Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
For multi-channel retailers competing in the cutthroat direct-to-consumer market, the key to success lies in creating a positive delivery experience for the customer. Make deliveries cheap, fast, and reliable, and the retailer is one step ahead of the game.
That's not as simple as it might sound. Mastering the delivery challenge requires not only getting the transportation part right, but also the fulfillment part. And as Bob Monti, senior vice president of supply chain operations for St. Petersburg, Fla.-based Home Shopping Network, will tell you, labor management software and process improvements have a lot to do with it as well.
Founded in 1977 as the nation's first television network devoted to shopping, the company now known as HSN has built a $3 billion-a-year brand through its ubiquitous presence on the tube and the Web. It broadcasts 364 days a year, reaches 96 million homes, and represents one of the top 10 sites for e-commerce traffic.
Behind the smiles of the celebrities and the almost-famous hawking virtually anything imaginable beats the heart of the HSN operation: a fulfillment network consisting of three distribution centers, located in Roanoke, Va.; Piney Flats, Tenn.; and Fontana, Calif. The DCs, which combined total more than 1 million square feet of space, are overseen by the no-nonsense Monti.
Monti is only as demanding as the environment he works in. HSN guarantees deliveries within 10 calendar days of a customer's order, but nearly 70 percent of its deliveries are made within six calendar days. At the same time, HSN, like its rivals, has been aggressively pushing such customer promotions as free or reduced-cost shipping and handling (S&H) to boost its value proposition. While this has pleased HSN's customers, it puts pressure on Monti and his staff to continue to drive out costs while improving its fulfillment and delivery standards.
Because HSN's top brass plans to expand its shipping and handling promotional efforts—and given that S&H accounts for two-thirds of his operation's expenses—Monti doesn't expect his job to get any easier.
A push to slash labor costs
With the pressure to contain costs mounting, in mid-2008, Monti and his chief assistant, Caroline Dreyer, vice president of fulfillment operations, decided it was time to act. They began exploring ways to improve efficiencies in HSN's three DCs to reduce operating costs and free up cash flow so HSN could fund more delivery-related promotions.
They focused on a plan to improve DC worker productivity and slash what Monti calls "variable labor spend." The goal was an 18-percent improvement in productivity and a 10-percent reduction in operating expenses.
Given the fulfillment-heavy nature of HSN's work, Monti and Dreyer believed the company was further along than most in understanding the nuances of DC work-force issues. However, because they didn't have automated productivity tools or sophisticated engineered labor standards to measure workplace output, they were forced to measure present and future results by past performance metrics. While this yielded reasonably accurate data, Monti felt it didn't give HSN the maximum visibility needed to unearth even greater efficiencies and cost-savings.
Monti proposed to engage TZA, a Long Grove, Ill.-based consultancy specializing in the design and implementation of labor-management software and supporting it with a deep knowledge of best practices and engineered standards. But consummating the marriage wasn't easy. HSN's executive suite, in hunkered-down mode as the financial crisis and recession took hold, twice rejected the proposal. On the third try, in January 2009 with the downturn in full fury, it was green-lighted.
A 20-percent boost in productivity
The project took two years to complete and required a major change in how the DCs and their workers functioned. But when the dust settled, the results surprised even the hard-to-impress Monti. The operation met its operational savings goals, and worker productivity rose by more than 20 percent, exceeding HSN's original objectives. HSN recouped its entire investment in less than 15 months, according to Monti.
Meanwhile, the savings enabled Monti's unit to help HSN defray the rising cost of shipping & handling-related promotions it considered so critical to building customer loyalty.
As part of the project, HSN installed TZA's labor management software, a program that runs on a stand-alone basis but functions in close concert with the company's warehouse management system. For the first time, HSN had the visibility to track DC performance at the individual employee level and to reward workers—as well as hold them accountable—for meeting the engineered standards. In addition, the program helped HSN determine best practices for each of the operation's functional areas. Through it, the company was able to eliminate steps impacting its product returns function, through which 6.5 million units move per year.
To Monti and Dreyer, seasoned logisticians who felt they already ran an efficient shop, it was an eye-opener to have a specialist in DC work-force issues apply high-level labor standards to the HSN operation. "You don't know what you don't know until you put these tools in and run with them," Monti said.
Monti said that without the TZA toolkit, "we couldn't have achieved this level of improvement." Leveraging the visibility provided by TZA's labor management software and applying it to the engineered labor standards, "made all the difference in the world for us," he added.
$10 million in transportation savings
With the fulfillment project behind them, Monti and Dreyer turned to revamping HSN's delivery network. For years, UPS Inc. had been HSN's main shipping vendor, mostly managing end-to-end deliveries from the three DCs to the consumer. But Monti and Dreyer decided to tap into a joint venture between UPS and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), under which UPS hands off HSN's packages to the USPS system for "last-mile" deliveries to any U.S. address.
By relying more heavily on the lower-cost postal network, HSN cut its annualized shipping spend by $10 million. It also developed a broad-based logistics program with UPS that included, among other things, volume-based incentives for customers and an enhanced returns solution.
Monti acknowledges that expanding HSN's use of the USPS system and introducing a physical exchange of packages between the two carriers "slowed down" the retailer's delivery schedules by half a day, on average. However, he said that the newly streamlined picking and packing operations allow the DCs to push packages out the door faster, offsetting the impact of the slower delivery timetables.
Monetary incentives
As for the transition, Monti and Dreyer said many members of the DC work force were apprehensive about what the new efficiency standards would mean to them. To quell uncertainty and motivate workers, they instituted a plan to give workers half of the proceeds from productivity gains above a certain baseline called for by the engineering standards implemented by TZA.
About 70 percent of the workers have achieved more than what Monti termed "baseline productivity" metrics and have pocketed what can be considered performance bonuses. Monti and Dreyer said DC employee turnover is currently at an all-time low.
Based on his conversations with TZA, Monti believes companies in and out of the multi-channel retailing category can achieve productivity gains of up to 30 percent through implementing a mix of DC labor-management software and processes. HSN's improvements were lower on a percentage scale, he said, because the company has already worked for years to improve labor productivity and was not starting from scratch.
C. Dwight Klappich, vice president of research at consultancy Gartner Inc., said the use of labor-management software and engineering standards to measure DC worker performance is gaining momentum as companies focus more on productivity improvements than cost-cutting to drive efficiencies. The declining costs of software implementation and ongoing support will further boost demand as the tools become more affordable to a wider customer base, he added.
Klappich said Gartner's research shows that firms have "already slashed costs about as far as brute force will allow, so now they need tools like [labor-management software] to help drive efficiency, to keep costs where they are, and lower costs more intelligently wherever possible." The consultant added that labor-management software is an area of "potential low-hanging fruit, and typically these investments have strong financial returns" for its users.
Comments like those are music to the ears of companies like TZA, which has positioned itself as both software vendor and consultant to capitalize on what it sees as a wide-open market opportunity. "The labor-management software market is today where the WMS market was 10 years ago," said Steve Simmerman, the consultancy's senior vice president of business development.
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."