Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
It's a familiar story: An enterprising party with a truck or some extra storage space starts a local business. Over time, the company extends its service menu and broadens its reach, becoming more of a full-service provider than simply a warehousing or trucking firm. Eventually, the business is passed down to the next generation of family members, who may further expand the operation.
That story's been repeated countless times throughout the industry's history, and today, companies bearing family names still stand side by side with the giant global third-party logistics service providers (3PLs). Indeed, some of the largest 3PLs, like C.H. Robinson, started out as family-owned businesses.
But times have changed. Higher barriers to entry and tighter margins have made the industry less appealing to entrepreneurs. At the same time, more customers are looking for a one-stop shop solution that can provide global reach at a low cost. Under the circumstances, it seems appropriate to ask: Is there still a future for the family-owned 3PL?
Size matters
There's no getting around the fact that there are competitive disadvantages to being small. Few family-owned 3PLs can offer the same geographic reach or end-to-end solutions that a global 3PL can.
"The biggest [challenge facing family-owned 3PLs] is they don't have the asset base," says Tom Speh, professor of distribution at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. "When you're talking about IT systems, advanced handling systems, or [the capacity for] rapid expansion should a major client want that, they're really constrained in terms of their ability to do that because of the capital requirements."
Similarly, the smaller players are at a disadvantage when it comes to leveraging economies of scale. "We don't have the buying power to compete in a large-volume, low-cost scenario," admits Nicholas Carretta, president of Ultra Logistics, a family-owned 3PL based in Fairlawn, N.J.
But just as there are disadvantages to being a small player, there are also advantages, these 3PLs say. For one thing, they don't have to worry about pleasing Wall Street. "I've heard a lot of stories [suggesting that] multinational 3PLs can lose sight of who pays the bills," says John Ness, president of ODW Logistics, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. "Consolidation in the industry has brought a lot of private equity players into our market, and I wonder how many CEOs spend their time and energy working to please boards versus their customers. That's a tough battle. But that's not an issue for us; we know who our customer is."
That kind of freedom can translate to service advantages for customers, these smaller 3PLs say. For one thing, there's the small players' agility and responsiveness to clients' requests. "Family-owned companies typically can make quick decisions," says Bill Butler, CEO of fourth-generation family-owned Weber Logistics, which is headquartered in Santa Fe Springs, Calif. "When the managers are also the shareholders, you don't have a lot of processes or bureaucracy that you have to deal with. You don't have to call someone back at the corporate office before you can make a decision."
For another, there's management stability. Carretta notes that in the wider world, career advancement often comes through hopping from one competitor to another. In a family-owned business, there's a greater likelihood that senior managers will be at the company for the long haul. "When you're working on a project with a family-run business and you know the stakeholders, you don't have to worry about a changing of the guard or a major reorganization," he says.
But most important of all, perhaps, is the culture and attitude that infuses these smaller operations. "When it's your name on the side of the truck or the building, you treat customers just as if you were ... welcoming someone into your home," explains Mark Richards, who took over Orange, Calif.-based Associated Warehouses Inc. from his father. "You're going take care of them, treat them as a guest. The big national companies can try to have that feeling and at some locations they do, but having that across the board is pretty rare."
Perception problem
Given all the advantages they cite, you might think these 3PLs would be eager to promote their status as family-owned businesses. But that's not necessarily the case. Some downplay the fact out of concern that potential customers will hear "family owned" and think "mom and pop."
There are times when being a family-owned business works to your advantage, says Carretta of Ultra Logistics, particularly if the potential customer is itself a family-owned business. "But other times, a family business is seen in a different light and may create a negative perception," he says. "Some potential customers may think you're not as capable or you don't have the abilities of some of the larger companies."
That concern is not unfounded, says Speh. "I think sometimes shippers have this assumption that bigger is better, that to get sophistication and so forth, you need to go to the big global players," he says. "I think they'd really be surprised if they took a close look at some of the family-owned fairly sizeable 3PLs."
Carving out a niche
To survive in the modern marketplace, family-owned businesses cannot rely solely on a folksy culture, say those at some of the leading entities. They must supplement their traditional customer focus with the kind of business discipline, technology, and information services typically associated with corporate enterprises. For example, Ultra Logistics has developed proprietary technology solutions, including a transportation management system, a spot bidding tool, and carrier monitoring programs, that it makes available to customers.
But developing and maintaining these types of systems does not come cheap. Not only are the solutions themselves expensive, says Speh, but companies also have to hire specialists to operate and maintain the software. The high price tag may keep some of the smaller family-owned 3PLs from truly competing on technology, he says.
Some of the smaller players have found success through the specialized services route. This might include focusing on a specific product category or providing regional expertise or highly customized solutions. For example, Weber Logistics, which counts a number of Fortune 500 companies among its clients, has also carved out a niche serving small yet growing companies that tend to be overlooked by the mega-3PLs.
The next generation
Ultimately, however, the future of family-owned 3PLs rests with the next generation—specifically, those in line to take over today's operations. Speh, who has been consulting for family-owned 3PLs for more than 30 years, says he sees fewer entrepreneurs entering the business. That means as family-owned businesses exit the market, they're less likely to be replaced.
And as much as heads of family-owned enterprises like to brag about the business's being in their blood, that's no guarantee their descendants will prove equally enthusiastic. After all, only 15 percent of family-owned businesses make it to the third generation, says Butler of Weber Logistics.
Butler adds that increasing consolidation in the marketplace, driven by factors like international competition and an infusion of private equity dollars, will likely further diminish the role of family-owned businesses. "I don't see family businesses as a dying breed, but the increasing consolidation in the industry will mean that you see fewer of them," he says.
Others remain more optimistic. Ness believes that there will always be a place for family-owned businesses in the 3PL industry. "I am an advocate of family business," he says. "I believe it represents some of the best business stories in our country. I'm regularly encouraging my peers to fight the good fight and stay private, but I recognize that selling the business makes sense for some people. For me, a better path is building a business that sustains the values of the family and flourishes for multiple generations."
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.