Lift truck attachments make specialized product handling more efficient and drivers more productive. But there's a lot to consider before you go out and buy one.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
If your lift trucks carry products that are bulky or come in unusual shapes or sizes, then you've probably already figured out that standard-issue forks may not be the best tools for handling them. Or perhaps they do the job well enough but you suspect there's a more efficient way to move those hard-to-handle items.
If that's the case, then it's time to look into buying lift truck attachments. These add-ons improve productivity and reduce damage while making it easier and safer for drivers to handle items that are a little out of the ordinary. Among the more common types are side shifters, multi-pallet handlers, and clamps for paper rolls, barrels, and so forth. (For other examples, see the sidebar at the bottom of this article.)
Although attachments can offer a quick and easy solution to specialized handling problems, there are many things to consider before you buy one. As the experts we consulted made clear, if you want to get the full benefit from this type of equipment, you'll need to "think before you attach."
Who does what?
Most attachments are sold through lift truck dealers, but some attachment manufacturers sell directly to end users. (Several truck makers, by the way, manufacture certain attachments themselves.) Commonly used attachments ordered with a new truck generally are installed by the dealer. "Typically, the customer will look to the dealer to provide the truck and the attachment as one unit that works together," says J.B. Mayes, manager of product strategy for NACCO Materials Handling Group, which includes the Hyster and Yale brand lift trucks.
Dealers also usually handle retrofitting, but the attachment manufacturer should install specialized attachments when neither the forklift manufacturer nor the dealer has experience with the technical aspects of that particular attachment, says Steve Rogers, a program manager with Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (MCFA).
Regardless of who does what, the experts urge users to consult with all of the parties involved—the lift truck dealer, the truck manufacturer, and the attachment maker—to ensure that the attachment is right for both the application and the vehicle. "We have a saying: Don't go it alone," says Brad Vandehey, a product manager with the attachment manufacturer Cascade Corp. "Even though an attachment may be quite popular, there are so many variants and nuances that we believe dealers should not be spec'ing them alone. All it takes is to be wrong by one inch to have a $15,000 attachment go south on you."
What to think about
So what kinds of factors should you consider when selecting an attachment? There are more details than we can cover here, but the following are some of the main considerations:
Product to be handled, and load weight and size. Obviously, you want an attachment that can safely handle your loads without damaging the product. A driver operating a clamp that was designed for a different type of container or a smaller load, for example, can end up exerting so much pressure that the attachment crushes or cuts the packages.
Where the attachment will be used. Think about the width and height of the areas where the attachment will be used. Would the added depth and width of the attachment hamper the lift truck's mobility in narrow or congested aisles, or inside truck trailers and containers? Even a dock plate can add enough height to cause a problem at the trailer's or container's entrance.
Frequency of use. Will the attachment be used all the time on every shift, or will it see only occasional use? If the former, then it's probably worthwhile to have a permanent installation on a dedicated truck; if the latter, consider a "quick release" version that can be put on and taken off without special tools so you can use the truck for different applications, says Craig Curtis, product manager for counterbalanced products at The Raymond Corp.
Attachment's impact on truck capacity. The weight and size of an attachment has a huge impact on safety and performance. As the attachment moves away from its original position, the load center changes and the weight and dimensions of the attachment will affect the lift truck's stability, load capacity, and the way the driver should operate it, MCFA's Rogers explains. As a result, attachments must be carefully matched to the size of the truck.
The truck manufacturer is responsible for the integrity of the vehicle's design, and federal regulations require it to certify each truck's lifting capacity at the time it is produced, says Clark Simpson, a sales engineer with Clark Material Handling Co. "The user must make sure the combination of the [truck and attachment] is tested and approved in advance for the rated capacity by the truck manufacturer's engineers. The user has an obligation to obtain the prior written consent of the manufacturer because the attachment will probably lower the truck's capacity," he says.
