Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
The attraction of outsourcing last-mile delivery to the customer is not difficult to figure out. The last leg of a shipment's journey can be expensive, and customer expectations are high that their merchandise will arrive on time and defect free.
Yet handing off that task to a third party can be something of a risk, particularly when it comes to specialty products that can't just be tossed on the customer's doorstep like a book or article of clothing. For suppliers of specialty items, the final delivery is a key element in the customer service equation—one that can either bolster its reputation or cost it a client's business. That makes it all the more essential they select the right partner.
One such specialty supplier is New York-based Windowrama, the Northeast's largest retailer of windows, doors, and skylights. The majority of its products are delivered straight from its Edgewood, N.Y., distribution center to a home or construction site. These products are generally large, heavy, and made of glass. It's critical that they be properly handled. For this reason, for the first 23 years of the company's existence, Windowrama handled all of its logistics in-house with its own set of employee drivers.
But over the years, managing drivers grew increasingly complex and time-consuming. "It became a lot of work for us between the [Department of Transportation] laws, the drug-testing regulations, and the hiring of drivers," says Al Altieri, Windowrama's director of distribution. "It reached a point where it was very difficult for us to continue to do it. Our focus really needed to be on our business, which is windows, doors, and skylights, and not on running a trucking company." In the end, Windowrama decided to give outsourcing a try.
A rough start
But the transition to outsourcing wasn't easy. The company initially contracted with a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) under an "employee-based" arrangement, whereby the 3PL hired Windowrama's former drivers. That model proved to have its drawbacks. For one thing, it turned out to be very expensive because Windowrama was required to pay for the use of 21 trucks, 21 drivers, and 21 helpers each day—no matter how many it actually needed.
On top of that, Windowrama had no way to ensure it got the level of service it wanted, since it had no leverage with the drivers. "[The drivers] had union protection and they were employees of [the 3PL]," explains Altieri, "so if they broke something or treated a customer disrespectfully, there were no ramifications."
That crucial link between last-mile delivery and customer service was being lost. "There was nothing pushing [the drivers] to be good customer-service people, and in our business, that's key," says Altieri. "Our sales people can do a fantastic job selling the product, and my warehouse and distribution people can do a good job handling and receiving it. But when the driver is the last person to see that customer and he doesn't do the right thing at the job site, you could lose a current customer and you could lose a future customer."
Furthermore, the new setup was proving unpopular with the drivers. "We had a very good relationship with the drivers when they worked for us," says Altieri, "but when they transferred over to [the new employer], there were some bitter people."
Despite several appeals from drivers to take them back, Windowrama was determined to stay the outsourcing course, Altieri says. "Once we had subcontracted out, there was no way we were going back," he says. The company was convinced the outsourcing route made sense, he says; it just needed to find the right model and the right service provider.
If at first you don't succeed ...
The right provider with the right model came in the form of 3PD, a national third-party logistics company that specializes in deliveries to homes and job sites—particularly deliveries of heavy-duty appliances and furniture. In fact, last-mile delivery is all 3PD does, so the provider is very choosy about the delivery teams it uses. 3PD's business model calls for subcontracting with owner-operators to handle the deliveries, but that doesn't mean it's willing to settle for whoever's available. The 3PL takes great pains to find delivery teams with the right skill sets, and then make sure they understand exactly what 3PD and its customers expect of them.
"We look for special individuals who have very strong customer skills and are really customer ambassadors because we're going into some very private parts of individuals' homes," says Will O'Shea, chief sales and marketing officer for 3PD. "There's a big difference between that and bumping a dock at a Target or Walmart and waiting to be unloaded."
And yet, Altieri still had trepidations about handing over delivery responsibilities to 3PD. "When 3PD came on board, we were very nervous about turning the whole thing over to not only a third-party provider but to one that then goes out and gets a subcontractor to work for it," he says.
But it turns out the Windowrama executive had nothing to worry about. "The [subcontractors] take responsibility," says Altieri, noting that he can count on them to load the product correctly, show up on time, and provide prompt, courteous service.
In fact, the difference in service is "night and day" according to Altieri. "Our customers are thrilled," he says. "They get phone calls an hour before the [truck] arrives, and they get uniformed, proper, professional drivers."
Altieri especially likes the survey system 3PD uses to evaluate its delivery teams, noting that it's the first thing he looks at every morning. Following each delivery, the 3PL e-mails the customer asking it to rate the overall delivery experience: Was it on time? Did the drivers call ahead? If you needed another delivery, would you want the same team? According to O'Shea, the survey elicits a 45-percent response rate.
Another big advantage of 3PD's model is its flexibility. In contrast to its previous arrangement, Windowrama is not required to maintain a fleet of 21 trucks; instead, 3PD offers a variable pricing model that allows the client to pay for only those trucks and delivery teams it actually uses. "It really worked well for us when the economy came tumbling down," says Altieri. "We were running 21 to 20 trucks a day; now we're down to 12 to 13 trucks per day. That's a big deal, and adds up to lots of dollars in savings."
And by lots of dollars, Altieri means $2 million. "We expected to save about $1 million by switching to 3PD and taking advantage of its network redesign, routing, and customer service expertise," says Altieri, "And we would have been really, really happy with that. But in the end, the pricing model ended up being an equally significant part of the equation, so we wound up saving $2 million instead."
Is outsourcing right for you?
While outsourcing was clearly the right decision for Windowrama, it's not right for every company. For instance, if a company has fewer than five trucks on the road each day, the financial benefits of outsourcing are questionable, according to Will O'Shea, chief sales and marketing officer for 3PD. Anything over five trucks, however, warrants taking a look at outsourcing.
Say you're interested in going down this route. How do you pick the provider that's right for you? O'Shea suggests you start by asking yourself the following questions:
Are you only delivering in one local market? If so, a local provider may be the most economical choice for you. But if you are a national company, it makes more sense to go with a larger, national 3PL than spend time trying to manage a lot of different providers across the country.
What type of technology do you need? To provide the customer-service levels that your customers demand, do you need real-time visibility or can you get by with phone calls? Many companies choose to outsource because the provider offers technology that they can't justify buying for a fleet of 10 trucks.
How important is last-mile delivery to you? Is it a key part of your customer service strategy? If so, you should look for a provider that has a core competency in this area and doesn't view it as just another sideline business. "A lot of companies out there are trying to get into this space with the economy being down and their revenue being lower," says O'Shea. "But at the end of the day, they are still primarily a truckload provider or warehousing company."
How much flexibility does the provider offer? Home deliveries tend to require more resources on weekends than on weekdays, says O'Shea. Make sure your provider has the capacity to flex with your demand.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."