Rising costs and a stubborn recession weren't enough to throw Gough Grubbs of Stage Stores off his game. He simply used them as an opportunity for some creative collaboration.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
It's been said that historically, the shipper community gets creative when its collective back is to the wall. Gough Grubbs of Stage Stores is a prime example of that. During the most recent economic slump, Grubbs collaborated with his company's dedicated outbound carrier to work out a new delivery regimen that saved everybody time and money. His takeaway from that experience? "Economic downturns can actually be positive," he says, "in that they force the kind of communication with business partners that we should have had all along."
Grubbs is senior vice president of distribution and logistics at Stage Stores, a retail chain that operates more than 800 stores under the Goody's, Bealls, Palais Royal, Peebles, and Stage brands. He joined the retailer in 1996, following 23 years in the distribution positions with Foley's (May Co.) and Sanger Harris (Federated Department Stores).
Grubbs holds a B.A. in business management from the University of Texas at Arlington and is a frequent speaker on the logistics and supply chain conference circuit. He recently spoke with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about the operation he oversees, his management philosophy, and how he was converted from skeptic to hard-core fan of transportation management systems.
Q: Could you tell us a little about Stage Stores and how it has grown since you joined the company? A: When I arrived back in 1996, Stage was operating 235 stores in 13 states. Today, we have over 800 stores in 39 states and continue to expand. This fall, we're opening a store in Wyoming, which will be our 40th state. Our aim is to have over 1,000 stores by 2014.
We sell name brand apparel, footwear, cosmetics, and jewelry to rural America. Our focus niche is to be in towns of less than 50,000, although over the years, some of those towns have grown well beyond that.
Q: Could you briefly describe the distribution network that serves those stores? A: We have three DCs—in Jacksonville, Texas; South Hill, Va.; and Jeffersonville, Ohio. Those DCs have a combined capacity of 1,150 stores, so you can see we have quite a bit of growth potential as long as we stay within our traditional geographic footprint. If we expanded heavily into the West, with the cost of transportation, we might need to consider adding a fourth DC, but we don't see that in the near future.
Q: Sounds like you're well positioned to provide next-day service from the DCs to stores? A: Well, we could if we wanted to, but we're not doing that right now because of volume and distance. After the 2008 economic slump, we began talking with our dedicated outbound carrier, Velocity Express, about reducing delivery frequencies. What we decided was that some of the stores were small enough that they didn't really need three cartons delivered every day, and we could both save some money by moving them to a designated-delivery-day system. So, we took a segment of the stores and put them on a Tuesday-Thursday or a Monday-Wednesday-Friday delivery schedule, all based on volume and business.
It was a win-win for both the carrier and for us. The stores had no objection—they didn't necessarily enjoy going to the back door every day to receive two or three cartons.
That's not to say this will be a permanent arrangement, however. The grand plan, since we have a dedicated delivery partner, is that as it adds other clients in these areas and finds itself going to a location anyway for some other client, we will probably go back to more frequent deliveries.
Q: Tell us a little bit about the logistics operation's role in supporting Stage's broader corporate success. A: Well, as I mentioned, we are a growth company, so our primary role is to make sure that we are never the reason they can't continue down that path—that I have sufficient capacity and have the mechanisms in place to support whatever strategy they decide to pursue.
Another of our main responsibilities has to do with balancing stock levels and transportation costs. We operate literally hundreds of stores in rural areas and the average store size is around 18,000 square feet, so we are pretty shallow in terms of depth of our SKUs. As a result, we have to be very sensitive to how quickly we can replenish to avoid out-of-stocks. Trying to marry up the need to keep inventory in the store but do it cost effectively in so many widely scattered locations is a major challenge.
Q: Could you talk a bit about your specific role? For instance, what do you do when you come to work each day? A: Most of my time is spent communicating with our own merchants, communicating with vendors, communicating with carriers, and trying to develop an environment that is conducive to the maximizing of productivity and efficiency within the organization.
What makes that possible is that I have a very good team. They are solid. They are experienced. They are great leaders. That has allowed me to focus my efforts on things outside the four walls. They are running what goes on the inside.
Q: So you're a proponent of hiring good people and getting out of their way? A: Absolutely. Often when I speak, I open with, "I love my job." The reason I love my job so much is I get to do my job. So many of my peers appear overworked and over-tasked. When you talk to them for just a little while, you find out that the reason is that they're not only doing their own jobs, they're also attempting to do their people's jobs.
Q: Assume for a moment that you've stepped into a new job and discovered some pretty substantial personnel problems within the logistics operation. How would you go about orchestrating change? A: I think you do it one step at a time. You have to spend time with each of the individuals to try to get to the root of the problem and then go attack those issues.
That can lead to difficult decisions, like having to cut loose a star player—someone who's well thought of in the industry—for the sake of the team. Sometimes that has to be done and a lot of things happen as a result of that. For one thing, it sends a message about what is acceptable and what is not acceptable no matter who you are. For another, people see that you're serious about your philosophies and they start to get into line.
Q: You've spent 40 years in the logistics profession. What are some of the biggest changes you've seen in that time? A: The biggest one is the increased availability of data. Take advance ship notices, for example. We're now at about 93 percent advance ship notice utilization. An advance ship notice is basically like an electronic packing slip for every carton that comes across. With that information, you can do a better job of staffing, and the receiving process is more efficient because instead of having to do the old count and sort and stack, you just scan a carton. On top of that, it allows us to make store allocation decisions based on up-to-the-minute information, rather than having to decide as much as six weeks out where merchandise is going to go. When you do that, of course, by the time it gets there, that's not where you need it.
It's the same thing for transportation. We have a transportation management system that helps us optimize our loads. When we first installed the system back in 2002, we compared the routes it developed with those created by our people and questioned some of the decisions. We said, "Why are we sending that truck there?" But when we went back and did the math on the miles and the costs, it was right.
Q: What do you see coming down the road in terms of logistics technology? A: I'd say RFID has a great deal of potential. We are not a part of that right now—mainly because the price has not come down enough that it has been totally embraced by the vendor community—but I think it is coming.
I remember a day when just scanning a bar code seemed like a huge win. But now I'm hearing complaints from store personnel about the amount of time they have to spend at the back door to receive freight because they have to scan a bar code. With RFID, they could just wave a wand over a pallet load of cartons and get back to their primary job of selling. I think we will get there.
RFID holds similar promise for tracking inventory. The ability to validate your inventory with the stroke of a wand is something we will eventually have, and probably sooner rather than later.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."