After it approves the attachment/truck combination, the lift truck manufacturer will provide a new data plate for the vehicle with updated information on the attachment(s) installed, as well as a "derated" or an "as configured" capacity rating, explains David Land, who oversees the Design Engineering department at Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing (TIEM).
Hydraulic system pressure and flow. Hydraulic fluid flow (measured in gallons per minute) and pressure (measured in pounds per square inch) provide the speed and force attachments need to manipulate loads. It's critical, then, that a truck's hydraulic system capacity be adequate and properly adjusted for the needs of both the truck and the attachment, says Matt Ranly, senior product marketing manager for Crown Equipment Corp. As for the type of situation where a mismatch might occur, Raymond Corp. sales engineer Rick Woerter offers the example of a paper industry customer's request for walkie stackers with rotating clamps. The stacker might have a hydraulic flow of three to four gallons per minute, while the rotator attachment would demand five to seven gallons per minute, he says.
Battery capacity. Some attachments are quite heavy, so if you operate electric trucks, make sure the battery has sufficient capacity for the additional weight. You may need a bigger battery with more amp hours.
Ease of use. If attachments aren't easy to use, drivers will avoid them. That's particularly true in operations where drivers are inexperienced or turnover is high. Attachments that require little or no decision-making or adjustment by the driver are good choices for facilities where operators will be using different trucks and attachments, says Cesar Jimenez, national product planning manager for Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.
Purchase, installation, and freight costs. Do the math and be sure that increased productivity and safety, and a reduction in damage outweigh the cost of the attachment plus installation and freight.
Listen to the engineers
Although you know your operation better than anyone, it's critical that you heed the recommendations of the lift truck and attachment manufacturers' engineers—even when they're unwilling to spec the job as you ask, say the experts consulted for this article. Such instances are few and far between, according to NACCO's Mayes, because the dealers are very knowledgeable and typically have vetted the buyer's request before it ever reaches this stage.
Sometimes, the problem is a capacity mismatch between an existing forklift and the desired attachment, and the solution may be a higher-capacity truck, he says. In other cases, the problem arises because a buyer is unaware of recent changes in attachment design and technology and is basing a request on outdated information, says Cascade Corp. product manager Rick Whiting.
When a manufacturer does say no to a request, it's because the request would affect the safe operation of the truck and put the safety of the driver and other warehouse associates at risk, says Simpson of Clark Material Handling. Sometimes, a request for an attachment can be accommodated by tightly restricting the equipment rating and the circumstances in which the attachment can be used. In any event, it's critical that you make sure the data plate reflects the capacity and any other changes, he adds.
The attachments themselves are not the problem, agrees Crown's Ranly. "They're all safe," he says. "They just have to be spec'd to do what they're supposed to do, and they have to be attached in the way they're designed to be attached."
Whether the issue is safety or efficiency, a lot is riding on your choice of lift truck attachment. After all, says Toyota's Jimenez, "if you use the wrong attachment, then you're not going to accomplish the ultimate goal: moving product more efficiently and at a higher level of productivity."
The wide world of lift truck attachments
There's a remarkable variety of lift truck attachments on the market today. Some are applicable to just about any operation, while others are designed for specific products or industries. Among the more common types are side shifters that move the forks to the right or left; fork positioners for adjusting to different-sized loads; multi-pallet handlers; push-pull attachments for palletless loads; and load rotators. Some of the more specialized units include wine barrel handlers, tire clamps, layer pickers (used in the beverage industry to build mixed pallet loads), and vacuum lifters.
Attachment manufactures will even custom-design devices for individual customers or a particular industry. One example is a tipping clamp designed by Cascade Corp. for use by appliance manufacturers when loading cartons of washers, dryers, and the like into tractor-trailers. The clamp allows the forklift driver to maximize trailer utilization by rotating the carton 90 degrees and pushing it into an appropriate-sized space.
Lift truck manufacturers design and produce some of their attachments, but most are manufactured by specialists. Here are just a few of the dozens of companies in this space:
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."