Think there's nothing new in lift truck batteries and associated equipment? Not so. Here are four trends that could have a big impact on how you manage those assets.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Let's face it: Lift truck batteries and associated equipment—such as battery changing, monitoring, and charging systems—aren't the sexiest things in the warehouse. They're not as glamorous as robots or as attention-grabbing as high-speed conveyor systems. As a result, they're often taken for granted.
But these workhorses of the warehouse and DC are especially worthy of attention right now. Several factors—including technology, the economy, the environment, and regulatory controls—are having a notable impact on what buyers of batteries and associated equipment are purchasing and how they manage those assets.
What can you expect down the road? Here are four trends to watch.
1. Companies will adopt more efficient charging systems. Although high-frequency chargers have been available in Europe for years, they're now becoming a hot topic in North America. Most chargers for industrial batteries used here are ferroresonant or silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR) types, but these typically have only a 60- to 80-percent efficiency rate for converting AC current into the DC current needed to charge a battery, explains Steve Spaar, marketing director-Americas for the battery maker EnerSys. They also require large transformers that include costly commodities like steel and copper.
High-frequency charging technology, which uses a different type of switching componentry, doesn't require large transformers. These chargers have an efficiency rating of at least 90 to 92 percent and many are even higher, Spaar says. Fleets that use this technology typically see slightly lower electric bills. Electric utilities like these high "power factor" chargers, and many are willing to give a rebate to the end user for purchasing them, Spaar says. Buyers also can get LEED credit for installing these efficient charging systems.
There's no question that high-frequency chargers are becoming more prevalent, says Dan Dwyer, vice president and general manager of Sackett Systems, a manufacturer of battery handling equipment. "About 80 percent of the systems we've installed this year have some sort of high-frequency chargers involved," he says. For those installations, his company has had to modify the racking configuration in its multilevel battery changing systems because most high-frequency chargers have a smaller footprint and are mounted differently than traditional equipment, he says.
Concerns about electricity costs are encouraging lift truck fleet managers to reconsider not just how but when they charge their batteries, says Arun Patel, president of Access Control Group, a provider of asset management solutions for lift truck fleets. Charging during peak hours when electricity rates are highest, especially during the summer, can raise costs, he points out. By collecting and analyzing battery usage data, managers may find that they don't need to charge every battery at the same time or that some batteries are getting little enough use that they could be charged at night instead, he notes.
2. Regulatory restrictions will increase. Battery charging systems have come under scrutiny in California, where the California Energy Commission has proposed a regulation that would ban the sale of certain types of chargers in the state. The rule would apply to both consumer and industrial chargers.
The commission believes that charging devices that more efficiently convert AC electricity from the power grid to DC electricity stored in the battery will greatly reduce the billions of kilowatt hours of wasted energy generated by battery chargers in California each year. According to the commission's draft proposal, the regulation would require all chargers to shut off the flow of electricity after the battery has been fully charged. It would also set standards for the charge return factor (the amount of energy applied to a battery compared to the amount extracted from it) as well as for the efficiency in converting high-voltage AC to lower-voltage DC, power losses occurring in circuitry during charging, how well a charger synchronizes with the electric utility's 60 Hz cycle, and the amount of power the device draws to keep a battery at full charge. Finally, it would require that the charger draw no power when no battery is attached and the charger is in standby mode.
The proposed standards could make it illegal to sell SCR and ferroresonant chargers, according to Spaar. The commission is expected to issue its proposal this summer; if adopted, the standards could take effect as early as July 2013 for industrial chargers. It's believed that California is the only state planning to regulate chargers, but if the measure should prove successful, then other states might adopt similar rules.
For more information ...
Looking for a supplier of batteries, charging systems, handling equipment, or monitoring systems? Here are just some of the many companies that offer these products.
3. Battery rooms will get "lean." Lean systems are becoming ubiquitous in manufacturing, and lean processes have been making headway in logistics and warehousing. So why not in the battery room? Lean is all about the systematic elimination of waste. Of the eight wastes that lean processes address, six (transportation, inventory, motion, people, waiting, and defects) exist in battery rooms, says Hal Vanasse, vice president of sales and marketing for Philadelphia Scientific, a provider of battery management systems. "People are happy to throw money at battery rooms, but they do not look systemically at what's going on and how to reduce waste," he says.
Almost any process related to changing and charging batteries can be wasteful and inefficient, Vanasse points out. For example, if you're checking the water levels of batteries that don't need water, then you've wasted time, money, motion, and people. If operators are queuing for battery changes because of poor charging practices or slow watering, then you're wasting time and people. And having more batteries than are needed for the required work produces costly excess inventory. All this waste can add up to tens of thousands of dollars annually, even for a small fleet, he says.
Not surprisingly, Vanasse touts electronic battery management systems as a tool for ensuring that only necessary tasks are done, and in the most efficient way. But he's hoping that the concept of lean itself will catch on with every company that uses industrial batteries, whether they adopt battery management systems or not. "The interesting thing about the lean framework is that it has a feedback mechanism that requires you to measure what you are doing against a plan, then make decisions that will lead to improvement," he explains. "It's systematizing not what we do, but what we should do."
4. Fleet managers will look to get more productivity out of existing assets. There is tremendous pressure on fleet and battery room managers to improve their return on assets, says John Kim, general manager of Aerovironment's Power Systems Business Unit, which supplies battery charging systems and accessories. "Management wants more out of that same piece of machinery and the people who use it," he observes.
Vendors are responding to that pressure by developing new technologies specifically aimed at achieving more with less. Kim's company, for instance, currently has a product under development that will allow users of fast chargers to charge two trucks from a single port. Port Splitter, as the device is called, does "sequence charging," constantly checking the state of charge for two batteries and automatically charging one or the other as needed.
Other vendors have focused on devising ways to give customers better management information. One of Access Control Group's products, for instance, lets forklift fleet managers integrate data from disparate sources like asset management and battery management systems for analytical purposes. "That way, they can combine them in a single view of how the whole mobile asset is working," Patel says. "You need a good picture in one screen that includes information that comes from different sources."
The pressure to improve asset utilization is also behind the rapidly growing interest in electronic battery management systems, says Dwyer of Sackett Systems. "We're seeing an increase in requests for battery management systems software because it helps customers with both operational decisions and capital decisions—for instance, which batteries they need to replace and how much they need to allocate from a budgetary perspective."
Indeed, says Kim, battery management systems that used to be a luxury are now seen as a necessity. Those systems' ability to prolong battery life, which is what drives a battery's total life-cycle cost, makes them worthwhile investments, he says.
Technology is important, of course, but battery owners also are seeking personal advice on how to get more benefit from existing assets, according to Spaar. "Customers now are looking to us not just to sell batteries and charging systems to them; they want us to be more involved in that part of their business," he says. "They want us to be the experts in what we are selling to them and advise them on how to best utilize them."
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.