We tend to think of business strategy as essentially timeless, but that's not necessarily the case. A lot of times, yesterday's paradigms are worth about 20 cents.
Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
We tend to think of business strategy as essentially timeless, but that's not necessarily the case. A lot of times, yesterday's paradigms are worth about 20 cents.
In the last century, for instance, value propositions tended to center on a few themes:
Price – we are less expensive than the competition (the term "cheaper" was studiously avoided)
People – we are smarter than anybody else
Processes and Products – we've built a better mousetrap, and we've built it a better way.
But these days, we're hearing some new themes, such as:
"We are really easy to work with"
"You ain't seen nothin' 'til you've seen our service"
"We help you make things happen"
"We're in this together."
So what does this mean? Have cost, quality, creativity, and processes fallen off the radar? Not at all. Continuous improvement in value (what the customer gets for the cost, not simply a low unit price) will remain a core objective for companies and for supply chain organizations. Attracting and retaining the right talent will forever be a critical contributor to success. And re-engineering and refining processes for design, planning, execution, quality, communications, and marketplace relevance must be a way of life in a fiercely competitive global economy.
What has changed is that nowadays, everybody claims to have the best people, prices, and processes. And when everyone has them, they're no longer a source of competitive differentiation. They've simply become table stakes—what it takes to be in the game at all.
Enter the Neanderthals
Some are left shaking their heads. "Enough of this soft stuff; we're after hard business results." They've made fun of what they call the "soft stuff" for so long that we've all become a little defensive about it. What they're not getting is that the "soft stuff" is the hard stuff.
To put it another way, what they call the "hard stuff" is not sustainable without the soft stuff. Lowest price might get the first order; shoddy quality might disqualify a supplier from any future sales.
Smart people who are abrasive might get through the bidding process but turn an entire company against them over the course of a working relationship. And bright people will not stay long in a working environment that is not positive and supportive. Perhaps they'll tough it out in a weak economy, but they'll bolt for the door at the first sign of turnaround.
An excellent product without strong service behind it won't score many repeat orders. And processes that don't contribute to strong, timely communications and multi-level relationship building can exhaust an otherwise satisfied customer.
Why is the soft stuff hard?
There are several reasons, and they're all important. And they've got to be mastered before a company can hope to be effective at the hard stuff.
It begins with the reality that people are all wired differently. Left to their own devices, they'll kill off (figuratively) those who aren't pretty much like them. They—at all levels in an organization—need to learn how the "others" are different, and how they can use the differences to create more effective, higher-performing organizations, solutions, products, and processes. In the process, they also need to learn about themselves, their strengths, and their weaknesses.
Then, there's the vital need for alignment, again at all levels. The senior management team has got to be, without reservation, behind a singular vision and mission. Components of the organization must link their efforts with strategic directions and clear supporting objectives. They also need to communicate and collaborate with peer corporate functions for integrated and multi-faceted solutions—and learn to trust those they've been suspicious of in the past.
Finally, all of this vision, collaboration, and communication has to get baked into the corporate DNA. The new way of working together can't afford to be a transient program-of-the-year. Every clerk, every order picker, every salesperson, every IT specialist has to get it.
True story: A company we know of lost one of its best customers because an accounts payable functionary with a bad attitude aggressively dunned the customer for an invoice that had already been paid.
Examples from the real world
You're probably tired of hearing the same old names, but let's give credit where it's due. Who in the brick-and-mortar retail arena is easier to deal with than Nordstrom's? For sure, they don't have the lowest prices. But they are borderline cult-like when it comes to customer service, and their customers are not only happy, but loyal.
How about L.L.Bean in catalog retail? Or Infiniti in automobiles? Or Ritz-Carlton in hospitality?
We'll not name names in the supply chain universe, lest we offend a worthy candidate by omission. But contemplate a logistics service provider (LSP) that thinks more about how to strengthen your position with customers than it does how much to charge for each transaction. Consider the IT specialist who works 24/7, not to finish a "deliverable," but to flush out the bugs in an implementation.
Reflect on your relationship with a service provider who doesn't already "know" the right solution for you, but instead figures out a way to customize a standard solution to fit the needs of both you and your customers. Back to the LSP world, how do you react to a company that wants to invest time and resources in building a long-term relationship with you, rather than try to recoup last year's losses with a series of take-it-or-leave-it rate increases?
