connection has an interline relationship with U.S. Cargo, a regional carrier that serves Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia, where Eastern Connection tenders packages to U.S. Cargo network for two- to three-day deliveries into a region mostly beyond Eastern Connection's geography. In return, Eastern Connection handles packages originating in the Ohio region for delivery throughout New England, the Northeast, and the Middle Atlantic.
"We are already a super-regional carrier through this relationship," Berluti said.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.