Think there's nothing new in lift truck batteries and associated equipment? Not so. Here are four trends that could have a big impact on how you manage those assets.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Let's face it: Lift truck batteries and associated equipment—such as battery changing, monitoring, and charging systems—aren't the sexiest things in the warehouse. They're not as glamorous as robots or as attention-grabbing as high-speed conveyor systems. As a result, they're often taken for granted.
But these workhorses of the warehouse and DC are especially worthy of attention right now. Several factors—including technology, the economy, the environment, and regulatory controls—are having a notable impact on what buyers of batteries and associated equipment are purchasing and how they manage those assets.
What can you expect down the road? Here are four trends to watch.
1. Companies will adopt more efficient charging systems. Although high-frequency chargers have been available in Europe for years, they're now becoming a hot topic in North America. Most chargers for industrial batteries used here are ferroresonant or silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR) types, but these typically have only a 60- to 80-percent efficiency rate for converting AC current into the DC current needed to charge a battery, explains Steve Spaar, marketing director-Americas for the battery maker EnerSys. They also require large transformers that include costly commodities like steel and copper.
High-frequency charging technology, which uses a different type of switching componentry, doesn't require large transformers. These chargers have an efficiency rating of at least 90 to 92 percent and many are even higher, Spaar says. Fleets that use this technology typically see slightly lower electric bills. Electric utilities like these high "power factor" chargers, and many are willing to give a rebate to the end user for purchasing them, Spaar says. Buyers also can get LEED credit for installing these efficient charging systems.
There's no question that high-frequency chargers are becoming more prevalent, says Dan Dwyer, vice president and general manager of Sackett Systems, a manufacturer of battery handling equipment. "About 80 percent of the systems we've installed this year have some sort of high-frequency chargers involved," he says. For those installations, his company has had to modify the racking configuration in its multilevel battery changing systems because most high-frequency chargers have a smaller footprint and are mounted differently than traditional equipment, he says.
Concerns about electricity costs are encouraging lift truck fleet managers to reconsider not just how but when they charge their batteries, says Arun Patel, president of Access Control Group, a provider of asset management solutions for lift truck fleets. Charging during peak hours when electricity rates are highest, especially during the summer, can raise costs, he points out. By collecting and analyzing battery usage data, managers may find that they don't need to charge every battery at the same time or that some batteries are getting little enough use that they could be charged at night instead, he notes.
2. Regulatory restrictions will increase. Battery charging systems have come under scrutiny in California, where the California Energy Commission has proposed a regulation that would ban the sale of certain types of chargers in the state. The rule would apply to both consumer and industrial chargers.
The commission believes that charging devices that more efficiently convert AC electricity from the power grid to DC electricity stored in the battery will greatly reduce the billions of kilowatt hours of wasted energy generated by battery chargers in California each year. According to the commission's draft proposal, the regulation would require all chargers to shut off the flow of electricity after the battery has been fully charged. It would also set standards for the charge return factor (the amount of energy applied to a battery compared to the amount extracted from it) as well as for the efficiency in converting high-voltage AC to lower-voltage DC, power losses occurring in circuitry during charging, how well a charger synchronizes with the electric utility's 60 Hz cycle, and the amount of power the device draws to keep a battery at full charge. Finally, it would require that the charger draw no power when no battery is attached and the charger is in standby mode.
The proposed standards could make it illegal to sell SCR and ferroresonant chargers, according to Spaar. The commission is expected to issue its proposal this summer; if adopted, the standards could take effect as early as July 2013 for industrial chargers. It's believed that California is the only state planning to regulate chargers, but if the measure should prove successful, then other states might adopt similar rules.
For more information ...
Looking for a supplier of batteries, charging systems, handling equipment, or monitoring systems? Here are just some of the many companies that offer these products.
3. Battery rooms will get "lean." Lean systems are becoming ubiquitous in manufacturing, and lean processes have been making headway in logistics and warehousing. So why not in the battery room? Lean is all about the systematic elimination of waste. Of the eight wastes that lean processes address, six (transportation, inventory, motion, people, waiting, and defects) exist in battery rooms, says Hal Vanasse, vice president of sales and marketing for Philadelphia Scientific, a provider of battery management systems. "People are happy to throw money at battery rooms, but they do not look systemically at what's going on and how to reduce waste," he says.
Almost any process related to changing and charging batteries can be wasteful and inefficient, Vanasse points out. For example, if you're checking the water levels of batteries that don't need water, then you've wasted time, money, motion, and people. If operators are queuing for battery changes because of poor charging practices or slow watering, then you're wasting time and people. And having more batteries than are needed for the required work produces costly excess inventory. All this waste can add up to tens of thousands of dollars annually, even for a small fleet, he says.
Not surprisingly, Vanasse touts electronic battery management systems as a tool for ensuring that only necessary tasks are done, and in the most efficient way. But he's hoping that the concept of lean itself will catch on with every company that uses industrial batteries, whether they adopt battery management systems or not. "The interesting thing about the lean framework is that it has a feedback mechanism that requires you to measure what you are doing against a plan, then make decisions that will lead to improvement," he explains. "It's systematizing not what we do, but what we should do."
4. Fleet managers will look to get more productivity out of existing assets. There is tremendous pressure on fleet and battery room managers to improve their return on assets, says John Kim, general manager of Aerovironment's Power Systems Business Unit, which supplies battery charging systems and accessories. "Management wants more out of that same piece of machinery and the people who use it," he observes.
Vendors are responding to that pressure by developing new technologies specifically aimed at achieving more with less. Kim's company, for instance, currently has a product under development that will allow users of fast chargers to charge two trucks from a single port. Port Splitter, as the device is called, does "sequence charging," constantly checking the state of charge for two batteries and automatically charging one or the other as needed.
Other vendors have focused on devising ways to give customers better management information. One of Access Control Group's products, for instance, lets forklift fleet managers integrate data from disparate sources like asset management and battery management systems for analytical purposes. "That way, they can combine them in a single view of how the whole mobile asset is working," Patel says. "You need a good picture in one screen that includes information that comes from different sources."
The pressure to improve asset utilization is also behind the rapidly growing interest in electronic battery management systems, says Dwyer of Sackett Systems. "We're seeing an increase in requests for battery management systems software because it helps customers with both operational decisions and capital decisions—for instance, which batteries they need to replace and how much they need to allocate from a budgetary perspective."
Indeed, says Kim, battery management systems that used to be a luxury are now seen as a necessity. Those systems' ability to prolong battery life, which is what drives a battery's total life-cycle cost, makes them worthwhile investments, he says.
Technology is important, of course, but battery owners also are seeking personal advice on how to get more benefit from existing assets, according to Spaar. "Customers now are looking to us not just to sell batteries and charging systems to them; they want us to be more involved in that part of their business," he says. "They want us to be the experts in what we are selling to them and advise them on how to best utilize them."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."