How to set up a green transport program with your carriers: interview with Deverl Maserang
Internal sustainability programs will only get you so far, says Deverl Maserang of Chiquita Brands. But bring your carriers into the effort, and you stand to make noteworthy gains.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
there's one thing that Deverl Maserang believes passionately, it's this: Distribution and supply chain management is all about relationships. If you're looking to improve performance in your distribution network, says Maserang, who is vice president of North America product supply and logistics for Chiquita Brands, you're not going to get very far on your own. For truly meaningful results, you have to work collaboratively with your carrier partners.
when the fresh fruit and vegetable company launched a fuel efficiency program in 2007, it was a given that Maserang and his team would enlist their carriers' help. At its carrier conference that year, Chiquita brought in industry experts to talk about today's eco imperatives as well as techniques for cutting an operation's carbon footprint. The company also urged its carriers to sign on with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) SmartWay Transport Program, a collaborative initiative between government and the freight sector to boost energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to become a certified partner in the program, a carrier must agree to reduce emissions by a certain percentage each year.
The results have been impressive. Under Maserang's direction, Chiquita has cut CO2 emissions by 44 percent in its North American transportation/distribution network in just three years. At the same time, it has boosted fuel efficiency by 9 percent and reduced food miles (the distance food is transported from the place where it's grown to the point of consumption) by 8.3 percent.
Maserang, who previously held supply chain management positions at the information technology firm Freedom Pay and at Pepsi Bottling Group, joined Chiquita in 2003. He recently spoke with DC Velocity associate managing editor Susan Lacefield about the techniques Chiquita used to reduce its North American supply chain's carbon footprint.
Q: What led Chiquita to start looking at ways to boost fuel efficiency and sustainability in its transportation operations?
A: For decades now, Chiquita has looked for innovative ways to continue our efforts to be a good corporate citizen, especially regarding the environment. Even prior to the change in presidential administrations and the potential for a cap-and-trade policy, we were engaged in reducing our carbon footprint.
We also saw that fuel was not going to get any cheaper. If you remember back to the '06 to '08 time period, fuel was just going through the roof. We saw $4 dollar-plus diesel, almost $5 diesel. So we knew we were going in the right direction.
We're constantly looking for ways to drive efficiencies. That's partly because if you can drive efficiency, you can drive cost out, which is good for the customer and good for the carrier. But there's the sustainability side to consider as well. And that's more important because more people—at least from a consumer customer perspective—are focusing on food miles and on buying local. We just felt we needed to get as far ahead of that as possible to remain competitive in the market.
Q: How did Chiquita go about introducing its program to carriers? A: For the last 18 years, we've held annual carrier conferences, and we decided that would be the ideal opportunity to get the word out. So at our 2007 conference, we started encouraging carriers to participate in SmartWay.
Then, we set a goal of 100 percent SmartWay miles [freight miles logged by SmartWay-certified carriers] and using 100 percent SmartWay-certified carriers in the network. We also put out a challenge that year to push the network to work toward achieving 10 miles per gallon with the new engines that were coming out in 2010 [to meet the EPA's new stricter emission standards].
During the conference, we talked about some of the things that carriers should be doing. Obviously, you need to be thinking about single-wide tires [as opposed to using two thin tires]. We'd done our own internal application of single wides on about a thousand chassis that year, and we've seen a 0.3 to 0.5 mile-per-gallon differential. So we were trying do within our own network—our private fleet and dedicated operations—some of the same things we were asking all the common carriers to do.
We also installed cowlings, which are aerodynamic devices that you put on the roof of a truck, and freight wings, which go underneath the vehicle. We looked at some APU (auxiliary power unit) technology, which eliminates the need for drivers to keep their engines idling during long stops to provide heat, light, and power.
That's what we did at first. We measured ourselves so we'd have baseline numbers. Then, we started introducing small, incremental improvements. Each year since, we've gotten a little stronger.
Probably the most impressive thing we've done is change the way we compensate carriers for fuel. A couple years back, we decided the only way we were ever going to drive the right behavior was to take a different approach to fuel surcharges. Basically, we pulled all costs related to fuel out of the base transportation rate. We then created a new fuel surcharge table for the carrier that incorporates all of the fuel costs that were previously embedded in the base rate. Doing it this way provides full transparency to all costs related to fuel. Bottom line: You cannot impact effectively what you cannot measure.
Q: Was there any grumbling from the carriers? A: Oh, sure. Some didn't understand it or didn't want to change because they had been using the fuel surcharge to their advantage. I would always tell them, "You know, guys, I'm with you when it comes to competing in other areas of the business. But when it comes to fuel, I want all of us to be competing together to reduce fuel consumption levels or to achieve the highest miles per gallon. Now's the time for all of us as an industry to look at fuel because we've got to figure out how to use as little of it as possible."
Q: What else have you done in the past year? A: We've outfitted vehicles in both our private and dedicated fleets with a simple device called an "Eco-flap." Instead of the traditional mud flap you see on tractors and trailers, the Eco-flap features an aerodynamic design that allows for optimal airflow through the flap but still protects the cars behind from rocks and such. You get a pretty interesting increase in fuel efficiency just from reducing rolling resistance and reducing drag in terms of the air that's being stopped by the truck, the tractor, the wheels, and the flaps.
We did two other major things this past year as well. First, we upgraded all of our reefer units and the gensets on our chassis. The genset is the unit that generates the electricity to power the reefer unit. That alone has saved us a tremendous amount of diesel.
Second, we installed more plug-ins for electrical reefer units. Normally, when you're hooked up to a truck, the refrigerated trailer runs off diesel. So we collaborated with a couple of our carriers on the West Coast, and we put electrical plug-ins at our dock doors. Then, we converted some of the fleet to get off of genset fuel and run those reefers on the electrical grid. So they plug into our facility when they're there, and that has had a dramatic impact as well. Taken together, these steps have yielded substantial results.
Q: What was the carriers' response to all of this? Were they willing to partner with you on these efforts? A: People ask me that question a lot. We've had an incredible response from our carrier community. I think it's because of the way we manage our carriers. We're not in this for the short run. We've always taken a long-term view. We don't expect that they are getting disproportionately wealthy, nor are we getting disproportionately advantaged.
As an example, when we got into 2009, we voluntarily elected to hold our rates intact through the balance of the year, because we knew that our carriers were having problems. Everyone else was going out to bid constantly. The carriers were seeing more bids in the market than they had ever seen. But we take a long-term view with our carriers.
That long-term view has enabled us to gain their cooperation because they're more willing to listen to us and try to make things happen. We are constantly putting ideas in front of them, and we listen to them when they have a great idea. It's a nice give and take in terms of trying to push the network to a new level.
Q: What kinds of results have you seen from your sustainability program? A: In our baseline year of 2007, 21 percent of our carriers were SmartWay-certified. We're now up to 88 percent. And in 2007, 75 percent of our miles were SmartWay miles. Now, that number is north of 95 percent.
Also, from 2007 to 2010, we reduced our CO2 emissions by 44 percent in our North America network. Plus, between 2009 and 2010, we improved our fuel efficiency by 9 percent. In addition to the fuel savings, we were able to reduce the total number of trucks. As a result, we consumed 17 percent fewer gallons of fuel in 2010 than we did in 2009. And we reduced our food miles by 8.3 percent.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."