Marketing services specialist Archway had its internal processes and services in good order. Transportation was another story ... until a third-party specialist arrived.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
When Jerry Johnson joined Archway nearly seven years ago, the company was growing fast. Its distribution centers, located in 13 metro areas throughout North America, were serving some of the nation's largest firms—Fortune 1000 and Fortune 500 corporations. And its transportation program was in trouble.
The problem lay in the back end of the transportation operation—in the billing process, to be precise. As a provider of marketing fulfillment services, Archway spends on the order of $25 million a year to ship everything from gift cards to store signage to locations throughout the continent on its corporate customers' behalf. While Archway had no trouble getting shipments out on schedule, customer billing was another story. It was taking Archway as long as nine months to get invoices out to clients. That created complications with cash flow, receivables, and working capital. And customers were none too happy.
What brought matters to a head was Johnson's discovery that not only was billing slow, but sometimes it wasn't happening at all. Clearly, something had to change.
Systems failure
Since its founding in 1952, the Rogers, Minn.-based Archway has made a name for itself in the marketing fulfillment services business. It has developed systems for delivering such diverse items as gift cards, point-of-sale materials, promotional goods, and marketing materials to company locations, retailers, auto dealers, and the like. Last year alone, Archway sent out nearly half a billion gift cards to 150,000 retail stores.
Some of the services Archway provides are extremely complex. For example, it has an arrangement with a leading fast-food restaurant chain that not only calls for it to procure print material for the client's 10-times-a-year promotions but also to distribute the material to restaurants based on a profiling system that fine-tunes shipments for each individual register, window, and drive-through location in the chain's system.
Archway's client list includes some of the best-known names in American business: Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Lowes, Staples, American Eagle Outfitters, Colgate, Owens Corning, McGraw Hill, and others. It serves those clients from 21 distribution centers that collectively occupy more than 4 million square feet of space—and that is growing, says Johnson, who is the company's vice president of continuous improvement.
But while Archway shines in the services it provides its customers, until a few years ago, its transportation management did not measure up. The source of the problem was the system Archway was using for transportation rating and customer billing. The company had built the system internally, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in the process. But by nearly every measure, it did not work.
"It was a complete failure," says Johnson. "And it was proving very costly."
Just how costly was revealed by an audit Johnson conducted shortly after he arrived in 2004. The audit uncovered unbilled charges going back five or six years. With limited supporting material, Archway was forced to take a significant write-off. "We could not charge for those shipments. We had no idea what they were," Johnson says. Obviously, it was time for a new system, and Johnson decided the company's best bet was to call in a transportation specialist.
Quick turnaround
Archway selected Echo Global Logistics Inc., a Chicago-based third-party transportation management specialist, to take over management of its transportation. What Echo brought to the partnership, Johnson says, was a combination of "relationships, competence, and knowledge." On top of that, he says, Echo brought top-notch negotiating capabilities. "That was a big piece," he says. "And they gave us a textbook implementation plan."
Johnson set an aggressive timeline for the project, giving Echo just 45 days to turn matters around. But he says he had full confidence in the new contractor. "We felt we could partner with them, roll up our sleeves and get things done," he says.
Johnson reports that he was particularly impressed by the way Echo employees jumped right in, meeting with Archway's staff to develop a full understanding of the operation—Archway's reporting requirements, manifesting and operating systems, and so forth. "They worked with our teams to see what we were doing," he says. To ensure a smooth handoff, Echo kept a full-time team at Archway throughout the transition, and continues to maintain an on-site team at Archway today.
Among other improvements, Echo developed a rating plan for its client's small packages. Of Archway's approximately annual $25 million transportation spend, 60 to 65 percent goes for small package shipments. The rating system, built off files from Federal Express, provides rating and routing for all small package shipments and established billing rules for clients.
The result was an immediate reduction in billing times. Where it once took as long as nine months to complete a billing process, it now happens in days. Each Sunday, FedEx uploads information on shipments through the previous Wednesday to the Echo system. "[The Echo system then] goes through rating and routing, kicks out exceptions, gives the team a day to fix those, and on Wednesday loads into the Archway system," Johnson explains. "We can track by job number and client, and show billing rules. We get two files from Echo: One goes to a financial application, the other to a billing application. They have really helped us manage our day-to-day business."
Big payoff
Johnson sees Echo as a true business partner for Archway. "We have open books," he says. "We know what each other is doing."
Furthermore, he says, Echo has steered Archway toward new business. "They have helped us come to the table with existing business clients and new clients," Johnson says. "And I am comfortable putting them in front of a client."
He cites as an example Echo's analysis of one client's spending. "Based on their knowledge and leverage in the transportation industry, they showed that they could save 30 percent on small package shipping and 35 percent on LTL based on current rates. That's on a million dollar spend. That's savings the client gets."
Johnson says the partnership has paid off in multiple ways for Archway. "The relationship has meant millions and millions of dollars, and it has helped us secure business," he says. But it's also been a two-way street, he adds. "It has helped us, and it has helped them."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.