While many in the logistics world still think of propane as a fuel for forklifts, that's only part of the story. It's also being used as a clean, cheap source of power for over-the-road trucks.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Long before the EPA's SmartWay program, carbon mapping, and hybrid electric trucks, Schwan's Home Service trucks were running on an alternative fuel. But the fuel wasn't ethanol or biodiesel or one of the others you might expect. It was a fuel that's more often associated with lift trucks than their over-the-road counterparts: propane.
Why propane? "It started back in the '70s when ... fuel prices were rising," explains Jeff Schueller, director of fleet maintenance for Schwan's. "Marvin Schwan, the founder of the company, did not want the fuel prices back then to affect his company's growth and the routes that he was building, and so he looked for a more economical way to run the equipment."
Today, 75 percent of the 6,000-plus trucks in the company's fleet run on propane. That includes both the medium-duty vehicles and the light-duty trucks Schwan's uses to deliver its flash-frozen food to homes in suburban neighborhoods and rural areas throughout the country.
Does propane still have the cost advantage over mainstream fuels 35 years later? Schueller says it does. "Every year, we do an analysis—diesel vs. propane, or diesel vs. gas and propane—and operationally, the numbers continue to show that it is more economical for us to operate on alternative fuels," he says.
Cheap, clean, and available
While many in the logistics world still think of propane—also known as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or propane autogas—as a way to power forklifts, that's only part of the story. It has long since moved out of the warehouse and onto the highways. Today, there are approximately 15 million over-the-road vehicles running on propane worldwide, according to the Propane Education & Research Council (PERC), making it the third most-popular fuel source for vehicles after gas and diesel.
In the United States, most of the uptake has been in the commercial (as opposed to passenger) vehicle sector—particularly among fleets whose vehicles operate within a fixed range. For the most part, the vehicles running on propane are light- and medium-duty trucks.
For fleet owners, much of propane's appeal is its low cost. According to PERC, the price of propane tends to be about 30 percent below the national average price for gasoline.
And it's not just cheaper; it's cleaner too, advocates say. Depending on the application, propane-fueled vehicles generate 17 to 24 percent fewer greenhouse gas emissions than their gasoline-powered counterparts, says Brian Feehan, vice president of PERC.
Another advantage is that 90 percent of propane is derived from sources in the United States, which minimizes the risk of supply disruptions caused by geopolitical events. In comparison, the United States imports roughly 60 percent of its petroleum.
On top of that, propane is readily available. The lack of refueling infrastructure that has hampered the adoption of some other alternative fuels, like hydrogen, is less likely to be a concern with propane. Although most propane-based fleets handle refueling at the company's own locations, that's not their only option. A network of public fueling stations already exists. According to the Department of Energy, there are 2,500 propane refueling stations throughout the country.
Bumpy road to adoption
Yet for all its advantages, propane has made only limited inroads in the U.S. over-the-road truck market. Although it appeared to be poised for takeoff following the OPEC embargo and resulting oil crisis in the '70s, interest faded once oil supplies loosened up and fuel prices retreated.
Historically, this hasn't been the easiest of routes for a fleet manager to pursue. While propane itself may be relatively inexpensive and widely available, that's not necessarily true of the trucks that run on it. Even today, a fleet manager contemplating going over to propane will face a number of hurdles.
For one thing, the vehicles carry a high price tag. Propane-powered trucks cost on average $6,500 to $11,000 more than gasoline-powered ones.
For another, there's vehicle availability. Although Feehan says things are starting to change, one of the biggest barriers fleet owners have encountered to date has been simply finding a propane-powered truck that meets their needs.
Some companies have solved the problem by converting gasoline trucks to propane. Schwan's, for instance, buys its fleet vehicles with their original gasoline systems intact and uses certified technicians to install a liquid propane injection system. "Basically it just adapts right to the engine and wiring harness without any alterations to the original equipment," says Schueller.
"[Conversion] is not difficult to do," agrees Feehan. "The difficult part is getting the vehicle certified in terms of durability, drivability, emissions-testing compliance, and EPA standards. Once that's done—and that's usually [handled] by the fuel-system manufacturer—it takes eight hours for a certified installer to put in the fuel system."
But that still leaves the question of service and repairs. With propane not yet in widespread use, it's not always easy to find technicians who are familiar with the fuel and willing to work with it. To build a repair network, Schwan's ended up training potential service providers itself.
Although Schueller says the training required was minimal, he acknowledges that the prospect of starting over with, say, hydrogen or natural gas has deterred his company from investigating other alternative fuels. "After three decades of use, we have a well-trained [repair] network [staffed with operators who are] knowledgeable in that arena," he says, "so it hasn't been conceivable to start in with another alternative fuel system at this point."
The road ahead
When it comes to propane's prospects for widespread adoption, the biggest impediment of all may simply be a lack of visibility. In the trucking industry, overall awareness about propane remains low compared with other alternative fuels. The American Trucking Associations, for example, has published white papers addressing alternative fuels such as biodiesel and natural gas, but not propane.
A related problem is outdated perceptions about propane. Many people don't realize how much the technology has evolved since the '70s, advocates say. Feehan points to vehicle acceleration as an example. Although earlier propane vehicles didn't offer as much horsepower as their gasoline-powered counterparts, advances in liquid injection technology have essentially erased the difference, he says. Today, propane vehicles mirror gasoline models in terms of horsepower and acceleration. But Feehan adds that it's often necessary to get people to demo the vehicles to convince them of that.
To combat outdated perceptions and re-establish propane's credibility as a transportation fuel, the propane industry has made a concerted effort to educate the market over the last five or six years, says Feehan. And it appears the effort may be paying off.
One indication is the expanded availability of propane autogas vehicles. Roush CleanTech, a division of Roush Industries, now sells propane-powered light- and medium-duty Ford trucks and vans, while CleanFuel USA offers light- and medium-duty GMC trucks.
This past February, snack maker Frito-Lay announced that it would begin piloting a Ford E-350 light-duty truck from Roush that's powered by liquid propane autogas. If the pilot produces the expected cost and environmental benefits, Frito-Lay says it could convert as many as 2,000 gasoline-powered trucks to propane over the next few years.
These and other market developments have led at least one observer to conclude that propane's day may finally have come. "With the industry initiatives to go green, I would advise companies to consider propane," says Schueller. "In addition to conversion kits, the major manufacturers, Ford and GM, are going to be offering the option for fleet owners and buyers in the future. I think with the rising gasoline [prices], propane is a very viable option."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."