Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Several of the nation's top less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers, fresh from announcing rate increases of nearly 7 percent on their non-contract traffic, are prepared to impose another round of rate hikes in February 2012, according to a top executive at a firm that advises shippers on spend management issues.
John Haber, executive vice president of transportation for Atlanta-based NPI, said he's been told by reliable sources at several LTL carriers to expect another round of general rate increases in February. That would be about six months after the most recent cycle of increases, most of which went into effect at the beginning of August. The one exception is FedEx Freight, the LTL unit of FedEx Corp. and the nation's largest LTL carrier, which today announced a 6.75-percent rate increase, effective Sept. 6.
Haber, whose firm represents about 300 shippers of varying sizes, said he's been told that the 2012 increases would likely fall in the 5- to 6-percent range, less than the 6.9-percent rate increases announced by UPS Freight, ABF Freight System Inc., YRC Worldwide Inc., and Con-way Freight or the 6.75-percent increase from FedEx Freight.
YRC CEO James L. Welch, in an Aug. 5 interview, declined comment on any future rate increases. Representatives for UPS Freight and ABF denied that such a rate increase was in the offing. A spokesman for Con-way declined comment.
From late 2006 through 2009, LTL carriers were buffeted by a freight recession exacerbated by a broad economic downturn that followed the financial crisis that began in September 2008. During that time, the industry was also embroiled in a persistent rate war that compressed carriers' profit margins. Many speculate that the rate-cutting strategy was a concerted effort to drive financially ailing YRC, then the market leader, out of business.
YRC has survived, however, and since the start of 2010, the carriers have reversed course, raising rates and culling marginally priced freight in an effort to boost revenue per pound—or yields—and improve profitability. Since January 2010, for example, UPS Freight, the LTL unit of UPS Inc., has imposed three general rate increases. UPS Freight was the first carrier to announce a rate hike this time around.
Haber said LTL shippers can look for alternative solutions, but with the major carriers falling in lockstep—or poised to—they may have little room to maneuver. He said experienced shippers with significant volumes might be able to bargain the carriers down to a 3- to 5-percent increase, but likely no lower.
Haber said he understands the carriers' need to generate adequate returns to offset higher labor and operating costs, satisfy shareholders, and reinvest in the business. However, he added that the amount and the frequency of the increases have been "excessive."
Haber said FedEx Freight has been the most active in walking away from low-margin business after two years of aggressive rate-cutting designed to capture market share. The unit last month reported that it turned an operating profit in its fiscal fourth quarter, its first quarter in the black after six consecutive quarters of operating losses. In the quarter, FedEx Freight's yields rose 13 percent year over year, while tonnage fell by 8 percent during that span.
In April, Alan B. Graf Jr., FedEx's CFO, told an investor conference the company "shot ourselves in the foot" with its LTL discounting strategy. "We got too aggressive on yields and tried to make it up in productivity. The reality was that we could not," he said.
In a statement accompanying ABF's generally solid second-quarter results, Judy R. McReynolds, president and CEO of parent Arkansas Best Corp., cautioned that the "progress made so far does not produce sufficient returns for our shareholders nor does it allow us to adequately recapitalize our business." The path to profitability lies with "improved pricing on ABF's existing account base and from continuing efforts to achieve a more competitive cost structure," she added.
The wild card in any future rate actions is likely to be the health of the U.S. economy. Charles W. Clowdis Jr., managing director-transportation advisory services for consultancy IHS Global Insight, said although "all of the LTL players would like to raise rates in early 2012," a weak economy and stagnant or declining freight volumes may make it difficult to implement an increase at that time.
Unless business picks up appreciably, a rate increase is possible only if carriers can tighten capacity to the point where shippers must pay up to get their freight moved, according to Clowdis.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."