The long-term view
In the end, of course, what's important in the hard stuff/soft stuff balancing act is how to do the hard stuff in a way that has legs, in a way that will last over the long pull. The answer lies in beginning with the soft stuff.
Almost any fool can drive a hard bargain once. But he or she is a one-trick pony. Without the foundational infrastructure the soft stuff builds, the bargain is tough to replicate, and impossible to maintain. It's even a Pyrrhic victory in some cases.
We are reminded of the cheese maker that decided to wrestle its carriers to the earth every time out to get the lowest possible rates. Brilliant, until truckload capacity was in short supply in the harvest season, available only to those who had treated the carriers fairly the rest of the year. To quote Monty Python, "Blessed are the cheese makers." Not in this case, though.
“The past year has been unprecedented, with extreme weather events, heightened geopolitical tension and cybercrime destabilizing supply chains throughout the world. Navigating this year’s looming risks to build a secure supply network has never been more critical,” Corey Rhodes, CEO of Everstream Analytics, said in the firm’s “2025 Annual Risk Report.”
“While some risks are unavoidable, early notice and swift action through a combination of planning, deep monitoring, and mitigation can save inventory and lives in 2025,” Rhodes said.
In its report, Everstream ranked the five categories by a “risk score metric” to help global supply chain leaders prioritize planning and mitigation efforts for coping with them. They include:
Drowning in Climate Change – 90% Risk Score. Driven by shifting climate patterns and record-high temperatures, extreme weather events are a dominant risk to the supply chain due to concerns such as flooding and elevated ocean temperatures.
Geopolitical Instability with Increased Tariff Risk – 80% Risk Score. These threats could disrupt trade networks and impact economies worldwide, including logistics, transportation, and manufacturing industries. The following major geopolitical events are likely to impact global trade: Red Sea disruptions, Russia-Ukraine conflict, Taiwan trade risks, Middle East tensions, South China Sea disputes, and proposed tariff increases.
More Backdoors for Cybercrime – 75% Risk Score. Supply chain leaders face escalating cybersecurity risks in 2025, driven by the growing reliance on AI and cloud computing within supply chains, the proliferation of IoT-connected devices, vulnerabilities in sub-tier supply chains, and a disproportionate impact on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and the electronics industry.
Rare Metals and Minerals on Lockdown – 65% Risk Score. Between rising regulations, new tariffs, and long-term or exclusive contracts, rare minerals and metals will be harder than ever, and more expensive, to obtain.
Crackdown on Forced Labor – 60% Risk Score. A growing crackdown on forced labor across industries will increase pressure on companies who are facing scrutiny to manage and eliminate suppliers violating human rights. Anticipated risks in 2025 include a push for alternative suppliers, a cascade of legislation to address lax forced labor issues, challenges for agri-food products such as palm oil and vanilla.
That number is low compared to widespread unemployment in the transportation sector which reached its highest level during the COVID-19 pandemic at 15.7% in both May 2020 and July 2020. But it is slightly above the most recent pre-pandemic rate for the sector, which was 2.8% in December 2019, the BTS said.
For broader context, the nation’s overall unemployment rate for all sectors rose slightly in December, increasing 0.3 percentage points from December 2023 to 3.8%.
On a seasonally adjusted basis, employment in the transportation and warehousing sector rose to 6,630,200 people in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 1.7% from December 2023. Employment in transportation and warehousing grew 15.1% in December 2024 from the pre-pandemic December 2019 level of 5,760,300 people.
The largest portion of those workers was in warehousing and storage, followed by truck transportation, according to a breakout of the total figures into separate modes (seasonally adjusted):
Warehousing and storage rose to 1,770,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 0.2% from December 2023.
Truck transportation fell to 1,545,900 in December 2024 — down 0.1% from the previous month and down 0.4% from December 2023.
Air transportation rose to 578,000 in December 2024 — up 0.4% from the previous month and up 1.4% from December 2023.
Transit and ground passenger transportation rose to 456,000 in December 2024 — up 0.3% from the previous month and up 5.7% from December 2023.
Rail transportation remained virtually unchanged in December 2024 at 150,300 from the previous month but down 1.8% from December 2023.
Water transportation rose to 74,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 4.8% from December 2023.
Pipeline transportation rose to 55,000 in December 2024 — up 0.5% from the previous month and up 6.2% from December 2023.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.