Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
By early June, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) will have moved one of its core parcel products from regulatory protected status and opened it to the unpredictable winds of the free market. Only time will tell if the decision ends up being the right one for the financially struggling organization.
On April 6, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the body that approves changes to postal rates and services, blessed USPS's decision to shift its first-class mail parcel product from "market dominant" status to what's known as a "competitive product" classification. The change, which affects bulk shipments of parcels and not single pieces tendered at postal counters, is expected to take effect after a required three-week public notification process, according to David Lewin, a USPS spokesman.
The commission's action ends the USPS's historic monopoly on parcels weighing 13 ounces or less, a category that accounted for 44 percent of the post office's total parcel business in its 2010 fiscal year, which ended last Sept. 30. USPS officials say the change frees it to modify rates beyond annual adjustments pegged to the Consumer Price Index. It also enables the agency to offer bulk-shipping discounts to large users, though there are no immediate plans to change the product's pricing schemes, according to Lewin.
"This product serves a highly competitive marketplace, with many participants offering similar products," Gary Reblin, USPS's vice president, domestic products, said in a late February press release announcing the move. "By moving to a competitive product classification, we have greater flexibility to make this offering more attractive to commercial shippers."
However, the change would also give private carriers like FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc. an opportunity to compete for business previously not available to them.
Like other first-class mail, the USPS first-class parcel business is protected by the Private Express Statutes, a law passed in 1792 barring private companies from setting competitive rates with USPS on certain products. As a result, UPS and FedEx don't offer service for parcels weighing less than one pound. First-class mail parcels are mostly used by fulfillment houses and other businesses that ship lightweight merchandise.
Jerry Hempstead, a former top parcel executive and a close observer of USPS as president of his own consulting firm, said the post office may move too aggressively to hike prices on the parcel product in an effort to raise revenue any way it can to stem mounting losses. If it does, USPS risks losing significant share to private rivals, Hempstead said.
"The USPS, in their effort to right the ship, may do something stupid and take a big increase—because they can—and put some of these pieces into a [price] range that makes them attractive to UPS and FedEx," Hempstead said.
Kevin Smith, a former supply chain executive at CVS Caremark who now runs a supply chain sustainability firm, said USPS may box itself in by raising rates on first-class parcels while at the same time consummating its proposal to eliminate Saturday deliveries, which many online retailers have long relied on to reach their customers.
"In their effort to increase revenue and decrease costs, they could just about put themselves out of the parcel business," Smith said.
Hempstead echoed those remarks, saying a substantial price increase could turn the private carriers from users to competitors. In such a scenario, "one has to question if the USPS should be in the parcel business at all, since it's successfully and competitively handled by the private sector," he said.
UPS spokesman Norman Black said the company would evaluate the post office's move to see if it presents any opportunities for the Atlanta-based shipping giant. "But it's really too soon to say at this point," Black added. FedEx did not respond to a request for comment.
Lewin, the USPS spokesman, said the organization is aware of the competitive risks. "Any plans for future price increases have to be weighed against the potential for loss of business in the segment," he said. "It is a primary factor in our due diligence process with our pricing models."
Mounting losses
The untethering of the parcel segment comes as USPS announces a fiscal second-quarter net loss of $2.2 billion, which was $600 million larger than its net loss for the same period a year ago. It also warned that barring legislative measures to relieve it of such burdens as pre-funding $5.5 billion in future retiree health benefits in the current fiscal year, it will be forced to default on payments to the federal government by the end of its fiscal year.
Revenue from USPS's "mailing services" segment, which includes first-class and standard mail, fell 14 percent year over year. USPS's first class-mail business in particular continues to suffer market share erosion from the growing use of electronic mail formats.
Revenue and volume from "shipping services," which include Express and Priority Mail, rose 5 percent in the quarter to $2.2 billion, while volume increased 3.2 percent to 352 million pieces. To put the numbers in perspective, USPS handled 38.7 billion pieces of first-class and standard mail in the quarter with combined revenue of $12.2 billion.
As its fiscal situation deteriorates, the post office has stepped up its efforts to raise revenue and slash expenses. Its most visible cost-cutting proposal is to suspend Saturday deliveries for most products, a move the organization said would save about $3 billion a year. USPS would be free to drop Saturday deliveries unless Congress intervenes to disallow it.
Post offices would remain open on Saturdays for pickups and drop-offs, and next-day Express Mail deliveries would continue. Reblin said USPS is weighing the possibility of maintaining Saturday deliveries for its less-urgent Priority Mail product if demand warrants.
In recent months, USPS has rolled out two shipping products designed to attract high-volume shippers moving goods within relatively short distances, a fast-growing segment of domestic transportation but one where the Post Office has been a minor player.
The first, unveiled in January, is patterned after the Priority Mail product, where a flat rate is charged regardless of how much is stuffed in a package. That service is geared toward businesses shipping packages weighing between five and 15 pounds and moving within 700 miles for delivery within two to three days.
The second, introduced in mid-April, offers a regional ground service for high-volume business-to-consumer users.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.